| gnomefreak | i would rather have them all download at once so this is good | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| === MikaLuostarinen is now known as milu | ||
| === milu is now known as miluxi | ||
| * gnomefreak fed up with this tb3 bullshit | 01:04 | |
| ddecator | what's wrong with it? | 01:05 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: it wont let me log in to any account it keeps failing. server is working fine | 01:06 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak, 3.0 or 3.1? | 01:07 |
| gnomefreak | 3.0 | 01:07 |
| gnomefreak | it happens with pop and imap ddecator | 01:07 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak, i haven't had any trouble (although i only use it to backup my emails). have you filed a bug report? | 01:07 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: not yet i was trying to fix it. it seems one account is working | 01:08 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak, are you setting them up manually or using the auto setup? | 01:08 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: i tried both | 01:09 |
| gnomefreak | this start it worked fine | 01:09 |
| ddecator | so it's not consistent? | 01:09 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: nope it seems to not be | 01:10 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak, that always makes things fun... | 01:10 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: yep it does. it has been problem after problem with it today for some reason | 01:11 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak, you could run it from the terminal and if it fails to connect to your accounts then it may leave some error messages | 01:14 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: k i will test that tomorrow. today is just not going well and its later than i thought :( | 01:15 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak, np, just a thought, it would make it easier to diagnose | 01:15 |
| * gnomefreak going to bed. night | 01:16 | |
| ddecator | cya | 01:16 |
| mahfouz | i get a hash sum mismatch in daily ppa | 06:39 |
| mahfouz | is that alright? | 06:39 |
| micahg | mahfouz: probably not, which package | 06:41 |
| mahfouz_ | sry | 06:44 |
| mahfouz_ | works again now | 06:44 |
| [reed] | what is gluezilla, and why is buildd spamming my inbox? | 07:57 |
| kecsap | hi guys, I would like to work on some bugs, but Micah told me I should ask if "a bug is assigned in the Ubuntu task". What is the "Ubuntu task"? I can't find it with google. | 08:39 |
| kecsap | does it mean: is there an assignee for a bug in the launchpad bug tracker? | 08:40 |
| directhex | is xulrunner-dev updating to 1.9.2 any time soon? or should i build-depend on firefox-dev instead? | 10:22 |
| gnomefreak | the progress bar never stops work even when it says its done | 10:42 |
| gnomefreak | and it keeps freezeing up. i cant beleve how many problems with tbird 3 | 10:44 |
| gnomefreak | i am most likely going to move to another client | 10:48 |
| gnomefreak | im goin gto lay back down | 10:48 |
| gnomefreak | ok now to look for an email client :( | 10:54 |
| gnomefreak | ok it is unusable. i am going to ask that it gets fixed before it lands in Lucid | 10:58 |
| * BUGabundo_remote points gnomefreak to KMail *even* if he dislikes KDE | 10:58 | |
| gnomefreak | BUGabundo_remote: i would rather not have KDE due to it being very slow | 10:59 |
| BUGabundo_remote | don't lye | 10:59 |
| gnomefreak | safe mode doesnt help either damnit | 11:06 |
| gnomefreak | Inbox - gnomefreak@gmail.com - Shredder is not responding. | 11:06 |
| gnomefreak | You may choose to wait a short while for it to continue or force the application to quit entirely. | 11:06 |
| gnomefreak | fails tot close now | 11:06 |
| gnomefreak | seamonkey-2.0 needs some loving before than are pushed to repos and thunderbird-3.0 | 11:10 |
