[15:00] <bac> #startmeeting
[15:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 09:00. The chair is bac.
[15:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[15:00] <bac> Hi and welcome to the Launchpad Reviewers Meeting.  Who is here today?
[15:00] <abentley> me
[15:00] <adeuring> me
[15:00] <sinzui> me
[15:01] <deryck> me
[15:01] <henninge> me
[15:02] <bac> gary_poster, bigjools, flacoste, mars, EdwinGrubbs_, gmb, allenap:ping
[15:02] <gmb> me
[15:02] <bigjools> o/
[15:02] <flacoste> me
[15:02] <bac> BjornT_: ping
[15:02] <mars> bac, my apologies, on CHR
[15:03] <bac> mars: ok, thanks
[15:03] <bac> who've i forgotten to harass?
[15:03] <bac> noodles775: ping
[15:03] <henninge> bac: I already pinged danilos ...
[15:03] <danilos> oh, me :)
[15:04] <bac> is jtv around?
[15:04] <henninge> bac: nope, getting an identity
[15:04] <bac> ok, well let's proceed and hope stragglers will arrive in due time.
[15:05] <bac> not much no the agenda today so perhaps it'll be a brief meeting
[15:05] <bac> [topic] agenda
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  agenda
[15:05] <bac>  * Roll call
[15:05] <bac>  * Action items
[15:05] <bac>  * Peanut gallery (anything not on the agenda)
[15:05] <bac> [topic] Action items
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Action items
[15:06] <bac> [topic] * allenap to start discussion on the ML about doctest size, refactoring, moving corner cases to unittests, etc (done, 10-Feb)
[15:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  * allenap to start discussion on the ML about doctest size, refactoring, moving corner cases to unittests, etc (done, 10-Feb)
[15:06] <bac> allenap: as noted, i see you did follow through.  thanks.
[15:06] <allenap> me
[15:07] <allenap> bac: Yes, though I need to reply to the replies :-/
[15:07] <bac> allenap: ok, thanks.  there was some discussion last week and lots of agreement.
[15:07] <salgado> me
[15:07] <bac> [topic] * gary_poster to do timing tests for try/except, examine current usage of check_permission, and we'll discuss again 17-Feb.
[15:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  * gary_poster to do timing tests for try/except, examine current usage of check_permission, and we'll discuss again 17-Feb.
[15:08] <bac> gary isn't here ATM so let's leave that one on the list and move on.
[15:08] <bac> [topic] * salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[15:08] <MootBot> New Topic:  * salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[15:08] <salgado> I didn't do it
[15:09] <bac> salgado: ok.  think you can do that for next week?
[15:09] <salgado> sure!
[15:09] <bac> [topic] * bac to update wiki page to make clear community contributor landing responsibilities
[15:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  * bac to update wiki page to make clear community contributor landing responsibilities
[15:09] <gary_poster> try/except: correct, but I'll do it right now.
[15:09]  * bac fail
[15:09] <bac> [topic] * henninge to update guidelines to allow lambda in twisted context
[15:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  * henninge to update guidelines to allow lambda in twisted context
[15:09] <EdwinGrubbs_> me
[15:10] <henninge> Done.
[15:10] <bac> \o/
[15:10] <bac> [topic] * leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree
[15:10] <MootBot> New Topic:  * leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree
[15:10] <bac> gary_poster: did leonardr actually know about this?  i didn't tell him.  did you?
[15:11] <gary_poster> bac: no, it is something in our plans generally
[15:11] <bac> gary_poster: any idea when it'll happen?  if it's just a foundations TODO i'll take it off this list.
[15:11] <gary_poster> bac: is it reasonable to have a "check on this in a month" action item?
[15:11] <gary_poster> Yeah that's fine
[15:12] <bac> [topic] peanut gallery -- items not on the agenda
[15:12] <MootBot> New Topic:  peanut gallery -- items not on the agenda
[15:12] <bac> anyone have something to discuss?
[15:13] <bac> ok, let's adjourn.
[15:14] <bac> thanks for coming.
[15:14] <bac> #endmeeting
[15:14] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 09:14.
[15:14] <bigjools> quick!
[15:14] <bac> no sense dawdling...
[21:34] <thumper> bac: meeting?
[21:35] <bac> thumper: sure.  it completely slipped my mind
[21:35] <bac> is mwhudson around?
[21:35] <bac> and rockstar?
[21:35] <rockstar> Hi
[21:35]  * rockstar are here
[21:35] <bac> does anyone else come to this one?
[21:36] <bac> #startmeeting
[21:36] <MootBot> Meeting started at 15:36. The chair is bac.
[21:36] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[21:36] <mwhudson> hello
[21:36] <bac> welcome to the ASIAPAC + Rocky Mountain reviewers meeting
[21:37] <bac> this ought to be pretty quick, unless you all brought topics of conversation
[21:37] <thumper> I didn't
[21:37]  * mwhudson neither
[21:37] <bac> today's AMEU meeting was very straightforward.  we just checked in out past action items and discovered everyone but Gavin was incredibly slack
[21:38] <mwhudson> heh heh
[21:38] <bac> last week allenap started the conversation on the ML about limiting the size of doc tests.  chime in on it if you have thoughts.
[21:38] <thumper> my thoughts revolve around not liking doc tests
[21:38] <bac> those of use who had things to do but failed are:
[21:38] <bac> gary_poster to do timing tests for try/except, examine current usage of check_permission, and we'll discuss again 24-Feb.
[21:38] <bac> salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[21:38] <bac> bac to update wiki page to make clear community contributor landing responsibilities
[21:38] <bac> leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree. (revisit 17-Mar).
[21:39] <mwhudson> was that the same thread where BjornT_ talked about actually using doctests as documentation?
[21:39] <mwhudson> because that would be a very good idea
[21:39] <bac> mwhudson: yeah, i believe so.  i must admit i have that thread in my inbox to review in detail
[21:40]  * gary_poster seems to be agreeing, though the sounds are distant
[21:40] <bac> so, rockstar you have anything to discuss?
[21:41] <rockstar> I did, but I can't, for the life of me, remember what it was.
[21:41] <rockstar> So, no.
[21:41] <bac> this meeting is scheduled for 2100UTC but i forgot about it and last week thumper was busy then.  is 2130 better?  matters not one bit to me.
[21:42] <thumper> yes, it is better for me, I have a call with mrjazzcat at 2100
[21:42] <bac> thumper: ok.  anyone opposed to moving it to 2130?  thumper is that too early or is it good to bound your earlier call?
[21:42] <thumper> 2130 is good
[21:43] <thumper> at least until DST ends
[21:43] <bac> ok
[21:43] <bac> i'll update the team calendar...and set an alarm for myself
[21:43] <rockstar> thumper, DST hasn't started yet...  :)
[21:44]  * thumper shakes his head...
[21:44] <bac> otherwise i've got nothing else.  see you next week...
[21:44] <bac> #endmeeting
[21:44] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 15:44.
[21:44]  * thumper resisted the urge to smack rockstar around
[21:44] <mwhudson> thanks bac