/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/03/03/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

bcurtiswxfor UDS-M.. what is a "member of the crew"00:26
persiabcurtiswx: It usually means someone willing to help out in various ways (changing signs, giving 5-minute warnings to sessions, helping move stuff around for room setup/teardown, etc.)00:27
bcurtiswxpersia: ah, neat.  I've done that at another annual conference.. its actually kinda fun00:28
ddecatorbug 526453 is ready to be [low, triaged]. i was thinking medium at first, but low seems more appropriate since the user can simply leave the search bar in the toolbar and it will function properly01:39
ubot4Launchpad bug 526453 in firefox (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Firefox does not allow users to change the default search engine, unless the search bar is present (affects: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52645301:39
kermiacddecator: bug 526453: 6. 6. Go to View -> Toolbars -> Customize and drag the search box out of the toolbar    doesn't have a search box to remove for me01:48
ubot4Launchpad bug 526453 in firefox (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Firefox does not allow users to change the default search engine, unless the search bar is present (affects: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52645301:48
ddecatorkermiac, you should be able to drag the search bar out of the top toolbar, removing it and placing it in the customization window, so then there will only be the address bar01:50
kermiacok, that wasn't clear in the reproduction steps (I don't mess with FF settings that much though)01:50
ddecatorhm, i could reword it if you think it's too unclear01:51
kermiacmight be a good idea.... devs would probably know what you mean though - as I said, I don't mess with FF settings that much01:53
kermiacone related question though...01:53
ddecatoralright, i'll work on that. and yes?01:53
kermiacis there any way to make the search bar go back to the original size after placing it back?01:53
kermiacright now it's VERY big, lol01:53
ddecatorhaha, try restarting FF01:53
kermiacnope, that was the first thing i tried ;)01:54
ddecatordid you place it back in the same place to the right of the address bar?01:54
* kermiac is embarrassed01:55
kermiacuser error, lol01:55
ddecator;)01:55
kermiacok, well I can reproduce easily (minus my user error)01:55
kermiacI'll set to low/triaged.... you may wish to reword step 6 just to be clear on exactly how to produce01:56
ddecatorkermiac, thanks, i'm updating the description right now...01:57
kermiacok, let me know when you're done & I'll check it & set for you :)01:57
ddecatorkermiac, alright, is that more clear?02:00
* kermiac looks02:01
kermiacexcellent work ddecator :)02:05
kermiacmuch clearer now (for FF noobs, like me)02:05
ddecatorkermiac, thanks =) it definitely helps that i'm specializing in FF bugs now, haha, easier to know what to do02:05
kermiactrue :)02:05
ddecatornow if i can just get one more +1, i won't need to bug you to do this -cough cough- haha02:06
kermiachahaha... There are a lot more experience -control members than me that should +1 you mate. I've only been in control for a very short time mate ;)02:07
ddecatorhaha, i know i wasn't implying you should, just saying it'll be nice when it happens ;)02:07
kermiac:)02:07
ddecatoralright, on that note, thanks for setting that for me, now i need to go test a bug with lucid une...02:07
kermiacok mate... keep up the good work :)02:08
ddecatorthanks, you too02:09
cjohnstonquestion... bug 530256 is a gtg bug.. Since gtg uses LP for bug tracking should the bug be moved from gtg (ubuntu) to just the gtg project?04:48
ubot4Launchpad bug 530256 in gtg (Ubuntu) "gtg crashed with GError in loadDialog() (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53025604:48
micahgcjohnston: it's not about the package?05:05
* micahg is looking05:05
micahgcjohnston: just open a task for GTG as well05:06
=== scream is now known as QDA4
AnzenkethWhy Why do I have to get so busy.05:56
=== QDA4 is now known as scream
kermiacI saw that Brian un-set the security vulnerability flag on bug 530805 - any idea why I don't have permission to access it? This is the first time I have seen this so it got me curious :)07:06
ubot4kermiac: Bug 530805 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/530805 is private07:06
