[00:00] <ddecator> micahg, if you're around it's a firefox bug ^
[00:01] <bcurtiswx> ddecator: i put back to private for now
[00:01] <ddecator> bcurtiswx, alright thanks
[00:01] <micahg> ddecator: yeah, we can't do anything until the retracer looks at it, so if you see something public with a coredump, make private and explain why
[00:02] <ddecator> can bugsquad make them private? i thought bugcontrol had to do that
[00:02] <hggdh> anyone that has access can
[00:02] <ddecator> good to know
[02:00] <Roxyhart0> hi ddecator, i see my report of bug unasigned...nobody is cheking this one? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/522482
[02:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 522482 in samba (Ubuntu) "Domain Members can not join to Samba DC (ubuntu 9.10). (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New]
[02:01] <ddecator> Roxyhart0, micahg probably just forgot to this morning. i can remind him when he gets back, otherwise someone else on here might see this and be able to look over it as well
[02:03] <Roxyhart0> thanks a lot, i really need solve this problem soon
[02:03] <ddecator> anyone familiar with samba here?
[02:28] <ddecator> micahg, did you get a chance to look at that samba report this morning?
[02:29] <micahg> ddecator: yeah, unfortunately it doesn't look like the same bug that I was refered to last night
[02:29] <micahg> needs more research
[02:29] <ddecator> Roxyhart0, ^
[02:30]  * micahg double checks the upstream bug
[02:31] <micahg> well, I might have been looking at the wrong upstream bug, but the one I was looking at certainly isn't it
[02:33] <bcurtiswx> backporting is harsh :P
[02:37] <Roxyhart0> is this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/522482
[02:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 522482 in samba (Ubuntu) "Domain Members can not join to Samba DC (ubuntu 9.10). (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New]
[02:37] <Roxyhart0> look very similar to the before
[02:37] <micahg> Roxyhart0: it looks like the old bug that ddecator posted?
[02:37] <micahg> or the one in the message?
[02:38] <ddecator> micahg, yah, i didn't really look at it, Roxyhart0 found it as a possibility so i thought i'd put it on there for you to look over
[02:38] <ddecator> idk anything about samba so i had no idea if it was related or not
[02:38] <micahg> Roxyhart0: how familiar are you with samba?
[02:40] <Roxyhart0> no too much bu i got running 3 server just domain member server, this one is domain controler
[02:41] <micahg> Roxyhart0: if I show you the changelog for 3.4.1, you think you can tell me which bug is yours?
[02:42] <Roxyhart0> ait a min
[02:46] <ddecator> so my guess is, if a bug -seems- to be fixed in lucid, but the exact cause of the bug in karmic isn't known, then it can't be marked "fix released" since we can't know for sure that one was?
[02:46] <Roxyhart0> it is similat t this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/164544
[02:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 164544 in samba (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Error while join to domain (Unable to create machine account)" [Undecided,Triaged]
[02:48] <micahg> ddecator: right
[02:48] <ddecator> thought so, thanks micahg
[02:48] <micahg> Roxyhart0: here's the changelog for 3.4.1, if you can tell me which bug, I can see about making you a test package to see if it's fixed: http://samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.4.1.html
[02:51] <Roxyhart0> i think is this onw, but i can not even join my ourn PDC...maybe this one as well    o Fix Winbind authentication issue (bug #6646).
[02:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 6646 in trac (Ubuntu) "trac: merge new debian version" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/6646
[02:51] <Roxyhart0> i try to join my windows client i i couldnt...i just translate the ldp database form the old server to this new one
[02:52] <micahg> Roxyhart0: that's what I thought too, but the fix is due to a timeout
[02:57] <Roxyhart0> sorry what do you mean?
[03:00] <micahg> idk, I'm not that familiar with samba
[03:00]  * micahg can make a test package and you can see if it helps
[03:06] <Roxyhart0> :( please dont tell me that
[03:08] <Roxyhart0> there are new than can be a update relaible like you said yesterday?
[03:09] <micahg> Roxyhart0: if it works, then I can see about pushing it through normal update channels, I don't know if this wil fix your issue, so I can't propose it...
[03:10] <micahg> I can push to a PPA for you to test with if you want
[03:10] <micahg> this will be the only change
[03:10] <Roxyhart0> ah ok
[03:15] <micahg> Roxyhart0: i386 or amd64?
