| bob2 | as in branch a subtree of an existing branch? you can try "split", but I don't think it's production-y yet | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| mathrick | okay, so the correct fix is to s/map.// | 00:05 |
| * mathrick hugs bzr blame | 00:05 | |
| gregcoit | bob2: the option is to copy the dir to another place and init is as a new bzr branch, right? | 00:07 |
| bob2 | yeah, but that loses history | 00:08 |
| bob2 | you could also branch the whole thing, delete everything else and then move the files in this one dir to the root | 00:08 |
| gregcoit | bob2: oh, that works too - thanks! | 00:08 |
| mathrick | is there some trick to get bzr blame to find where a particular line has disappeared? | 00:43 |
| lifeless | use gannotate and click around versions | 00:46 |
| lifeless | is what most people seem to do | 00:46 |
| mathrick | aha | 00:51 |
| mathrick | http://bazaar.pastebin.com/GaJP7cRb | 00:55 |
| mathrick | any idea what's wrong? | 00:55 |
| dOxxx | yarr | 01:27 |
| poolie | mathrick: this looks like an already fixed bug, are you up to date? | 01:33 |
| mathrick | poolie: 2.1.0 | 01:33 |
| poolie | and also in bzr-git? | 01:34 |
| mathrick | bzr git is r721 | 01:36 |
| poolie | sorry | 01:37 |
| poolie | suggest you file or look for a bzr-git bug then | 01:37 |
| mathrick | ok | 01:37 |
| keithy | when I do bzr cat <remote url> it changes my remote directory setting how do I stop it? | 01:47 |
| lifeless | what do you mean? | 01:48 |
| keithy | I think I misunderstood the error | 01:50 |
| keithy | I got a "permanently redirected" report | 01:51 |
| keithy | << is tired | 01:51 |
| keithy | btw if you are interested in how I am using bzr for squeak/cuis http://smalltalkers.pbworks.com | 01:51 |
| poolie | thanks keithy | 02:07 |
| poolie | how are things working out? | 02:08 |
| keithy | in what respect? | 02:08 |
| poolie | just with bzr and lp | 02:08 |
| keithy | I am suffering form spiderman syndrome...."with great power comes great responsibility" | 02:08 |
| keithy | very well indeed | 02:09 |
| keithy | some quibbles with the squeak licence | 02:09 |
| keithy | I dont think people in the OSI community realise how much trouble they caused | 02:10 |
| poolie | i heard about some of that | 02:11 |
| keithy | it has taken something like 10 years to relicence squeak, all because of two paragraphs in the licence that arent relevant any more | 02:11 |
| keithy | for example | 02:11 |
| keithy | the licence says, you cant distribute apples fonts | 02:11 |
| keithy | but readers of the licence dont think to ask if there are any apple fonts in the product to distribute | 02:12 |
| keithy | the last remnant was removed 6 years ago | 02:12 |
| keithy | Apart from that | 02:13 |
| poolie | right | 02:13 |
| keithy | In a week or so | 02:13 |
| poolie | i see your point about the difficulty of updating things that predate OSI | 02:13 |
| keithy | exactly, it was very disingenious of them | 02:13 |
| keithy | especially when squeak was a pioneer of OS for commercial purposes | 02:13 |
| keithy | the SqueakL was actually designed to enable reuse for commercial purposes | 02:14 |
| bob2 | who is 'them'? | 02:14 |
| keithy | unlinke Gnu etc | 02:14 |
| keithy | squeak was developed by a team in the Apple Technology Group | 02:14 |
| keithy | this team was originally at Zero parc | 02:14 |
| keithy | xerox | 02:14 |
| keithy | parc | 02:14 |
| poolie | ok | 02:15 |
| keithy | The system was released by xerox to the public by publishing the full spec in a book, the famous blue book | 02:15 |
| poolie | so, i hope we work something out | 02:15 |
| poolie | rebooting, biab | 02:15 |
| poolie | i know, i read it years ago | 02:15 |
| poolie | it's pretty cool that it's out there | 02:15 |
| keithy | its on the net now | 02:15 |
| poolie | rebooting, biab | 02:16 |
| poolie | i'm thinking about just removing the attempted fix for bug 456077 from 2.0 because of the fallout it caused | 02:30 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 456077 in bzr "MYSQL/BZR P3: bzr doesn't explain it's doing a slow cross-format fetch" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/456077 | 02:30 |
| poolie | lifeless: ping, teddybear wanted on this | 02:34 |
| lifeless | poolie: voice? | 02:34 |
| poolie | irc will do | 02:35 |