kermiacah nvm - bot answered my question, lol07:06
persiaheh07:11
AnzenkethLook the bot is answering questions now.07:11
Anzenkethbug 80399 needs to be sent to fix released right?07:21
ubot4Launchpad bug 80399 in sendmail (Ubuntu) "sendmail configuration makefile fails" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/8039907:21
thekorngood morning!07:28
Anzenkethmorning07:33
AnzenkethI am outa it is night for me07:46
toresbehey guys... I experienced a bug with my nVidia card that I think might be a little serious08:27
toresbeI booted it up with the VESA driver - when I installed the nVidia proprietary drivers, the GPU fan spun up to 100%, and I discovered that the card had been very warm.08:29
arandtoresbe: I don't know where to go further, but first of all, get a good bug report down.08:30
toresbeI assume the card shuts or slows down before damage could be done, but if this and other nVidia cards do this, then it might be a serious problem.08:30
arandtoresbe: agreed, might want to hop into #ubuntu+1 as well and see if others have similar problems, but do get the bug report done, that way if many sees the same thing and notes it there, it's importance will be obvious.08:34
BUGabundo_remotemorning09:05
LimCoreprogram hangs on11:39
LimCoreselect(39, [38], [], NULL, NULL11:39
LimCorehow to get more information about, I guess, file descriptors number 39, 3811:40
LimCorebug #53128711:50
ubot4Launchpad bug 531287 in trickle (Ubuntu) "Trickle does not work with kmail - hangs it (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53128711:50
yofel_LimCore: the file descriptors are kept in /proc/$APP_PID/fd, ls -l will show if it's a file/device/socket/pipe/...12:20
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
LimCorenumber of users fail to use programs like: kgpg, cryptkeeper, because they do not open a window - just a popup. This should be fixed.12:24
LimCorewow 2 sigsegv bugs in encrfs.12:45
LimCoremine is bug #53131312:45
ubot4Launchpad bug 531313 in cryptkeeper (Ubuntu) "[karmic] cryptkeeper crashes on creating new encfs (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53131312:45
LimCoreif someone have 2 minutes please confirm it12:45
thekornpedro_, hey! nice to see you around again, I hope you, your family and friends are all fine13:03
pedro_thekorn, hello!! thank you, i'm happy to be here too :-). I'm ok and my family too13:04
pedro_thekorn, a couple of friends lost their home though, but the material things are not the important right now, they are still alive13:05
thekornpedro_, ok, good. take care ;)13:10
BUGabundo_remotethat's the spirit pedro_13:10
TeTeThow can I set the source package for a bug once I found out what it is? bug in question is bug 525700 and should be against plymouth13:11
ubot4Launchpad bug 525700 in ubuntu "Removing quiet and splash will have gdm start on tty1 (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52570013:11
TeTeTI try: 'also affects distribution', then select ubuntu and plymouth, but I get an error that this bug is already filed against ubuntu13:13
TeTeTnevermind, found it13:14
LimCoreI wish one day I would try to use something in Ubuntu, and there would be not a 50% chance it will fail totally13:27
LimCorecan I do something more to help to fix the encfs bug? Because usesrs are left with no easy encryption it seems (that do not require partition, root, etc)13:27
BUGabundo_remoteLimCore: I use encfs daily13:32
BUGabundo_remoteno prob there13:32
iktmy netbook won't resume from hibernation/suspend any more, only since one of the updates to alpha 313:37
iktwhere should I report a bug?13:40
BUGabundo_remoteikt: ask in #ubuntu+113:41
BUGabundo_remotebut you want to file it against the kernel13:41
BUGabundo_remoteaka linux package13:41
nigelbikt: though BUGabundo_remote must know about it ;)13:41
BUGabundo_remote$ ubuntu-bug linux13:42
BUGabundo_remotenigelb: you are slow :S13:42
* nigelb thinks BUGabundo_remote knows all the lucid bugs plus bug numbers ;)13:42
BUGabundo_remotenot for the last two cicles :(13:42
BUGabundo_remoteI'm off shape13:42
nigelbbah..13:42
nigelbtime to get back fit ;)13:42
BUGabundo_remotecan't!13:43
BUGabundo_remotework takes precedence13:43
nigelbah, reasonable then13:43
* BUGabundo_remote is afraid to look into MLs folders13:43