| gnomefreak | they and out of ordeer | 11:11 |
| * gnomefreak has had nothing but problems yesterday and today but they are not related | 11:21 | |
| gnomefreak | to each other | 11:21 |
| asac | gnomefreak: file bugs upstream | 11:26 |
| gnomefreak | i will but i would love to see what is causing it first :( | 11:27 |
| BUGabundo_remote | gnomefreak: $ gdb --args tb --verbose | 11:28 |
| gnomefreak | ill try later | 11:36 |
| gnomefreak | claws has same problem. im starting to think its me not the app | 11:40 |
| gnomefreak | oh well fuck it be cack this afternoon i think | 11:42 |
| === gandi_ is now known as gandi | ||
| micahg | asac: so, 6 uploads of ffox36 transitions and 6 failures :( | 14:40 |
| directhex | nsNetError.h isn't in firefox-dev ? | 15:08 |
| micahg | directhex: nothing is in firefox-dev | 15:09 |
| directhex | micahg, so it's not possible to build any plugin which requires xulrunner 1.9.2 (NOT 1.9.1 which is what xulrunner-dev yields)'s headers right now? i see. | 15:10 |
| jetsaredim | any ideas as to why the nightly build of shredder doesn't like the nightly builds of lightning and gdata-provider? | 15:10 |
| asac | micahg: sorry. what do you mean? | 15:10 |
| micahg | directhex: I'm working on that now | 15:10 |
| asac | directhex: we will get 1.9.2 son | 15:10 |
| asac | soon | 15:10 |
| micahg | asac: well, I did a minimal upload change of 6 main packages to the PPA with xul192 and they all failed to build | 15:11 |
| micahg | asac: in other words, I've got a lot of work to do :) | 15:11 |
| micahg | asac: yelp, seems ported can I remove it from the wiki for lucid? | 15:11 |
| micahg | asac: also, is it worth pushing the rest of the lucid packages to the PPA to see if they fail or should I work on the first 6? | 15:13 |
| asac | micahg: first check why they failed | 15:13 |
| asac | most likely its a missing packaging facility if everything failed | 15:14 |
| asac | rather than headers | 15:14 |
| asac | oder api problems | 15:14 |
| asac | micahg: start with the plugins you probably uploaded | 15:14 |
| asac | 95% of those should just build ... if all plugin packages failed, there is something missing on packaging side or in -dev package | 15:14 |
| asac | maybe a .pc file ... or maybe the xulrunner-dev doesnt pull in everything etc. | 15:14 |
| micahg | k, I'll check the -dev package to make sure it's populated | 15:15 |
| micahg | yep, 4.7MB | 15:15 |
| micahg | ah, yes, I see, couchdb has a patch...I'll update and try again | 15:17 |
| ddecator | is bugmail for the firefox package extremely high traffic? | 15:17 |
| micahg | ddecator: kinda high | 15:18 |
| asac | micahg: why does the patch needs to be updated? | 15:18 |
| asac | does it use the versioned xulrunner? | 15:18 |
| micahg | asac: links against xul191 | 15:18 |
| asac | binary? | 15:18 |
| asac | link? | 15:18 |
| asac | how that? | 15:18 |
| asac | imo that can be done right so we dont need to touch it next time | 15:18 |
| micahg | http://pastebin.com/f1c13bb4 | 15:18 |
| * micahg thinks dh_xulrunner should be used? | 15:19 | |
| micahg | but that's not where it failed | 15:21 |
| asac | micahg: right. thats +LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/xulrunner-`xulrunner-1.9.1 --gre-version`/ | 15:22 |
| asac | thats at runtime | 15:22 |
| asac | +export LD_LIBRARY_PATH | 15:22 |
| asac | the other as well | 15:22 |
| asac | the right fix would be to use realpath /usr/bin/xulrunner at build time imo | 15:22 |
| micahg | asac: do we provide that? | 15:23 |
| asac | to replace that path in the .in file | 15:23 |
| asac | micahg: the -dev package provides it | 15:23 |
| asac | err | 15:23 |
| asac | all packages, through alternative | 15:23 |
| asac | but during build with just the 1.9.2 -dev package installed that binary should point to the right one | 15:23 |
