[00:03] k, testing locally on karmic, then I'll up;load to hardy ppa [00:03] lots of build targets are required [00:04] well, I left them all [00:04] you should leave most. yes [00:04] just replace the logic tha currently deals with installing the stuff [00:04] with install-xpi i guess [00:05] and your new logic for getting new orig [00:05] would help if I spelt the build targets right (not dh_shlibdeeps) :) [00:05] lol [00:05] hmm. [00:05] don't worry [00:05] are we doing anything about the maxVersion? [00:05] I'm, fixing it all [00:06] yeah, I have it set to 3.0.* [00:06] ah ... that happens in update-debian-files? [00:06] anyway. [00:06] you misspelled dh_shlibdeeps ? [00:06] that means you didnt start with the original one :( [00:06] right [00:06] we will see [00:06] hopefully the diff is minimal :;) [00:07] I know mine works..now I just need the old stuff [00:07] anyways [00:07] i know the old thing works [00:07] ;) [00:07] http://pastebin.com/f2e34c6b7 line 39 in the new rules file [00:07] micahg: create a diff -u [00:07] but that changed [00:07] and paste that [00:08] http://pastebin.com/f2eb71257 [00:09] -build-stamp: configure-stamp [00:09] +build-stamp: configure-stamp [00:09] - [00:09] (23) [00:10] row 71 [00:10] 75 [00:10] does it not like my spaceS? [00:10] 140 [00:10] not sure [00:10] make those diffs go away ;) [00:10] k [00:11] 149 152ff [00:11] they have extra spaces before :) [00:12] whats the difference of update-xpi and rebuild-debian-files ? [00:12] just the wget? [00:12] asac: yes [00:12] what uses rebuild-debian-files? [00:12] or is that external API? [00:12] external if you need to fix the control file after you download [00:13] make update-xpi: wget rebuild-debian-files [00:13] i guess [00:13] k [00:13] should I try pushing to hardy? [00:14] + cat $(CURDIR)/debian/locales.list >> $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list [00:14] + sort -u $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list > $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list.new [00:14] + mv $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list.new $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list [00:14] that probably should be [00:14] oh [00:14] is the >> intentional? then nevermind [00:14] consider to make emtpy line in between [00:14] yes, so we keep all the previous ones [00:15] so we always have a stub package if we published a translation previously [00:15] * micahg should probably comment :) [00:15] the sort gets rid of duplicates? [00:15] yep [00:16] second and third line might be cat FILE | sort -u > $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list [00:16] combinable [00:16] maybe do this ;) [00:16] even though I'm writing to the same file I'm reading? [00:17] cat $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list $(CURDIR)/debian/locales.list | sort -u > $(CURDIR)/debian/packages.list [00:17] hmm [00:17] oh [00:17] my brain still had the > in it [00:17] but you can combine 1 and 2 like it ;) [00:17] i would hope [00:18] but not important enough [00:18] so just keep ;) [00:18] asac: before I had uniq FILE | sort > [00:19] micahg: ok. did you do a local test build? [00:19] do the languages install? [00:19] yes, works fine in karmic [00:19] ugh [00:19] jsut erased it [00:19] please test the following languages: de, fr, es, pt, en_GB, if more you can take them [00:19] oh and also zh [00:19] (if you do release tests of locales) [00:20] how do you list the files in a .deb again? [00:20] if you have the deb? [00:20] yeah [00:20] installed its dpkg -L packagename [00:20] dpkg -c filename [00:21] yep, appears to be working :) [00:21] install them . test them [00:21] and then upload to a ppa for lucid [00:21] and then try hardy [00:21] is it enough to just install the .debs locally to test or do I need the language-selector test again? [00:21] no [00:21] just install locally [00:21] and use [00:21] k [00:21] export LANG=de [00:21] firefox [00:22] export LANG=zh_TW [00:22] firefox [00:22] export LANG=zh_CN [00:22] firefox [00:22] s/firefox/thunderbird/ [00:22] export LANG=fr [00:22] etc. [00:22] oh, I was using the language addon in TB to switch [00:22] thats not how we do it [00:22] we just use LANG env ;) [00:22] k [00:22] you probably need to uninstall that [00:23] oh ... nowadays we seem to have issues with some extensions [00:23] when starting firefox twice [00:23] so start twice to test ;) [00:23] second time for greasemonkey it doesnt start anymore for instance [00:23] hardy worked now :) [00:23] same could be true for translations ... until someone has debugged that we should use extra care [00:24] good ;) [00:24] well done [00:24] thanks [00:24] maybe give the full roundtrip a try too ... e.g. does updating xpis sstill work etc. [00:25] * micahg will have to remove the broken .xpis again, but ok [00:26] broken xpis? [00:26] yeah, tehre were 3 languages that had whitespace [00:27] ah [00:27] yes [00:29] bug...package names need to be lowercase... [00:29] probably ;) [00:35] all is ok now :) [00:38] test build in ppa on lucid and karmic [00:38] asac: should I spin a TB3 build as well? [00:43] bdrung: thanks, all is working on hardy :) [00:55] micahg: yes [00:55] k [01:12] asac: is it worth denting about pushing stuff to my personal PPAs? [01:13] asac: also, have you reviewed my changes for TB3? [01:31] asac: TB3 built fine on lucid amd64 [01:31] i think all security stuff should be up now [01:32] minus xul 1.9.1 lucid [01:32] k [01:32] that's great then [01:32] 63 pending builds [01:32] BTW, debian apaprently has a fix for sparc [01:32] well [01:32] we should disable-jit there [01:32] until we have upstream fix [01:32] we have that fix in 1.9.1 i thought [01:33] at least karmic ? [01:33] for sparc? [01:33] yeah [01:33] so in karmic 1.9.1 builds for sparc [01:34] ah, yes [01:35] so, that needs to be ported fwd as well? [01:35] to 3.6? [01:36] yes. though i think there is an upstream fix pending [01:36] armin76 would know ;) [01:37] I get this now ... [01:37] (process:20696): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library. [01:37] Using the fallback 'C' locale. [01:37] when I try this: export LANG=de [01:37] thunderbird [01:38] is it in german? [01:38] hmm [01:38] might be you need for language packs [01:38] but tbird should be german still, isnt it? [01:38] no [01:38] try [01:38] de_DE [01:39] export LANG=de_DE [01:39] or [01:39] export LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 [01:39] niope [01:39] then there is something wrong ;) [01:39] the warning shouldnt be the problem [01:39] * micahg probably needs the langpacks [01:40] try it... but afaik, tbird doesnt care for that [01:40] * micahg has it [01:40] no go [01:40] rather check if all is right [01:40] when I use the locale switcher, it works [01:40] have you uninstalled that now? [01:40] yes [01:40] the langpacks show up in tb [01:40] go to config editor [01:41] search for matchOS [01:41] most likely that messed with that setting [01:41] ah, I might not have that... [01:41] it should be default aka true [01:41] you should have that [01:41] but probably set to false [01:41] false :) [01:41] from the extension shit [01:41] ;) [01:41] yeah [01:41] sorry for bad tone [01:42] says the default is false [01:42] thats a problem then [01:42] for firefox we ship it like: [01:42] grep matchOS /etc/firefox/pref/* [01:42] pref("intl.locale.matchOS", true); [01:42] so in the syspref file [01:42] * micahg is chcecking with a clean profile [01:42] most likely we dont even have a syspref patch? [01:42] yes, try everything clean [01:43] false [01:43] we dont even ship /etc/thunderbird ? [01:43] we need the syspref feature from firefox [01:43] and the link from APPDIR/defaults/sysprefs /etc/thunderbird/pref [01:43] yes,w e do [01:44] http://pastebin.com/f37dff5ad [01:44] micahg: thats not shipped by our tbird 3 package, or is it? [01:44] yes, that's from the tb3 package [01:44] if its shipped we need a patch and a link like above [01:45] APPDIR/defaults/sysprefs /etc/thunderbird/pref [01:45] like in firefox [01:45] b ls debian/patches/*sys* [01:45] debian/patches/add_syspref_dir.patch [01:46] thats what we need in tb3 i guess [01:46] for the syspref dir [01:48] should I pull hte patch from ff3.5? [01:48] or rather xul191 [02:04] I grabbed the xulrunner patch and it's bulding now [02:21] micahg: from 3.6 [02:21] ffox [02:21] but i think it just applies [02:21] from 1.9.1 [02:23] asac: I pulled the patch from xul191 since that's what TB3 is built on [02:23] right [02:23] all good i guess [02:23] should be almost done building [02:23] micahg: remember that the link needs to be created [02:23] are the rest of my patches ok? [02:23] no idea [02:23] ;) [02:23] * micahg forgot the link...I'll let it build first :) [02:25] i assume you picked the other patches from xul etc.? [02:25] then they should be fine [02:25] please commit the rest of the stuff (incl. the link and the script) i will review and upload tomorrow [02:26] you can make a release commit on your branch ... just in case that its perfect ;) [02:26] try a few cases for the profile migration and see if decide later makes it pop up again and so on [02:26] i have to drop to bed ;) [02:26] the locale packages are in your ppa now? [02:26] yes [02:27] the debhelper 5 ones? good [02:27] well, I have it for dh6 [02:27] since that's what hardy has [02:27] i am quite sure your script works with 5 too [02:27] probably :) [02:27] the previous rules didnt have anything newer [02:27] please use whatever was used in the previous package [02:27] that was 4 [02:27] then that [02:27] and I had lintian complaints [02:28] i think 5 is decent old [02:28] but whatever. i might change it on upload [02:28] k [02:28] it definitly needs to match what you have as lower versoin in control [02:28] that's what I set both at 6 [02:29] well, control is 6~ [02:29] do I need a .js file for tb [02:29] use hte one from the old pakcage [02:29] package [02:29] tbird 2 [02:29] cat /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js | pastebinit [02:29] http://pastebin.com/f5532a62 [02:30] dont ask me why we have those ;) [02:30] matchOS is important [02:30] no idea about pref("extensions.update.enabled", true); [02:30] feels like its really old [02:33] ok, I got rid of the line and added it to the .install file [02:34] the line? [02:34] you mean dh_install? [02:34] debian/thunderbird.js etc/thunderbird/pref [02:34] k [02:34] now,do i need to link that to the TB dir in addition? [02:34] yes [02:34] like in ffox3.6 [02:35] k [02:38] got it [02:41] * micahg is changing compat back to 4 [02:43] asac: good night [02:43] I'll try to be on around 13:00 UTC [02:59] asac: locales work now :) [05:01] asac: orz... respinning language-pack updates now. [07:17] asac: uploading [08:41] morning [10:22] ArneGoetje: i wanted to update the searchplugins today ... now we need another run :( [10:22] gaa [10:23] asac: actually I need to leave now... how much time do the changes need? [10:23] no clue [10:23] i will talk to pitti [10:23] just give me instructions how to run that stuff [10:23] i dont like the idea doing it manually :/ [10:23] i have all the info now [10:24] asac: respin the language packs? [10:24] yes [10:24] we need to do that [10:25] asac: the latest tarball for lucid in unpacked in /srv/language-packs.ubuntu.com/langpack-o-matic/temp [10:26] asac: edit rosetta-lucid/timestamp.txt and bump the version number to .3 and +1 for every respin. [10:26] ArneGoetje: so this time bump it to .3, right? [10:26] ArneGoetje: and how to run? [10:26] asac: from temp/, build a new tarball, so that the top level directory in the tarball is rosetta-lucid/ [10:26] asac: yes [10:27] when you have the tarball, cd to /srv/language-packs.ubuntu.com/langpack-o-matic [10:27] asac: the run ./import $tarball lucid 1> ../logs/lucid.log 2>../logs/lucid_errors.log [10:27] does the tarball name matter? [10:28] asac: no [10:28] ok [10:28] and then? [10:28] asac: then check the logs and tarballs in ../lucid/sources-update/language-pack-$languagecode/data/mozilla.tar.gz [10:29] asac: if everything is fine, run dchroot -d /srv/language-packs.ubuntu.com/langpack-o-matic/packages upload [10:29] asac: done. [10:29] hmm ok [10:29] ArneGoetje: i dont see any langpacks on the builders [10:29] does that mean it just takes a few hours to build all? [10:30] asac: are they in the queue? [10:30] which queue? [10:30] asac: or maybe built already? [10:30] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lucid/+queue [10:30] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue [10:31] no idea [10:31] ArneGoetje: does that automatically produce update langpacks? [10:32] its odd... i thought we push 100 langpacks or so [10:32] how can it be that they already finished? [10:32] i see the -nl is already build [10:32] asac: the updates are not that big [10:32] asac: those are not full-exports from rosetta, just deltas [10:32] what does it mean? [10:33] ok [10:33] so langpack-o-matic checks later if there were any changes and decides to not upload