| poolie | just about whether to revert the cross-format fetch warning in 2.0 | 02:35 |
| lifeless | what was the fallout | 02:35 |
| poolie | warnings during upgrade | 02:36 |
| poolie | and the message is not always very clear, eg bug 513157 | 02:36 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 513157 in bzr "warning about on-the-fly upgrades to "(remote)", and when upgrading" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/513157 | 02:36 |
| lifeless | right | 02:36 |
| lifeless | uhm, I think the upgrade one is easy enough; squelch the warning before starting upgrade. | 02:36 |
| lifeless | the clarity one, seems like polishon the format %s that spiv worked on in france | 02:37 |
| lifeless | so, I would attempt to finish it off rather than revert it, myself. | 02:37 |
| poolie | i guess the fallout is not so severe that it needs to be immediately pulled | 02:37 |
| poolie | yeah | 02:37 |
| poolie | ok | 02:37 |
| poolie | thanks | 02:37 |
| lifeless | poolie: no probs | 02:45 |
| lifeless | poolie: are you doing https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/515356 too? | 03:13 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 515356 in bzr "unnecessary message about conversion during upgrade" [Medium,Confirmed] | 03:13 |
| poolie | yes | 03:13 |
| lifeless | cool; was wondering as its not assigne | 03:13 |
| poolie | i'm not doing it right now | 03:15 |
| poolie | i'm going to fix the underlying fetch thing first | 03:15 |
| poolie | is bug 388269 a dupe of bug 435048? | 03:19 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 388269 in bzr "getting a branch into an empty shared repository takes a long time to figure out revisions to send" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/388269 | 03:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 435048 in bzr "many get_parent_map calls during walk to common revisions" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/435048 | 03:20 |
| lifeless | I think so | 03:20 |
| lifeless | if not a dupe then remarkably similar | 03:20 |
| parthm | Hello, based on the discussion on bug 503670 'bzr grep', I have created a bzr-grep plugin explained here https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/503670/comments/11 | 04:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 503670 in bzr "bzr grep should be builtin" [Medium,In progress] | 04:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 503670 in bzr "bzr grep should be builtin" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503670 | 04:40 |
| parthm | I would appreciate any review comments this as I am still new to bzrlib API. Whats a good launchpad mechanism for this? Probably the comments can be left on the bug listing? | 04:41 |
| parthm | Another question, I am planning to work on the test cases, any pointers would be much appreciated. | 04:42 |
| poolie | parthm: there wasn't a bzr-grep already? | 04:45 |
| parthm | I could find anything. I saw bzr-search and ~vila/bzr/grep which was unix only. | 04:45 |
| poolie | ok | 04:46 |
| poolie | so i don't think there's any particular way to say please review this from scratch | 04:46 |
| poolie | other than making an empty trunk branch | 04:46 |
| poolie | then proposing a merge of all your code into that | 04:46 |
| poolie | which would work ok | 04:46 |
| parthm | Sounds ok. So for the purpose of review, I would just branch the trunk and put in the grep folder so the comments can be tracked. | 04:47 |
| parthm | What would be a good way to create tests? Basically, I need to create a working tree, add files and file content. then run "bzr grep" on it pattern matching on output. | 04:49 |
| Kilroo | ...I think I just figured out a set of process I can use to let my team treat our non-versioned ftp servers at work as if they are under version control with all the people who use raw ftp as a sort of "ghost committer." | 04:53 |
| Kilroo | I'm not sure though. Gotta think about that. It may require either more steps to follow when committing, or finding somewhere I can put a bzr smart server and getting rather creative with hooks. | 04:55 |
| === mordred_ is now known as mtaylor | ||
| GaryvdM | Hi vila | 05:59 |
| poolie | hi GaryvdM, vila | 06:02 |
| === mordred_ is now known as mtaylor | ||
| GaryvdM | Hi poolie | 06:03 |
| wgrant | Where is the bzr documentation? | 06:08 |