| asac | let me check | 15:23 |
| asac | too bad ;) | 15:23 |
| asac | yeah well. i dont care. fix it hard for this | 15:24 |
| asac | e.g. adjust the patch as you suggested | 15:24 |
| micahg | it failed because of a help2man update :) | 15:24 |
| micahg | asac: is dh_xulrunner a good option? | 15:24 |
| asac | for what? | 15:24 |
| asac | dh_xulrunner doesnt do anything | 15:24 |
| asac | but add dependencies | 15:25 |
| micahg | oh, I thought it linked? | 15:25 |
| asac | no | 15:25 |
| asac | it doesnt do anything | 15:25 |
| micahg | k, so just update the reference to xul192 for now then? | 15:25 |
| asac | yes | 15:25 |
| micahg | k | 15:25 |
| asac | try that | 15:25 |
| micahg | looks like I will have to fix some of these packages for rebuild as well... | 15:25 |
| asac | yes. go one by one | 15:27 |
| micahg | actually, the unversioned xulrunner binary should do this right | 15:27 |
| asac | no | 15:27 |
| asac | its not reliable enough for runtime stuff | 15:27 |
| asac | just for build time | 15:27 |
| micahg | xulrunner --gre-version won't work? | 15:27 |
| asac | if someone installs xulrunner-1.9.1 the alternative might be messed up | 15:27 |
| micahg | ah | 15:27 |
| asac | alternatives is nothing we can rely on to deliver a good user experience | 15:27 |
| micahg | k, good to know | 15:28 |
| asac | good. the searhcplugin fix seems to work | 15:30 |
| asac | wow we have lots of cruft in the db ;) | 15:30 |
| asac | maybe we should clean that up at some point | 15:30 |
| micahg | which db? | 15:30 |
| asac | http://pastebin.com/m1792f244 | 15:31 |
| asac | search.sqlite | 15:31 |
| asac | seems it never deletes items there if they disappear | 15:31 |
| micahg | ah, yeah | 15:31 |
| asac | micahg: do you know the bug id for searchplugins reset ? upstream and lp? | 15:36 |
| micahg | asac: the overwrite one? | 15:37 |
| asac | yes. that it always is forgotten on versionh update | 15:38 |
| micahg | bug 428306 mozilla 534663 | 15:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 428306 in firefox "default search engines are removed and readded (keywords wiped) with upgrade" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/428306 | 15:38 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 534663 in Search "[ubuntu] updates overwrite/erases defined keywords for default search engines" [Minor,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534663 | 15:38 |
| asac | thx | 15:39 |
| asac | fg | 15:39 |
| micahg | asac: initial success :) couchdb built :) | 15:53 |
| asac | good | 15:55 |
| micahg | asac: are you upstreaming the patch for the search keywords? | 15:59 |
| * micahg just wants to know whether or not to mark off his list | 16:00 | |
| asac | micahg: TBD | 16:28 |
| micahg | asac: :) | 16:28 |
| micahg | asac: if I have an upstream fix for a package I got to work with xul192 (like couchdb), when do I upstream it? | 16:29 |
| asac | micahg: nowhere | 16:30 |
| micahg | ? | 16:30 |
| asac | thats not an upstream fix | 16:30 |
| asac | its an ubuntu hack | 16:30 |
| asac | upstream wants a libmozjs ... which we dont provide (for good reasons) | 16:31 |
| micahg | no, I'm referring to my help2man fix, not xulrunner | 16:31 |
| asac | ah | 16:31 |
| asac | #couchdb | 16:31 |
| asac | anyway have to run out for a while (getting hardware) | 16:31 |
| asac | be back in 1h or so i guess | 16:32 |
| micahg | k, it actually would need to be improved for upstream... | 16:32 |
| micahg | asac: k, I'll probably go offline in a few minutes anyways | 16:32 |
| Milos_SD | Hello | 16:41 |
| Milos_SD | Still no fix for "dom.ipc.plugins.enabled" ? :( | 16:41 |
| Milos_SD | It still freezes browser when there is flash on a page | 16:42 |
| Milos_SD | it needs to be set to false to work | 16:42 |
| Milos_SD | upstream fixed that a month ago :S | 16:42 |
| === mconnor_ is now known as mconnor | ||
| === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh | ||
| fta | asac, what are you supposed to do for the MIR bug? | 19:00 |
| asac | fta: which? | 19:02 |
| asac | i am supposed to provide info ;) | 19:02 |
| asac | then with some luck i wont get it for sign off ;) | 19:02 |
| micahg | asac: I prepared a a lot of uploads, but the PPA has chroot issues in Lucid now, so I'll check later | 19:08 |
| fta | asac, bug 522645 | 19:08 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 522645 in chromium-browser "[MIR] chromium-browser" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522645 | 19:08 |
| fta | asac, what's the goal? move to main? | 19:12 |
| [reed] | asac / fta: how do I stop these buildd mails? | 19:27 |
| [reed] | they are new | 19:27 |
| [reed] | and they are spamming me | 19:28 |
| [reed] | :( | 19:28 |
| fta | ? | 19:28 |
| micahg | of from the ffox36 PPA? | 19:28 |
| micahg | [reed]: ^^ | 19:28 |
| micahg | ffox35 | 19:28 |
| fta | oh, not my fault, i didn't touch anything | 19:28 |
| micahg | fta: me this time :) | 19:28 |
| [reed] | why are they being sent to every member of mozillateam? | 19:29 |
| micahg | [reed]: mozillateam owns the PPA | 19:29 |
| micahg | asac: should I just work in my own PPA instead? | 19:30 |
| fta | micahg, yep, create your own sandbox ppa | 19:32 |
| fta | asac and I both have one | 19:32 |
| micahg | fta: then after it builds, push to the team ppa? | 19:32 |
| fta | yep | 19:32 |
| micahg | fta: got it | 19:33 |
| fta | or copy | 19:33 |
| micahg | [reed]: sorry | 19:33 |
| micahg | fta: right, forgot about that feature :) | 19:33 |
| fta | .. the binaries | 19:33 |
| micahg | fta: do you have a size suggestion for the sandbox? | 19:33 |
| asac | [reed]: you should have gotten similar errors last cycle when i did the ffox 3.5 transition preparations ;) | 19:33 |
| asac | otherwise its a launchpad regression | 19:33 |
| asac | i definitly had plenty of build failures back then too | 19:34 |
| micahg | asac: so, sandbox then? | 19:34 |
| asac | no | 19:34 |
| asac | i dont think its that bad | 19:35 |
| asac | its temporarily | 19:35 |
| asac | and once we hav a build failure we will work on the fixes locally i guess | 19:35 |
| asac | so next upload will succeed | 19:35 |
| micahg | I'll have to get my chroot working again or upgrade to lucid :) | 19:35 |
| micahg | asac: there were chroot issues, that's why they all failed at once | 19:36 |
| fta | micahg, if you have a fast box, you'd better use pbuilder | 19:46 |
| micahg | fta: once xulrunner-1.9.2 hits lucid, I can do that too :) | 19:46 |
| micahg | fta: also, chroot can keep all the build deps | 19:47 |
| fta | i'm just use bzr bd --merge --builder='pdebuild --buildsourceroot fakeroot --debbuildopts -j4' (through a bzr alias) | 19:48 |
| fta | pbuilder maintains it's own cache too | 19:48 |
| fta | it's just that it unpacks all the build-deps for each builds (hence the fast box) but everything else could be done easily | 19:49 |
| micahg | fta: ok | 19:49 |
| fta | i've used chroots for a long time but i've completely stopped since i use pbuilder | 19:49 |
| fta | micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/378572/ | 19:51 |
| micahg | fta: thanks | 20:05 |
| micahg | how are they called? | 20:05 |
| micahg | bzr CMD? | 20:05 |
| jdstrand | [reed], asac, micahg: I'm almost done with my ff testing-- are there any issues I should know about before publishing? | 20:33 |
| micahg | jdstrand: was released today instead of yesterday... | 20:33 |
| jdstrand | micahg: were there last minute changes that require us to rebuild? | 20:34 |
| micahg | jdstrand: not that I know of | 20:34 |
| micahg | it was still build1 | 20:34 |
| micahg | I think they gave an extra day because of the holiday | 20:34 |
| micahg | only a guess | 20:34 |
