[00:00] i would rather have them all download at once so this is good === MikaLuostarinen is now known as milu === milu is now known as miluxi [01:04] * gnomefreak fed up with this tb3 bullshit [01:05] what's wrong with it? [01:06] ddecator: it wont let me log in to any account it keeps failing. server is working fine [01:07] gnomefreak, 3.0 or 3.1? [01:07] 3.0 [01:07] it happens with pop and imap ddecator [01:07] gnomefreak, i haven't had any trouble (although i only use it to backup my emails). have you filed a bug report? [01:08] ddecator: not yet i was trying to fix it. it seems one account is working [01:08] gnomefreak, are you setting them up manually or using the auto setup? [01:09] ddecator: i tried both [01:09] this start it worked fine [01:09] so it's not consistent? [01:10] ddecator: nope it seems to not be [01:10] gnomefreak, that always makes things fun... [01:11] ddecator: yep it does. it has been problem after problem with it today for some reason [01:14] gnomefreak, you could run it from the terminal and if it fails to connect to your accounts then it may leave some error messages [01:15] ddecator: k i will test that tomorrow. today is just not going well and its later than i thought :( [01:15] gnomefreak, np, just a thought, it would make it easier to diagnose [01:16] * gnomefreak going to bed. night [01:16] cya [06:39] i get a hash sum mismatch in daily ppa [06:39] is that alright? [06:41] mahfouz: probably not, which package [06:44] sry [06:44] works again now [07:57] <[reed]> what is gluezilla, and why is buildd spamming my inbox? [08:39] hi guys, I would like to work on some bugs, but Micah told me I should ask if "a bug is assigned in the Ubuntu task". What is the "Ubuntu task"? I can't find it with google. [08:40] does it mean: is there an assignee for a bug in the launchpad bug tracker? [10:22] is xulrunner-dev updating to 1.9.2 any time soon? or should i build-depend on firefox-dev instead? [10:42] the progress bar never stops work even when it says its done [10:44] and it keeps freezeing up. i cant beleve how many problems with tbird 3 [10:48] i am most likely going to move to another client [10:48] im goin gto lay back down [10:54] ok now to look for an email client :( [10:58] ok it is unusable. i am going to ask that it gets fixed before it lands in Lucid [10:58] * BUGabundo_remote points gnomefreak to KMail *even* if he dislikes KDE [10:59] BUGabundo_remote: i would rather not have KDE due to it being very slow [10:59] don't lye [11:06] safe mode doesnt help either damnit [11:06] Inbox - gnomefreak@gmail.com - Shredder is not responding. [11:06] You may choose to wait a short while for it to continue or force the application to quit entirely. [11:06] fails tot close now [11:10] seamonkey-2.0 needs some loving before than are pushed to repos and thunderbird-3.0 [11:11] they and out of ordeer [11:21] * gnomefreak has had nothing but problems yesterday and today but they are not related [11:21] to each other [11:26] gnomefreak: file bugs upstream [11:27] i will but i would love to see what is causing it first :( [11:28] gnomefreak: $ gdb --args tb --verbose [11:36] ill try later [11:40] claws has same problem. im starting to think its me not the app [11:42] oh well fuck it be cack this afternoon i think === gandi_ is now known as gandi [14:40] asac: so, 6 uploads of ffox36 transitions and 6 failures :( [15:08] nsNetError.h isn't in firefox-dev ? [15:09] directhex: nothing is in firefox-dev [15:10] micahg, so it's not possible to build any plugin which requires xulrunner 1.9.2 (NOT 1.9.1 which is what xulrunner-dev yields)'s headers right now? i see. [15:10] any ideas as to why the nightly build of shredder doesn't like the nightly builds of lightning and gdata-provider? [15:10] micahg: sorry. what do you mean? [15:10] directhex: I'm working on that now [15:10] directhex: we will get 1.9.2 son [15:10] soon [15:11] asac: well, I did a minimal upload change of 6 main packages to the PPA with xul192 and they all failed to build [15:11] asac: in other words, I've got a lot of work to do :) [15:11] asac: yelp, seems ported can I remove it from the wiki for lucid? [15:13] asac: also, is it worth pushing the rest of the lucid packages to the PPA to see if they fail or should I work on the first 6? [15:13] micahg: first check why they failed [15:14] most likely its a missing packaging facility if everything failed [15:14] rather than headers [15:14] oder api problems [15:14] micahg: start with the plugins you probably uploaded [15:14] 95% of those should just build ... if all plugin