[03:16] <micahg> nm, they're all going :)
[03:16] <Roxyhart0> i have both
[03:16] <micahg> Roxyhart0: should be ready in about a half hour
[03:17] <Roxyhart0> thanks a lot!!!
[03:17] <micahg> Roxyhart0: remember, this is a test, so I would do it off hours :)
[03:20] <Roxyhart0> i am not using samba at the moment ...i think is whould not broke my slapd configuration?
[03:20] <Roxyhart0> shouln't i mean
[03:21]  * micahg doesn't know...that's the problem :)
[03:21] <micahg> the patch is 5 lines: https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4667&action=edit
[03:21] <micahg> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4667
[03:25] <Roxyhart0> sorry what it means? the solution or i need to wait for the half hour that you say?
[03:40] <micahg> Roxyhart0: the package will be ready in about 15 minutes
[03:40] <Roxyhart0> thanks a lot
[03:47] <PRab> I just read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance and am now trying to decide what to assign to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/522425
[03:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 522425 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Install crashes after choosing custom partitions. (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New]
[03:48] <PRab> does high make sense because "Makes a default Ubuntu installation generally unusable for some users"
[04:34] <micahg> Roxyhart0: the package is in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/patch-test
[04:35] <nigelb> how often does package status update itself?
[04:35] <nigelb> the qa.ubuntu.com site..
[04:37] <micahg> the graphs approx every hour
[04:37] <micahg> the stats I think are out of date
[04:38] <micahg> nigelb: bug 520802
[04:38] <nigelb> yea.  been wondering how the numbers dont go down after 1 week of working on old bugs
[04:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 520802 in ubuntu-qa-website "sidebar stats not updated since 2010-01-23 (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/520802
[04:39] <nigelb> micahg: ah, thanks :)
[04:39] <nigelb> micahg: shall I confirm?
[04:39] <micahg> nigelb: go ahead :)
[04:39] <micahg> maybe someone will fix it :)
[04:40] <nigelb> micahg: probably poke brian?
[04:41] <micahg> nigelb: probably tomorrow :)
[04:41] <nigelb> hm :)
[04:41]  * micahg figures everyone's busy
[04:41] <nigelb> micahg: the bug I fixed yday got sponsored :)
[04:41] <micahg> nigelb: great :)
[04:42] <nigelb> yeah, its busy days
[04:42] <nigelb> release time is getting closer
[04:42] <Roxyhart0> micahg, so what i nee is copy this two lijnes in one file and then do apt-get update ?
[04:43] <micahg> Roxyhart0: on karmic you can use sudo add-apt-repository
[04:44] <Roxyhart0> ok, sorry abot thw qautions but i forgot whow is cal the file where i need to add this lines ...:S
[04:44] <Roxyhart0> how is called
[04:45] <micahg> Roxyhart0: you can just do sudo add-apt-repository ppa:micahg/patch-test
[04:45] <Roxyhart0> sorry the splelling im sleeping
[04:45] <Roxyhart0> thanks
[04:46] <micahg> Roxyhart0: it'll add a file to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ that you can either edit or delete when you're doen testing
[04:47] <Roxyhart0> okis
[04:52] <Roxyhart0> ok, i just did the command that you say, so i should just restart samba?
[04:52] <micahg> Roxyhart0: no, that just adds the ppa
[04:52] <micahg> you need to upgrade samba to the package in my ppa
[04:53] <micahg> Roxyhart0: make sure you don't grab my phpmyadmin version :)
[04:56] <Roxyhart0> sorry micahg but it is the first time that in do it. Is just see you file, what i need to do now?
[04:56] <micahg> Roxyhart0: apt-get update
[04:56] <micahg> then upgrade the samba pacakge
[04:58] <Roxyhart0> it is doing now
[04:59] <micahg> I was just warning not to grab phpmyadmin as that's teh prerelease version
[05:03] <Roxyhart0> ok, it is done
[05:04] <Roxyhart0> so just restart samba :S
[05:04] <Roxyhart0> ?
[05:04] <Roxyhart0> what about phpldaoadmin i am using that ...
[05:10] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I don't have that packaged in tehre, so not to worry
[05:11] <micahg> Roxyhart0: doesn't the install restart it?
[05:11] <Roxyhart0> no apparently
[05:11] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I guess so
[05:14] <Roxyhart0> :( i just restart samba and i did again net rpc join -Uuser%pass and i got the same problem :(
[05:15] <Roxyhart0> do i nee reboot the server?
