/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/02/24/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

micahgncrfgs: use one flag or the other00:08
ncrfgsI ahve used only one00:12
ncrfgsI can't see anything like the second in the mozconfig I've used00:12
[reed]asac: ping04:21
micahg[reed]: anything I can help with?04:21
[reed]micahg: network-manager question04:23
[reed]specifically, VPN04:23
micahg[reed]: nope :), sorry, maybe cyphermox can help?04:24
cyphermox[reed] what is your question?04:24
cyphermoxor perhaps come  ask in #nm04:25
micahgcyphermox: [reed] is one of our upstream mozilla contacts, so that's why he asked here04:29
crimsunasac: we don't carry the necessary kernel patch to eliminate the stuttering.04:32
crimsunfta: I'm 100% certain that symptom has nothing to do with pulse04:32
cyphermoxcool04:34
BUGabundo_remotebom dia08:49
=== BUGabundo_remote is now known as BUGabundo_lunch
=== BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_remote
gnomefreakanyone have an update on how seamoney and lightning-sunbird are comming along?13:32
gnomefreakoh and we are dropping *ubuntu-desktop?13:33
gnomefreaki need to reboot but can someone try going to a java site using 3.6.2~hg20100223r33605+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd114:00
gnomefreaklet me know if you crash or not. be right back14:00
gnomefreakanyone feel like sending me alot of emails? my email box seems to be weird15:01
BUGabundo_remotegnomefreak: sure15:06
BUGabundo_remotedoes your isp accept spam makerd level 3 ip?15:07
gnomefreakBUGabundo_remote: ubuntu.ase AT gmail DOT com15:07
BUGabundo_remoteahh gmail , forget it :)15:07
BUGabundo_remotesec15:07
BUGabundo_remotewhy are you making it hard on me to read the email?15:08
BUGabundo_remotelol15:08
BUGabundo_remotebatch one done15:09
BUGabundo_remotelet me know whn I can send batch 2, gnomefreakm15:10
gnomefreakBUGabundo_remote: ok ill check in a few15:10
gnomefreakBUGabundo_remote: i only got one. maybe because the +#?15:15
BUGabundo_remoteon your email client?15:21
BUGabundo_remoteor web?15:21
BUGabundo_remoteit should have been multiple15:21
BUGabundo_remoteno prob15:21
gnomefreakemail client. since it is the problem i feel15:22
BUGabundo_remotegnomefreak: 10 more15:22
gnomefreakBUGabundo_remote: thanks checking15:22
gnomefreaknope only got the 4 bug replies. let me check web15:23
gnomefreakoh shit sorry wrog box lol. i got 12 thanks that should do it :)15:24
gnomefreakim not seeing anywhere near as many as i used to. im now stumped15:24
BUGabundo_remoteerrr15:25
BUGabundo_remoteas in you stop receving email?15:25
BUGabundo_remoteor your client is not processing them?15:25
BUGabundo_remotetried IMAP and POP ?15:25
gnomefreak76oh well damn15:26
=== gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak
BUGabundo_remotegot backlog gnomefreak?15:29
gnomefreakdont seem to15:30
BUGabundo_remote(2010-02-24 15:24:54) gnomefreak: im not seeing anywhere near as many as i used to. im now stumped15:30
BUGabundo_remote(2010-02-24 15:25:10) freenode: errr15:30
BUGabundo_remote(2010-02-24 15:25:17) freenode: as in you stop receving email?15:30
BUGabundo_remote(2010-02-24 15:25:24) freenode: or your client is not processing them?15:30
BUGabundo_remote(2010-02-24 15:25:29) freenode: tried IMAP and POP ?15:30
gnomefreakyes using pop imap == freezing15:31
gnomefreaki guess i will let that box go for a few days and see how many i get15:34
micahg_Tsk_: has comm-central branched?  I see tests for comm-192, but no repo in hg.m.o16:10
_Tsk_we haven't branched for released yet16:17
_Tsk_I don't know what cc does16:17
_Tsk_we have two trunks at the moment and too many people on trunk trunk instead of 192 trunk16:17
micahg_Tsk_: is there a link to the branch for 192?16:20
_Tsk_not yet16:20
micahgis there a tag for it?  how is it defined?16:20
_Tsk_the diff is how we build16:20
_Tsk_and what cc we fetch16:21
micahgk, well, maybe next week I'll try to fix our builds here...16:21
brunoscunhaasac: since the latest karmic update (gnome network manager among other updates) I've lost my wired connection. Since I haven't been able to get the wired connection back. It tries to connect and then says wired network disconencted17:20
ftakenvandine, is there a list somewhere of the apps that will get Indicator Applet support? or at least, those users requested17:39
ftajdstrand, http://paste.ubuntu.com/383148/17:44
jdstrandfta: k, I'll look at it17:45
jcastrofta: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=indicator-application17:49
ftajcastro, thanks17:51
ftai see liferea and tucan are not there, too bad17:52
BUGabundo_remotewoot https://chrome.google.com is down17:53
jcastrofta: anyone is welcome to file bugs and tag them (and also work on them)17:59
ftajcastro, i don't have time, that's why i'm not willing to file those bugs18:00
ftatime + "to do it myself"18:00
jcastroheh18:01
jcastrofta: tbh it's been tough getting the stuff on the CD even finished.18:01
jcastrofta: perhaps after gnome(hopefully) accepts it as a blessed dep18:01
ftahm18:02
ftai like the concept, but it's still buggy, like it doesn't work to hide a window on x6418:03
ftaand it forces me to change old habits18:03
fta:P18:03
ftai find it also two wide. 3 indicator icons are widers than 4 tray icons18:04
ftatoo wide18:04
ftalol18:04
jcastroI have someone looking at the bugs18:14
jcastrothe too wide bit you'll have to ask on the ayatana mailing list18:15
ftaayatana?18:25
ftajcastro, filed bug 527267 instead19:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 527267 in indicator-application "Application Indicators too wide" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52726719:14
jcastrocool19:14
jcastrowhat is that bird?19:14
ftatucan19:15
jcastrofta: I know it's a tucan, I mean what app?19:16
ftajcastro, tucan :)19:17
fta!info tucan19:17
ubottutucan (source: tucan): Download and upload manager for 1-Click Hosters. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.3.8-1 (karmic), package size 158 kB, installed size 1340 kB19:17
jcastrowow that's cool19:17
ftalol http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3563921:06
BUGabundoasac: what did you do with network !??21:45
BUGabundoI got no DHCP21:45
BUGabundoeven when doing it manually :(21:46
ccheneyasac: i think i got webkit working, suprisingly easily, it didn't even seem to require any gtk bits which i think seems odd22:08
ccheneyasac: moving on to epiphany maybe something will show up then22:08
ccheneyasac: perhaps the gtk stuff was only needed for video related bits22:09
ccheneyi still need fix up the symbols though makeshlibs threw a fit22:09
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
* ccheney hopes him adding the stuff in the patch makeshlibs spat out works22:28
ccheneyhmm need to do soup-gnome now which requires libproxy23:09

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!