[00:37] hello motu's -- I'm looking for feedback on my FFE request bug 524183 - is it reasonable and complete? - what's a normal ETA for an FFE request? thanks! [00:37] Launchpad bug 524183 in hamlib "Sync hamlib 1.2.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/524183 === funkyHat is now known as drunkyHat === drunkyHat is now known as funkyHat [05:22] Folks: there are some ideas being thrown around about how Tahoe-LAFS ought to be packaged in Ubuntu. #tahoe-lafs [05:22] Specifically, should a Tahoe-LAFS node be auto-configured on install and auto-started on reboot. [05:23] Also, should every Ubuntu user get a free 2 GB of space on a Tahoe-LAFS storage grid. :-) [05:23] Generally the answer to such questions is yes. [05:24] :-) [05:24] Dunno about the last bit [05:24] :-) [05:24] Thanks. [05:24] If there is a sane default configuration, the package should provide it. [05:25] It isn't clear to me if there is one for this. [05:25] Please join #tahoe-lafs if you are curious what the options are. [05:28] ScottK: if these folks on #tahoe-lafs converge on a position that they want to configure the Ubuntu package to automatically connect you to a specific storage grid then I'll come back and ask you more about that... [05:28] It would basically mean them offering free storage service to Ubuntu users, I think. [05:59] ScottK, could you revu http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/fastpatx ? [08:54] does this line correctly copy the file rhythmbox.apport to the apport package hooks folder? "cp debian/rhythmbox.apport debian/rhythmbox/usr/share/apport/package-hooks/source_rhythmbox.py" [09:09] * hyperair wonders if it's time to upgrade to ubuntu lucid yet.. [09:42] hello, can someone help me with a FFe ? what am I supposed to do ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/scilab/+bug/511864/comments/18 [09:42] Ubuntu bug 511864 in scilab "FeatureFreezeException: Sync scilab 5.2.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] [10:06] c_korn: Answer Stefan's question. [10:06] c_korn: you should check whether listed packages will work with your new proposed version === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ [10:27] Hello [10:31] Hi. [10:32] Can someone can review my first package (cover-thumbnailer) please ? : http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/cover-thumbnailer [10:33] -can [10:39] we had a deadline 2 days ago, so new packages for Lucid will be accepted only in exceptional circumstances [10:40] arf /o\ [10:41] packages for Lucid+1 will be accepted since early May [10:41] randomaction: ok thanks :) [12:12] hello all [12:12] I am doing my first bit of python packaging, it works but builds just for Karmic. How do I get it to build for Jaunty/Lucid? [12:13] ppa:alanbell/lpod lpod-python is the package [12:13] http://lpod-project.org is the upstream [12:16] AlanBell: is it already packaged in ubuntu? [12:16] no, it only got announced yesterday [12:17] I would like to get it in Ubuntu proper, but I am not a motu [12:17] so I am practicing in my PPA [12:17] hmm no idea then :) [12:17] (ppa support in #launchpad) you can copy the source from Karmic to Lucid in your PPA [12:18] assuming it builds without changes [12:18] AlanBell: i just know that youll need to setup pbuilder and then build packages [12:19] Laney: thanks, I will try #launchpad [13:08] something seems strange about having a different package for different upstream version numbers - i'm looking at jruby, jruby1.1, and jruby1.2 [13:10] i see the reason for doing it, but it seems like it means that if i want to build a package for jruby 1.4, it won't be based off of the jruby1.2 package === shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ === lukjad86 is now known as ShadowChild === ShadowChild is now known as lukjad86 [14:04] I am trying to create pbuilder environment for sid but it fails everytime with "chroot: cannot run command `/usr/bin/apt-get': No such file or directory". However I am able to create environment for lucid with any problems. Any ideas what can be wrong? [14:06] jariq: apt is no longer installed automatically by debootstrap I believe, maybe pbuilder has an option to specify additional packages to include [14:06] jariq: or create a lenny environment and upgrade [14:14] azeem: thx I will try "sudo DIST=sid pbuilder create --extrapackages apt build-essential" [14:32] did not help [14:33] jariq: try pbuilder-dist sid create === Traveler3 is now known as bba [14:47] join ubuntu [15:39] Tried "pbuilder-dist sid create" and result is same as before "chroot: cannot run command `/usr/bin/apt-get': No such file or directory" [15:41] whats the exact command you gave? [15:43] nigelb: as you adviced "pbuilder-dist sid create" and it failed to finish [15:43] that's surprising. hold on [15:43] nigelb: i was executing it as root [16:48] nigelb: should i wait for any answer? or you're working on something else [16:48] woops, getting it [16:52] jariq: I have to step out now, can you see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto [16:53] there is a section on trouble with pbuilder (or something to that