| wgrant | The "Get Help" link on the website doesn't seem to lead there. | 06:08 |
| GaryvdM | http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/en/ | 06:09 |
| wgrant | Thanks. How does a normal user get there? | 06:09 |
| poolie | which website? | 06:09 |
| wgrant | http://bazaar.canonical.com/ | 06:09 |
| bob2 | "Documentation" link at the top left | 06:10 |
| bob2 | or at the bottom | 06:10 |
| wgrant | Ah, so to get help I don't actually use the "Get Help" link. | 06:10 |
| poolie | easily fixed | 06:10 |
| bob2 | if you say so | 06:10 |
| poolie | with sudo_sarcasm | 06:11 |
| poolie | wgrant: howzat | 06:13 |
| wgrant | poolie: Looks good. Thanks! | 06:16 |
| * wgrant wonders if 90000 users is really a stat that wants to be widely advertised. | 06:20 | |
| GaryvdM | wgrant: a often quoted figger for world wide developers is 9 mil. Based on that, bazaar is used by 1% | 06:39 |
| GaryvdM | Hmm, dose not sound to good. | 06:39 |
| poolie | it's very hard to estimate usage of open source | 06:39 |
| wgrant | So it's probably a bad idea to try. | 06:40 |
| poolie | is that on our homepage now, or elsewhere? | 06:44 |
| GaryvdM | vila: I wanted to talk to you about releasing bzr-gtk. I pop back later. | 06:44 |
| wgrant | poolie: It's on the homepage. | 06:46 |
| wgrant | Otherwise the website is pretty nice now. | 06:47 |
| wgrant | Particularly with the compelling linked logos at the bottom. | 06:47 |
| poolie | thanks | 06:48 |
| poolie | wgrant: how about the project count | 06:49 |
| poolie | and the link to the popcon page? | 06:49 |
| wgrant | Popcon needs to die, not be linked to from anywhere :/ | 06:49 |
| poolie | Bazaar is used by thousands of people around the world on both open | 06:50 |
| poolie | and closed projects, including<br/> | 06:50 |
| wgrant | +1 | 06:50 |
| poolie | gary? | 06:50 |
| poolie | maybe s/thousands of// | 06:50 |
| wgrant | I considered that. It's hard to say. | 06:50 |
| poolie | Bazaar is used by thousands of projects, both open and closed, | 06:51 |
| poolie | including<br/> | 06:51 |
| wgrant | That works. | 06:51 |
| wgrant | And is far more likely to be accurate. | 06:51 |
| wgrant | And cannot easily be interpreted as being a very low number. | 06:52 |
| poolie | k | 06:54 |
| poolie | cron will update it in a bit | 06:54 |
| wgrant | Thanks. | 06:54 |
| poolie | not at all, thanks for the review | 06:54 |
| vila | hi all | 07:01 |
| wgrant | poolie: Oh, I see that the number wasn't actually pulled out of nowhere. | 07:18 |
| wgrant | poolie: But popcon is completely the wrong order of magnitude to use. | 07:19 |
| poolie | cause it undercounts? | 07:19 |
| wgrant | BzrPopularity oddly states the numbers as facts. | 07:19 |
| wgrant | poolie: It's not enabled by default, and the option is well hidden. | 07:19 |
| wgrant | I don't know anybody who has it on. | 07:19 |
| poolie | well, it's a fact (i presume) that's what it reports | 07:19 |
| poolie | right | 07:19 |
| poolie | me :) | 07:19 |
| poolie | but feel free to update the wiki page | 07:19 |
| wgrant | Ah, it is a wiki page. I see. | 07:20 |
| wgrant | See, the most popular popcon package has only 1.4 million installations. We have quite a few more users than that. | 07:21 |
| poolie | sure, you're quite right | 07:22 |
| etenil | Hi all | 11:28 |
| etenil | I made the mistake to branch manually (copy-paste of directory). And I have commited some changes in both branches now. How can I make the branch aware that it diverged from the trunk? | 11:30 |
| bob2 | copying branches is fine | 11:31 |
| etenil | yeah, but merging them will be a problem | 11:31 |
| bob2 | why? | 11:31 |
| bob2 | bzr merge /the/other/one | 11:31 |
| etenil | well, they don't know where they diverged no? | 11:31 |
| bob2 | sure they do | 11:31 |
| etenil | ah | 11:31 |
| etenil | does bzr compare the history or something? | 11:32 |
| bob2 | yes | 11:32 |
| etenil | oh I see | 11:32 |
| bob2 | branch doesn't do anything inherently magic | 11:32 |
| etenil | there was no need to worry then | 11:32 |
| bob2 | you can use 'cp -a' if you prefer | 11:32 |
| etenil | ok | 11:32 |
| etenil | I was afraid to have done something dumb :) | 11:32 |
| etenil | thank you for your help bob2 | 11:32 |
| bob2 | well, back them both up first if you're worried :) | 11:32 |
| etenil | ok | 11:33 |
