[10:16] <asac> fta: maybe retry the inrepid build?
[10:55] <fta2> asac, it failed on all ppas for {intrepid,jaunty}+amd64
[12:28] <sindhudweep> asac: you there?
[12:29] <asac> yes
[12:30] <sindhudweep> can you review https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sindhudweep-sarkar/gnash/gnash0.8.7packaging
[12:34] <BUGabundo> Happy Carnaval o/
[12:35] <asac> have fun ;)
[12:35] <asac> sindhudweep: i might not get to it today. have to rush some stuff for a3
[12:35] <sindhudweep> perfectly understandable
[12:35] <sindhudweep> should i try to grab you in a week or so?
[12:37] <BUGabundo> thanks asac
[12:37] <BUGabundo> you too
[12:38] <asac> sindhudweep: i would assume tomorrow - latest wednesday the doors are closed for a3
[12:39] <asac> so then i am avail ;)
[12:39] <asac> just poke me
[12:39] <sindhudweep> great. I'll try to poke you then :D
[12:39] <asac> welcome!
[12:39] <sindhudweep> thanks, bye!
[13:14] <asac> !test
[14:15] <fta2> asac, upstream said they will fix ch to be usable with system libs
[14:17] <asac> nice
[14:17] <asac> fta2: will they include it in their test/QA somehow?
[14:17] <asac> otherwise it feels like a huge risk if we closely want to follow their releases
[14:17] <asac> or will they define a reference platform (like hardy or lucid) where they test on?
[14:26] <fta2> not sure. they had a dedicated builder for that at some point, but noone cared enough to keep it updated
[14:27] <fta2> as fedora is willing to stick to as many system libs at all costs, it puts some pressure on upstream
[14:34] <BUGabundo> fta [  819.688012] chromium-browse[6138] general protection ip:171edfb sp:7fff3f556a10 error:0 in chromium-browser[400000+22b7000]
[14:34] <BUGabundo> [ 1489.795093] chromium-browse[6291] general protection ip:171edf7 sp:7fff3f556a10 error:0 in chromium-browser (deleted)[400000+22b7000]
[14:38] <asac> fta2: so did fedora already find a fix for xslt issue? or dont they have it?
[14:39] <fta2> asac, i don't know, but their patches are public
[14:40] <fta2> BUGabundo, not very helpful, you should file a bug
[14:40] <BUGabundo> fta im still getting snaps
[14:40] <BUGabundo> now at identica
[14:41] <BUGabundo> I though you fixed it yesterday
[14:42] <fta2> BUGabundo, which version are you using?
[14:42] <BUGabundo> 5.0.329.0 (39037) Ubuntu
[14:44] <asac> BUGabundo: package version i guess
[14:44] <BUGabundo>   Installed: 5.0.330.0~svn20100216r39077-0ubuntu2~ucd1
[15:08] <fta2> BUGabundo, should work, it's probably another issue then
[15:08] <BUGabundo> ok
[15:08] <BUGabundo> anything on my side I can do to debug ?
[15:45] <micahg> asac: around?
[15:49] <asac> micahg: yes
[15:49] <asac> preparing a call in 10
[15:49] <micahg> asac: k, is there anything else needed for TB3?
[15:55] <asac> micahg: what i had looked good
[15:56] <asac> will upload it i think
[16:00] <BUGabundo> asac: [reed]: anything about this http://www.oxymoronical.com/web/firefox/nightly#comment-41247
[18:34] <jdstrand> asac: hey, do you have any idea what testing was performed on ff3 and ff35 in the mozilla security ppa?
[18:36] <jdstrand> micahg: 12:34 < jdstrand> asac: hey, do you have any idea what testing was performed on  ff3 and ff35 in the mozilla security ppa?
[18:36] <jdstrand> micahg: hi btw
[18:37] <micahg> hi jdstrand
[18:37] <micahg> jdstrand: no, sorry
[18:37] <micahg> asac: any idea for testing of ff3.0/3.5 updates/
[18:45] <asac> jdstrand: no testing on my side ... normal community testing for 1.5 days (no complains)
[18:45] <asac> e.g. lacks extensive tests by you and me
[18:54] <micahg> asac: I think I have the PPA apport issue fixed
[18:55] <micahg> asac: can I pastebin the bzr diff for you before I push?