[05:15] <micahg> Roxyhart0: yeah, so it's probably not that fix
[05:16] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I would downgrade the package to be safe then
[05:16] <micahg> and get rid of my ppa in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
[05:16] <Roxyhart0> what do you mean take off the package?
[05:17] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I suggest asking in #ubuntu-server tomorrow and show them the changelog for 3.4.1 and see if they know which bug it is
[05:17] <micahg> Roxyhart0: install the karmic version of samba
[05:17] <Roxyhart0> i did they dont say nothing and i got 2 bosses ask my for that now
[05:20] <linshine> anyone using karmic, update-motd?
[05:22] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I might be able the latest samba to my PPA
[05:25] <micahg> no, I can't do that easily
[05:28] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I'll ask on the ML to see if there are any samba people in bugsquad
[05:32] <micahg> Roxyhart0: posted
[05:33] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I wish I could do more, but I have to work on some other stuff
[05:33] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I'll let you know if someone replies to the request or hopefully, you'll see updates in teh bug :)
[05:50] <Roxyhart0> im big troubles now
[05:52] <micahg> Roxyhart0: why?
[05:53] <Roxyhart0> my boss are in my office
[05:54] <micahg> and they want it fixed?
[05:59] <Roxyhart0> yes
[06:00] <Roxyhart0> because the old server crush...and i am configurating this new server but the rest of the server that was file filver can not connect to this one which is PdC so every services is down
[06:01] <micahg> Roxyhart0: oh, that's bad, I didn't know it was that serious
[06:01] <micahg> I would've sent the mail yesterday
[06:01] <Roxyhart0> i mean i got domain member server and clients that cant not see file serves at all
[06:01] <Roxyhart0> and print server
[06:02] <Roxyhart0> because i didnt know that was a bug
[06:03] <Roxyhart0> and i was asking and asking differents forums and googling it
[06:04] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I can only backport up to 3.4.3 easily, but there are security concerns as well
[06:07] <Roxyhart0> like what?
[06:08] <micahg> there have been several vulnerabilities found and patched since that release
[06:09] <Roxyhart0> uff
[06:13] <kklimonda> I'd say if it is that urgent you could build the current samba package from lucid and give it a go
[06:14] <micahg> kklimonda: source format 3 :(
[06:14] <kklimonda> argh
[06:14] <Roxyhart0> what i can do?
[06:18] <kklimonda> Roxyhart0: you'll probably have to build samba from source if no one steps in
[06:19] <kklimonda> Roxyhart0: you couldn't get no one from #ubuntu-server to take a look at it?
[06:23] <Roxyhart0> micahg what do you recomend i can do?
[06:24] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I can try to build 3.4.3 for you with the security patches until we can figure out what the issue is...
[06:24] <micahg> Roxyhart0: is anyone using the system now?
[06:25] <Roxyhart0> just ldap which is in the same machine
[06:25] <Roxyhart0> if it doesn broke ldap I can try
[06:25] <micahg> so, we can test a version to see if it works without worrying?
[06:25] <Roxyhart0> yes
[06:25] <Roxyhart0> samba is not working so we can try
[06:26] <Roxyhart0> but is it doesn ruin ldap
[06:26] <micahg> idk, that's the problem
[06:27] <Roxyhart0> if i cant do wbinfo -u is it because i cant join my PDC to the domain?
[06:27] <micahg> idk, I wish I had answers
[06:27]  * micahg normally works on firefox bugs
[06:28] <Roxyhart0> can i install a samba PDC in a machine different to the LDAP server?
[06:28] <micahg> you can try asking in #ubuntu-server, idk
[06:28] <kklimonda> Roxyhart0: yes
[06:29] <kklimonda> samba doesn't really care where ldap server is as long as it's configured correctly
[06:45] <Roxyhart08> micahg can you or sombody work in my bug?
[06:46] <micahg> Roxyhart08: if someone gives me a patch, I'm happy to make a package, alternatively, I can try to build a later version for you, but I can't do it right now...I need to finish up some work
[07:08] <Roxyhart08> please
[08:35] <edakiri> how can I add the package update-initramfs as being affected by a bug?
[08:54]  * abogani waves
[08:55] <abogani> Sorry to bother you. Could anyone renew my membership to BugSquad Team? Thanks!