all? [10:33] asac: yes [10:33] where can i see what was uploaded? [10:33] ArneGoetje: how does it determine that? [10:34] now that we have searchplugins its more than just the .po files [10:34] does it produce all sources and then compare the content of those sources? [10:34] ArneGoetje: i need to run everything as langpack from above? [10:35] asac: no, it goes through the language codes in the rosetta tarball. [10:36] and compares the tarballs? [10:36] asac: only those languages which actually have updates in the tarball get built. [10:36] ok [10:36] makes sense [10:36] thanks [10:36] enjoy your holiday [10:36] and sorry for the disturbance ... i really didnt expect you to come back ;) [10:37] asac: IOW, when we implement the searchplugins stuff for all languages, we need to get new -base packages, means a full-export from rosetta. And then need to change the code in po2xpi to detect changes in the searchplugins folder, since they are independent from the rosetta-tarballs. [10:38] asac: currently it doesn't do that [10:38] asac: but languages, which ave upstream XPIs, get updated in any case. [10:40] asac: if you have trouble or questions, ping me later, I will probably be online again after 4 hours, when my kids are asleep. [10:40] i dont get that. [10:40] i thought rosetta tarballs means the .tar.gz produced by rosetta [10:40] i thought mozilla.tar.gz is included in each of that [10:41] asac: but from tomorrow on I will be travelling with my family for the rest of the week and won't always have internet connectivity. [10:41] so if the searchplugins change ... the mozilla.tar.gz changes ... the rosetta tarball changes [10:41] asac: no. [10:41] ArneGoetje: thanks. i think its ok this week [10:41] i just need to change the existing searchplugins ... or maybe add one more (or does that not even work?) [10:42] asac: the rosetta tarballs only include the .po files of those languages which have changes. [10:42] hmm [10:42] asac: the mozilla.tar.gz tarballs are produced by po2xpi [10:42] langpack-o-matic should do a full run and then compare the output rather than the input [10:42] ArneGoetje: i know. thats why i wondered if it works ata ll if i rerun [10:42] asac: if you are volunteering to write the code to do that, go ahead. ;) [10:43] why does it work if i rerun now? [10:43] in my book the .po files didnt change [10:43] -> searchplugins wont get included [10:45] fta: https://launchpad.net/bugs/522078 [10:45] Ubuntu bug 522078 in chromium-browser "Crashes reproducibly when trying to edit events in Google Calendar" [Undecided,New] [10:45] asac: it doesn't matter if the po files changed. If they are present, the language will get updated. [10:45] mdz says its not crashing from beta channel ppa, but from archive [10:46] asac: and somehow those languages with upstream xpis also get rebuilt... need to check the code in po2xpi to figure out how this works and why [10:47] ah ok [10:47] ArneGoetje: so it means we might not have gotten all langpacks? [10:47] err searchplugins [10:47] have you checked that at least those languages were included? [10:48] asac: I have only checked de and zh-hant, not all languages [10:48] ok. [10:49] i will see [10:49] enjoy your holiday [10:49] asac: ok, thanks [10:51] fta: how can we verify that our release really matches the beta channel? === BUGabundo_remote is now known as BUGabundo_lunch [12:15] asac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=34725 [12:17] fta2: so go for in-source? [12:17] what are we still using from system? [12:17] gtk, nss/nspr? anything else? [12:17] on jpeg? [12:18] lets upload with libxslt also dropped then [12:18] sigh [12:18] GYP_DEFINES += \ [12:18] use_system_bzip2=1 \ [12:18] use_system_zlib=0 \ [12:18] use_system_libjpeg=1 \ [12:18] use_system_libpng=1 \ [12:18] use_system_sqlite=$(USE_SYSTEM_SQLITE) \ [12:18] use_system_libxml=0 \ [12:18] use_system_libxslt=0 \ [12:18] $(NULL) [12:18] USE_SYSTEM_SQLITE=0 [12:18] so just bzip2, jpeg and png [12:18] right. [12:19] they dont have their own apng? [12:19] i don't think so [12:19] mm [12:19] wonder if we should just set everything to 0 ;) [12:19] probably [12:20] fta2: maybe do that and update the beta channel archive upload if you have time [12:20] ifeq (1,$(WANT_SYSTEM_LIBS)) [12:20] yeah [12:20] maybe we should disable that for beta builds now that we have that in archive ;) [12:20] though ... i am not sure we should have system libs [12:20] if upstream doesnt care [12:20] i have to regenerate all tarballs then [12:20] fta2: huh? [12:21] fta2: thats a build time option, isnt it? [12:21] or are we stripping based on GYP_DEFINES? [12:21] because when USE_SYSTEM_SQLITE is set, i strip the corresponding dirs from the tarball [12:21] yeah. [12:21] messy [12:21] can you just append +1 or something to the upstream version? [12:22] or does that kill the beta ppa? [12:22] yep, already did +0 last week for libxml [12:22] heh [12:22] ok so thats already done right ;) [12:22] proven to work (TM) [12:23] so all or just xslt this round? [12:23] in-sourcifying that is [12:27] fta2: maybe comment on the launchpad bug and close it for the upload (or ask mdz etc. to verify a testbuild from beta ppa) ... so you get the credits ;) === BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_remote [13:41] asac: I'm getting a different rich root support error when trying to merge dmitrij's branch [13:50] micahg: yeah. then he has to redo his branch ;) [13:50] micahg: what do you have for bzr info ? [13:51] branching now to cehck [13:51] Standalone tree (format: unnamed) [13:51] same as ours..weird [13:54] asac: ^^ [13:55] micahg: i would suggest to start with a fresh branch [13:55] maybe even the branch attempt messes up our format [13:57] k [13:57] maybe all the branches got upgraded? [13:57] no [13:58] should I just grab the diff and apply manually? [13:58] or ask him to redo [14:09] asac: ^^ [14:16] i dont know ;) [14:16] i would hope he made a mistake such as bzr upgrade [14:17] lets ask on #bzr [14:17] asked [14:24] micahg: run info -v [14:24] to get more info [14:24] bzr info -v [14:24] can you paste that output? [14:28] yeah, his is using rich roots (2a) [14:28] asac: ^^ [14:29] repository: Repository format 2a - rich roots, group compression and chk inventories [14:29] ours: repository: Packs containing knits without subtree support [14:31] i would hope he made a mistake such as bzr upgrade [14:31] Unfortunately there's a hideous trap for the unwary where if you 'bzr init-repo' and then 'bzr branch' a remote project into that repo, you can unwittingly get a local branch that is rich-rooted [14:32] ouch [14:32] that feels bad ;) [14:32] very bad [14:32] asac: is it bad to ping on identi.ca? [14:33] micahg: for what? [14:33] asac: to get dmitrij to update his branch [14:33] you can ask on the merge request [14:33] k [14:33] asac: what can I do in the mean time, prepare the 1.9.1.8 update? [14:36] micahg: testing it [14:36] the bits are there [14:36] for 3.0 and 3.5 [14:37] micahg: also just apply his branch manually and reject [14:37] his merge [14:37] saying that he upgraded branch format [14:37] asac: I asked you that and already replied :( [14:38] yeah. you can update ;) [14:38] and say you changed your mind because someone else was stupid ;) [14:45] micahg: xulrunner-1.9.2.head is pack-0.92 [14:45] same for firefox-3.6.head [14:45] not sure why you think it isnt [14:45] anyway [14:46] so the reason is that they submitter branched firefox in a rich-root repository [14:46] I'm doing xulrunner-1.9.1 [14:46] bzr info https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.1.head [14:46] Repository branch (format: pack-0.92) [14:47] you have a local repository? [14:47] yes [14:47] I've tried branching anew 3 times [14:48] and local checkout is [14:48] bzr info [14:48] Standalone tree (format: pack-0.92) [14:48] micahg: you probably have a repository in the top level directory where you branch it [14:48] like you ran bzr init-repo at some point [14:48] never do that ;) [14:48] its messy [14:48] hmm [14:48] at least i only have bad experiences with repositories [14:48] locally [14:48] nope [14:48] they cause things like this [14:48] not a branch [14:49] paste bzr info -v [14:49] anyway. i dont know then [14:49] http://pastebin.com/f13c46178 [14:49] maybe you have something odd in .bazaar? [14:49] ii bzr 2.0.4-1~bazaar1~karmi [14:50] working tree format is 4 for me [14:50] for you its 6 [14:50] nothing in the conf file [14:51] asac: which version of bzr do you have? [14:52] 2.1.0 [14:52] ~rc2 [14:52] from lucid [14:52] should I upgrade? [14:53] to lucid? [14:53] no, to the 2.1rc2 [14:53] do that in a time when it doesnt block your work :) [14:53] i dont know [14:53] seems