[03:43] i think pageup/pagedown is busted in the dailies. [03:43] * micahg checks [03:43] wfm [03:43] 3.7 [03:44] broken on many sites. [03:44] in 3.6.2 [03:47] not for me [03:48] probably an xorg error [03:53] LLStarks: let us know if a reboot helps [03:56] will do [04:56] http://start.ubuntu.com/10.04/ [04:56] my god [04:56] i feel sick [04:57] micahg, there aren't enough antacids in the world for this [05:33] LLStarks: yeah, I say that [05:33] *saw [05:33] LLStarks: that's not so bad... [05:33] there are worse things [05:41] such as? [05:45] hmmm [05:45] LLStarks: you referring specifically to within Ubuntu? [05:46] yeah [05:46] doesn't help that gecko is slower than whale-****. [05:47] LLStarks: 3.7 will fix that we hope :) [05:47] 3.6 is pretty snappy for me [05:48] lolno. xulrunner 1.9.3 is a small step. [05:49] while webkit and presto make leaps and bounds [05:49] 1.9.3 has a lot of speed improvements and OOPP will be big as well, it's only alpha right now, so not even feature complete [13:13] I've got FTBFS while building libjdic-java, here is log: http://s1.plikos.pl/11e3/f30af66d18095996ca4d3c886ed16287/buildlog.txt [13:22] ari-tczew: i dont see any log of anything [13:23] oh wait i think i found it [13:23] ari-tczew: nope doesnt seem to be there [13:27] gnomefreak: I'll pastebin it for you. [13:27] sebner: thanks [13:27] gnomefreak: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/376172/ [13:28] gnomefreak: I can't read polish but I guessed the download link xD [13:28] oh its in polish? [13:28] that leaves me out as well :( [13:30] ari-tczew: do you have fakeroot installed? [13:31] gnomefreak: yes, I do [13:33] ari-tczew: other than it looking like you are missing xulrunner-1.9-dev im not sure. I have gotten lucky to not play with java ever :) [13:35] ari-tczew: is this just a respin or is it an upgrade? [13:37] gnomefreak: it's test build in pbuilder ... [13:37] assuming you changed debian/rules there is a chance that is the issue but im not sure why *.cpp:* [13:40] gnomefreak: I've test Debian revision of libjdic-java, so I didn't change debian/rules, and FTBFS is still exist [13:41] where i am kind of confused is that the build was successful at one point. You may have better luck asking in #ubuntu-motu [13:41] ari-tczew: the debian revision built? [13:42] gnomefreak: sebner redirect me from #ubuntu-motu to here... [13:42] gnomefreak: no, debian revision too got ftbfs [13:42] gnomefreak: I just saw xulrunner and moz* so I thought this is the appropriate place :P [13:43] sebner: yeah i saw them too but im not 100% sure this is a mozilla failure. does it list xulrunner-1.9-dev as a build dep in control? [13:44] * gnomefreak thinks micahg would have fun with this [13:44] hi micahg [13:44] gnomefreak: dunno, ask ari-tczew [13:44] gnomefreak: hahaha, what a luck :P [13:44] hi micahg [13:44] hi gnomefreak, sebner [13:44] ari-tczew: xulrunner-1.9-dev listed in build deps? [13:44] Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 5), quilt, ant, pkg-config, [13:44] * micahg wonders what he walked into [13:44] libgnome2-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libxt-dev, xulrunner-dev, libx11-dev, [13:44] openjdk-6-jre-headless, default-jdk, libnetx-java, default-jdk-builddep [13:44] what is this? [13:44] xulrunner-dev exist in B-D [13:45] are you wondering about openjdk and firefox 3.6? [13:45] xulrunner-1.9-dev is what we use maybe try adding that to build-deps and retry? [13:45] gnomefreak: what are you trying to do? [13:45] micahg: libjdic-java http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/376172/ [13:46] is this a new package? [13:46] gnomefreak: replace xulrunner-dev with xulrunner-1.9-dev ? [13:46] micahg: doesnt seem to be. [13:46] ari-tczew: im not sure since we have both in archives [13:47] is this for lucid [13:47] micahg: no, package exist, I want to merge with Debian [13:47] * micahg is looking [13:48] ari-tczew: squeeze? [13:49] micahg, yes, squeeze [13:49] into lucid I"m assuming? [13:49] the problem is the build depends on openjdk I think [13:49] micahg, yes for lucid [13:50] what version is in squeeze? [13:50] ah -6 [13:50] openjdk will be fixed later this week [13:50] when we get xul192 in [13:52] micahg, so what's next? waiting? [13:53] asac: searchplugins modification in po2xpi implemented. -> lp:~arnegoetje/rosetta/po2xpi-arne . New Lucid langpacks with the (unmodified) searchplugins included are being uploaded into the archive right now. [13:54] i guesss that would explain all the "missing *" and all those errors [13:54] I'm not sure exactly what the problem is, but last time I looked at openjdk there was this weird build-deps on xul-1.9 [14:03] micahg: did you hold the meeting on thursday? [14:14] ok looks like i have a while to wait between updates and extracting tar.gz together they are slowing me down alot. so ill be back in a while [14:14] micahg, gnomefreak: maybe ftbfs is causing by gcc 4.4? [14:15] i thought that it was taken care of already or im thinking 4.3 [14:17] gnomefreak: I can't replace xulrunner-dev with xulrunner-1.9-dev because xulrunner-1.9-dev isn't exist in lucid [14:19] ari-tczew: yeah i noticed that after i said it. [15:32] ArneGoetje: rock. [15:32] ArneGoetje: so i case i need to redo this, what are the steps? [15:32] * asac assumes he would for now just manually upload the langpacks [15:33] rather than running langpack-o-matic [15:33] so nevermind [16:25] asac: please review https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/gnash0.8.7packaging/+merge/19293 when it's convenient for you. [17:19] asac: what do you mean with 'redo'? [17:19] anyone running Chromium daily ? care to try to open this site? https://caixadirecta.cgd.pt/ [17:19] fta: ^^^^^ [17:32] Hey if I get 3.6 from PPA firefox-stable will it actually be branded Firefox? [17:34] lantizia: yes [17:34] shocking, and I'm guessing that's because it was ran by mozilla for approval ? [17:37] and I'm guessing it's one of those that have been screwed with Yahoo as default search, extra extensions etc... [17:44] micahg, ? [18:00] asac: if you want to change anything in the mozilla.tar.gz in a langpack, just bump the version number when you are done and upload the package again [18:20] ArneGoetje: right. thats what i mean ;) [18:21] ArneGoetje: so you uploaded the langpacks [18:21] ? [18:21] * asac upgrades system to figure [18:22] cool ... getting new langpack stuff [18:23] asac: hi [18:24] hi [18:24] all set? [18:25] I think so, just need to test the changes I made [18:25] great [18:25] let me know [18:25] k [18:27] hi dupondje [18:27] ;) [18:27] ArneGoetje: so devmode export seems to be bogus for "nl" [18:28] it is ;) [18:33] bbl :) fix it plz ;) [19:04] and asac ? :) [19:16] bleh :) so ? :D [19:18] network is up and down [19:18] let me check if download of packages actually finished [19:19] ok so de is OK [19:19] * asac installs -nl [19:25] ArneGoetje: [19:25] ls -la /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-nl\@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-nl.jar [19:25] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1789 Feb 14 14:33 /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-nl@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-nl.jar [19:26] asac@tinya:~/Development/ubuntu/mozillateam/thunderbird.dev$ ls -la /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-de\@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-de.jar [19:26] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 163832 Feb 10 19:59 /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-de@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-de.jar [19:26] seems nl is unhappy [19:26] so its only nl that is broke ? :( [19:28] yes [19:28] not sure if its only nl [19:28] let me check w afew others [19:29] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 159839 Feb 10 20:00 firefox-3.6-it.jar [19:29] that looks ok [19:30] the nl shouldn't have changed ? [19:30] hmm [19:30] ls -l /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-en-CA\@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-en_CA.jar [19:30] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1819 Feb 14 14:32 /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-en-CA@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-en_CA.jar [19:30] -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1819 Feb 14 14:32 firefox-3.6-en_GB.jar [19:30] hmm [19:30] dupondje: what do you mean? [19:30] the -nl size needs to be way bigger ;) [19:31] same for en_GB en_CA [19:31] let me look in the logs [19:31] ah wasn't looking at the size, but the changetime :p [19:31] the file is quite empty indeed :( [19:34] darn cant find the server name of the langpack stuff [19:34] its gone ... :D [19:38] ArneGoetje: whats the machine name? [19:38] so ... not much i can do for you till tomorrow ;) [19:39] wait [19:39] * dupondje slaps ArneGoetje ;) [19:40] he is in taiwan ;) [19:41] all the week is public holiday there for some reason :( [19:41] and its currently like 3am? [19:43] crap :) and my firefox is broken !!!! :D [19:45] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39051421/language-pack-nl-base_1%3A10.04%2B20100206_1%3A10.04%2B20100206.1.diff.gz [19:45] lol :) [19:45] everything got removed ? ;) [19:53] hmz asac [19:53] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-pack-nl-base/1:10.04+20100206.1 [19:54] seems to contain everything ... [20:01] ok found the issue [20:01] language-pack-nl-base provides mozilla.tar.gz language files [20:01] but it seems that language-pack-nl now also provides them, and overwritten them [20:01] but those are totally NOT complete [20:23] asac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-pack-nl/+bug/521876 [20:23] Ubuntu bug 521876 in language-pack-nl "mozilla languages seems to get broken by last language-pack-nl upgrade" [Undecided,New] [20:23] yes [20:24] the language-pack-nl is an update pack [20:24] seems not complete [20:24] i found the machin ename ;) [20:24] * asac goes and looks for logs [20:25] !date [20:26] /echo $date [20:26] rofl :) [20:26] ok so that log shows nothing really bad [20:26] it seems to be a log from today [20:27] so i assume the export was busted [20:27] * asac thinks [20:27] * asac tries to find the delta to download [20:27] language-pack-de doesn't have the firefox language file ... [20:27] it doesnt? [20:27] language-pack-nl does have it ... and overwrites the file from language-pack-nl-base [20:27] no ... [20:28] interesting [20:29] http://paste.ubuntu.com/376419/ [20:29] first in -nl [20:29] last -de [20:30] ./usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-nl@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-nl.jar is in language-pack-nl (broken) and in language-pack-nl-base (working) [20:32] * asac pulls current delta pack: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39159844/ubuntu-lucid-translations-update.tar.gz [20:32] https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+language-packs [20:35] huge ;) [20:36] true:) [20:39] http://paste.ubuntu.com/376427/ [20:39] those are the only translations [20:39] in update [20:39] * asac looks what is inside [20:40] not too bad [20:42] but why is there a mozilla.tar.gz with firefox-3.6-nl.jar inside language-pack-nl ... :D [20:42] something went wrong :) [20:44] i sthere? [20:44] ouch [20:44] dupondje: replace the other .jar with the .jar from there ;) [20:44] i dont see the mozilla.tar.gz [20:44] in language-pack-nl [20:45] dpkg -L language-pack-nl | pastebinit [20:45] http://pastebin.com/f28c32641 [20:45] where do you see that? [20:45] dupondje: ? [20:46] asac: language-pack-nl-10.04+20100213/data$ tar -zxvf mozilla.tar.gz ... :D [20:46] well [20:46] thats the source [20:46] hmm [20:46] ah [20:46] yeah [20:46] thats right [20:46] thats the way we do the