[18:57] <asac> micahg: yes
[18:58] <micahg> asac: http://pastebin.com/fdd3ca26
[19:12] <Dunkirk> How do I add the PPA, but pin it so that I have to specify which packages I want? (I just want thunderbird-3.0, the "stock" firefox is just fine, and I don't want to upgrade it.)
[19:16] <micahg> Dunkirk: we'll probably be making a thunderbird-stable PPA soon if you want to wait
[19:16] <micahg> Dunkirk: or I can give you the pin configuration for the daily ppa
[19:17] <Dunkirk> micahg, I would like both, actually. ;-)
[19:17] <Dunkirk> micahg, For the record, I really want to understand pinning in general, so seeing your example would be brilliant.
[19:17] <micahg> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/377828/ could go in /etc/apt/preferences.d/umd
[19:18] <micahg> Dunkirk: here's a tutorial on pinning: http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
[19:19] <micahg> Dunkirk: I actually pin all PPAs at 450 and override when necessary
[19:19] <Dunkirk> micahg, That's swell! How would I know to use "o=<stuff>" and what "stuff" would be?
[19:19] <micahg> Dunkirk: take a look at 'apt-cache policy'
[19:19] <Dunkirk> micahg, Ok, begging another, why do you do 450, but tell me 475?
[19:19] <micahg> Dunkirk: it's all relative
[19:19] <micahg> I use 450 so I can override in between
[19:19] <micahg> 500 is default

[19:21] <Dunkirk> micahg, WAAAAY cool. Thanks for that. That's been a mystery for about 10 years now. (I've wandered through Suse and Gentoo lands for a long time since looking at Debian.)
[19:26] <Dunkirk> micahg, Hrm. I don't mean to be a pest, but after putting that file into place, and reloading the configuration, synaptic still wants to pull in the newer firefox.
[19:29] <micahg> Dunkirk: sudo apt-get update?
[19:31] <Dunkirk> Yeah. apt-get upgrade isn't showing anything, but if I "mark all changes" in synaptic, it gets picked up. I see that `aptitude' also picks it up. I guess synaptic runs aptitude?
[19:32] <micahg> Dunkirk: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/PinningHowto
[19:33] <Dunkirk> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/377841/
[19:34] <micahg> hmm
[19:34] <micahg> Dunkirk: aptitude shouldn't upgrade that
[19:34] <Dunkirk> Guess I'm going to have to "lock version" in synaptic.
[19:35] <micahg> Dunkirk: check in #ubuntu about that...I don't know why synaptic would do that
[19:35] <micahg> Dunkirk: you don't want to lock version as we still provide updates for 3.5 in karmic
[19:35] <micahg> (one should be coming this week)
[19:36] <Dunkirk> Hrm... OK. I'll check later. Roger on the updates. I hadn't thought of that.
[19:36] <Dunkirk> I'll keep an eye out for that Thunderbird-only PPA. ;-)
[19:36] <Dunkirk> micahg, Thanks again.
[19:36] <micahg> Dunkirk: np
[20:04] <micahg> asac: would it be bad for me to retweet your dent to the ubuntu group?
[20:05] <fta> http://www.ted.com/talks/blaise_aguera.html
[20:10] <asac> micahg: no why not
[20:10] <asac> i think its just bad to retweet without removing groups currently used in the dent
[20:10] <micahg> asac: idk, I'm new to denting :)
[20:10] <micahg> asac: I saw no groups
[20:11] <asac> micahg: yes, i forgot
[20:11] <asac> micahg: ask BUGabundo about etiquette
[20:11] <micahg> asac: np, I rt'd it :)
[20:11] <asac> ;)
[20:11] <BUGabundo> ?
[20:11] <micahg> asac: how was my diff?
[20:12] <BUGabundo> YOU RD TO GROUPS!?!?!?!?!?