extend) [16:53] that might solve your issues [16:54] is it possible to use 3.0 debian source format by new debian revision? without new upstream release? [16:54] ari-tczew: yes [16:57] <_Andrew> Anyone know why in my deb when I specify to the debian.install file to glob usr/include/LIB/*.h it says in doesn't find anything? [16:57] nigelb: ok thx i will look at it [16:59] ari-tczew: shouldn't be the only change and especially not without Debian doing it too [17:00] sebner: I'm doing fakesync for package which is in 3.0 source format [17:00] but ubuntu's package isn't in 3.0 [17:01] ari-tczew: kk, it's fine then [17:02] ;-] [17:07] hello motu's -- I'm confused about the status of bug 503111 -- ubuntu-sru is subscribed but I do not see it listed in the queue https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/503111 -- shouldn't it be listed there? [17:07] Launchpad bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503111 [17:07] Ubuntu bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] [17:08] oops -- pasted wrong link -- shouldn't it be listed in the sru queue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-sru ? [17:12] kamalmostafa: the only open task is for karmic, so it's showing up only at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-sru [17:13] randomaction: okay yes, that makes sense -- looks like its in the right place then -- thanks. [17:14] I don't know whether SRU guys look at that queue though [17:16] randomaction: hmm. but wouldn't this situation apply to all SRU's (which are already fixed in Lucid)? Any "SRU guys" around that can chime in here? [17:21] I now see that my bug 503111 is unlike the rest of the Karmic-targeted SRU's in the "regular" queue... E.g. 511868 says "Nominated for Karmic" but doesn't already have a Karmic task -- whereas my 503111 does already have a Karmic task (which Laney created). [17:21] Launchpad bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503111 [17:23] i would imagine they should look at the stable release lists [17:25] hi Laney -- that one (503111) has been in the karmic sru queue for about 6 weeks -- is that not an unusually long time? [17:26] it sure is [17:26] you should ask an sru guy [17:26] where can I find one? :-) [17:26] e.g. dfiloni [17:27] cody-somerville [17:27] check out the team member list on LP [17:40] Looking for an ubuntu-sru member -- please check status of bug 503111, pending for 6 weeks (ping cody-somerville cjwatson dfiloni jdong pitti slangasek). [17:40] Launchpad bug 503111 in ubuntu-dev-tools "False: The versions in Debian and Ubuntu are the same already during requestsync" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503111 [17:40] kamalmostafa: one sec please [17:42] kamalmostafa: patch looks good, ACKed. Sorry it took so long. Must've slipped through the cracks when I did mass bugmail purging [17:43] * jdong kinda wishes there was a needs-sru-attention type tag that magically worked. [17:43] (not serious wishlist item, too much bug triage manpower to make that actually work) [17:43] jdong: no problem at all -- was just checking up on my "lost work" list and found that it had slipped through the cracks here also. thanks! [17:43] no problem :) [17:44] thanks for the help Laney, ari-tczew [17:44] once in a while I do attempt to look at all subscribed+open SRU bugs, but the last time I did that I think there's 600-ish and never was terribly productive... [17:44] most tended to be false-positives [17:46] jdong: for what reason? Couldn't you unsubscribe the team? [17:46] jdong: well, if this is a useful datapoint, I noticed that the "/ubuntu" SRU queue lists 91 bugs, while the "/ubuntu/karmic" SRU queue lists 95. So maybe the 4 bugs which are only on the Karmic queue need specific investigation to see if they're in this 'lost' state. (?) [17:49] Laney: Yeah I suppose I can unsubscribe. Usually it's some unrelated task still held open [17:49] Couldn't find a LP search option to specify what distro to match status fields to. [17:51] jdong: thanks for your ACK on 503111 -- what's the next step for this bug? Who is supposed to "proceed with upload"? [17:53] kamalmostafa: any MOTU can do that [17:53] the official procedure is to subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors [17:53] jdong: I'll subscribe them then -- thanks again [17:53] if the response time is not good, feel free to come back here and kidnap the first MOTU to talk ;-) [17:53] I mean.... shhhhh nobody read that. [17:55] jdong: regarding the "match distro search" question... I imagine that a Launchpad API script could be crafted to do this... (sounds like I have a new project for this morning :-). [17:56] kamalmostafa: hehehe indeed that's a way to do it :)f [17:57] jdong: I'll let you know if I manage to construct anything useful. [17:58] ok cool [18:04] bah, will need an FFe for the rest of this haskell mess [18:19] Laney: do you plan to request an FFe for haskell-x11, or do you want to leave it at 1.4.6.1? [18:21] crimsun: I got some kind of release approval for the transition [18:21] I didn't imagine having to request exceptions [18:22] ok [18:23] I'll wait til