/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/03/02/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

BUGabundofta: heads up: latest daily of gwibber is dead. kenvandine: http://paste.ubuntu.com/386650/00:15
ddecatorhuh, it's working for me00:17
BUGabundoddecator: upgrade :D00:18
ddecatorBUGabundo, i just did a dist-upgrade and it didn't show up, but i just might not be able to access it yet00:19
BUGabundolucid?00:19
BUGabundodon't do dist upgrades00:19
BUGabundothose are evil00:19
BUGabundoinstead do $ sudo aptitude safe-upgrade00:20
ddecatorkarmic00:20
crimsunkenvandine: I proposed a fairly trivial merge for lp:gwibber, but I don't think you're subscribed (sorry): https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~crimsun/gwibber/fix_comment_hig_compliance/+merge/2018900:20
BUGabundo_remotebom d|a08:41
BUGabundo_remotefta: kenvandine: latest gwibber trunk http://paste.ubuntu.com/386841/08:47
TroubleI've just updated to firefox_3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu5~mfs~karmic1, re-started Firefox and suddenly I'm feeling a performance increase and seeing Firefox (and Xorg) using less CPU! :-D11:07
TroubleMy laptop is now a lot perkier :-p11:09
asaccool ;)11:13
asacand yes ...fffox 3.6 is better ;)11:14
TroubleI should have said I updated from firefox 3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu4~mfs~karmic1 ;-)11:15
TroubleMy laptop has been practically flying since updating!11:17
Milos_SDHi12:20
Milos_SDI was here a month ago with a problem with dom.ipc.plugins.enabled=true12:21
Milos_SDwith that option set on true, Firefox 3.7 would freez on every page that has flash12:21
Milos_SDwhat will that be resolved?12:21
sindhudweepasac: you there?12:58
gnomefreakit looks like tb3 PPA is back14:53
gnomefreakhas anyone looked at seamonkey2  yet?14:54
TroubleWhere's the TB3 PPA gnomefreak?15:29
gnomefreakTrouble: its the daily PPA but tb3 is in Lucid already15:29
gnomefreakTrouble: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu lucid main  << sources entry15:30
gnomefreakor karmicjaunty ect...15:31
gnomefreaks/karmicjaunty/karmic jaunty15:31
gnomefreakTrouble: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa for an overview15:32
gnomefreakmicahg: hi15:32
micahghi gnomefreak15:32
gnomefreakmicahg: i hought we were no longer using tb3 daily PPA15:33
Troublegnomefreak: I thought you meant a "stable" PPA (like for Firefox), but I see the dailies for TB 3.0.3 have stopped now we're up to 3.1, so that gives me an opportunity to update my TB to a stable version on Karmic, so thanks anyway :)15:34
micahggnomefreak: no, it's there15:34
micahgbrb15:34
gnomefreakTrouble: we are not using 3.1 for a while15:34
gnomefreaksorry we are not using ff-3.1 any longer now the package will be just "firefox"15:35
gnomefreaksame with thunderbird IIRC15:36
* gnomefreak not sure if the trasnition has been pushed to <lucid15:36
TroubleI'm using 3.6 from the firefox-stable PPA :-p15:36
gnomefreakTrouble: for karmic?15:37
Troubleyea15:37
gnomefreakTrouble: once its updated it will no longer carry a version #15:37
TroubleThat sounds good to me15:37
gnomefreakthat is why the firefox-stable PPA15:37
micahgTrouble: dailies haven't stopped...amd64 is broke...I'll fix tonight15:38
micahgtb3.1 is broke as well15:39
gnomefreakmicahg: transitioning firefox to <lucid?15:39
micahggnomefreak: later15:40
TroubleHehe it's all good. I'm not interested in 3.1 yet, and my amd64 machine is currently down leaving me with this i386 laptop :-p15:40
micahgmozilla might actually release a 3.0.19...15:40
TroubleInitially I was just referring to the fact that there is a firefox-stable PPA for 3.6, but not a thunderbird-stable PPA for stable releases of 3.0.x. I thought gnomefreak was saying there was a thunderbird-stable PPA ;-)15:41
gnomefreakTrouble: nope sorry15:41
TroubleNever had any real problems using the 3.0.x nightlies tho :)15:42
micahgTrouble: 3.0.x wasn't so stable yet :) 3.0.3 is though...I also have to check the backlog of bugs to make sure we don't have any issues yet15:42
TroubleI'm gunna update from 3.0.2pre (20100131) to the 3.0.3 in the PPA15:43
micahghmm15:53
micahgwhen did the daily switch..I must have missed that15:53
micahgfta: you switched the thunderbird daily to the unversioned package?15:54
micahgasac: around?16:01
gnomefreaki havent seen him yet16:14
gnomefreakmicahg: have you heard anything on SM2/sunbird-lightning 1 ?16:43