| etenil | thanks a lot | 11:33 |
| bialix | jaьЖ рш | 13:37 |
| bialix | jam: hi | 13:38 |
| bialix | jam: about next windows installer: please use qbzr 0.18.1 for it, not 0.18.2 | 13:38 |
| jam | bialix: why is that? | 14:11 |
| jam | ah, found your email | 14:14 |
| jam | bug #524483 | 14:14 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 524483 in qbzr "qrevert: Select all checked even if there is some files unchecked" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/524483 | 14:14 |
| bialix | офьЖ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526933 | 15:01 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 526933 in qbzr "qadd inadvertantly adds all my ignored files " [Critical,Confirmed] | 15:01 |
| bialix | jam: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526933 | 15:01 |
| bialix | sorry | 15:01 |
| === gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| aquarius | yo, bzr people. Imagine, hypothetically, that I'd got a branch merged into the trunk of my project and everyone hated me for it, so I now want to submit a new branch which removes the changes that the previous one made. What's the easiest way to create this new branch? | 16:12 |
| aquarius | do I just branch trunk, do bzr diff -r -5..-6 > patchfile (or whatever revision my branch landed in), then patch -p0 < patchfile and bzr commit? | 16:13 |
| aquarius | that seems a bit long-winded | 16:13 |
| james_w | aquarius: branch trunk | 16:14 |
| james_w | bzr merge -r -6..-5 . | 16:14 |
| james_w | bzr commit | 16:15 |
| james_w | bzr push lp:... | 16:15 |
| aquarius | haha! you can merge from yourself? | 16:15 |
| james_w | propose merge | 16:15 |
| aquarius | smart. I didn't know you could do that :) | 16:15 |
| james_w | yep | 16:15 |
| aquarius | I knew you'd know a better way than making a patch file. Cheers, pal :P | 16:15 |
| james_w | and doing the revision range backwards applies the reverse diff | 16:15 |
| IslandUsurper | wait. -5..-6 *is* the backwards diff | 16:21 |
| james_w | aquarius: err yeah, what IslandUsurper said :-) | 16:23 |
| aquarius | james_w, I knew what you meant. negative numbers. It's the opposite of the opposite of what you think :) | 16:23 |
| aquarius | vds, ^ :-) | 16:23 |
| vds | aquarius: yup | 16:23 |
| CaMason | how can I show which files were edited at a specific revision | 16:38 |
| Peng | CaMason: bzr st -c 123 | 16:39 |
| Peng | CaMason: Probably | 16:39 |
| rubbs | CaMason: try bzr annotate filename | 16:40 |
| rubbs | er... | 16:40 |
| rubbs | yeah I miss understood your question | 16:40 |
| rubbs | peng's answer might be better. | 16:40 |
| Peng | My answer is the best! :D Probably. | 16:40 |
| rubbs | heh | 16:40 |
| CaMason | thx :) | 16:42 |
| === IslandUsurper is now known as IslandUsurperAFK | ||
| === radoe_ is now known as radoe | ||
| stefanlsd | Hi, is it possible to remove a tag? | 17:46 |
| stefanlsd | oh ok. tag --delete works. i was using -d and it wasnt | 17:47 |
| === _TiN_ is now known as TiN | ||
| mathrick | stefanlsd: -d means --directory | 18:12 |
| === IslandUsurperAFK is now known as IslandUsurper | ||
| bialix | channel trolls? really> | 19:27 |
| * bialix summons garyvdm | 19:27 | |
| Peng | Eh? Trolls? Where? | 19:28 |
| bialix | banner said: [freenode-info] channel trolls and no channel staff around to help? | 19:29 |
| bialix | only channel staff has weapon? | 19:30 |
| bialix | evening Peng, btw | 19:30 |
| Peng | Hi. :) | 19:31 |
| bialix | anybody seen new Joel Spolsky's project? http://hginit.com/index.html Looks like very nice tutorial | 19:37 |
| Peng | Hehe, "Mercurial tutorial" rhymes. | 19:38 |
| bialix | I wonder why people started bashing svn | 19:41 |
| Peng | Because it's terrible, like Boxbot. | 19:42 |
| fullermd | It's ugly, and its mother dresses it funny. | 19:43 |
| bialix | Peng, Boxbot is http://gunnerkrigg.wikia.com/wiki/Boxbot ? | 19:47 |
| Peng | bialix: Yes. | 19:47 |
| bialix | nobody likes boxbot | 19:47 |
| bialix | but Martin Fowler does rate svn highly | 19:48 |
| bialix | and he don't like a Feature Branches | 19:48 |
| bialix | is not it's funny? | 19:48 |
| gregcoit | i'd like to make a co a branch from launchpad, then branch that co, make changes to the new branch, and push the changes to a new branch on launchpad (without effecting the original branch on launchpad). Is that sane/o-able? | 19:50 |
