kamalmostafa | hello motu's -- I'm looking for feedback on my FFE request bug 524183 - is it reasonable and complete? - what's a normal ETA for an FFE request? thanks! | 00:37 |
---|---|---|
ubottu | Launchpad bug 524183 in hamlib "Sync hamlib 1.2.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/524183 | 00:37 |
=== funkyHat is now known as drunkyHat | ||
=== drunkyHat is now known as funkyHat | ||
zooko | Folks: there are some ideas being thrown around about how Tahoe-LAFS ought to be packaged in Ubuntu. #tahoe-lafs | 05:22 |
zooko | Specifically, should a Tahoe-LAFS node be auto-configured on install and auto-started on reboot. | 05:22 |
zooko | Also, should every Ubuntu user get a free 2 GB of space on a Tahoe-LAFS storage grid. :-) | 05:23 |
ScottK | Generally the answer to such questions is yes. | 05:23 |
zooko | :-) | 05:24 |
ScottK | Dunno about the last bit | 05:24 |
zooko | :-) | 05:24 |
zooko | Thanks. | 05:24 |
ScottK | If there is a sane default configuration, the package should provide it. | 05:24 |
zooko | It isn't clear to me if there is one for this. | 05:25 |
zooko | Please join #tahoe-lafs if you are curious what the options are. | 05:25 |
zooko | ScottK: if these folks on #tahoe-lafs converge on a position that they want to configure the Ubuntu package to automatically connect you to a specific storage grid then I'll come back and ask you more about that... | 05:28 |
zooko | It would basically mean them offering free storage service to Ubuntu users, I think. | 05:28 |
patx2 | ScottK, could you revu http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/fastpatx ? | 05:59 |
nigelb | does this line correctly copy the file rhythmbox.apport to the apport package hooks folder? "cp debian/rhythmbox.apport debian/rhythmbox/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_rhythmbox.py" | 08:54 |
* hyperair wonders if it's time to upgrade to ubuntu lucid yet.. | 09:09 | |
c_korn | hello, can someone help me with a FFe ? what am I supposed to do ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/511864/comments/18 | 09:42 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 511864 in scilab "FeatureFreezeException: Sync scilab 5.2.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] | 09:42 |
iulian | c_korn: Answer Stefan's question. | 10:06 |
randomaction | c_korn: you should check whether listed packages will work with your new proposed version | 10:06 |
=== shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ | ||
FLOZz | Hello | 10:27 |
iulian | Hi. | 10:31 |
FLOZz | Can someone can review my first package (cover-thumbnailer) please ? : http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/cover-thumbnailer | 10:32 |
FLOZz | -can | 10:33 |
randomaction | we had a deadline 2 days ago, so new packages for Lucid will be accepted only in exceptional circumstances | 10:39 |
FLOZz | arf /o\ | 10:40 |
randomaction | packages for Lucid+1 will be accepted since early May | 10:41 |
FLOZz | randomaction: ok thanks :) | 10:41 |
AlanBell | hello all | 12:12 |
AlanBell | I am doing my first bit of python packaging, it works but builds just for Karmic. How do I get it to build for Jaunty/Lucid? | 12:12 |
AlanBell | ppa:alanbell/lpod lpod-python is the package | 12:13 |
AlanBell | http://lpod-project.org is the upstream | 12:13 |
shadeslayer | AlanBell: is it already packaged in ubuntu? | 12:16 |
AlanBell | no, it only got announced yesterday | 12:16 |
AlanBell | I would like to get it in Ubuntu proper, but I am not a motu | 12:17 |
AlanBell | so I am practicing in my PPA | 12:17 |
shadeslayer | hmm no idea then :) | 12:17 |
Laney | (ppa support in #launchpad) you can copy the source from Karmic to Lucid in your PPA | 12:17 |
Laney | assuming it builds without changes | 12:18 |
shadeslayer | AlanBell: i just know that youll need to setup pbuilder and then build packages | 12:18 |
AlanBell | Laney: thanks, I will try #launchpad | 12:19 |
danblick | something seems strange about having a different package for different upstream version numbers - i'm looking at jruby, jruby1.1, and jruby1.2 | 13:08 |
danblick | i see the reason for doing it, but it seems like it means that if i want to build a package for jruby 1.4, it won't be based off of the jruby1.2 package | 13:10 |
=== shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ | ||
=== lukjad86 is now known as ShadowChild | ||
=== ShadowChild is now known as lukjad86 | ||