LimCoreBUGabundo_remote: on karmic? then please comment by bug13:49
alvinI want to report a postgresql wishlist bug. Upon looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-8.4 I see that not a single postgresql bug is triaged. Am I mistaken, or is postgresql unsupported? It's in main. (A lot of these bugs look like duplicates. I'm willing to triage a few, but not today.)14:05
hggdhOK. The BugSquad membership roster has just been reduced in half ;-)14:17
nigelbthank you hggdh :)14:17
hggdh(just meaning earlier today)14:17
nigelbwish we could have something on the join team itself14:18
nigelbsomething like a page to write something to admins14:18
hggdhlater on, after this adjustment phase14:18
nigelbhm:)14:19
nigelbHeads up bug squad: LP will be read only for a few hours today.14:19
vishnigelb: huh?14:20
vishi mean time? ;)14:20
Zusnigelb,  all aspects of  LP?14:21
nigelbyup14:21
nigelb2300 UTC14:21
nigelb23.00 UTC Wed 3 March - 00:30 UTC Thu 4 Marc14:21
vishheh , i'll be fast asleep ;p14:21
nigelbZus: I believe so14:21
nigelbvish: I know, me too14:21
nigelbbut US will be awake, just posting a warning :)14:22
Zusthanks i was actually working on my profile...14:22
aburchLaunchpad just told me that my membership in the Bug Control team is about to expire.14:28
aburchShould I do anything besides pinging the admins?14:30
nigelbaburch: you can poke brian when he comes on.14:30
nigelbis this bug squad or bug control?14:30
aburchBug control.14:30
nigelbyep, poke brian, b d m u r r a y14:31
BUGabundo_remote"Please pretty please STOP changing the status of this bug!" some one made pitty mad !14:31
vishyay , pedro_ is safe and back :)14:31
nigelbvish: was he unsafe?14:32
vishnigelb: earthquake14:32
* pedro_ hugs vish14:32
nigelbah :)14:32
nigelbpedro_: welcome back :)14:33
pedro_vish, i'm ok! thanks for worrying about me ;-)14:33
pedro_the internet connection is working pretty slow though, but at least i'm able to IRC a bit14:33
aburchbdmurray: Could you please renew my bugcontrol membership (~ansgar-43-1)?  If there are any questins, I will probably need some time to reply (I'm travelling in the next days).14:33
pedro_phone lines are still going up and down14:33
pedro_but we're safe ;-)14:33
vishpedro_: lot of us here were worried :) and seb_128 put  our minds to rest :)14:33
vishs/to rest/at ease14:35
nigelbpedro_: I must have spammed you quite a bit with bug mails :)14:36
pedro_nigelb, no worries about that ;-)14:37
hggdhpedro_: Welcome!!14:38
nigelbhehe14:38
* pedro_ hugs hggdh14:39
* hggdh higs pedro_ -- really. Glad to know all is well with you & yours14:40
hggdhs/higs/hugs/ # oh dyslexia14:40
nigelblol14:40
* LimCore writes letter to god why the noobs didn't still fixed earthquakes with attached strace15:05
ddecatorhola pedro_15:09
pedro_hello there ddecator!15:09
ddecatorpedro_, do you have some time to work with me this morning?15:10
pedro_ddecator, tomorrow would be better, but if you have any question just drop those here in the channel15:10
pedro_I'm sure our rocking bugsquad will help with any15:11
ddecatorpedro_, fair enough, i have a ton of bugmail to respond to anyway. i'll plan on tomorrow then =). did you have a good vacation? (sorry to go off topic for a second)15:11
pedro_ddecator, had a good beginning of the holidays but a terrible end due to the earthquake15:12
ddecatorpedro_, i didn't realize you were near the earthquake, sorry to hear about that.15:12
Hellowpedro_, You was near the earthquake?15:13
LimCoreBUGabundo_remote: so creating a new encfs from cryptkeeper does not crash for you? on lucid? karmic?15:13
LimCoreBUGabundo_remote: 32 or 64?15:13
pedro_Hellow, I was near the city of the epicenter, nothing bad happened to me or to my family though15:14
Hellowpedro_, That's good that nothing happened to you guys.15:14
* vish thinks we can add pedro_'s safe return to the channel topic ;)15:15
* ddecator agrees15:16
BUGabundo_remoteLimCore: ? cryptkeeper?15:22
BUGabundo_remotenever used that!15:22
BUGabundo_remotecurrently lucid 6415:22
BUGabundo_remotevolume created long ago in 8.x15:23
ddecatorif a person doesn't give apport proper permission (when running apport-collect), how can they change the permission so they can use it?15:26
LimCoreBUGabundo_remote: yes, I was saying about using encfs via cryptkeeper.  Perhaps you can try it?15:27