your commits at least dont trash the online branch ;) [14:53] * micahg wonders why using the stable bzr branch is worse [14:54] probably a bug in 2.0.4 [14:55] 15:52 < asac> so guess that was a bug in karmic bzr? [14:55] 15:52 < asac> thats 2.0.4 [14:55] 15:54 < fullermd> No, 2.1 does it too. [14:55] 15:54 < asac> why not for me? [14:55] 15:54 < asac> 15:51 < asac> i have http://pastebin.com/f230277fa [14:55] 15:54 < asac> thats bzr info -v [14:55] 15:54 < fullermd> Because you're using http; it's preserving it over that. [14:55] omg [14:55] heh [14:56] karmic released with 2.0.0 and was updated to 2.0.2 [14:56] * micahg follows the bzr teams' PPA [14:56] yeah [14:56] so over http its ok [14:56] seems the working tree format only matters for local trees according to bzr [14:56] ok lets move on [14:57] k [14:57] whats up with the tbird script? [14:57] thats tested thoroughly? [14:57] migrator? should be done [14:57] I did some testing [14:57] all cases? [14:58] and langpacks are also tested? [14:58] * asac pulls latest [14:58] langpacks work [14:59] * micahg tested with .m-tb and .tb3 and keep, .m-tb and .tb3 and use .tb3, .m-tb w/out .tb3, and migrated .m-tb and .tb3 and use .tb3 [15:00] you didnt add all commits to changelog? [15:00] like rev 121 [15:01] asac: those were my fault from the import [15:02] ok [15:02] should be the same as TB2 [15:02] micahg: i assume we dont have the orig production fixed? [15:02] asac: nope, I fixed it in my branch :) [15:02] oh we have [15:02] cool [15:02] let me try that [15:02] asac: should I get someone to test it [15:02] I mean TB3 [15:03] asac: I added fta's fix so that we can do rc's as well [15:03] if your ppa is clean (e.g. locales + tb3) you can ask someone, yes [15:03] i would test the upgrade locally first once though [15:04] if i was you that is [15:04] unfortunately, it's 2 ppas since I messed up with the first .orig.tar.gz [15:04] I did test them locally first :) [15:06] asac: I [15:06] asac: I'll merge in the changes for 1.9.1.8 on my way to work [15:48] micahg: thanks [15:56] asac: I should be back online in 1.5-2 hours [17:11] where's the builds been? [17:59] asac: fta: is adobe flash in parter missing ? flash installer just 404's [18:04] BUGabundo_remote: needs to get updated [18:04] i need to ping the guy [18:14] asac: karmic clean install, full upgrade, adding ppa stable release to get FF 3.6, it loses icon on top bar [18:23] asac: FYI security repo seems to have the last one, while partner doesn't [18:24] BUGabundo_remote: you talking about flash? [18:25] micahg: BUGabundo_remote strange [18:25] micahg: oops [18:25] micahg: hi [18:25] oops [18:25] asac: I have stuff for you :) [18:26] micahg: looking at tbird i wonder why the locales dont alternativeyl depend on language-support... anymore? [18:26] * asac runs [18:26] ;) [18:26] asac: doesn't exist [18:26] hmm [18:26] have you checked with pitti what to use instead and he said nothing? [18:27] asac: I asked ArneGoetje and he said nothing [18:27] he said that the language selector installs it automatically [18:27] s/it/tb-locale/ [18:29] right [18:29] pitti confirmed [18:30] micahg: so you had something for me? [18:31] asac: yes, sorry..I took dmitrij's changes and just enhanced the changelog [18:31] * micahg is pushing now [18:31] good [18:31] is lucid ready then? [18:31] is it on 1.9.2 too? [18:31] I also added the apport hook for ff and added PPA support for it hopefully, but I need to test [18:31] asac: not yet [18:32] right. so ffox is done? [18:32] * asac checks if its ready for upload [18:32] asac: which ff? [18:32] yes [18:32] 3.6 [18:33] the others are in the security ppa ;) [18:33] oh, I wanted to test the apport hook first :) [18:33] we dont upload 3.5 to lucid anymore [18:33] asac: lucid xul191 is ready though [18:33] I jsut pushed [18:35] ok let me put that in security ppa [18:35] micahg: I was [18:35] actually its not ffox ... let me upload that directly [18:36] BUGabundo_remote: yeah, partner updated over the weekend and security team didn't get to it yet [18:36] ok [18:36] asac: should I set dmitrij's branch to merged since I merged it in manually or is that deceptive? [18:36] yes [18:36] comment that you manually did it now [18:38] asac: done [18:38] asac: I'm test building 3.6 now [18:41] yeah [18:41] so the migrator seems to be more or less happy for main