ghc6 has finished building then toss haskell-utf8-string up [18:24] oh, no don't do that [18:24] that package should be removed ;) [18:24] ghc6 now provides it [18:26] mmkay [18:26] well, whatever doesn't break my window manager so I can keep hacking alsa, I suppose. [18:26] if you want to carve a path through to xmonad then that's fine [18:27] doesn't make sense to do anything until ghc6 -10 is built, tho' [18:27] or else aptitude should hold things back for you well enough [18:33] anyone using pubilder-dist that doesnt listen to .pbuilderrc (seems like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567995) [18:33] Debian bug 567995 in cowbuilder "cowbuilder doesn't honor my $HOME/.pbuilderrc" [Normal,Open] [18:37] crimsun: (filed the RM bug) [18:47] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pq/+bug/267536 [18:47] Ubuntu bug 267536 in pq "Arbitrary dependency on specific Wine version" [Undecided,Fix committed] [18:47] is this a valid way of submitting a patch [18:47] or do I need to do something more? [18:50] cyberix: quite valid, these days we have slightly more bugs than usual to review, but some sponsor will get to it [18:50] cyberix: afaik https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess is the steps to follow, seems like in your case only the "subscribe team" bit is missing.. [18:51] cyberix: just set status to "Confirmed" [18:51] randomaction: oh, should the subscription be added or not? [18:52] arand: u-u-s is subscribed [18:53] randomaction: cyberix: ah, noevermind then, didn't see that (though sponsors had another icon.. whatever..) [18:55] <|sistpoty|> cyberix: looks good, test-building and uploading === |sistpoty| is now known as sistpoty [18:57] huhu sistpoty :) [18:57] hi sebner [18:58] cyberix: uploaded [19:25] Hello folks, [19:26] I've uploaded to revu, my package but It doesn't appear, this take some minute to refresh on the web page? [19:32] user007: which package? [19:33] sistpoty: bygfoot [19:33] user007: ah, seeing it in the rejected directory [19:34] opss, what happend? please [19:34] user007: give me a minute, looking at the logs [19:35] ok, thank you sistpoty [19:36] sistpoty: thanks [19:36] we have bygfoot in the archive, why upload it to REVU? [19:36] it is the last version [19:38] and fix, some bugs [19:39] Don't use REVU if it's not a new package. [19:39] file a bug against bygfoot package and attach .diff.gz [19:39] use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess [19:40] be aware that we're in the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze [19:40] user007: it says incorrect signature. is your key in revu's keyring already? [19:40] sistpoty: yes [19:41] user007: hm, I'll put it back to incoming, let's see if it's processed then [19:42] user007: oh, it's a binary upload, revu will only accept source packages [19:42] ops, I don't know, I think it's similar to debian-mentors [19:47] user007: if you manage to get your package into Debian, you can then sync it to Ubuntu [19:48] exactly, but as you know, Debian process is... well, [19:50] but If want to colaborate with bygfoot, How can I updated it? exists similar to NMU? [20:00] user007: have you read what I wrote earlier? [20:02] ok, I understand. === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [20:06] thank you guys, [20:24] Hi [20:24] I already answered you, nacho_ [20:25] nacho_: i.e., see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess [20:25] ok [20:26] also we released gtranslator 1.9.8, 1 week ago and it seems it was not added [20:26] and it fixes quite a lot of important bugs [20:26] again, the above URL [20:26] nhandler, ScottK, iulian: any objections to sync a new upstream of gpodder (no rdepends) to fix bug #508886? [20:26] Launchpad bug 508886 in gpodder "gpodder crashed with AttributeError in set_attributes()" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/508886 [20:27] crimsun, ok thanks al ot [20:32] sistpoty: Looking. [20:33] iulian: I didn't add a build log (it's still building here *g*), and upstream changelog, just ask if you want one [20:34] sistpoty: An upstream changelog would be nice. [20:35] Hiya highvoltage. [20:37] sistpoty: Got it. [20:38] iulian: it somehow doesn't diff well :/ [20:39] sistpoty: I'm currently looking at http://gpodder.org/oldnews.html. [20:39] ah, heh [20:46] sistpoty: Looks good to me. Ack. [20:47] thanks iulian, I'll give it some testing yet, and then subscribe ubuntu-archive [20:48] Excellent. [20:49] gpodder works fine, however I had imagined the web 2.0 somehow fancier, it doesn't even have 3d effects *g* [20:50] sistpoty: xD xD xD, you are the right QA guy ;) [20:51] heh [20:52] :) === lukjad86 is now known as aninsanelylongni === aninsanelylongni is now known as lukjad86 [22:24] fta | asac: mind giving some insights on bug #522254 [22:24] Launchpad bug 522254 in gnash "[MASTER] FFe: please sync with upstream version of Gnash .8.7" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522254 [22:27] sistpoty: debian just packages gnash btw [22:27] d* [22:27] Laney: oh, nice, thanks! [23:14] BlackZ : Hi, any news on the Cairo-Dock's build ? [23:15] yep