[09:08] <thekorn> abogani, you need to talk to one of the teams administrators
[09:10] <abogani> thekorn: I already sent emails on every team admin: No replay.
[09:10] <abogani> s/replay/reply
[09:16] <thekorn> abogani, what's you lp login? abogani I guess?
[09:16] <abogani> thekorn: Exactly.
[09:18] <thekorn> abogani, looks like your membership expires in 2011, so no need for an action right now
[09:18] <thekorn> http://paste.ubuntu.com/378223/
[09:20] <abogani> thekorn:  Do you have done something?
[09:20] <thekorn> abogani, no, nothing
[09:21] <abogani> thekorn: I really received that: "On 2010-02-18, seven days from now, your membership
[09:21] <abogani> in the Ubuntu BugSquad (bugsquad) Launchpad team
[09:21] <abogani> is due to expire."  <-- It is automatic email message form LP.
[09:23] <thekorn> yes, you recieved this message 7 days ago, and someone must have renewed your membership since then
[09:26] <abogani> I know from my membership in other Team that LP should notify it (renew approved) to me.... I never received the notification. In any case it is also good.
[09:26] <abogani> thekorn: Thanks and sorry for disturb.
[09:26] <thekorn> no problemo ;)
[09:29] <thekorn> bdmurray, hi, I just checked the list of administrators of the bugsquad team, out of curiosity, do you know why sfllaw is still admin of this team, I have not seen him around for a long time,
[09:30] <thekorn> not sure if it makes sense to have him as admin
[09:30] <thekorn> bdmurray, nice presentation, btw
[09:37] <Roxyhart08> hi micahg is not here but he worte me that: <micahg> Roxyhart0: I can only backport up to 3.4.3 easily, but there are security concerns as well
[09:38] <Roxyhart08> how i can get from ubuntu 9.10
[09:38] <Roxyhart08> ?
[10:02] <Roxyhart08> somebody there?
[10:06] <BUGabundo_remote> nope, no one
[11:45] <RoadRunnR> hi, i need a bit of help and review of a very strange bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/453330
[11:45] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 453330 in bash (Ubuntu) "[Karmic] pipes are somewhat brocken (affects: 1)" [Medium,Incomplete]
[11:46] <RoadRunnR> it's filed under bash, but it really could be almost anything kernel, libc, gzip, tar or bash...
[12:07] <kamusin> :)
[12:37] <radoe> RoadRunnR: Does not seem to be a bash problem, happens with sh and ksh to. Also, it does not fail all the time, I have cases (on the same system) where it works.
[12:41] <RoadRunnR> radoe: the problem seems a bit random, once it has happened on one of my systems, it continues to occur until i reboot the box, then sometimes it will be ok and sometimes it still happens
[12:48] <radoe> RoadRunnR: I have some "cycles" when I run it from the same shell: it starts working a few times, then fails a few times, works again, fails again and so on. But i can't see a common pattern whether it fails or works.
[12:49] <RoadRunnR> radoe: if run some more tries, in about 5% of the cases it works for me, but only one time, followed by 10 to 20 non working runs
[12:51] <RoadRunnR> radoe: i used the simplified case: tar tvzf - < data.tar.gz ; echo $?
[13:06] <RoadRunnR> radoe: from my nonworking tracing, it seems that gzip tries to write to the pipe to tar, but can't deliver all the data, but tar decides is has gotten everything from gzip and terminates, at this point the pipe between tar and gzip is broken and a SIGPIPE error occurs
[13:07] <RoadRunnR> if the working case, gzip is able to deliver all data to tar in one go and exits before tar tries to exit, so the pipe is properly closed and everything is fine
[13:07] <radoe> RoadRunnR: looks a little bit like http://bugs.debian.org/533356
[13:07] <RoadRunnR> this would point to a problem with how tar is handling the pipe
[13:08] <radoe> RoadRunnR: and yes, I see the same SIGPIPE throwing up to the shell in the nonworking cases.
[13:11] <radoe> RoadRunnR: I will reassign this bug to tar, link the debian bug report and adjust the subject?