jariq | I am trying to create pbuilder environment for sid but it fails everytime with "chroot: cannot run command `/usr/bin/apt-get': No such file or directory". However I am able to create environment for lucid with any problems. Any ideas what can be wrong? | 14:04 |
azeem | jariq: apt is no longer installed automatically by debootstrap I believe, maybe pbuilder has an option to specify additional packages to include | 14:06 |
azeem | jariq: or create a lenny environment and upgrade | 14:06 |
jariq | azeem: thx I will try "sudo DIST=sid pbuilder create --extrapackages apt build-essential" | 14:14 |
jariq | did not help | 14:32 |
nigelb | jariq: try pbuilder-dist sid create | 14:33 |
=== Traveler3 is now known as bba | ||
deel | join ubuntu | 14:47 |
jariq | Tried "pbuilder-dist sid create" and result is same as before "chroot: cannot run command `/usr/bin/apt-get': No such file or directory" | 15:39 |
nigelb | whats the exact command you gave? | 15:41 |
jariq | nigelb: as you adviced "pbuilder-dist sid create" and it failed to finish | 15:43 |
nigelb | that's surprising. hold on | 15:43 |
jariq | nigelb: i was executing it as root | 15:43 |
jariq | nigelb: should i wait for any answer? or you're working on something else | 16:48 |
nigelb | woops, getting it | 16:48 |
nigelb | jariq: I have to step out now, can you see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto | 16:52 |
nigelb | there is a section on trouble with pbuilder (or something to that extend) | 16:53 |
nigelb | that might solve your issues | 16:53 |
ari-tczew | is it possible to use 3.0 debian source format by new debian revision? without new upstream release? | 16:54 |
randomaction | ari-tczew: yes | 16:54 |
_Andrew | Anyone know why in my deb when I specify to the debian.install file to glob usr/include/LIB/*.h it says in doesn't find anything? | 16:57 |
jariq | nigelb: ok thx i will look at it | 16:57 |
sebner | ari-tczew: shouldn't be the only change and especially not without Debian doing it too | 16:59 |
ari-tczew | sebner: I'm doing fakesync for package which is in 3.0 source format | 17:00 |
ari-tczew | but ubuntu's package isn't in 3.0 | 17:00 |
sebner | ari-tczew: kk, it's fine then | 17:01 |
ari-tczew | ;-] | 17:02 |
kamalmostafa | hello motu's -- I'm confused about the status of bug 503111 -- ubuntu-sru is subscribed but I do not see it listed in the queue https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/503111 -- shouldn't it be listed there? | 17:07 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503111 | 17:07 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 17:07 |
kamalmostafa | oops -- pasted wrong link -- shouldn't it be listed in the sru queue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-sru ? | 17:08 |
randomaction | kamalmostafa: the only open task is for karmic, so it's showing up only at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-sru | 17:12 |
kamalmostafa | randomaction: okay yes, that makes sense -- looks like its in the right place then -- thanks. | 17:13 |
randomaction | I don't know whether SRU guys look at that queue though | 17:14 |
kamalmostafa | randomaction: hmm. but wouldn't this situation apply to all SRU's (which are already fixed in Lucid)? Any "SRU guys" around that can chime in here? | 17:16 |
kamalmostafa | I now see that my bug 503111 is unlike the rest of the Karmic-targeted SRU's in the "regular" queue... E.g. 511868 says "Nominated for Karmic" but doesn't already have a Karmic task -- whereas my 503111 does already have a Karmic task (which Laney created). | 17:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503111 | 17:21 |
Laney | i would imagine they should look at the stable release lists | 17:23 |
kamalmostafa | hi Laney -- that one (503111) has been in the karmic sru queue for about 6 weeks -- is that not an unusually long time? | 17:25 |
Laney | it sure is | 17:26 |
Laney | you should ask an sru guy | 17:26 |
kamalmostafa | where can I find one? :-) | 17:26 |
ari-tczew | e.g. dfiloni | 17:26 |
ari-tczew | cody-somerville | 17:27 |
Laney | check out the team member list on LP | 17:27 |
kamalmostafa | Looking for an ubuntu-sru member -- please check status of bug 503111, pending for 6 weeks (ping cody-somerville cjwatson dfiloni jdong pitti slangasek). | 17:40 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503111 | 17:40 |
jdong | kamalmostafa: one sec please | 17:40 |
jdong | kamalmostafa: patch looks good, ACKed. Sorry it took so long. Must've slipped through the cracks when I did mass bugmail purging | 17:42 |
