[00:09] It would be nice if there was a Firefox addon for forcing the web browser to access specific domains ONLY using HTTPS, and never with HTTP [00:09] * _diablo agrees [00:09] As a way to circumvent things like SSLstrip [00:16] yeah.. some sites support https but constantly send you to http anyway (facebook) [00:18] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/12714 [00:18] True [00:19] Just more in terms of Gmail, Launchpad, etc [00:34] Takyoji: cool! thanks! [00:35] Haven't tried it yet myself though [00:35] it works for facebook [02:30] It would also be interesting to have some type of a patrolled DNS system as well [02:30] of when the IP address of a domain resolves to something else [02:30] or outside of a specific IP range [02:31] especially if hell breaks lose with root DNS servers [02:31] * Takyoji wears a tinfoil hat [02:42] I think I need to poke around with Assembly more. [02:43] in terms of a project that it could be used for, etc [03:02] I don't mind the purple and stuff all that much really, but moving the minimize/close buttons to the left deserves lynching. [03:03] It's almost like some people are implicitly sabotaging Lucid or something. :P [03:03] "Hey, let's screw with the muscle memory of EVERY USER EVER!" "Yeah!" === rlaager1 is now known as rlaager === rlaager1 is now known as rlaager [21:31] Thoughts? http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/03/ubuntu-gets-new-themes-logo-more.html [21:31] I'm favourable of it [21:32] also, the controls are back on the right side: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/03/worried-ubuntu-1004-will-have-left-hand.html [21:36] also, as I was looking at the new plymouth screen, it looked like it the background was black (when viewing on a CRT at schewl), and apparently at my desktop it appears as purple. [21:37] But hey, there's finally a theme set down for 10.04, thus that means someone can certainly make the countdown image now [22:11] they made minmize, expand and close back on the right vs the left side of the windows? [22:12] It's back on the right side again [22:21] <_diablo> thank god [22:22] good..otherweise I wouldnt upgrade. [22:22] That was Nautilus that did that right? [22:23] <_diablo> nope. ubuntu [22:23] <_diablo> in prep work afaik [22:32] so its back t o normal.. god, when programmers try to "improve" things that DO N O need it... I swaR... [22:33] <_diablo> :) [22:38] Lewts just reinvent the wheel every release. If I wnated that, Id use Windows. [22:38] -w [22:40] but yea, tabs in nautilus are back at the top again, rather than the bottom. [22:41] why cant they just leave it alone? [22:42] what tabs? [22:43] in the nautilus file browser, for tabs of different folders open in the same window. [22:43] ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh cant they pulow?t them back at the top like they be [22:44] It is at the top [22:44] ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh cant they put them back at the top like they belong? [22:44] ok, then what is at the bottom? Guess Im confused. [22:44] Then changed it to the bottom, then they changed it to be back at the top [22:45] within the development of Lucid [22:47] <_diablo> they keep trying to mess with things, and everyone tells them to leave it the same, so they change it back [22:50] but yea; any thoughts in regards of the new Ubuntu logo? [22:51] also https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brand2 [22:51] * Takyoji wonders if tonyyarusso is alive/alert [22:54] <_diablo> ugly imo. [22:54] <_diablo> why stick it in a superscript circle? [22:54] <_diablo> it makes it harder to see and looks messy [22:55] it could be placed differently yes; but I find interest in the font and simpler color palette. [22:56] but at the same time it does seem a bit *cough* familiar *cough* http://fedoraproject.org/ [23:20] one thing that annoys me quite a bit though is that they pushed these updates right on the day of the UI freeze. [23:20] (today) [23:21] so that they can hold the excuse of "well, we can't change it now" when people complain [23:22] when it should have been released to the public at least a few days prior [23:22] I wont cpmplain. I'll just use Debian. [23:23] :P [23:23] Many wqill just leave. If they wanna be Mac, Im gone. [23:25] Ubuntu OS X. :P [23:26] *vomit* [23:26] Just run FreeBSD [23:26] It just makes me shudder whenever I see a commercial with IE6.. [23:26] Just want to bash my head into this table [23:28] IE6? IIs that new? I'm on IE 2.0 [23:28] heh [23:30] http://ie6funeral.com/ [23:31] <_diablo> ugh. I can't deal with FreeBSD. Because it's free gratis, not free libre :) [23:31] BSD licensing is "open source compliant". :P [23:31] unless if I missed the memo [23:32] of course it can be closed however, yes [23:34] http://futurist.se/gldt/gldt1003.svg [23:35] <_diablo> free software != open source [23:41] Obsidian1723: nice [23:42] Seen the image before; it's used on Wikipedia [23:44] yeah thats the new one. [23:48] ahh [23:48] nor does free software or open source neccessairly equal open system [23:49] of the 3, i care most about open systems [23:50] if i have the term right? .. things that are designed to work, with no aspects designed to impede you.