hggdhif it has not been changed, delete the current auth, and create a new one with the correct permissions15:27
hggdhddecator: ^15:27
ddecatorhggdh, thanks. how would they delete the current auth?15:27
hggdhddecator: heh. Now I have to remember that also... it will be in a hidden directory off home15:30
hggdhlet me look for it15:30
ddecatorhaha, great, thanks hggdh15:31
thekornhggdh, ddecator ~/.cache/apport/launchpad.credentials15:33
ddecatorthekorn, tyvm15:33
hggdhhah! Thank you, thekorn . We should try to standardise the launchpadlib credentials directory15:34
ddecatori need to change my custom stock response so it reminds them to give permission...15:34
LimCoreI found a bug that silently (nothing in logs) crahes apache. How to debug?15:34
* thekorn files a bug to change this location, launchpadlib is now smart enough to use a central place15:34
thekornhggdh, exactly15:34
hggdhthekorn: can you give me the bug #? I would like to subscribe15:38
thekornhggdh, upps, sorry, have to create the bug in 1.5 hours, have to get a bus now15:39
hggdhthekorn: np15:39
thekornbut sure, will post the id here15:39
micahgare people having an issue with this mercedes character?15:42
ddecatormicahg, yup15:43
nigelbmicahg: re: the foul language in a firefox bug, already taken care of15:45
micahgnigelb: really...I haven't gotten to that yet15:45
ddecatornigelb, there was foul language in one? i just had to reset the status of a few...15:45
nigelbyou'll get there ;)15:46
nigelbbug 49711715:46
ubot4Launchpad bug 497117 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "[i915gm] Firefox appears to crash Ubuntu (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49711715:46
ddecatornigelb, that's someone else, but thanks for taking care of that haha15:47
nigelbno problem :)15:47
micahgnigelb: ah, yeah..thanks15:47
nigelbshould we have the LP downtime on /topic? wise to have it?15:47
ddecatormicahg, yah i got a few emails about mercedes this morning just for firefox, idk if anything got changed for -3.0 or -3.515:48
micahgnigelb: well, not the focus of this channel...should be in #launchpad topic though15:50
nigelbits there15:50
nigelbbut if we get excessive, I can't file a bug15:50
nigelbit would be nice to have it here too15:50
micahgwhat do you mean if we get excessive...15:51
nigelbwell, lots of people popping in to ask why they are not able to file bugs15:51
micahgnigelb: IIRC, that doesn't usually happen15:51
nigelbbut if LP directs them to #launchpad or shows a sane error message, no worries15:51
nigelbah, then fine :)15:51
ddecatormicahg, mind taking a look at bug 524065 ? i'm not sure if you know what the cause would be or not15:52
ubot4Launchpad bug 524065 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Download Manager does not display an icon to download (affects: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52406515:52
micahghggdh: do you think we should file a block request for this user changing all the statuses or try email first?15:52
ddecator(title isn't the clearist...)15:52
micahgddecator: I think that's an upstream issue that's been filed already...I forgot the bug number15:54
micahgalthough, I'm not sure if it's firefox or not15:54
micahgddecator: BTW, good job on finding that upstream bug for the deleted search box15:55
hggdhlet me see it15:55
micahghggdh: the user?15:56
ddecatormicahg, thanks, i'm getting better at figuring bugzilla out haha. i wasn't sure if this was upstream since windows uses the default icons. i can look for an upstream report though15:56
hggdhyes. Have a link? I am not sure I know who you are talking about15:56
micahghggdh: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~preciousa123715:58
ddecatorhggdh, bug 501393 is one example15:58
ubot4Launchpad bug 501393 in notify-osd (Ubuntu) (and 3 other projects) "Integrate Firefox notifications with notify-osd bling (affects: 3) (dups: 1)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/50139315:58
LimCoreapache crashing bug is security?15:59
nigelbhggdh: we probably need status changes made by a user to show in their LP history, (it does not right now)16:00
hggdhLimCore: probably not16:00
hggdhnigelb: indeed16:00
nigelbI'll file it when I get time.  Busy days.  New timings at work16:01
hggdhI can see only one bug the user changed16:01
hggdhddecator: ^16:01
micahghggdh: I have gotten at least 316:02