[13:11] <RoadRunnR> radoe: or more like this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532570
[13:11] <ubot4> Debian bug 532570 in tar "tar - relies on standard SIGPIPE behaviour" [Grave,Fixed]
[13:12] <RoadRunnR> radoe: just installed the lucid version of tar on my test systems, now it is working everytime
[13:15] <RoadRunnR> radoe: could also be http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525818
[13:15] <ubot4> Debian bug 525818 in tar "tar: closes file stream before real EOF" [Normal,Fixed]
[13:16] <radoe> RoadRunnR: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525818
[13:16] <radoe> RoadRunnR: O yes, you got this too.
[13:17] <RoadRunnR> ;-)
[13:17] <RoadRunnR> radoe: i'll have to leave now, got an appointment, thanks for your help on this! :-)
[13:18] <radoe> RoadRunnR: most likely it is #525818
[13:42] <kyubutsu> having issue resuming from suspend, screen too dim on ac power. what package is associated with that
[13:43] <edakiri> kyubutsu: there is a setting in the power panel.  have you done a bug search yet?
[13:43] <kyubutsu> i want a hint about package for that reason
[13:44] <edakiri> good reason.
[13:44] <edakiri> 1 moment
[13:45] <BUGabundo_remote> for gnome gnome-power-manager
[13:45] <BUGabundo_remote> kyubutsu: ^^^^
[13:45] <kyubutsu> 10-4
[13:45] <BUGabundo_remote> you gonna need a debug log
[13:46] <BUGabundo_remote> the steps are on the GPM wiki
[13:46] <BUGabundo_remote> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGNOMEPowerManager
[13:47] <kyubutsu> input gpm or gnome-power-management dont return anything about it on launchpad search.. i'll check that link too
[13:52] <kyubutsu> duh.. spelling matters .. search ok for gnome-power-manager
[14:03] <kyubutsu> so far i think i got bug 451282 .. need further testing as far as adjusting brightness levels after resuming and etc
[14:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 451282 in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) "display is fully dimmed after resume from suspend (affects: 26) (dups: 4)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/451282
[14:07] <BUGabundo_remote> that's a dupe
[14:07] <BUGabundo_remote> but I guess its up to mpt to look at them
[14:08] <kyubutsu> well this dupe has 4 dupes
[14:08] <kyubutsu> anyhow, it accurately describes my issue
[14:22] <kyubutsu> should i use $ubuntu-bug when the bug actually happens?
[14:23] <BUGabundo_remote> won't help
[14:23] <BUGabundo_remote> and just make spam to it
[14:23] <BUGabundo_remote> use the debug wiki, collect what it asks, add to the bug
[16:29] <bdmurray> thekorn: I've unmade him an admin, thanks for pointing this out.  Additionally, thanks regarding the presentation!
[16:40] <nigelb> Can someone change bug 521474 to Wont Fix.  Upstream says they only include ogg vorbis support and cbc seems to have removed them
[16:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 521474 in rhythmbox (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "CBC Radio 1 & 2 Live Feeds need updating (affects: 1)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/521474
[16:41] <genii> The moveable divider between nicks and text doesn't become moveable unless I first move the hand icon to the right then back again onto the divider. Is this by design?
[16:42] <genii> Sory, meant for #quassel
[16:44] <nigelb> hggdh_: ^
[16:44] <hggdh_> nigelb: looking
[16:45] <nigelb> :)
[16:45] <hggdh_> nigelb: where is the comment in the bug about that? ;-)
[16:45] <nigelb> hggdh_: in the upstream bug
[16:45] <nigelb> gnome 609916
[16:45] <ubot4> Gnome bug 609916 in Internet Radio "CBC Radio 1 & 2 Live Feeds need updating" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609916
[16:45] <hggdh_> yes, but it is not refected locally...
[16:46] <hggdh_> reflected
[16:46] <hggdh_> adding it in, and marking wontfix as requested
[16:46] <nigelb> thank you :)
[16:49] <nigelb> hggdh_: that is one bug down :p
[16:49] <nigelb> been working on the rhythmbox bugs for a week now and I've closed only 2 ;)
[16:50] <hggdh_> nigelb: when upstream closes a bug, but it is not refrected down to us, we should add a local comment about it -- otherwise all people will see is 'closed with no reasoning'
[16:50] <hggdh_> yes, I know, it is in the upstream bug, but we are in LP...
[16:50] <nigelb> I hoped you'd add it ;)
[16:50] <hggdh_> oh boy, I simply cannot write reflectde right :-(
[16:50] <hggdh_> dammit
[16:50] <nigelb> lol
[16:51] <nigelb> bdmurray: um, status.qa.ubuntu.com is not getting updated?
