[00:37] thanks for all the hard work getting libjack0 rdepends done, folks! [05:59] not trying to be picky but it would appear that hydrogen-0.9.4 didn't make it into lucid according to bug #495507 [05:59] Launchpad bug 495507 in hydrogen "Please sync hydrogen 0.9.4-1 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/495507 [05:59] i realise there was a lot going on just before the FF and of course I could have contact debian multimedia sooner [06:00] but anyway, i'll be moving on to some testing in the next couple of days (and hopefully some community documentation again as well) [06:00] cheers everyone [20:42] can someone explain the difference between ISO's from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/daily/ and one's found at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/ubuntustudio/all? [20:42] when would you choose to download one in preference to the other? [20:45] huh? [20:45] the latter URL gives me "We are not testing at the moment" [20:45] am I missing something? [20:49] i did not understand that either and was hoping it was a lack on my knowledge and would become clear when someone explained more [20:50] well, I don't see any list of isos at the latter, so I can't tell you anything [20:50] normally there's a link from the latter to something resembling the former [20:50] it's usually dated, however [20:51] would it be fair to say that th former is "cutting edge" with daily builds and the latter is more formalized for testing and documentation purposes? [20:52] I don't think so [20:53] again, normally the latter links to a specific dated iso hosted on the former [20:53] i'm hoping to aggregate the information i gain and make a ubuntu studio community testing documentation page to help the community at large and the launchpad testing team specifically [20:54] well, to be honest, stochastic has already started something and I wanted to flesh it out more