ddecatorhggdh, yah that's why i provided one example, i can provide another...one sec16:02
ddecatorwhat the...i know i had en email for another one that someone else reset the status on, but it's not in my trash16:04
ddecatoroh, the same the micahg just had to take him off of assigned...16:05
ddecatorhggdh, bug 43287616:05
ubot4ddecator: Bug 432876 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/432876 is private16:05
LimCorehggdh: crashing apache is not DoS security problem?16:06
ddecatorhuh, still got an email for it...16:06
LimCorebug #53144116:06
ubot4Launchpad bug 531441 in apache2 (Ubuntu) "[karmic] Apache crashes (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53144116:06
ddecatorpretty sure it's not private, but ok16:06
hggdhLimCore: not necessarily, and probably not16:06
hggdhddecator: indeed it is not private16:07
ddecatorhggdh, thought so haha, i'm looking at it now16:07
hggdhlet's try first by sending him/her an email asking not to do it, and linking the HelpingWithBugs16:08
ddecatorhggdh, good deal, thanks =)16:08
hggdhnew user, may just be lost/experimenting16:08
ddecatorit does make the karma requirement appealing...16:08
hggdhddecator: please copy the text of the email with a comment of why to the -control ML (so that we all know this was done)16:09
ddecatorhggdh, which email? you mean about the karma requirement that a bug was filed for?16:09
hggdhno the one (via +contactuser) to mercedes16:10
ddecatorhggdh, oh, you want me to send the email to mercedes?16:10
hggdhI had understood you would...16:11
hggdhbut I can do it16:11
ddecatorhggdh, haha i was thanking you for doing it, but i can if you want. just let me know16:11
hggdhI will do it16:13
hggdh:-)16:13
ddecatorthanks, your the pro at this ;)16:13
hggdh(so to stop the "wait for me to wait for you" :-)16:13
ddecatormicahg, mozilla 410094 looks good to me16:17
ubot4Mozilla bug 410094 in Download Manager "Missing file type icons in download manager" [Minor,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41009416:17
ddecatormicahg, i linked it downstream. if you can put it on the upstream report and mark the downstream [low, triaged], i think we're set for that one16:22
nigelbhggdh, micahg: http://shermann.name/content/thank-you-micah-and-zend-framework-1-10-216:26
nigelb:)16:27
hggdhheh. Way to go, micahg :-)16:27
* nigelb hugs micahg :)16:29
micahgheh..cool16:31
micahgthanks hggdh, nigelb16:32
micahgseb128: is CSD in Lucid an upstream GNOME thing or an Ubuntu thing?16:40
seb128micahg, ubuntu for now it was too late for GNOME schedule this cycle16:40
seb128ie after their feature freeze16:41
seb128it will be GNOME upstream probably next cycle though16:41
seb128micahg, why?16:41
micahgseb128: well, I saw the bugs cody opened for firefox and thunderbird and was wondering if this is something that needs to be upstreamed for a more permanent fix16:42
seb128micahg, better to talk to bratsche about that maybe, not sure if that's a gtk issue or a firefox one16:43
seb128or in which one it should be worked16:43
micahgseb128: k16:45
=== radoe_ is now known as radoe
jcastrobdmurray: who is scheduling bug days while pedro is gone?17:06
bdmurrayjcastro: we hadn't anticipated his absence on Thursday...17:06
bdmurrayjcastro: Do you want to set one up? ;-)17:06
jcastroI was hoping to request one and then have you guys go off and do the actual work. :D17:07
bdmurrayI bet!17:07
bdmurrayjcastro: for next week? its a bit short notice for tomorrow17:08
jcastrofor whenever17:08
jcastroGwibber bugs need love17:09
jcastrobdmurray: this guy om26er has adopted it and he's doing a good job there, so I was thinking one day to help get them under control would help out ken and ryan a ton17:09
bdmurrayhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Planning - you could put it there ;-)17:11
jcastrook!17:11
bdmurrayaburch: you are all set now17:44
SoftwareExplorerI reported a bug on launchpad that apport retracing said was a duplicate of another bug. That bug didn't have a way to reproduce it and it was forwarded to the gnome bug tracker, where it was marked as RESOLVED INCOMPLETE because the person didn't know how to reproduce it. I logged in and added instructions to reproduce it, but I can't figure out how to mark it as REOPENED.17:58
SoftwareExplorer(I guess I should actually ask a question) So, how can I set the bug to reopened?17:59