[16:53] <bdmurray> ogasawara: ^ the xml files are a bit stale
[16:53] <nigelb> okay, the graphs are but not the information on the sidebar
[16:53] <bdmurray> nigelb: that's a bug right?
[16:53] <nigelb> yep
[16:53] <bdmurray> nigelb: I mean there is a bug number for that ;-)
[16:53] <nigelb> we already logged one I believe
[16:54] <nigelb> bug 520802
[16:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 520802 in ubuntu-qa-website "sidebar stats not updated since 2010-01-23 (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/520802
[17:16] <Laibsch> Can somebody confirm bug 523298 on different hardware or otherwise give some valuable hints for triage?
[17:16] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 523298 in ubuntu "suspending the lid on an ASUS 1001P cuts off USB (affects: 1)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/523298
[17:39] <bdmurray> mvo: could you look at bug 288912?
[17:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 288912 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Two spaces in "About 1 hour remaining" (affects: 1)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/288912
[17:51] <charlie-tca> Ummm, somewhere along the way, we seemed to have removed all trouble-shooting techniques and response information for the alternate images.
[17:59] <seb128> bdmurray, why did you raise the packagekit bug as a canonical desktop team one?
[17:59] <seb128> bdmurray, it's only a warning, not affecting the default installation and has 0 duplicate
[18:03] <bdmurray> seb128: because it seemed to have been fixed and then unfixed
[18:04] <seb128> hum ok
[18:04] <seb128> I will let pitti comment on this one ;-)
[18:08] <mvo> bdmurray: looking
[18:13] <bdmurray> ogasawara: hey there, the xml files for status.qa.ubuntu.com are a bit stale
[18:14] <ogasawara> bdmurray: was about to check on that
[19:30] <ogasawara> bdmurray: pkg stats should be up to date now
[19:30] <bdmurray> ogasawara: cool, there was a bug about that if you want to close it
[19:31] <ogasawara> bdmurray: do you have the bug# by chance?
[19:31]  * ogasawara scrolls back
[19:32] <bdmurray> bug 520802
[19:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 520802 in ubuntu-qa-website "sidebar stats not updated since 2010-01-23 (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/520802
[19:33] <ogasawara> bdmurray: thanks (power was out at home so I couldn't get to my machine with the backlog)
[20:22] <hggdh> bdmurray: what do you think should be done for bug 523327?
[20:22] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 523327 in bughugger (Ubuntu) "bughugger crashed with AttributeError in __init__() (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/523327
[20:49] <bdmurray> hggdh: so the httplib2 bug is not fixed in 0.6.0 or at least that patch is not in it
[20:49] <bdmurray> hggdh: additionally I think (2) should be a couchdb bug report
[20:58] <hggdh> bdmurray: yes, I agree, but I do not know enough about bughugger & couchdb to be sure. I will split them
[22:14] <hggdh> micahg: how to debug fairefox 3.6 failure to start?
[22:15] <micahg> hggdh: try a new profile
[22:15] <micahg> hggdh: or try safe mode
[22:15] <hggdh> trying profilemanager now
[22:17] <hggdh> yes, bad profile
[22:17] <hggdh> is there any way of recovering part of the profile?
[22:17] <micahg> hggdh: you can try --safe-mode
[22:17] <hggdh> will do
[22:18] <hggdh> yay, safe-mode works. So now to pinpoint the issue...
[22:18] <micahg> hggdh: it's an addon then
[22:18] <hggdh> sounds like
[22:18] <hggdh> oops -- safe-mode defaulted to the new profile
[22:18] <micahg> heh
[22:19] <micahg> run profile manager and tell it to ask every time
[22:19] <hggdh> yes
[22:29] <hggdh> micahg: interwsting -- (1) run firefox --safe-mode, do nothing & close; run firefox -- it runs, do nothing & close; (3) run firefox again -- it fails
[22:29] <micahg> hggdh: it might not have closed
[22:30] <seb128> hggdh, uninstall greasemonkey
[22:30] <micahg> oh, right. that's that ug
[22:30] <micahg> *bug\
[22:30] <hggdh> oh
[22:30] <hggdh> will try it now
[22:33] <hggdh> no, not greasmonkey
[22:34] <micahg> then the greasemonkey bug might not be greasemonkey, but soemthing else..