sources [20:47] we just make a mozilla.tar.gz [20:47] that should match what you have in your language-pack-nl [20:47] binary [20:47] well in the language-pack-nl the mozilla.tar-gz contains /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-nl@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-nl.jar [20:48] while in language-pack-de for example, it doesn't contain files in that dir ... [20:48] cfr my pastebin [20:48] it doesnt? [20:49] /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-nl@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-nl.jar [20:49] this file isin my paste [20:49] thats the language-pack-nl content [20:49] line 44 # [20:49] /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-nl@firefox-3.6.ubuntu.com/firefox-3.6-nl.jar [20:49] ... :D [20:50] as i said [20:50] the de language didnt get an update [20:51] anyway fetched the language file from language-pack-nl-base and copy'ed over the broken one :) its working now [20:51] ok so only the filtered entities are included [20:51] i guess it has something to do with versioning [20:58] oh dear [20:58] the po2xpi binary is not even installed in the new locatoin ;) [20:59] ArneGoetje: ^^ [21:00] ok [21:00] let me go the manually road ;) [21:01] * asac pulls delta to langpack-o-matic machine [21:02] the magic machine ? ;) [21:05] dupondje: ok i have a tar.gz for you [21:05] one second [21:06] http://people.canonical.com/~asac/tmp/nl.tar.gz [21:06] i think just replacing the .jar out if it might fix you [21:06] dupondje: ^ [21:08] it works ... now get the package fixed :D [21:08] not toda [21:08] y [21:09] i have no clue how to respin the langpacks [21:09] and manually updating all is painful [21:10] :) [21:10] i think i have to touch them tomorrow anyway [22:08] i wonder if it's worth pushing libjs-modalbox to lucid [22:10] whats that? [22:11] http://okonet.ru/projects/modalbox/ [22:12] not sure [22:12] does it really make sense to ship .js web libs in the archive? [22:12] feels like not [22:12] maybe some webkit apps might wanna use that? [22:12] well, we just got dojo in through debian [22:13] how is that supposed to be used? [22:13] to generate AJAX content [22:13] does packaging give you anything? like automatic upgrades etc.? [22:13] well, we're using it with zend framework [22:13] or is it just something everyone would copy to their webapp directory anyway [22:13] we have libjs-jquery, libjs-yui and many others [22:14] which \sh keeps up to date in lucid and I help him backport [22:14] fta: that answers my question then i guess ;) [22:14] go ahead [22:14] :-P [22:14] it uses javascript-common [22:14] which provides it to any app to use [22:14] asac, did you read http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/1431 & http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.announce/1432 [22:15] ok. thats what i wanted to know [22:15] doesnt open [22:15] fta: hmm. so i guess ffox needs to go to in-source jpeg ;) [22:16] chromium too [22:16] lets see [22:17] asac: do we have to do this for all xul apps (TB, SM)? [22:17] * micahg is testing the migrator now [22:17] maybe we skip that transition ;) [22:17] for lucid [22:17] push back rather [22:18] micahg: most likely ... but not if we dont do the transition in lucid [22:18] k, lets see how far we get I guess :) [22:18] asac: I didn't realize that the release date was tue for 3.0.18 and 3.5.8 [22:19] do you want to push 3.5.8 and 1.9.1.8 to jaunty and karmic now [22:19] so we don't have the builds piling up [22:19] I thought it was thurs for some reason [22:19] in security-ppa [22:19] its already in debian testing. so i guess it was blacklisted [22:20] micahg: is everything ready? [22:20] for karmic and jaunty 3.5.8 and 1.9.1.8 [22:20] all xul/ffox branches? [22:20] no [22:20] right [22:21] but we don't want to be caught with blocked builders, right? [22:21] if I finish tonight will there be enough time for all the builds in 24 horus? [22:23] i'm