* jdong kinda wishes there was a needs-sru-attention type tag that magically worked. | 17:43 | |
jdong | (not serious wishlist item, too much bug triage manpower to make that actually work) | 17:43 |
kamalmostafa | jdong: no problem at all -- was just checking up on my "lost work" list and found that it had slipped through the cracks here also. thanks! | 17:43 |
jdong | no problem :) | 17:43 |
kamalmostafa | thanks for the help Laney, ari-tczew | 17:44 |
jdong | once in a while I do attempt to look at all subscribed+open SRU bugs, but the last time I did that I think there's 600-ish and never was terribly productive... | 17:44 |
jdong | most tended to be false-positives | 17:44 |
Laney | jdong: for what reason? Couldn't you unsubscribe the team? | 17:46 |
kamalmostafa | jdong: well, if this is a useful datapoint, I noticed that the "/ubuntu" SRU queue lists 91 bugs, while the "/ubuntu/karmic" SRU queue lists 95. So maybe the 4 bugs which are only on the Karmic queue need specific investigation to see if they're in this 'lost' state. (?) | 17:46 |
jdong | Laney: Yeah I suppose I can unsubscribe. Usually it's some unrelated task still held open | 17:49 |
jdong | Couldn't find a LP search option to specify what distro to match status fields to. | 17:49 |
kamalmostafa | jdong: thanks for your ACK on 503111 -- what's the next step for this bug? Who is supposed to "proceed with upload"? | 17:51 |
jdong | kamalmostafa: any MOTU can do that | 17:53 |
jdong | the official procedure is to subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors | 17:53 |
kamalmostafa | jdong: I'll subscribe them then -- thanks again | 17:53 |
jdong | if the response time is not good, feel free to come back here and kidnap the first MOTU to talk ;-) | 17:53 |
jdong | I mean.... shhhhh nobody read that. | 17:53 |
kamalmostafa | jdong: regarding the "match distro search" question... I imagine that a Launchpad API script could be crafted to do this... (sounds like I have a new project for this morning :-). | 17:55 |
jdong | kamalmostafa: hehehe indeed that's a way to do it :)f | 17:56 |
kamalmostafa | jdong: I'll let you know if I manage to construct anything useful. | 17:57 |
jdong | ok cool | 17:58 |
crimsun | bah, will need an FFe for the rest of this haskell mess | 18:04 |
crimsun | Laney: do you plan to request an FFe for haskell-x11, or do you want to leave it at 1.4.6.1? | 18:19 |
Laney | crimsun: I got some kind of release approval for the transition | 18:21 |
Laney | I didn't imagine having to request exceptions | 18:21 |
crimsun | ok | 18:22 |
crimsun | I'll wait til ghc6 has finished building then toss haskell-utf8-string up | 18:23 |
Laney | oh, no don't do that | 18:24 |
Laney | that package should be removed ;) | 18:24 |
Laney | ghc6 now provides it | 18:24 |
crimsun | mmkay | 18:26 |
crimsun | well, whatever doesn't break my window manager so I can keep hacking alsa, I suppose. | 18:26 |
Laney | if you want to carve a path through to xmonad then that's fine | 18:26 |
crimsun | doesn't make sense to do anything until ghc6 -10 is built, tho' | 18:27 |
Laney | or else aptitude should hold things back for you well enough | 18:27 |
stefanlsd | anyone using pubilder-dist that doesnt listen to .pbuilderrc (seems like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567995) | 18:33 |
ubottu | Debian bug 567995 in cowbuilder "cowbuilder doesn't honor my $HOME/.pbuilderrc" [Normal,Open] | 18:33 |
Laney | crimsun: (filed the RM bug) | 18:37 |
cyberix | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pq/+bug/267536 | 18:47 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 267536 in pq "Arbitrary dependency on specific Wine version" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 18:47 |
cyberix | is this a valid way of submitting a patch | 18:47 |
cyberix | or do I need to do something more? | 18:47 |
randomaction | cyberix: quite valid, these days we have slightly more bugs than usual to review, but some sponsor will get to it | 18:50 |
arand | cyberix: afaik https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess is the steps to follow, seems like in your case only the "subscribe team" bit is missing.. | 18:50 |
randomaction | cyberix: just set status to "Confirmed" | 18:51 |
arand | randomaction: oh, should the subscription be added or not? | 18:51 |
randomaction | arand: u-u-s is subscribed | 18:52 |
arand | randomaction: cyberix: ah, noevermind then, didn't see that (though sponsors had another icon.. whatever..) | 18:53 |