| gregcoit | er, do-able | 19:50 |
| bialix | gregcoit: almost | 19:51 |
| gregcoit | well, almost if close. :) what am I missing? | 19:52 |
| fullermd | Sure, though within the confines of that the co isn't doing anything. | 19:52 |
| bialix | gregcoit: it's a bit hard to read your slang | 19:54 |
| gregcoit | bialix: yeah, i'm new to bzr terminology | 19:54 |
| bialix | gregcoit: you can omit the step of co | 19:55 |
| gregcoit | bialix: what I'm trying to do is take a part of a branch and make it into a new branch with history preserved while keeping the original branch unaffected | 19:55 |
| bialix | co wo nt he lp yo | 19:55 |
| gregcoit | kk - I can see that | 19:56 |
| fullermd | Hey! No Swahili in #bzr! | 19:56 |
| bialix | I hear you the white master | 19:57 |
| fullermd | When you run 'branch', you're creating a new independent branch. Things done to it don't affect the original, unless you do things like 'push' that are designed to doing things inter-branch. | 19:57 |
| bialix | gregcoit: to extract part of the tree and preserve history.. it's not very easy | 19:57 |
| gregcoit | bialix: well, copy might be a betterterm than extract - I don't want to affect the orginal branch contents | 19:58 |
| bialix | every branch is separate copy | 19:59 |
| gregcoit | bialix: ahh, ok, perfect | 20:00 |
| gregcoit | bialix: thanks for talking me through this | 20:00 |
| bialix | may I advice you to read tutorial? | 20:01 |
| bialix | I'm not really sure I understand your intent | 20:01 |
| gregcoit | not a bad idea.... | 20:06 |
| === gregcoit is now known as gregcoit_lunch | ||
| bialix | hmmm, Kiln is really attempting to be launchpad competitor | 20:15 |
| maxb | Except Launchpad doesn't even attempt to enter the "here it is, you can run it on your own server if you like" market | 21:13 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| lifeless | moin | 21:20 |
| poolie | hi jam? | 21:35 |
| jam | morning poolie | 21:35 |
| poolie | how are things? | 21:35 |
| jam | going pretty well | 21:36 |
| === gregcoit_lunch is now known as gregcoit | ||
| === jelmer__ is now known as jelmer | ||
| === jelmer is now known as Guest75587 | ||
| === Guest75587 is now known as ctrlsoft | ||
| poolie | hi all | 22:57 |
| ctrlsoft | 'morning poolie | 23:04 |
| spiv | Morning. | 23:10 |
| lifeless | vila: ping | 23:15 |
| poolie | hi ctrlsoft | 23:23 |
| ctrlsoft | poolie: fwiw I managed to get colocated branches in a git repo partially working, I can now list and access them using the patch I proposed to bzr.dev and an additional small change to bzr.dev | 23:28 |
| RAOF | ctrlsoft: YOU ARE MY HERO | 23:29 |
| ctrlsoft | RAOF: :-) Please note the "in a git repo", this doesn't work in a native Bazaar branch yet and it's still a prototype at this point. | 23:30 |
| RAOF | The *only* reason I want colocated branches is so that I can switch to bzr as my full-time git client. | 23:31 |
| RAOF | Which means being able to pull & push non-master branches. | 23:31 |
| * RAOF imagines a world where reading “git help add” doesn't happen quite so often | 23:31 | |
| poolie | that's great | 23:41 |
| lifeless | jelmer: nice | 23:44 |
| lifeless | Peng: was Peng taken on twitteR? | 23:45 |
| RickCogley | hi - I'm a newbie at version control and at bazaar, and have bzr set up from the latest package on an os x server. Can I ask: when I set up a central repository, what are people doing? Setting up a single repository (e.g. organization name "acme") and putting projects under that, or, are people setting up multiple repositories... ? | 23:47 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: repositories are just for storage optimisation: when making a new branch in a repository from another branch in the same repository no data needs to be copied around | 23:48 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: this has several implications: many repositories are the norm - every user usually has a repository on their machine | 23:48 |
| lifeless | secondly, you don't need to worry about them until you are up and running, they are an optional facility. | 23:48 |
| lifeless | lastly, whether you make one for all your projects, or one per project, is totally up to you. | 23:49 |
| maxb | Although for performance and disk-space reasons they rapidly become less optional if your project is large | 23:49 |