testing 3.0 now to make sur epatches apply [22:24] 23:21 < asac> dont know [22:24] 23:21 < asac> needs to be [22:24] 23:22 < asac> in worst case we use the big archive admin stick to raise prio ;) [22:24] 23:22 < asac> err buildd admin [22:24] 23:22 < asac> we need the branches ready tomorrow afternoon european time [22:24] k [22:24] my provider is bad [22:24] k, patches applied on 3.0.18 [22:24] * micahg saw the dents :) [22:25] patches? === asac_ is now known as asac [22:25] on jaunty [22:25] you mean no rebasing needed? [22:25] there's an offset, but they all apply [22:25] ok [22:25] xulrunner is more interesting i guess [22:26] xulrunner applied too iirc [22:26] are we still at build1 ? [22:26] yep :) [22:26] then just do it ;) [22:26] should be like 45 minutes to add changelog, test if the package starts building (e.g. patches apply) [22:27] yep [22:27] ... for all 6 [22:27] :) [22:27] jaunty's done :) [22:27] 5 left [22:28] I got this error on my migrator script: [: 115: !=: unexpected operator [22:28] http://pastebin.com/f657f0873 [22:29] i usually use two commits [22:29] so one commit also has the changelog info [22:29] * New upstream release v3.0.17 (FIREFOX_3_0_17_RELEASE) [22:29] - see USN-877-1 [22:29] I have been [22:29] AFAIK [22:29] no [22:29] did I not? [22:29] you just have releasing version 3.0.18+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [22:29] in .jaunty [22:29] 3.0 [22:29] :( [22:30] thought I did 2 commit [22:30] * micahg looks [22:30] micahg: also today is the feb 14 [22:30] maybe uncommit that ;) [22:30] run a dch -r -DUNRELEASED to update date [22:30] debcommit [22:30] dch -r -Djaunty-security [22:30] debcommit -r [22:31] weird... [22:31] sorry [22:31] I know I did 3.5 right [22:32] yes 3.5 karmic is ok [22:33] [Lag: 26.78] [22:33] guess i am going down soon again [22:33] 3.0.jaunty is fixed [22:33] :( [22:33] yes. thats better [22:34] dch -r -DUNRELEASED doesn't work [22:36] ok given how bad my net is i probably should prepare the update on some other machine outside my net [22:36] micahg: it doesnt work if you have a real release there [22:36] ah [22:36] yeah [22:36] you need to manually fix that first and then run it to update timestamp [22:37] its a new feature of dch since karmic i think [22:37] well, the -r part to update the itmestamp works :) [22:37] previously it wasnt that annoyingly smart [22:38] asac: any idea about the error I'm getting with the migration script [22:39] havent seen an errr [22:39] asac: it seems that xul1.9.intrepid was never released in the changelog :( [22:40] 23:28 < micahg> I got this error on my migrator script: [: 115: !=: unexpected operator [22:40] that means its a syntax error in line 115 [22:40] yes, that's fi [22:40] so am I missing something in that block? [22:41] let me check [22:41] micahg: ok committing [22:41] was still modified locally [22:41] thanks [22:41] done [22:41] err not yet done ;) [22:41] damn net [22:41] now [22:41] micahg: ok now you can pull xul19.intrepid [22:42] micahg: probably means that you have a missing quote or something in the previous [ ] thing [22:42] or you forgot to ] [22:42] I know [22:42] but everything looks ok to my limited eye [22:43] most likely $FOUND_CURRENT != "" [22:43] isnt legal dash [22:43] ah [22:43] should be "$FOUND_CURRENT" [22:43] thanks [22:43] yeah [22:43] thats true ;) [22:43] otherwise if its empty its missing first operand [22:43] * micahg loves having someone to ask :) [22:44] others use x$FOUND_CURRENT = x [22:44] to test for empty [22:44] * micahg was following the convention in the firefox wrapper [22:45] not exactly sure where that style comes from though (the x) [22:45] yeah. thats right. stick to existing style [22:51] micahg: do you have the tarballs in a ppa or something? [22:51] for which? [22:51] for ffox/xul sec update [22:52] no [22:52] you want me to? [22:52] no [22:52] I've been testing locally [22:52] just wondered [22:52]