packages failed, there is something missing on packaging side or in -dev package [15:14] maybe a .pc file ... or maybe the xulrunner-dev doesnt pull in everything etc. [15:15] k, I'll check the -dev package to make sure it's populated [15:15] yep, 4.7MB [15:17] ah, yes, I see, couchdb has a patch...I'll update and try again [15:17] is bugmail for the firefox package extremely high traffic? [15:18] ddecator: kinda high [15:18] micahg: why does the patch needs to be updated? [15:18] does it use the versioned xulrunner? [15:18] asac: links against xul191 [15:18] binary? [15:18] link? [15:18] how that? [15:18] imo that can be done right so we dont need to touch it next time [15:18] http://pastebin.com/f1c13bb4 [15:19] * micahg thinks dh_xulrunner should be used? [15:21] but that's not where it failed [15:22] micahg: right. thats +LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/lib/xulrunner-`xulrunner-1.9.1 --gre-version`/ [15:22] thats at runtime [15:22] +export LD_LIBRARY_PATH [15:22] the other as well [15:22] the right fix would be to use realpath /usr/bin/xulrunner at build time imo [15:23] asac: do we provide that? [15:23] to replace that path in the .in file [15:23] micahg: the -dev package provides it [15:23] err [15:23] all packages, through alternative [15:23] but during build with just the 1.9.2 -dev package installed that binary should point to the right one [15:23] let me check [15:23] too bad ;) [15:24] yeah well. i dont care. fix it hard for this [15:24] e.g. adjust the patch as you suggested [15:24] it failed because of a help2man update :) [15:24] asac: is dh_xulrunner a good option? [15:24] for what? [15:24] dh_xulrunner doesnt do anything [15:25] but add dependencies [15:25] oh, I thought it linked? [15:25] no [15:25] it doesnt do anything [15:25] k, so just update the reference to xul192 for now then? [15:25] yes [15:25] k [15:25] try that [15:25] looks like I will have to fix some of these packages for rebuild as well... [15:27] yes. go one by one [15:27] actually, the unversioned xulrunner binary should do this right [15:27] no [15:27] its not reliable enough for runtime stuff [15:27] just for build time [15:27] xulrunner --gre-version won't work? [15:27] if someone installs xulrunner-1.9.1 the alternative might be messed up [15:27] ah [15:27] alternatives is nothing we can rely on to deliver a good user experience [15:28] k, good to know [15:30] good. the searhcplugin fix seems to work [15:30] wow we have lots of cruft in the db ;) [15:30] maybe we should clean that up at some point [15:30] which db? [15:31] http://pastebin.com/m1792f244 [15:31] search.sqlite [15:31] seems it never deletes items there if they disappear [15:31] ah, yeah [15:36] micahg: do you know the bug id for searchplugins reset ? upstream and lp? [15:37] asac: the overwrite one? [15:38] yes. that it always is forgotten on versionh update [15:38] bug 428306 mozilla 534663 [15:38] Launchpad bug 428306 in firefox "default search engines are removed and readded (keywords wiped) with upgrade" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/428306 [15:38] Mozilla bug 534663 in Search "[ubuntu] updates overwrite/erases defined keywords for default search engines" [Minor,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534663 [15:39] thx [15:39] fg [15:53] asac: initial success :) couchdb built :) [15:55] good [15:59] asac: are you upstreaming the patch for the search keywords? [16:00] * micahg just wants to know whether or not to mark off his list [16:28] micahg: TBD [16:28] asac: :) [16:29] asac: if I have an upstream fix for a package I got to work with xul192 (like couchdb), when do I upstream it? [16:30] micahg: nowhere [16:30] ? [16:30] thats not an upstream fix [16:30] its an ubuntu hack [16:31] upstream wants a libmozjs ... which we dont provide (for good reasons) [16:31] no, I'm referring to my help2man fix, not xulrunner [16:31] ah [16:31] #couchdb [16:31] anyway have to run out for a while (getting hardware) [16:32] be back in 1h or so i guess [16:32] k, it actually would need to be improved for upstream... [16:32] asac: k, I'll probably go offline in a few minutes anyways [16:41] Hello [16:41] Still no fix for "dom.ipc.plugins.enabled" ? :( [16:42] It still freezes browser when there is flash on a page [16:42] it needs to be set to false to work [16:42] upstream fixed that a month ago :S === mconnor_ is now known as mconnor === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh [19:00] asac, what are you supposed to do for the MIR bug? [19:02] fta: which? [19:02] i am supposed to provide info ;) [19:02] then with some luck i wont get it for sign off ;) [19:08] asac: I prepared a a lot of uploads, but the PPA has chroot issues in Lucid now, so I'll check later [19:08] asac, bug 522645 [19:08] Launchpad bug 522645 in chromium-browser "[MIR] chromium-browser" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522645 [19:12] asac, what's the goal? move to main? [19:27] <[reed]> asac / fta: how do I stop these buildd mails? [19:27] <[reed]> they are new [19:28] <[reed]> and they are spamming me [19:28] <[reed]> :( [19:28] ? [19:28] of from the ffox36 PPA? [19:28] [reed]: ^^ [19:28] ffox35 [19:28] oh, not my fault, i didn't touch anything [19:28] fta: me this time :) [19:29] <[reed]> why are they being sent to every member of mozillateam? [19:29] [reed]: mozillateam owns the PPA [19:30] asac: should I just work in my own PPA instead? [19:32] micahg, yep, create your own sandbox ppa [19:32] asac and I both have one [19:32] fta: then after it builds, push to the team ppa? [19:32] yep [19:33] fta: got it [19:33] or copy [19:33] [reed]: sorry [19:33] fta: right, forgot about that feature :) [19:33] .. the binaries [19:33] fta: do you have a size suggestion for the sandbox? [19:33] [reed]: you should have gotten similar errors last cycle when i did the ffox 3.5 transition preparations ;) [19:33] otherwise its a launchpad regression [19:34] i definitly had plenty of build failures back then too [19:34] asac: so, sandbox then? [19:34] no [19:35] i dont think its that bad [19:35] its temporarily [19:35] and once we hav a build failure we will work on the fixes locally i guess [19:35] so next upload will succeed [19:35] I'll have to get my chroot working again or upgrade to lucid :) [19:36] asac: there were chroot issues, that's why they all failed at once [19:46] micahg, if you have a fast box, you'd better use pbuilder [19:46] fta: once xulrunner-1.9.2 hits lucid, I can do that too :) [19:47] fta: also, chroot can keep all the build deps [19:48] i'm just use bzr bd --merge --builder='pdebuild --buildsourceroot fakeroot --debbuildopts -j4' (through a bzr alias) [19:48] pbuilder maintains it's own cache too [19:49] it's just that it unpacks all the build-deps for each builds (hence the fast box) but everything else could be done easily [19:49] fta: ok [19:49] i've used chroots for a long time but i've completely stopped since i use pbuilder [19:51] micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/378572/ [20:05] fta: thanks [20:05] how are they called? [20:05] bzr CMD? [20:33] [reed], asac, micahg: I'm almost done with my ff testing-- are there any issues I should know about before publishing? [20:33] jdstrand: was released today instead of yesterday... [20:34] micahg: were there last minute changes that require us to rebuild? [20:34] jdstrand: not that I know of [20:34] it was still build1 [20:34] I think they gave an extra day because of the holiday [20:34] only a guess [20:36] micahg, yes, you can create your own aliases depending on your needs [20:36] fta: I'm just wondering how to run them [20:37] i just do "bzr bdm" or "bzr ppab", etc. [20:37] fta: I've been using bash aliases for everything [20:37] k [20:55] asac: you can't file bugs or translate against 3.7 at the moment [20:56] asac: and the rosetta template is being renamed to firefox per ArneGoetje at some point, that's why I commented the merge should be done then [20:57] but I do need to fix the links for 3.0 and 3/5 [20:57] 3.5 [21:06] micahg, an example of how easy it is to prepare a release: http://paste.ubuntu.com/378613/ [21:06] (search for my prompt) [21:07] fta: yes, I see, thanks :) [21:18] [reed]: did the release not happen yet for FF 3.5.8? [21:18] * micahg saw in the delivery meeting notes it's today [21:18] <[reed]> micahg: it's happened. [21:19] [reed]: k, because the latest-3.5 link on the ftp site is still pointing to 3.5.7 [21:40] bug 381674 [21:40] Launchpad bug 381674 in ubufox "Unnecessary whitespace before ellipsis in Ubuntu Firefox menu" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/381674 [21:40] kecsap: sure [21:40] go ahead [21:41] kecsap: well. just work on it ;) [21:41] i wont do it if you say you are working on it [21:41] just give us update at least once week so we know you are still working on it [21:41] ok [21:41] thanks [21:42] asac: were my fixes ok for ubufox? [21:42] I saw the dent about upload?