[20:12] <BUGabundo> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
[20:12] <BUGabundo> NEVER EVER do that
[20:12] <BUGabundo> you get killed, and hundreds replies from users
[20:12] <asac> micahg: you chatted too much ;)
[20:12] <asac> BUGabundo: initial dent didnt have any group
[20:12] <BUGabundo> ahh
[20:12] <asac> so rd with group is ok imo
[20:12] <BUGabundo> then its safe
[20:13] <asac> if you think its worth forwarding to a group
[20:13] <asac> that didnt get it yet
[20:13] <BUGabundo> some ppl will still complain
[20:13] <BUGabundo> but you can shut off those
[20:13] <asac> yeah, because they miss that fact i just metnioned ;)
[20:13] <fta> jcastro, will we have that in lucid? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nzk4MQ
[20:13] <BUGabundo> micahg: and its ReDent
[20:13] <BUGabundo> not retweet
[20:13] <jcastro> fta, unsure, tseliot is the guy to ask though
[20:13] <micahg>  asac: http://pastebin.com/fdd3ca26 <--ff bzr commits
[20:14] <asac> micahg: how about abrowser-branding etc.?
[20:14] <asac> for packages?
[20:14] <asac> or does it fail if a package isnt installed?
[20:15] <micahg> asac: shouldn't fail
[20:15] <micahg> I could add whatever I think
[20:15] <micahg> idk
[20:15] <asac> micahg: add email on first commit
[20:15] <asac> micahg: please leave ffox 3.6 open
[20:15] <asac> i have to add a patch tomorrow before the upload
[20:15] <asac> otherwise it looks good
[20:15] <fta> jcastro, you're well informed & well connected :) it's usually easier to ask you rather than remembering lots of nicknames and their respective specialties :P
[20:15] <micahg> asac: ok, I'll redo the commits tonight
[20:16] <jcastro> yeah sorry, I don't follow nouveau closely at all.
[20:16] <micahg> asac: do you want abrowser in there?
[20:16] <micahg> asac: also, can you do the ubufox merge I proposed?
[20:16] <asac> abrowser abrowser-branding
[20:16] <asac> ubufox
[20:16] <asac> micahg: what did that do?
[20:17] <micahg> asac: changed the apport reporting package to firefox instead of firefox-$version
[20:17] <micahg> for everything except 3.0 and 3.5
[20:18] <micahg> asac: why do we have a firefox-dev package?
[20:18]  * micahg thought we weren't going to allow building against ff
[20:30] <asac> just because i wasnt sure
[20:30] <asac> isnt -dev empty?
[20:30] <asac> i think we should empty it
[20:30]  * micahg doesn't remember
[20:31] <micahg> it's empty I think
[20:31] <micahg> yeah, should we change the descritpion then?
[20:32] <kklimonda> hey - could someone take a look at bug 482890? I can't get neither squeeze version or current lucid one to work with seamonkey
[20:32] <micahg> asac: http://pastebin.com/md854544 seems inappropriate
[20:33] <micahg> kklimonda: are you using SM1 or SM2?
[20:33] <asac> yeah
[20:33] <kklimonda> micahg: SM1 from lucid repository
[20:33] <asac> micahg: anyway. lets start on the transition ppa
[20:33] <asac> isn anything missing for xul 1.9.2 ?
[20:34] <micahg> asac: yeah, 1 thing, I was going to merge tonight on my way home and start pushing
[20:34] <asac> merge?
[20:34] <asac> rebase?
[20:34] <micahg> asac: merge
[20:34] <kklimonda> micahg: if I install debian package I get errors about noscript not installed correctly. The Ubuntu package installs fine and there is no error but also I see no indication that noscript is actually running
[20:34] <asac> oh the dh_xullrunner thing? i thought it already happened
[20:35] <micahg> asac: that was for xul191
[20:35] <asac> micahg: did you already add the unversioned -dev package?
[20:35] <micahg> asac: yeah
[20:35] <asac> micahg: good. what merge is it thne?
[20:35] <micahg> asac: one of the non ppa arches I think
[20:35] <asac> ?
[20:35] <asac> the sparce thing?
[20:35] <asac> ok
[20:35] <micahg> bug 427638
[20:35] <asac> we have that patch in 191 i think
[20:36] <micahg> nope, nspr :)
[20:36] <asac> ok
[20:36] <asac> double check that the patch does the same we did last package
[20:36] <asac> then its good
[20:36] <micahg> k, then I'll push tonight before bed that and everything in main on the xulrunner list
[20:38] <micahg> kklimonda: if no one else looks at it, I can look later, sometimes we modify the install.rdf on extensions to only work with a certain version of the package
[20:39] <micahg> kklimonda: what TZ are you in?
[20:41] <kklimonda> micahg: UTC+1 but actually I see that it not depends on seamonkey-browser (>= 2.0) which is weird - I remember checking it two weeks ago and it wasn't there.. /me is confused..