[22:34] <seb128> uninstalling the xul...greasemonkey package worked for several users
[22:34] <seb128> it worked there
[22:34] <seb128> it might not be specific to greasemonkey though
[22:35] <hggdh> still trying, and reducing my add-ons drastically ;-)
[22:35] <micahg> seb128: can you tell me if bug 452938 is the same as bug 410407?
[22:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 452938 in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Left mouse button click in (java|flash) does not work. (affects: 18)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452938
[22:35] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 410407 in flashplugin-nonfree (Debian) (and 8 other projects) "Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION] (affects: 636) (dups: 39)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/410407
[22:35] <seb128> it seems similar
[22:37] <micahg> seb128: is it worth merging, or should I just subscribe to upstream gnome?
[22:38] <hggdh> after I removed the prism* packages, it seems to be working now
[22:38] <micahg> hggdh: yeah, prism from archive isn't compatible with 3.6
[22:39] <hggdh> yes, but it should not fail firefox
[22:39] <micahg> hggdh: well, idk what code is in there, it might
[22:39] <hggdh> there is that, yes
[22:39] <micahg> I'll be updating to beta 3 soon
[22:39] <hggdh> adding GM back now, and testing
[22:40] <hggdh> yes, seems to be working. Interesting that prism had been there for a while
[22:42] <hggdh> ah well. Go figure. At least I was able to save my profile :-)
[22:42] <seb128> micahg, no real opinion
[22:42] <seb128> you can merge the bugs I guess
[22:43] <micahg> seb128: which way?
[22:43] <seb128> micahg, whatever is easier
[22:43] <seb128> or keep the one with the better comments open
[22:43] <micahg> seb128: k, thanks
[23:40] <Roxyhart0> Goog Morning micahg any news?
[23:40] <Roxyhart0> good
[23:42] <micahg> Roxyhart0: I was going to ask you the same thing...seems like you got some answers last night
[23:42] <micahg> unfortunately, no one responded on the ml
[23:43] <micahg> hggdh: you know anything about samba?
[23:43] <Roxyhart0> nah, i just wanted to update to 3.4.5
[23:43] <Roxyhart0> i just download the package but i dont know how install it
[23:43] <hggdh> micahg: not yet, not much (don't have that many Windows to work with)
[23:43] <hggdh> ml...  let me have a look
[23:44] <micahg> hggdh: bugsquad
[23:44] <micahg> Roxyhart0: the checkinstall package can make a deb for you I think
[23:44] <hggdh> go tiy
[23:44] <hggdh> got it
[23:47] <hggdh> micahg: there are two fixes that *might* be related to the bug
[23:48] <hggdh> 6650 and 6646
[23:48] <hggdh> this seems to be the issue -- authentication fails
[23:48] <micahg> Roxyhart0: By the way, an update was pushed to karmic-proposed today with some fixes
[23:49] <Roxyhart0> ok, i will try
[23:49] <Roxyhart0> that first
[23:50] <micahg> well, the patch for 6650 is small
[23:52] <micahg> hggdh: can you see if this matches the bug desc: https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4582
[23:54] <Roxyhart0> no still the same problem!!!
[23:55] <Roxyhart0> i am wondering if i am the only person that have this problem or is something else, my samba is working and validating users and group the only problem is i cant join machines to the domain, even the PDC
[23:55] <hggdh> micahg: it might -- the patch resolves an user authentication failure. Per the bug, the OP is trying to join the domain. The auth failure might be due to user auth
[23:56] <micahg> Roxyhart0: well, I can try to add teh patch hggdh suggested to see if it fixes it
[23:56] <Roxyhart0> please...
[23:56] <hggdh> note that this all depends on having winbind running or not
[23:56] <Roxyhart0> yes is running
[23:57] <micahg> well, than 6650 won't fix it as that's for when winbind isnt' running
[23:57] <hggdh> then this is not it
[23:57] <Roxyhart0> ??
[23:58] <hggdh> next bug is more cryptic, I need to read more
[23:59] <micahg> hggdh: maybe you can take over trying to help with this bug, I have a few things to finish this evening
[23:59] <hggdh> will do
[23:59] <micahg> hggdh: if you find a patch, I'm happy to throw an update together
[23:59] <micahg> hggdh: thanks :)
[23:59] <hggdh> welcome
[23:59] <Roxyhart0> for that problem?
[23:59] <Roxyhart0> my bug?