[10:32] <Laibsch> I'd like to see if http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15180 is fixed for karmic.  But I'm not sure anymore how to recompile a Ubuntu kernel. 
[10:32] <ubot3> bugzilla.kernel.org bug 15180 in Wireless "new atheros chipset" [Normal,Resolved: code_fix] 
[10:32] <Laibsch> http://blog.avirtualhome.com/2009/11/03/how-to-compile-a-kernel-for-ubuntu-karmic/ used to work nicely, but broke recently (just a few days ago)
[10:32] <Laibsch> how am I supposed to recompile a kernel with a patch that is not in mainline, yet?
[10:41] <abogani> [OT] Sorry to bother you. , I wondering on how many Ubuntu Kernel Team members plays with Arduino... If someone could review it ( http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7690 and https://launchpad.net/~arduino-ubuntu-team/+archive/ppa/+packages ) would be really appreciated! Thanks in advance!
[12:03] <apw> Keybuk, hey ... did we get any times today?
[12:03] <apw> i need my fix
[12:04] <cking> abogani, a few of use use them - afraid the guys who really use them a lot are  not in the channel at the moment 
[12:07] <cking> abogani, sconklin and hughhalf are the best ones to ask - I'm not acquainted enough with it to do the review any justice
[12:18] <abogani> cking: Thanks anyway! :-)
[12:19] <cking> abogani, I've email'd them so maybe they will give it a look when they are up
[12:22] <abogani> cking: Really thanks!
[15:47] <Keybuk> apw: I have times
[15:47] <Keybuk> but no, installer broken still and colin's busy at work on mark stuff
[15:47] <apw> Keybuk, got a graph i can look at?
[15:48] <Keybuk> apw: not yet
[15:48] <Keybuk> the kernel times are back in the 1.6s
[16:56] <JFo> apw, I have the bugs jdstrand mentioned in the meeting up
[16:57] <apw> JFo, ok ta
[16:57] <apw> what a mess.  why do we find out soooo late it is all fucked
[16:58] <JFo> dunno, but I have been hounding about all the plymouth fails we have
[16:58] <JFo> and I have seen these type of failures lately too
[16:58] <JFo> but I have left them mostly to bryce
[16:59] <JFo> and most of these are against xorg too so there is that.
[17:09] <JFo> apw, you want any of those on the list for Monday?
[17:15] <abogani> tgardner: Is there a chance to have a preempt flavour for i386?
[17:16] <tgardner> abogani, as I expressed in the kernel-team email, I'm not really interested in supporting another 32 bit variant.
[17:17] <abogani> tgardner: Is there something that I can do for let you change your decision?
[17:23] <tgardner> abogani, perhaps you should present some real use cases for a 32 bit -preempt version.
[17:24] <tgardner> but be advised that I'm not interested in wasting resources on legacy hardware support.
[17:25] <abogani> tgardner: Use cases: the Ubuntu Studio users.
[17:26] <tgardner> abogani, lay them out in an email. Tell me _why_ Studio users can't use 64 bit?
[17:27] <tgardner> them == use cases
[17:29] <abogani> tgardner: I would want only avoid to cut off people whom still have 32bit system (Pentium M, P4 and so on).
[17:30] <tgardner> abogani, email, I'm not having this discussion on IRC
[17:31] <abogani> tgardner: Ok. I'll write it asap. Thanks!