[20:42] <kklimonda> it now*
[20:42] <micahg> kklimonda: yeah, that's probably why
[20:42] <micahg> SM1 will be EOL soon
[20:42] <micahg> kklimonda: we hope to replace it for Lucid...
[20:42] <micahg> s/we/me :)
[20:43] <kklimonda> micahg: great - I'll change it to sync request then
[20:43] <micahg> kklimonda: yep, there are still a few pieces missing but hopefully by beta 1 all the pieces will be in
[20:54] <kklimonda> micahg: can you sync it or should ask on -motu? :)
[20:55] <micahg> kklimonda: I can't yet...maybe soon :)
[20:55] <kklimonda> ach :)
[21:41] <micahg> hi gnomefreak
[21:41] <gnomefreak> hi micahg
[21:41] <micahg> gnomefreak: we didn't have the meeting as asac and I were the only ones tehre :)
[21:41] <gnomefreak> micahg: sorry about that
[21:42] <micahg> gnomefreak: np, we should reschedule in a few weeks
[21:44] <gnomefreak> if someone comes up with a date and agenda i can pretty much work it out. i only have a handful of appointments in the next month i think
[21:44] <gnomefreak> oh shit 3.0 is not helping.
[21:45] <micahg> gnomefreak: ?
[21:45] <gnomefreak> micahg: i think it was the server. i fixed it
[21:48] <gnomefreak> i got the error again damnit.
[21:48] <gnomefreak> Sending of password did not succeed. Mail server pop.gmail.com responded: Username and password not accepted.
[21:49] <gnomefreak> it would be nice if it told  you what account
[21:49] <micahg> gnomefreak: why not use imap?
[21:50] <micahg> gnomefreak: check activity manager
[21:50] <gnomefreak> imap+tb has too many bugs. at least did
[21:50] <micahg> gnomefreak: I've been using it since 2.0.x without issue
[21:50] <micahg> *issues
[21:50] <gnomefreak> ok let me see if i can change it and get it working
[21:53] <gnomefreak> ok ill give it a little time before i open it again
[21:54] <micahg> asac: looks like we can jump from 3.0 to 3.0.2 for TB :)
[21:54] <BUGabundo> when did chromium entered the archive?
[21:54] <BUGabundo> and why are we pushing a BETA version instead of the stable ?
[21:55] <micahg> BUGabundo: last month
[21:55] <BUGabundo> ho did I miss that?
[21:56]  * gnomefreak be back in a few
[21:56] <micahg> BUGabundo: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/4.0.305.0~svn20100123r36929-0ubuntu1
[21:57] <BUGabundo>     5.0.307.7~r38400+0-0ubuntu1 0
[21:57] <BUGabundo>         500 http://neacm.fe.up.pt lucid/universe Packages
[21:57] <BUGabundo>         500 http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid/universe Packages
[21:57] <micahg> BUGabundo: that was the initial entry into archive :)
[21:58] <BUGabundo> ah
[22:01] <gnomefreak> do we have profile patch for tb or is it in debian/*profile?
[22:01] <gnomefreak> to use thunderbird dir.
[22:02] <gnomefreak> sorry mozillathunderbird dir
[22:02] <gnomefreak> -
[22:02]  * gnomefreak hopes it upgrades with little issues
[22:03] <gnomefreak> imap didnt help it seems
[22:04] <micahg> gnomefreak: daily?
[22:04] <gnomefreak> yes
[22:04] <micahg> thunderbird-3-profile in debian/patches
[22:04] <micahg> gnomefreak: I think google requires SSL?
[22:04] <gnomefreak> im using SSL but rechecking
[22:05] <gnomefreak> micahg: server 995 ok?
[22:05] <micahg> gnomefreak: that's POP secure
[22:05] <micahg> iirc
[22:06] <gnomefreak> what server should i use and should i use secure auth.?
[22:06]  * micahg checks his settings
[22:06]  * gnomefreak doesnt remember :(
[22:06] <micahg> imap.gmail.com 993 ssl/tls
[22:07] <gnomefreak> ok lets try
[22:07]  * gnomefreak tries
[22:08] <gnomefreak> hmmmmm
[22:09] <micahg> gnomefreak: username w/out domain if it's gmail
[22:11] <gnomefreak> micahg: in the server settings or the main settings
[22:12] <micahg> gnomefreak: server I think
[22:12]  * gnomefreak thought server settings was only place to use that
[22:12] <gnomefreak> micahg: i have been using it without @*
[22:12] <micahg> it still fails?