\ [21:42] micahg: i rejected your change ... commentd on merge request [21:42] asac: I reproposed :) [21:42] ok [21:42] well ;) [21:42] its not in then ;) [21:42] for this round [21:43] asac: the only thing that won't work is translate until we rename the template [21:43] kenvandine, you said "2.29.90 released", i just see 2.29.1 bzr607.. ??? [21:43] micahg: i dont think its good. just looking at your commit comment [21:44] yes. its still not good [21:44] asac: I cleaned it up so that it's extensible [21:44] the translate and help url is still broken ... do what i suggested in my comment [21:44] fta, i didn't update the packaging branch for the dailies [21:44] sorry [21:44] micahg: i dont like the "getAppVersion" returning - [21:44] fta, did a tarball and uploaded to lucid though :) [21:44] really do a func that cares for assembling full launchpad source name [21:45] and use that in all places directly [21:45] asac: k, I'll work on that later then, that's a better solution [21:45] right [21:46] kenvandine, hm ok. i don't really understand the release management of gwibber. Maybe i should just stop the daily as you seem to update lucid very often [21:46] well, not really [21:46] just during development cycle :) [21:47] been over a week since the last upload :) [21:47] fta, doesn't your script merge and update the package automatically? [21:47] it does [21:48] i bumped the version in trunk to 2.29.91 [21:48] so your dailies should win [21:49] fta, do i need to update the packaging branch for the dailies too? [21:49] * kenvandine definately wants to keep the dailies around [21:49] they are very useful! [21:51] let me respin then.. [21:51] asac: I assume we can probably push new versions through at least until beta 1? [21:53] kenvandine, hm, didn't work.. 2.29.1~bzr607 -> 2.29.1~bzr608 [21:54] gos-pack: VERSION = $(shell grep VERSION_NUMBER $(TMP_DIR)/src/gwibber/microblog/util/const.py | head -1 | cut -d\" -f2)~bzr$(REVISION) [21:54] oh! [21:54] should be updated to use setup.py instead [21:54] crud... well i guess we need it in both places :/ [21:54] asac: also, should I update firefox-stable tonight? [21:55] fta, pushed... sorry about that [21:55] np [21:56] we need a better way of keeping that in sync :) [21:57] asac, http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2010/01/27/icedtea6-17-released/ got requests to have that for chromium [22:00] doh! https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ [22:00] fta: lamont is working on it [22:01] ok, thx [22:02] fta: from his last post in #ubuntu-devel, it should be up soon [22:02] fta: ask doko ... i think he is almost ready for that [22:03] (icedtea) [22:10] nice the bug got fixed :) good work ;) [22:12] asac, micahg: Ok, I created a fix for the bug 452948, branch is uploaded, how should I nominate the branch for review? [22:12] Launchpad bug 452948 in ubufox "Report A Problem should have ellipsis per Gnome HIG" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/452948 [22:12] ok :D [22:12] robot [22:13] https://code.launchpad.net/~csaba-kertesz/ubufox/lp452948 [22:14] kecsap: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~csaba-kertesz/ubufox/lp452948/+register-merge [22:16] yeah [22:16] do that [22:16] against lp:ubufox [22:16] (if you used that as start ... if not, you should use that as start ;)) [22:17] asac, he's not there :( [22:19] micahg: thanks [22:19] fta: doko, you know, is old :-P ... so things take a bit longer sometimes [22:19] kecsap: thank you :) [22:19] he often comes back later the evening [22:19] asac, lol [22:29] fta: builders are fixed [22:33] join #ubuntu-qc [22:33] sorry :) [22:43] which is preferable, whilst waiting for xulrunner-dev 1.9.2 - ship a package built against 1.9.1 with known functionality missing in ff3.6, or sit on the package & wait? [22:44] micahg: why do not we have lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubufox/ubuntu.lucid branch yet? [22:44] kecsap: idk, but don't worry about that [22:45] micahg: but the trunk does not contain debian packaging files and then I can not fix 493805 in lucid...? [22:46] kecsap: ah, yeah, just propose a debdiff for that [22:46] s/propose/attach [22:47] * micahg remembers the packaging branch being somewhere [22:47] * micahg goes looking [22:47] ok, thanks [22:48] kecsap: here's teh branch: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubufox/ubuntu [22:50] thanks [22:50] I go to sleep now, it is 1am here [22:51] bye [22:51] kecsap: thanks [23:38] Bug 521211 [23:38] Bug 521211 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/521211 is private [23:42] a new chromium beta.. [23:44] those guys are working fasttttt [23:45] i wish middle-clicking the border slightly above my tabs in chromium didn't send the window to the back of the window pile