| RickCogley | Thanks lifeless and maxb. We are thinking we'd like to have a single central repository so that we can back it up, but I can see that perhaps if you were doing dev for clients, you might want multiple ones to make sure things are kept separate. | 23:50 |
| lifeless | maxb: yes, but that users having to get it 'right' at the start leads to analysis paralysis | 23:50 |
| RickCogley | lifeless, ok, so it's kind of "ready, fire, aim" ? | 23:51 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: the use or not of repositories won't affect backups (except for the size of data: as a new user that is unlikely to worry you for a while) | 23:51 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: yup. My advice: *completely ignore* repositories for at least a week | 23:51 |
| lifeless | get used to branching, pushing, pulling, merging | 23:51 |
| maxb | I'd agree with that for a user. I think a server admin setting up a central server might want to have a think about them up front | 23:52 |
| lifeless | maxb: ONLY if the admin is already fluent with bzr. | 23:52 |
| mathrick | <RAOF> The *only* reason I want colocated branches is so that I can switch to bzr as my full-time git client. <-- oooooh | 23:52 |
| lifeless | maxb: otherwise they don't have the context to make the right decisions. | 23:52 |
| RickCogley | I guess the idea is to just get used to it and you can merge things into a repository later... ? | 23:53 |
| lifeless | maxb: and as repositories are just storage optimisation, its easy to add them in later, or remove them. | 23:53 |
| mathrick | and yes, git help whatever takes up way too big a chunk of my time spent interacting with git | 23:53 |
| RickCogley | lifeless, ok, I see. | 23:53 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: 'repository' is just a database. If you don't make one, bzr makes one when you run any of 'init' 'branch' 'checkout' 'push' | 23:54 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: let bzr do that while you learn the user facing concepts and concerns. | 23:54 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: /none/ of the every day bzr commands manipulate repositories. They all work with 'branches' and 'trees'. | 23:54 |
| RickCogley | lifeless, so in other words, you make a branch anyway when you check it out of a repository (not yet sure how to do that but...) and then the commands just work on your local copy. ? | 23:56 |
| lifeless | you can't check out of a repository; its just a database | 23:56 |
| lifeless | you check out of a branch | 23:56 |
| lifeless | delete the work repository from your vocab; its not needed. | 23:56 |
| lifeless | s/work/word/ | 23:56 |
| bialix | mathrick: but do you will miss index? | 23:56 |
| mathrick | not at all | 23:56 |
| mathrick | index just gets in my way | 23:57 |
| mathrick | I use git when I have to, not by choice | 23:57 |
| RAOF | bialix: For me, the index is an incovenient version of “bzr shelve” | 23:57 |
| bialix | it seems there are 2 kinds of people: who loves index and who's not | 23:57 |
| RickCogley | *check out of a branch* *check out of a branch* *check out of a branch* :-) | 23:57 |
| lifeless | RickCogley: yup :) | 23:57 |
| bialix | RAOF: is not it's reverse thing? | 23:57 |
| RAOF | bialix: Which is one of the reasons it's inconvenient :). Mostly I want to commit my changes. | 23:58 |
| RAOF | That's the default case. | 23:58 |
| mathrick | bialix: index is used so rarely it doesn't make sense to make it the central element of everything | 23:58 |
| bialix | ok ok | 23:58 |
| RAOF | If I want to take some of my changes out, I'll *explicitly* do so, using a (more powerful) explicit command. | 23:58 |
| bialix | just too many people around me buzzing how's cool index | 23:59 |
| mathrick | actually I use the interactive plugin to do most of my change management | 23:59 |
| mathrick | so I just go bzr ci and pick logical sets of changes until I have zero left | 23:59 |
| lifeless | poolie: pig | 23:59 |
| lifeless | sorry! | 23:59 |
| lifeless | poolie: ping | 23:59 |
| RickCogley | lifeless, may I ask: what is the strategy if you want to let visitors to a site download the latest version of a script, like a perl or shell script? | 23:59 |
| bialix | lifeless: ! | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!