[22:12] <gnomefreak> i think i found the problem now i have to find it
[22:13] <gnomefreak> under server settings the server type says pop but i cant find the setting for that
[22:14] <gnomefreak> server name is imap.*
[22:15] <gnomefreak> i would love not to have to start over
[22:16] <micahg> gnomefreak: oh, hmmm, idk if you can convert yet
[22:16] <micahg> gnomefreak: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=13273
[22:17] <micahg> so, it should be 995 for pop3s
[22:20] <gnomefreak> 993 for imap
[22:21] <micahg> gnomefreak: I don't think you can convert from pop to imap in the interface
[22:21] <gnomefreak> i had the settings set as imap in gmail
[22:21] <micahg> that's the problem
[22:21] <micahg> so you need to make a new account
[22:21] <micahg> in TB
[22:21] <gnomefreak> i guess i have to :( now to remember the accounts i have
[22:22] <micahg> _Tsk_: there's no way to convert from pop to imap, right?
[22:22] <_Tsk_> convert what ?
[22:22] <_Tsk_> when creating an account or created accounts ?
[22:23] <micahg> _Tsk_: created
[22:23] <gnomefreak> created
[22:23] <_Tsk_> no :-(
[22:23] <_Tsk_> not that I know of
[22:23] <micahg> should be an enh request if it's not already :)
[22:25]  * gnomefreak has to reset filters too?
[22:25] <micahg> mozilla 129055
[22:27] <gnomefreak> any way to carry filters over?
[22:30] <micahg> gnomefreak: there should be an extension to export filters and reimport
[22:37] <gnomefreak> you would think rm -rf thunderbird-3.0 would work
[22:37] <gnomefreak> be back smoke+think
[22:38] <micahg> gnomefreak: for what?
[22:38] <gnomefreak> micahg: to remove all settings so i can re-enter accounts
[22:38] <micahg> gnomefreak: mv ~/.thunderbird-3.0 ~/.thunderbird-3.0.bak
[22:42]  * gnomefreak tries again
[22:43] <gnomefreak> nope
[22:44] <micahg> gnomefreak: ls -ld ~/.*thunderbird*
[22:46] <micahg> gnomefreak: if you have a TB2 profile, it'll keep importing it as well, so after you do the mv, just touch ~/.thunderbird-3.0
[22:46] <micahg> oops
[22:46] <micahg> gnomefreak: that should be mkdir ~/.thunderbird-3.0
[22:46] <micahg> should create a new identity on next launch then
[22:46] <fta> BUGabundo, fta@cube:/data/bot/chromium-browser.head $ grep ^c debian/changelog
[22:46] <fta> chromium-browser (5.0.307.7~r38400+0-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
[22:46] <fta> chromium-browser (5.0.307.7~r38400-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
[22:46] <fta> chromium-browser (5.0.307.5~r37950+0-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
[22:46] <fta> chromium-browser (5.0.307.5~r37950-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
[22:46] <fta> chromium-browser (4.0.305.0~svn20100123r36929-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low
[22:48] <BUGabundo> so another fix?
[22:50] <fta> BUGabundo, what for?
[22:50] <BUGabundo> I don't know
[22:50] <BUGabundo> you ping me
 when did chromium entered the archive?
 and why are we pushing a BETA version instead of the stable ?
 BUGabundo: last month
 ho did I miss that?
[22:50] <BUGabundo> ok
[22:50] <BUGabundo> thanks
[22:51] <fta> BUGabundo, + "because there is no stable for linux yet"
[22:51] <BUGabundo> ahh
[22:51] <BUGabundo> that would help
[22:51] <fta> you can subscribe to my chromium monitoring branch to get notified
[22:52] <BUGabundo> I already don't read all the email or RSS I should
[22:52] <gnomefreak> micahg: cant it comes up as old settings
[22:52] <BUGabundo> have to treem it down
[22:52] <BUGabundo> no add more
[22:55] <micahg> gnomefreak: you need to close the client first
[22:56] <gnomefreak> i did
[22:56] <micahg> mv .thunderbird-3.0 out of the way and then make an empty dir there
[22:57] <gnomefreak> maybe 3.1 was inporting
[22:58] <micahg> gnomefreak: which are you running?
