[00:08] <micahg> ncrfgs: use one flag or the other
[00:12] <ncrfgs> I ahve used only one
[00:12] <ncrfgs> I can't see anything like the second in the mozconfig I've used
[04:21] <[reed]> asac: ping
[04:21] <micahg> [reed]: anything I can help with?
[04:23] <[reed]> micahg: network-manager question
[04:23] <[reed]> specifically, VPN
[04:24] <micahg> [reed]: nope :), sorry, maybe cyphermox can help?
[04:24] <cyphermox> [reed] what is your question?
[04:25] <cyphermox> or perhaps come  ask in #nm
[04:29] <micahg> cyphermox: [reed] is one of our upstream mozilla contacts, so that's why he asked here
[04:32] <crimsun> asac: we don't carry the necessary kernel patch to eliminate the stuttering.
[04:32] <crimsun> fta: I'm 100% certain that symptom has nothing to do with pulse
[04:34] <cyphermox> cool
[08:49] <BUGabundo_remote> bom dia
[13:32] <gnomefreak> anyone have an update on how seamoney and lightning-sunbird are comming along?
[13:33] <gnomefreak> oh and we are dropping *ubuntu-desktop?
[14:00] <gnomefreak> i need to reboot but can someone try going to a java site using 3.6.2~hg20100223r33605+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1
[14:00] <gnomefreak> let me know if you crash or not. be right back
[15:01] <gnomefreak> anyone feel like sending me alot of emails? my email box seems to be weird
[15:06] <BUGabundo_remote> gnomefreak: sure
[15:07] <BUGabundo_remote> does your isp accept spam makerd level 3 ip?
[15:07] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo_remote: ubuntu.ase AT gmail DOT com
[15:07] <BUGabundo_remote> ahh gmail , forget it :)
[15:07] <BUGabundo_remote> sec
[15:08] <BUGabundo_remote> why are you making it hard on me to read the email?
[15:08] <BUGabundo_remote> lol
[15:09] <BUGabundo_remote> batch one done
[15:10] <BUGabundo_remote> let me know whn I can send batch 2, gnomefreakm
[15:10] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo_remote: ok ill check in a few
[15:15] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo_remote: i only got one. maybe because the +#?
[15:21] <BUGabundo_remote> on your email client?
[15:21] <BUGabundo_remote> or web?
[15:21] <BUGabundo_remote> it should have been multiple
[15:21] <BUGabundo_remote> no prob
[15:22] <gnomefreak> email client. since it is the problem i feel
[15:22] <BUGabundo_remote> gnomefreak: 10 more
[15:22] <gnomefreak> BUGabundo_remote: thanks checking
[15:23] <gnomefreak> nope only got the 4 bug replies. let me check web
[15:24] <gnomefreak> oh shit sorry wrog box lol. i got 12 thanks that should do it :)
[15:24] <gnomefreak> im not seeing anywhere near as many as i used to. im now stumped
[15:25] <BUGabundo_remote> errr
[15:25] <BUGabundo_remote> as in you stop receving email?
[15:25] <BUGabundo_remote> or your client is not processing them?
[15:25] <BUGabundo_remote> tried IMAP and POP ?
[15:26] <gnomefreak76> oh well damn
[15:29] <BUGabundo_remote> got backlog gnomefreak?
[15:30] <gnomefreak> dont seem to
[15:30] <BUGabundo_remote> (2010-02-24 15:24:54) gnomefreak: im not seeing anywhere near as many as i used to. im now stumped
[15:30] <BUGabundo_remote> (2010-02-24 15:25:10) freenode: errr
[15:30] <BUGabundo_remote> (2010-02-24 15:25:17) freenode: as in you stop receving email?
[15:30] <BUGabundo_remote> (2010-02-24 15:25:24) freenode: or your client is not processing them?
[15:30] <BUGabundo_remote> (2010-02-24 15:25:29) freenode: tried IMAP and POP ?
[15:31] <gnomefreak> yes using pop imap == freezing
[15:34] <gnomefreak> i guess i will let that box go for a few days and see how many i get
[16:10] <micahg> _Tsk_: has comm-central branched?  I see tests for comm-192, but no repo in hg.m.o
[16:17] <_Tsk_> we haven't branched for released yet
[16:17] <_Tsk_> I don't know what cc does
[16:17] <_Tsk_> we have two trunks at the moment and too many people on trunk trunk instead of 192 trunk
[16:20] <micahg> _Tsk_: is there a link to the branch for 192?
[16:20] <_Tsk_> not yet
[16:20] <micahg> is there a tag for it?  how is it defined?
[16:20] <_Tsk_> the diff is how we build
[16:21] <_Tsk_> and what cc we fetch
[16:21] <micahg> k, well, maybe next week I'll try to fix our builds here...
[17:20] <brunoscunha> asac: since the latest karmic update (gnome network manager among other updates) I've lost my wired connection. Since I haven't been able to get the wired connection back. It tries to connect and then says wired network disconencted
[17:39] <fta> kenvandine, is there a list somewhere of the apps that will get Indicator Applet support? or at least, those users requested
[17:44] <fta> jdstrand, http://paste.ubuntu.com/383148/
[17:45] <jdstrand> fta: k, I'll look at it
[17:49] <jcastro> fta: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=indicator-application
[17:51] <fta> jcastro, thanks
[17:52] <fta> i see liferea and tucan are not there, too bad
[17:53] <BUGabundo_remote> woot https://chrome.google.com is down
[17:59] <jcastro> fta: anyone is welcome to file bugs and tag them (and also work on them)
[18:00] <fta> jcastro, i don't have time, that's why i'm not willing to file those bugs
[18:00] <fta> time + "to do it myself"
[18:01] <jcastro> heh
[18:01] <jcastro> fta: tbh it's been tough getting the stuff on the CD even finished.
[18:01] <jcastro> fta: perhaps after gnome(hopefully) accepts it as a blessed dep
[18:02] <fta> hm
[18:03] <fta> i like the concept, but it's still buggy, like it doesn't work to hide a window on x64
[18:03] <fta> and it forces me to change old habits
[18:03] <fta> :P
[18:04] <fta> i find it also two wide. 3 indicator icons are widers than 4 tray icons
[18:04] <fta> too wide
[18:04] <fta> lol
[18:14] <jcastro> I have someone looking at the bugs
[18:15] <jcastro> the too wide bit you'll have to ask on the ayatana mailing list
[18:25] <fta> ayatana?
[19:14] <fta> jcastro, filed bug 527267 instead
[19:14] <jcastro> cool
[19:14] <jcastro> what is that bird?
[19:15] <fta> tucan
[19:16] <jcastro> fta: I know it's a tucan, I mean what app?
[19:17] <fta> jcastro, tucan :)
[19:17] <fta> !info tucan
[19:17] <jcastro> wow that's cool
[21:06] <fta> lol http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35639
[21:45] <BUGabundo> asac: what did you do with network !??
[21:45] <BUGabundo> I got no DHCP
[21:46] <BUGabundo> even when doing it manually :(
[22:08] <ccheney> asac: i think i got webkit working, suprisingly easily, it didn't even seem to require any gtk bits which i think seems odd
[22:08] <ccheney> asac: moving on to epiphany maybe something will show up then
[22:09] <ccheney> asac: perhaps the gtk stuff was only needed for video related bits
[22:09] <ccheney> i still need fix up the symbols though makeshlibs threw a fit
[22:28]  * ccheney hopes him adding the stuff in the patch makeshlibs spat out works
[23:09] <ccheney> hmm need to do soup-gnome now which requires libproxy