cases [18:41] great [18:41] in contrast to tbird itself ;) [18:41] seems i didnt open it for a bit ;) [18:41] now it has 250K messages to index ;) [18:42] ah, yeah, we had a complaint about the global search [18:42] there's an upstream bug to add some control over it in 3.1 [18:42] good [18:42] maybe its even a bit better in 3.0.1 [18:43] hopeefully [18:47] micahg: do you know 3.6.1 scheduled? [18:47] asac: 3.6.1 was skipped [18:48] interesting [18:48] I think they wanted to do 3.6.2 soon [18:48] but that didn't seem to happen [18:49] how many bug fixes piled up upstream for 3.6 branch? [18:49] * micahg checks [18:50] 20 [18:50] hmm [18:51] 10 fir 3.6.1 [18:51] *for [19:09] jdstrand: BTW, ff 3.0.18/3.5.8 is supposed to be released tomorrow from mozilla [19:10] fta2: seems it was fixed [19:10] can we get that in archive? [19:13] sure [19:14] remember to close the lp bug ;) [19:14] well done :-P [19:15] done [19:20] asac: I'll update the firefox-stable PPA after we get ubuntu3 in [19:21] yes [19:22] * asac waits for the bits [19:22] almost done building :) [19:25] micahg: I'm off today, but what testing has been/will be performed on those? [19:26] jdstrand: sorry, they were uploaded to the security PPA, idk what needs to be done, I'll ask asac, I just figured I'd let you know so that someone has time to write the USN [19:27] micahg: yes, I'll write the USN and do some testing, but normally asac et al does a bunch of testing. I wanted to make sure that was being done this time [19:27] jdstrand: k, sorry for bothering you on your day off [19:28] np :) [19:49] micahg: I was only reporting back [19:49] BUGabundo: k :) [19:50] since my boss did a clean install after he messed his debian squeese [19:50] went (k)ubuntu [19:50] and flash and FF upgrades gave him probs [19:50] I'm still waiting for a packaged 64bits flash [19:50] BUGabundo: as soon as it's released :) [19:50] I should upgrdade mine [19:51] running a old one [19:51] Shockwave Flash 10.0 r42 [19:51] r45 doesn't help with hulu, unfortunately [19:51] * micahg doesn't have a problem with hulu and nspluginwrapper [19:52] don't have it here [19:52] micahg: right, only 64-bit is affected [19:53] BUGabundo: adobe stopped doing 64-bit afaik for the last few releases [19:53] $ md5sum /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so [19:53] 57fb976761aac898897e96101ee1a4e0 /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so [19:53] asac: they did ? [19:53] crimsun: 64 bit flash doesn't work wiith hulu? [19:53] yes [19:53] libflashplayer-10.0.45.2.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz [19:53] so what is this ?? [19:54] maybe they resurrected it again. i know that they skipped a release at least [19:54] right [19:54] 64bits devel doesn't keep up with main team [19:54] which is why we can't publish it :) [19:54] and otehr reasosn.. [19:54] but that's either cause its small audience, doesn't affect it, or lacks man power [19:55] * micahg thinks it's because it's pre-release [19:55] micahg: being pre is only cause they don't want to go full support [19:55] ie very small audience [19:55] if they did release full support on all archs, browsers [19:55] it would be a mess [19:55] BUGabundo: no, because it's not ready yet, they plan on releasing with 10.1+ [19:55] MSFT is doing the same with silverlight [19:56] micahg: I dough they will ever make it a full rlease like 32bits [19:56] not enough quota [19:56] BUGabundo: you mean limited current use or potential userbase? [19:56] many of us use 64bits but still we are very few [19:56] BUGabundo: they said they plan too sometime after the 10.1 release [19:56] Win is still mostly 32bits, so is mac, and even canonical *only* shipps 32b CDs [19:57] micahg: not from what I've read... [19:57] BUGabundo: server CDs are 64 bit :) [19:57] no. they are multi kernel [19:57] with PAE support [19:57] AFAIK [19:57] could be wrong, stop following kernel ML last cycle [19:57] * BUGabundo should catch up on mozilla team ML [19:57] BUGabundo: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/faq.html#flashplayer10FAQ_64-bit03 [19:58] BUGabundo: the CDs I have say 64 bit only [19:58] how long as that been there?? [19:58] since jaunty at least [19:58] since the beginning ? [19:58] eheh [19:58] I'vent asked for server CDs [19:59] I only get 50 32bits on each cicle [19:59] I have a Remaning