ftamicahg, asac: if you want a stable ppa for moz stuff, drobotik can maintain it automatically. you can add something similar to what i've done for the chromium channels, i.e. I pass CHANNEL={beta,dev,stable} to get-orig-source via the pocket conf file16:44
fta(i lack both time and motivation to do it myself) :P16:45
micahggnomefreak: heard?16:46
micahgfta: that's ok, although I might use the bot to update a stable ppa16:46
gnomefreakmicahg: are either ready for Lucid16:46
micahggnomefreak: no16:47
micahgfta: so is tb3.head abandoned now?16:47
ftamicahg, 3.0, yes16:47
micahgfta: k, I'll update the branches so tb.head is lp:thunderbird/3.016:48
gnomefreakmicahg: ok thanks16:48
BUGabundo_remotefta: you made chromium too good16:57
BUGabundo_remoteit won't die16:57
BUGabundo_remotenot even with pkill chromium-b16:57
BUGabundo_remotenot even with pkill *-9* chromium-b16:58
BUGabundo_remoteI got a window stuck, and can't get rid of it :\16:58
ftalol16:59
ftaBUGabundo_remote, what is the pid state? Z? D?16:59
ftamicahg, the desktop file of 3.6 in the ppa still mention beta17:01
fta+s17:01
micahgfta: k, I'll update17:01
micahgfta, you think changing it to Firefox 3.6 is sufficient?17:02
ftamicahg, iirc, asac wants the ppa to remain namoroka, not firefox (i don't really like it but i won't fight for it)17:03
micahgfta: just the comment where it said beta, not the title17:03
ftayep17:04
micahghmm, maybe it should say Firefox Daily Buily?17:05
ftamicahg, change it to "Firefox pre-release" or something17:05
ftaas the release notes point to http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/prerelease.html17:05
ftai meant, the comment, not the title17:05
micahgright17:05
* gnomefreak gone for a while17:07
ftawooww.. 3.6 is really slow for <canvas>17:07
micahgfta: fixed17:07
ftaor js in general17:07
micahgfta: was the original fennec code all in mobile-browser?17:16
ftai don't remember17:20
ftahm.. i no longer have the branch locally :p17:21
micahgfta: k, I'll try it like it is first17:21
mahfouzI filed a bug today about 3.7 concerning crashes: is it normal that 3.7 freezes17:23
mahfouzor is it just me?17:23
mahfouzI'm not sure what the problem is, could be flash17:23
BUGabundo_remotemahfouz: prob process separation stuff17:30
BUGabundo_remoteif you turn that off, it will work maravelous17:30
mahfouzhow can i turn it off?17:30
BUGabundo_remoteI'm stump we can't get mozilla to branch alpha217:30
BUGabundo_remoteso I can't use my addons :(17:30
BUGabundo_remotemahfouz: http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2010-01-27/multi-process-plugins-on-by-default/17:30
BUGabundo_remote[reed]: http://www.oxymoronical.com/web/firefox/nightly#comment-41247  ?17:31
BUGabundo_remotewhat is there missing ?17:31
mahfouzi thought the point of separation is that firefox does not crash :)17:32
BUGabundo_remoteahahah17:37
BUGabundo_remoteirony isn't it mahfouz17:37
mahfouzhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53561217:37
ubottuMozilla bug 535612 in Plug-ins "[OOPP][Linux] Some Flash objects (e.g. Homestar Runner, Youtube) don't receive clicks, with Compiz effects & 'dom.ipc.plugins.enabled' turned on" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]17:37
mahfouzthis is reportedly fixed17:37
mahfouzbut I still have a flash issue17:38
mahfouzhttp://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2010-01-27/multi-process-plugins-on-by-default/#comment-43017717:41
mahfouzI guess this is my issue, comment 43017717:41
=== kenvandine is now known as kenvandine[busy]
=== kenvandine[busy] is now known as kenvandine
micahgmahfouz: anyhone answer your question?19:02
mahfouzmicahg, well I guess it's an issue with the new dom.ipc19:18
mahfouzmaybe I shld file on mozilla but I don't have an account there yet19:18
mahfouzmicahg, can you run 3.7 with dom.ipc.plugins.enabled?19:18
micahgmahfouz: don't have time to test now....if this the flash issue with clicks?19:23
micahg*is19:23
mahfouzwell, it just freezes during loading the page19:23
mahfouzhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/53060419:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 530604 in firefox-3.5 "firefox 3.7 freezes" [Undecided,New]19:23
mahfouz** (firefox-3.7:14282): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 1419:24
micahgah, yeah, that was already filed I thought19:24
micahgmahfouz: does it work with the upstream build?19:24
mahfouzhmm, have to download19:25
mahfouzhttp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/19:26
mahfouzI try this one19:26
micahgk19:26
mahfouzLoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /home/bkoenig/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so [/home/bkoenig/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64]19:37
mahfouzI don't have flash in upstream build, so I get no freezes19:38
gnomefreakevery time i read all my lucid changes list email i get mostly kde libs :( when i go through fast (normal) i never see any  :(19:39
mahfouzgnomefreak, then don't read at all19:40
micahgmahfouz: try this one: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/firefox-3.7a3pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz219:40
* gnomefreak still not sure why they dont upload as 119:40
gnomefreakmicahg: 3.7 is still extreamly slow here with/without flash19:41
gnomefreakbut its been like that a while19:41
mahfouzwas it the bits, I have 64bit atm, but x86_64 didn't run19:41
micahggnomefreak: I have a feeling that we're not installing something19:41
mahfouzok, this download runs for me19:42
gnomefreakmicahg: what could we be missing? wouldnt it FTBFS if we were not installing something?19:42
micahggnomefreak: idk, not necessarily19:43
* gnomefreak thought it would be noticable or failure during dh_* at the end of build19:43
micahggnomefreak: no, we just found something missing in ff3.619:44
gnomefreakah19:44
mahfouzwow, the upstream build of 3.7 rocks19:44
micahgI just haven't had time to look into 3.7 yet19:44
mahfouzflash and everything is fine19:44
micahgmahfouz: w/flash?  64 bit?19:44
gnomefreakhow do i find all bugs ive commented on in mozilla bug tracker19:45
micahggnomefreak: advanced search maybe19:45
mahfouzflash 64 bit and with ipc.plugins.enabled "true"19:45
mahfouzeverything fine19:45
micahgmahfouz: k, so we need to investigate here more19:45
mahfouzdid you see the errors, I posted on the bug report?19:45
micahgmahfouz: not yet, unfortunately, not a priority as we still need to get a few things in lucid19:46
gnomefreakill look after email but im looking for the tb3 customize tool bar.19:46
mahfouznp, just wanted to let you know19:46
mahfouz** (firefox-3.7:14282): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 1419:46
mahfouz** (firefox-3.7:14282): WARNING **: Serious fd usage error 1219:46
micahgmahfouz: thanks, feel free to poke me after beta 119:46
mahfouzjust those two errors, do you know what they mean?19:46
gnomefreakwe still didnt package 64bit flash or did we19:46
micahgmahfouz: no, but it's been reported already I think19:47
micahggnomefreak: no, it's not released yet19:47
mahfouzah, ok19:47
gnomefreaki didnt think adobe ever released stable builds19:47
micahggnomefreak: yes, they do19:47
micahggnomefreak: it's supposed to be in a release after 10.119:47
gnomefreakeveryone is going to want it for <=Lucid and backporting flash has been a problem as far as i tried.19:49
micahggnomefreak: do you have time to do seamonkey 2?19:49
micahggnomefreak: well, the main problem was that it wasn't ready IIRC19:49
gnomefreakmicahg: its too much of a mess for me to touch it. we have to add all packages that was removed and not sure if script for source is still there or if he added it to debian/rules19:50
ftahttp://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2010/03/firefox-may-never-hit-25-percent-market-share.ars19:50
micahggnomefreak: ok, I'll have to try to squeeze it in the next 2 weeks then19:50
gnomefreakfiles were also removed and same with nobinonly19:50
micahgI'm working on prism and fennec now19:50
gnomefreakif i can figure out how to fix sunbird to grab 1.0b1 since as of now it will only grab stable release19:51
micahggnomefreak: don't we need thunderbird-dev first?19:52
gnomefreaki had tried using tb3 stuff but it didnt work. this was for 0.9 pre release19:52
mahfouzmicahg, btw, it's definitely the ipc.plugins stuff, daily build ppa version works fine also if I disable ipc19:52
micahgmahfouz: ok, we're probably not installing something19:52
gnomefreakwe dont have t*-dev package?19:52
micahggnomefreak: not for TB3 yet19:52
gnomefreakoh ok than it can wait for that. its not really a priority for Lucid. it can always get to a PPA. I should have more time for lucid+119:54
micahggnomefreak: well, enigmail is broke in lucid, so it's kinda a priority...19:54
gnomefreakmicahg: yes it is, however enigmail is still a mess of crap. im not sure why it is the way it is.19:55
micahggnomefreak: 1.0 was released and it should be fine19:55
* gnomefreak has been using upstream dev. enigmail19:55
gnomefreakmicahg: ok i will try it in a bit19:56