| fta | micahg, yes, you can create your own aliases depending on your needs | 20:36 |
| micahg | fta: I'm just wondering how to run them | 20:36 |
| fta | i just do "bzr bdm" or "bzr ppab", etc. | 20:37 |
| micahg | fta: I've been using bash aliases for everything | 20:37 |
| micahg | k | 20:37 |
| micahg | asac: you can't file bugs or translate against 3.7 at the moment | 20:55 |
| micahg | asac: and the rosetta template is being renamed to firefox per ArneGoetje at some point, that's why I commented the merge should be done then | 20:56 |
| micahg | but I do need to fix the links for 3.0 and 3/5 | 20:57 |
| micahg | 3.5 | 20:57 |
| fta | micahg, an example of how easy it is to prepare a release: http://paste.ubuntu.com/378613/ | 21:06 |
| fta | (search for my prompt) | 21:06 |
| micahg | fta: yes, I see, thanks :) | 21:07 |
| micahg | [reed]: did the release not happen yet for FF 3.5.8? | 21:18 |
| * micahg saw in the delivery meeting notes it's today | 21:18 | |
| [reed] | micahg: it's happened. | 21:18 |
| micahg | [reed]: k, because the latest-3.5 link on the ftp site is still pointing to 3.5.7 | 21:19 |
| asac | bug 381674 | 21:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 381674 in ubufox "Unnecessary whitespace before ellipsis in Ubuntu Firefox menu" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/381674 | 21:40 |
| asac | kecsap: sure | 21:40 |
| asac | go ahead | 21:40 |
| asac | kecsap: well. just work on it ;) | 21:41 |
| asac | i wont do it if you say you are working on it | 21:41 |
| asac | just give us update at least once week so we know you are still working on it | 21:41 |
| kecsap | ok | 21:41 |
| kecsap | thanks | 21:41 |
| micahg | asac: were my fixes ok for ubufox? | 21:42 |
| micahg | I saw the dent about upload?\ | 21:42 |
| asac | micahg: i rejected your change ... commentd on merge request | 21:42 |
| micahg | asac: I reproposed :) | 21:42 |
| asac | ok | 21:42 |
| asac | well ;) | 21:42 |
| asac | its not in then ;) | 21:42 |
| asac | for this round | 21:42 |
| micahg | asac: the only thing that won't work is translate until we rename the template | 21:43 |
| fta | kenvandine, you said "2.29.90 released", i just see 2.29.1 bzr607.. ??? | 21:43 |
| asac | micahg: i dont think its good. just looking at your commit comment | 21:43 |
| asac | yes. its still not good | 21:44 |
| micahg | asac: I cleaned it up so that it's extensible | 21:44 |
| asac | the translate and help url is still broken ... do what i suggested in my comment | 21:44 |
| kenvandine | fta, i didn't update the packaging branch for the dailies | 21:44 |
| kenvandine | sorry | 21:44 |
| asac | micahg: i dont like the "getAppVersion" returning - | 21:44 |
| kenvandine | fta, did a tarball and uploaded to lucid though :) | 21:44 |
| asac | really do a func that cares for assembling full launchpad source name | 21:44 |
| asac | and use that in all places directly | 21:45 |
| micahg | asac: k, I'll work on that later then, that's a better solution | 21:45 |
| asac | right | 21:45 |
| fta | kenvandine, hm ok. i don't really understand the release management of gwibber. Maybe i should just stop the daily as you seem to update lucid very often | 21:46 |
| kenvandine | well, not really | 21:46 |
| kenvandine | just during development cycle :) | 21:46 |
| kenvandine | been over a week since the last upload :) | 21:47 |
| kenvandine | fta, doesn't your script merge and update the package automatically? | 21:47 |
| fta | it does | 21:47 |
| kenvandine | i bumped the version in trunk to 2.29.91 | 21:48 |
| kenvandine | so your dailies should win | 21:48 |
| kenvandine | fta, do i need to update the packaging branch for the dailies too? | 21:49 |
| * kenvandine definately wants to keep the dailies around | 21:49 | |
| kenvandine | they are very useful! | 21:49 |
| fta | let me respin then.. | 21:51 |