one! [19:59] BUGabundo: apple is moving to 64 bit only I think and MSFT is now installing 64 bit win7 on capable machiens [19:59] gave the last ones last Saturday, on my FLOSS class :D [19:59] true [19:59] and when did Linux moved to 64bits? [19:59] 10 years ago? [19:59] I've been using 64bits for 2 or more years [19:59] errr [20:08] asac: non distro apport doesn't seem to work [20:08] needs more debugging [20:08] should I push everything else? [20:10] you can trick apport [20:23] fta:yes, but I need to figure out what's wrong :) [20:29] asac, what's the impact of MeeGo for Moblin/Ubuntu? [21:02] any eta btw on the broken search engines ? [21:03] dupondje: lucid or firefox-stable ppa? [21:03] lucid [21:04] I guess that depends on whether or not we need to wait for PPA apport hooks [21:04] asac: what do you think ^^ [21:04] whats need to be done for it ? as its just broke recently [21:05] dupondje: fix is already commited [21:06] but ... :) [21:10] BUGabundo, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/11/street_view_finland//print.html [21:11] checking [21:12] fta: getting snaps again :( [21:12] with this page? [21:13] fta LOLOL [21:13] no not this page [21:13] google ones. [21:13] like gmail and greader [21:13] fta can you open https://caixadirecta.cgd.pt/ ? [21:13] gives me prob with cookies [21:14] gmail should be fixed with the last batch (except trunk) [21:15] ahhhh [21:15] so its know [21:16] I don't understand how they break their own products [21:16] pff [21:16] remind me the time when we couldn't login to greader [21:21] asac, micahg: maybe something you should reuse? http://glandium.org/blog/?p=900 [21:22] BUGabundo, they didn't, i sort of did (system lib related issue) [21:22] fta: I saw that [21:22] but it seems we already had it working for karmic/ff3.6 in lucid [21:23] ah ok [21:41] micahg: explain !? [21:41] * [reed] rolls eyes at all the patches glandium does for Debian [21:42] BUGabundo: unlimited.status.net vs brainbird bs identica [21:42] whats glandium ? [21:42] ahh [21:42] those [21:43] BUGabundo: mike hommey from debian [21:43] well BB is hosted by deepspawn [21:43] thanks micahg [21:44] s/bs/vs/^^^ [21:46] micahg: one of the reasons that makes me run on other server other then identica [21:46] is to _force_ SNI to improve Federation, aka OMB [21:46] they are now launching the new OStatus [21:47] that should improve it a lot [21:49] BUGabundo: so you're telling me I'm using the twitter of open source microblogging? [21:50] no no [21:50] why ? [21:50] ah [21:50] I thought you meant it's the big dog and people aren't paying attention to the rest of the network [21:52] ahh [21:52] well yes , a bit [21:53] and evan gets mad when ppl move away [21:53] I think he forgets its all a single network [21:53] no mather in which server the user is [21:53] BUGabundo: l [21:53] oops [21:53] k [22:19] BUGabundo, http://amix.dk/ [22:19] lol [22:19] you got lost about it ? [22:19] ahah [22:20] ahahahahahahahahaahha [22:42] kenvandine, with gwibber gone from the tray, i no longer see it, so i no longer think of using it :P [22:44] LOL [22:44] use the indicator [22:45] too slow [22:45] compared to the tray [22:46] if it was like rhythmbox, that would be acceptable [22:51] is there a way to zero out xsession-errors w/out restarting? [22:51] mine grew to 35G [22:58] cat /dev/null > ~/.xsessionblabla [22:58] micahg, ^^ [22:59] fta: will that actually give me the space back and keep writing to the file new stuff? [22:59] yes, unless a process still has the file opened [22:59] lsof could tell you [23:00] 92 processes have it open :( [23:00] * micahg guesses he will have to reboot [23:01] thanks anyways fta [23:02] micahg, well, no. try. it should work as it doesn't change the inode [23:04] well, it gave me the space back at least :) [23:05] * micahg won't actually need the info in the file until I report a bug against the program causing the issue [23:06] and it looks like new stuff is being written, even better, thanks fta [23:07] there a problem with wine/audio [23:37] asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39246642/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.chromium-browser_5.0.322.2~r38810%2B0-0ubuntu1~ucd1~intrepid_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [23:37] funny error [23:48] BUGabundo: does identi.ca support /me? [23:48] no