micahggnomefreak: it should probably be similar to xul-191-dev19:59
gnomefreakmicahg: you mean engimail?19:59
micahggnomefreak: no, tb-dev19:59
micahggnomefreak: you need tb-dev for enigmail19:59
gnomefreakmicahg: we need it for xul-192-dev no?20:00
micahggnomefreak: no20:01
gnomefreaki thought 192 was for tb320:02
micahggnomefreak: no, 19120:02
micahg3.1 is 19220:02
gnomefreakoh20:02
gnomefreakmicahg: do you recall what the problem was for 3.1?20:03
micahggnomefreak: after the branding landed, the build broke20:03
micahgI never had time to fix20:04
micahgand beta 1 is next week20:04
gnomefreakIIRC we have a branding patch, shouldnt that be the only change except maybe the *.desktop20:04
micahgno, that wasn't it20:05
gnomefreakoh20:05
gnomefreakthat would have been too easy ;)20:05
micahgwell, actually, it might have had something to do w/the branding patch..20:05
micahgyeah, something was missing20:06
micahgand right now comm-central has tb31 and tb3220:07
gnomefreakthere is a tb32 already. although they should be same base code ATM20:08
micahggnomefreak: no, I think sm21 and tb32 are the same20:08
gnomefreaksm2.1 is pretty much sm2.0 AFAIR20:09
gnomefreakwas may not be now20:09
micahgwell, only 2 bugs targeted for 3.2 ATM20:09
micahgwell, idk, but sm21 and tb32 should be on 19320:10
micahgsm21 already has 107 bugs targetted with about half fixed20:11
gnomefreakthey always start next release with stable code to start with. i had asked in IRC mozilla.org servers dont recall who i spoke to but he is main dev for sm20:11
gnomefreakat least that was when devscripts was grabbing 2.1 source rather than 2.020:13
micahggnomefreak: my guess is by now they've diverged...sm20 has had 4 releases20:28
gnomefreakmicahg: yeah by now they have have20:30
gnomefreak- one have20:30
gnomefreak!info firefox hardy20:30
ubottufirefox (source: firefox-3.0): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.18+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 (hardy), package size 65 kB, installed size 120 kB20:31
gnomefreakjust my luck gwibber doesnt start20:39
gnomefreakkenvandine: if you are around do you have a sec about gwibber not starting. more so a way to debug daily version20:46
gnomefreaki guess i just did :)20:47
kenvandinegnomefreak, not a gwibber bug :)20:47
kenvandinehttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/desktopcouch/+bug/53071620:47
ubottuLaunchpad bug 530716 in desktopcouch "desktopcouch starts, but applications can't access it" [High,Confirmed]20:47
kenvandinethey are working on a fix asap20:47
gnomefreakkenvandine: thanks i didnt see that one20:47
gnomefreakmissed it since i was looking for gwibber bug20:48
kenvandine:)20:48
gnomefreakmaybe its just me but it seems like desktopcouch is broken more than not20:50
BUGabundokenvandine: got the id for that couch bug ?21:24
BUGabundogwibber service is stuck at 100% when ever it starts21:25
kenvandinebug 53071621:25
ubottuLaunchpad bug 530716 in desktopcouch "desktopcouch starts, but applications can't access it" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53071621:25
kenvandinewe might have a fix21:25
kenvandinei need to reboot to test it for sure21:25
BUGabundothanks21:26
BUGabundoasac: I know of a NM bug that can't remember hidden SSIDs?21:39
BUGabundoI'm getting bashed on twitter21:39
asacBUGabundo: for what?21:39
BUGabundoand Ubuntu may loose an entire faculty,21:39
BUGabundocause they can't get it to work with 9.1021:39
BUGabundoasac: wifi, of course21:39
BUGabundotrying to get him on IRC or a bug report21:41
BUGabundowe are talking about one of the biggest faculties in portugal21:41
BUGabundoand they have all PCs with dualboot21:41
BUGabundoand provide users with their own remake of Ubuntu21:41
BUGabundothe guy incharge his making the new semester version21:42
BUGabundoand has several nasty bugs, some of them with keychain and one with NM21:42
BUGabundothey use wpa2 enterprise, with hidden SSIDs21:42
BUGabundoa limitation of cisco equipement they have their , to serve eduroam/E-U network21:43
BUGabundohttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subversion/+bug/47313921:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 473139 in subversion "gnome-keyring demands unspecified password, breaking svn commits" [Low,Confirmed]21:44
BUGabundoasac: can you take a quick look at that ^^^22:00
BUGabundoand see if there's anything you can do?22:01
BUGabundoI would hate to loose this much users!22:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!