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
hggdhheh. Gone18:14
kklimondawell, after all it's IRC - you should response faster!18:16
* kklimonda cracks his whip!18:16
kklimondawork, work, work!18:16
=== LimCore is now known as bender_pharaoh
* bender_pharaoh ports Ubuntu to GNU/Hurd18:18
* bender_pharaoh *whip* now fix all the bugs. and REMEMBER ME18:18
=== bender_pharaoh is now known as limcore
hggdhyes, master, right away, master18:25
* hggdh goes back to reading the book, confident master cannot see it18:26
thekornbdmurray, hey, can you please (one last time) extend my membership im bughelper-devs, before we decide how to go on with this team/project18:32
thekorns/im7in18:32
thekornem, fail18:32
thekornI mainly would like to be member of this team because of lp:~bughelper-dev/bughelper/bughelper-ng18:33
bdmurraythekorn: you are an admin of the team - can you not change your own membership?18:35
thekornbdmurray, I can change everything except my own expiry date18:36
thekornwhich is kind of strange18:36
bdmurrayheh that's neat18:37
thekornmaybe it is even a bug that an admin can expire from a team at all18:37
thekornnot sure what would happen if the only admin expires18:37
hggdhone way to find out, thekorn18:54
hggdh>-)18:54
thekornoi :)18:55
thekornstaging might help herte18:55
thekorn-t18:55
thekornoh, thanks for the reminder, /me goes creating the apporrt bug18:56
* genii ponders Hurdbuntu18:56
thekornhggdh, bug 53153519:05
ubot4Launchpad bug 531535 in apport "use generic ~/.launchpadlib folder to store credentials and cache (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53153519:05
hggdhthekorn: thank you19:06
hggdhwho deals with libc/locales?19:29
limcoreKJMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,19:41
* limcore removes cat19:41
BUGabundoseb128: to get     - git update to revert the tab at the bottom change (lp: #509079) done after upgrades21:07
BUGabundoall I need to do is kill nautilus ?21:07
seb128yes, nautilus --quit21:07
BUGabundohumm21:08
BUGabundostill on bottom21:08
BUGabundonautilus:21:09
BUGabundo  Installed: 1:2.29.91-0ubuntu121:09
BUGabundohumm21:09
BUGabundonot updated yet21:09
BUGabundo *** 1:2.29.91-0ubuntu1 021:09
BUGabundo        500 http://mirrors.fe.up.pt lucid/main Packages21:09
BUGabundo        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages21:09
BUGabundowasn't it fix released?21:09
BUGabundonautilus (1:2.29.91-0ubuntu2) lucid; urgency=low21:09
BUGabundoseb128: ^^^^^21:13
seb128BUGabundo, change mirror?21:13
BUGabundousing main21:13
seb128what arch?21:14
BUGabundo6421:14
seb128use a better arch? ;-)21:14
BUGabundoahaha21:14
seb128https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/1:2.29.91-0ubuntu2/+build/154148221:14
BUGabundoI am21:14
seb128it built one hour ago21:14
seb128wait for publishing or get the debs there21:14
BUGabundoGet:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main nautilus 1:2.29.91-0ubuntu2 [1,259kB]21:17
BUGabundothere we go21:17
BUGabundoseb128: I can confirm its fixed!21:20
BUGabundo*but* still no keyb shortcuts to change tabs21:20
seb128BUGabundo, did you see that bug getting closed? ;-)21:29
BUGabundonope21:30
BUGabundoI'm tracking it too21:30
BUGabundoglad desktop team or uptream reverted this code21:30
BUGabundohope to get the other too21:30
seb128;-)21:30
strycoreHi21:43
strycoreI'd like to learn how to fix bug 53162921:44
ubot4Launchpad bug 531629 in xdebug (Ubuntu) "xdebug can't be installed : wrong virtual package (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53162921:44
BUGabundostrycore: try #ubuntu-motu21:44
strycoreI wasn't sure if I should ask bugsquad or MOTUs , thanks ;)21:45
BUGabundowell if you want to help triage it21:45
BUGabundoits in here21:45
BUGabundoif you actually want to provide patchs to it, its there :D21:45
BUGabundowhat ever it is, thanks for helping21:46
iktduring bootup my screen will freeze and I have to hit enter for it to continue booting, do I file a bug directly under plymouth?22:08
* ikt pokes channel22:12
charlie-tcafile it under your video card22:13
charlie-tcaor "xorg" in general22:13
iktcheers22:13
ikthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/53165022:46
ubot4Launchpad bug 531650 in xorg (Ubuntu) "freeze during bootup (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New]22:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!