[22:58] <gnomefreak> micahg: 3.0
[22:58] <micahg> yeah, so what I said should work
[22:58] <micahg> 3.0 doesn't know about 3.1
[22:58] <gnomefreak> it didnt
[22:59] <micahg> gnomefreak: thunderbird-3.0 -ProfileManger :P
[22:59] <gnomefreak> trying
[22:59]  * micahg wonders when the simple solutions will register first :)
[22:59] <gnomefreak> nope :(
[23:00] <micahg> gnomefreak: you created a new profile?
[23:00] <gnomefreak> micahg: yes and thunderbird-3.0 -ProfileManger didnt help
[23:00] <micahg> gnomefreak: are you sure that tb3 is closing?
[23:00] <gnomefreak> yes but ill try to kill it
[23:01]  * micahg noticed that TB3 doesn't always close
[23:01] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@Development:~$ ps aux |grep thunderbird
[23:01] <gnomefreak> 1000      5611  0.0  0.2   1832   588 pts/1    S+   18:01   0:00 grep thunderbird
[23:01] <micahg> k
[23:01] <gnomefreak> didnt help
[23:01]  * micahg is running out of ideas...
[23:02]  * gnomefreak too
[23:02] <gnomefreak> brb
[23:02] <micahg> gnomefreak: are you launching thunderbird-3.0?
[23:08] <gnomefreak> micahg: yes from launcher on my panel
[23:08] <gnomefreak> it brings up 3 windows first is my boxes
[23:09] <micahg> might want to check the launcher
[23:09] <gnomefreak> one was 404
[23:09] <gnomefreak> thunderbird-3.0 %u
[23:09] <micahg> hmm
[23:09] <gnomefreak> this is pissing me off. do i have to remove --purge than install it again?
[23:10] <micahg> gnomefreak: won't help
[23:10]  * gnomefreak cant believe this is so hard
[23:10] <micahg> gnomefreak: the only 2 dirs it looks at is .mozilla-thunderbird and .thunderbird-3.0
[23:11] <gnomefreak> micahg: ah maybe because i have 2.0 installed
[23:11] <micahg> gnomefreak: shouldn't matter
[23:11] <micahg> the daily is meant to sit side by side
[23:11] <gnomefreak> checks /n for mozilla people :(
[23:12] <gnomefreak> [reed]: are you around for tbird help?
[23:13] <micahg> gnomefreak: ls -l ~/.*thunderbird* should show you what's there
[23:14] <micahg> it'll show you which dirs have imported profiles as the names will be the same
[23:14] <gnomefreak> i dont have .thunderbird-3.0 only the 3 backups
[23:15] <micahg> gnomefreak: k, now mkdir ~/.thunderbird-3.0
[23:16] <gnomefreak> ah workewd
[23:16] <micahg> \o/
[23:17] <gnomefreak> thanks
[23:17] <micahg> gnomefreak: np, I've been fighting with the profiles for over a week with the TB3 migrator script :)
[23:27] <gnomefreak> lol i cant do shit right today
[23:27] <gnomefreak> Failed to connect to server gmail.
[23:28] <gnomefreak> server name == gmail port ==993 and using SSL/TLS
[23:29] <gnomefreak> what is Gloda.myContact?
[23:33] <gnomefreak> ok got that working
[23:33] <gnomefreak> micahg: any reason why my inbox and default folders are above my email address
[23:34] <micahg> gnomefreak: local folders?
[23:34] <gnomefreak> no that is at bottom
[23:34] <micahg> which view are you in?
[23:34] <gnomefreak> the folders are inbox,trash,outbox,allmail,drafts,sent mail,spam
[23:35] <gnomefreak> main view i think
[23:35] <micahg> are you in the all folders view?
[23:35] <micahg> or favorites?
[23:35] <micahg> probably smart folders
[23:35] <gnomefreak> ah i see it is right now. i was in smart folder view
[23:35] <micahg> change to all if you want it normal
[23:49] <gnomefreak> holy crap one box is downloading 16992
[23:49] <gnomefreak> emails
[23:57] <gnomefreak> micahg: thanks again :)
[23:58] <micahg> gnomefreak: np
[23:59] <micahg> gnomefreak: you can set it not to d/l all messages in the migrator