=== Ursinha-brb is now known as Ursinha-afk
[04:11] <lifeless> dobey: don't suppose you're still around?
[06:30] <lifeless> what should be done with stable and db-devel are auto-merge-conflicting
[06:31] <wgrant> Somebody needs to resolve the conflicts and then just submit to db-devel.
[06:31] <wgrant> They're pretty easily resolved.
[06:33] <wgrant> So it needs somebody with about two minutes of time and PQM privileges.
[06:37] <lifeless> do you have pqm access?
[06:37] <lifeless> [if not why not :P]
[06:37] <wgrant> No :(
[06:53] <nigelb> https://launchpad.net/~bongcaivang has been assigning bugs to himself.  anything can be done?
[06:54] <wgrant> nigelb: eg?
[06:54] <lifeless> wgrant: I sggested nigelb pop in here
[06:54] <lifeless> wgrant: a new ubuntu spammer, need someone with the CHR bit set.
[06:54] <nigelb> wgrant: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntuone-client/+bug/447090
[06:54] <mup> Bug #447090: can not sign in <apport-bug> <i386> <ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu):Fix Committed by bongcaivang> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/447090>
[06:55] <wgrant> lifeless: You have the power.
[06:55] <lifeless> wgrant: do I?
[06:55] <wgrant> lifeless: Yeah. ~lifeless -> ~launchpad -> ~registry
[06:55] <lifeless> ah, I did't knw they had done that for all
[06:56] <nigelb> here's the list of all the bugs he's assigned to himself (ugh
[06:56] <nigelb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/~bongcaivang/+assignedbugs
[06:56] <wgrant> In fact, ~canonical-bazaar is sufficient too.
[06:57] <cody-somerville> To do what exactly? deactivate his account?
[06:57] <wgrant> cody-somerville: Suspend, but yes.
[06:57] <lifeless> suspended
[06:57] <wgrant> lifeless: Emailed too?
[06:57] <nigelb> thanks lifeless :)
[06:58] <lifeless> wgrant: I filled out the reason field
[06:58] <nigelb> we've been unassigning and he's be reassigning for quite some time
[06:58] <wgrant> lifeless: The user will be unable to see that.
[06:58] <nigelb> whole yday was cat and mouse
[06:58] <lifeless> wgrant: I'm assuming that that would email him
[06:58] <wgrant> I don't believe so.
[06:58] <lifeless> bah
[06:58] <wgrant> But let me check.
[06:58] <lifeless> care to spend 30 seconds to check?
[06:59] <wgrant> You might also want to look at the CHR docs on wiki.c.c. There might be something there.
[07:00] <wgrant> lifeless: Suspending does not email the user.
[07:00] <lifeless> wgrant: wasn't anything in the cheatsheet the other day (and all them should be faqs anyhow)
[07:00] <wgrant> And there can't be any hooks that do it, because the second thing the button handler does is unset the preferred email.
[07:01] <lifeless> not documented
[07:01] <wgrant> Damn.
[07:01] <wgrant> Send the user a nice email and ask them to contact feedback@ for objections, I guess.
[07:02] <lifeless> yeah
[07:02] <lifeless> feedback@launchpad.net right?
[07:02] <wgrant> Right.
[07:02] <lifeless> hmm, is that 6 or 7 bugs today
[07:03] <wgrant> More more more!
[07:03] <lifeless> I can't email them
[07:04] <lifeless> suspended accounts are 404
[07:04]  * lifeless asks a question
[07:04] <wgrant> I have their old page open.
[07:04] <lifeless> do you have their email
[07:04] <wgrant> PMed.
[07:06] <lifeless> thanks
[07:06] <lifeless> mailed them,
[07:06] <lifeless> bcc feedback@ so CHR folk have a record
[07:06] <wgrant> Great.
[07:06] <nigelb> lifeless, wgrant: both of you work for canonical?
[07:07] <lifeless> nigelb: I do; wgrant doesn't, though we should fix that :P
[07:07] <nigelb> hehe, file a bug ;)
[07:17]  * wgrant just got hit in the face by a Windmill.
[07:18] <wgrant> Must the test suite really pop up Firefox windows?
[07:18] <lifeless> wgrant: /o\
[07:18] <lifeless> wgrant: xvfb-run
[07:19] <wgrant> lifeless: Indeed.
[07:19] <wgrant> I just didn't think my test expression would catch any Windmill tests.
[07:19] <lifeless> nobody expects the windmill
[07:19] <wgrant> Very true.
[08:17] <wgrant> BjornT: Is ILFA actually exportable?
[08:18] <wgrant> It's not exported at the moment, and everywhere else just exposes URLs.
[08:18] <wgrant> (and Julian suggested it in the bug)
[09:52] <BjornT> wgrant: oh, i was quite sure it was exportable, but it seems that they aren't.