|sistpoty| | cyberix: looks good, test-building and uploading | 18:55 |
=== |sistpoty| is now known as sistpoty | ||
sebner | huhu sistpoty :) | 18:57 |
sistpoty | hi sebner | 18:57 |
sistpoty | cyberix: uploaded | 18:58 |
user007 | Hello folks, | 19:25 |
user007 | I've uploaded to revu, my package but It doesn't appear, this take some minute to refresh on the web page? | 19:26 |
sistpoty | user007: which package? | 19:32 |
user007 | sistpoty: bygfoot | 19:33 |
sistpoty | user007: ah, seeing it in the rejected directory | 19:33 |
user007 | opss, what happend? please | 19:34 |
sistpoty | user007: give me a minute, looking at the logs | 19:34 |
user007 | ok, thank you sistpoty | 19:35 |
cyberix | sistpoty: thanks | 19:36 |
randomaction | we have bygfoot in the archive, why upload it to REVU? | 19:36 |
user007 | it is the last version | 19:36 |
user007 | and fix, some bugs | 19:38 |
iulian | Don't use REVU if it's not a new package. | 19:39 |
randomaction | file a bug against bygfoot package and attach .diff.gz | 19:39 |
randomaction | use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess | 19:39 |
randomaction | be aware that we're in the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze | 19:40 |
sistpoty | user007: it says incorrect signature. is your key in revu's keyring already? | 19:40 |
user007 | sistpoty: yes | 19:40 |
sistpoty | user007: hm, I'll put it back to incoming, let's see if it's processed then | 19:41 |
sistpoty | user007: oh, it's a binary upload, revu will only accept source packages | 19:42 |
user007 | ops, I don't know, I think it's similar to debian-mentors | 19:42 |
randomaction | user007: if you manage to get your package into Debian, you can then sync it to Ubuntu | 19:47 |
user007 | exactly, but as you know, Debian process is... well, | 19:48 |
user007 | but If want to colaborate with bygfoot, How can I updated it? exists similar to NMU? | 19:50 |
randomaction | user007: have you read what I wrote earlier? | 20:00 |
user007 | ok, I understand. | 20:02 |
=== nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
user007 | thank you guys, | 20:06 |
nacho_ | Hi | 20:24 |
crimsun | I already answered you, nacho_ | 20:24 |
crimsun | nacho_: i.e., see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | 20:25 |
nacho_ | ok | 20:25 |
nacho_ | also we released gtranslator 1.9.8, 1 week ago and it seems it was not added | 20:26 |
nacho_ | and it fixes quite a lot of important bugs | 20:26 |
crimsun | again, the above URL | 20:26 |
sistpoty | nhandler, ScottK, iulian: any objections to sync a new upstream of gpodder (no rdepends) to fix bug #508886? | 20:26 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 508886 in gpodder "gpodder crashed with AttributeError in set_attributes()" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/508886 | 20:26 |
nacho_ | crimsun, ok thanks al ot | 20:27 |
iulian | sistpoty: Looking. | 20:32 |
sistpoty | iulian: I didn't add a build log (it's still building here *g*), and upstream changelog, just ask if you want one | 20:33 |
iulian | sistpoty: An upstream changelog would be nice. | 20:34 |
lightnin | Hiya highvoltage. | 20:35 |
iulian | sistpoty: Got it. | 20:37 |
sistpoty | iulian: it somehow doesn't diff well :/ | 20:38 |
iulian | sistpoty: I'm currently looking at http://gpodder.org/oldnews.html. | 20:39 |
sistpoty | ah, heh | 20:39 |
iulian | sistpoty: Looks good to me. Ack. | 20:46 |
sistpoty | thanks iulian, I'll give it some testing yet, and then subscribe ubuntu-archive | 20:47 |
iulian | Excellent. | 20:48 |
sistpoty | gpodder works fine, however I had imagined the web 2.0 somehow fancier, it doesn't even have 3d effects *g* | 20:49 |
sebner | sistpoty: xD xD xD, you are the right QA guy ;) | 20:50 |
sistpoty | heh | 20:51 |
iulian | :) | 20:52 |
=== lukjad86 is now known as aninsanelylongni | ||
=== aninsanelylongni is now known as lukjad86 | ||
sistpoty | fta | asac: mind giving some insights on bug #522254 | 22:24 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 522254 in gnash "[MASTER] FFe: please sync with upstream version of Gnash .8.7" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522254 | 22:24 |
Laney | sistpoty: debian just packages gnash btw | 22:27 |
Laney | d* | 22:27 |
sistpoty | Laney: oh, nice, thanks! | 22:27 |
fabounet | BlackZ : Hi, any news on the Cairo-Dock's build ? | 23:14 |
fabounet | yep | 23:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!