| micahg | asac: I assume we can probably push new versions through at least until beta 1? | 21:51 |
| fta | kenvandine, hm, didn't work.. 2.29.1~bzr607 -> 2.29.1~bzr608 | 21:53 |
| fta | gos-pack: VERSION = $(shell grep VERSION_NUMBER $(TMP_DIR)/src/gwibber/microblog/util/const.py | head -1 | cut -d\" -f2)~bzr$(REVISION) | 21:54 |
| kenvandine | oh! | 21:54 |
| fta | should be updated to use setup.py instead | 21:54 |
| kenvandine | crud... well i guess we need it in both places :/ | 21:54 |
| micahg | asac: also, should I update firefox-stable tonight? | 21:54 |
| kenvandine | fta, pushed... sorry about that | 21:55 |
| fta | np | 21:55 |
| kenvandine | we need a better way of keeping that in sync :) | 21:56 |
| fta | asac, http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2010/01/27/icedtea6-17-released/ got requests to have that for chromium | 21:57 |
| fta | doh! https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ | 22:00 |
| micahg | fta: lamont is working on it | 22:00 |
| fta | ok, thx | 22:01 |
| micahg | fta: from his last post in #ubuntu-devel, it should be up soon | 22:02 |
| asac | fta: ask doko ... i think he is almost ready for that | 22:02 |
| asac | (icedtea) | 22:03 |
| dupondje | nice the bug got fixed :) good work ;) | 22:10 |
| kecsap | asac, micahg: Ok, I created a fix for the bug 452948, branch is uploaded, how should I nominate the branch for review? | 22:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 452948 in ubufox "Report A Problem should have ellipsis per Gnome HIG" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452948 | 22:12 |
| kecsap | ok :D | 22:12 |
| kecsap | robot | 22:12 |
| kecsap | https://code.launchpad.net/~csaba-kertesz/ubufox/lp452948 | 22:13 |
| micahg | kecsap: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~csaba-kertesz/ubufox/lp452948/+register-merge | 22:14 |
| asac | yeah | 22:16 |
| asac | do that | 22:16 |
| asac | against lp:ubufox | 22:16 |
| asac | (if you used that as start ... if not, you should use that as start ;)) | 22:16 |
| fta | asac, he's not there :( | 22:17 |
| kecsap | micahg: thanks | 22:19 |
| asac | fta: doko, you know, is old :-P ... so things take a bit longer sometimes | 22:19 |
| micahg | kecsap: thank you :) | 22:19 |
| asac | he often comes back later the evening | 22:19 |
| fta | asac, lol | 22:19 |
| micahg | fta: builders are fixed | 22:29 |
| cyphermox | join #ubuntu-qc | 22:33 |
| cyphermox | sorry :) | 22:33 |
| directhex | which is preferable, whilst waiting for xulrunner-dev 1.9.2 - ship a package built against 1.9.1 with known functionality missing in ff3.6, or sit on the package & wait? | 22:43 |
| kecsap | micahg: why do not we have lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubufox/ubuntu.lucid branch yet? | 22:44 |
| micahg | kecsap: idk, but don't worry about that | 22:44 |
| kecsap | micahg: but the trunk does not contain debian packaging files and then I can not fix 493805 in lucid...? | 22:45 |
| micahg | kecsap: ah, yeah, just propose a debdiff for that | 22:46 |
| micahg | s/propose/attach | 22:46 |
| * micahg remembers the packaging branch being somewhere | 22:47 | |
| * micahg goes looking | 22:47 | |
| kecsap | ok, thanks | 22:47 |
| micahg | kecsap: here's teh branch: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubufox/ubuntu | 22:48 |
| kecsap | thanks | 22:50 |
| kecsap | I go to sleep now, it is 1am here | 22:50 |
| kecsap | bye | 22:51 |
| micahg | kecsap: thanks | 22:51 |
| asac | Bug 521211 | 23:38 |
| ubottu | Bug 521211 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/521211 is private | 23:38 |
| fta | a new chromium beta.. | 23:42 |
| BUGabundo | those guys are working fasttttt | 23:44 |
| directhex | i wish middle-clicking the border slightly above my tabs in chromium didn't send the window to the back of the window pile | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!