[09:05] <czajkowski> ara: I logged it bug 532068
[09:05] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 532068 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu) "Upgrading from karmic2lucid is giving error of open office dependency issue (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532068
[09:16] <ara> czajkowski, ok, thanks! I will try to raise the attention from the desktop team
[09:17] <czajkowski> ara: cheers
[09:17] <czajkowski> ara: mvo asked me to attach /var/lib/dpkg/status so I did.
[09:36] <mahesh> hi friends
[09:36] <mahesh> is thr any one
[09:36] <mahesh> can help me
[09:37] <mahesh> SIGHUP killing the process
[10:01] <mvo> czajkowski: I can reproduce it, marked the bug as high
[10:01] <czajkowski> mvo: oh we'll keep you :) cheets
[10:01] <czajkowski> *cheers
[10:58] <ara> morning davmor2
[10:59] <davmor2> morning ara
[10:59] <davmor2> me thinks fader_ forgot to set himself away :)
[10:59] <davmor2> oh no just this box
[11:03] <davmor2> that's better not resetting all the time
[11:03] <davmor2> morning ara
[11:03] <ara> hehehe
[11:04] <ara> davmor2, did you see my email about testing ubiquity? sent to ubuntu-qa mailing list
[11:05] <davmor2> spoke too soon
[11:08] <ara> davmor2, did you see my email about testing ubiquity? sent to ubuntu-qa mailing list
[11:08] <davmor2> yes vaguely
[11:08] <davmor2> was in London again yesterday
[11:09] <ara> nice :)
[11:09] <ara> davmor2, can you help with some of the amd64 testcases?
[11:09] <ara> davmor2, they are at pairwise.qa.ubuntu.com
[11:10] <davmor2> I'll have a look after if my connection stays up long enough
[11:27] <ara> mvo, software centre crashes in the last ubuntu image
[11:27] <ara> mvo, bug
[11:27] <ara> mvo, bug 532565
[11:28] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 532565 in software-center (Ubuntu) "software-center crashed with AttributeError in __init__() (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532565
[11:52] <davmor2> right ara things seems to be back to normal on irc now
[11:53] <ara> \o/
[11:56] <ara> davmor2, so, if you can help with the ubiquity amd64 testing, it would be great
[11:57] <ara> davmor2, they are specially interested in Kubuntu
[11:57] <davmor2> yeap on it now it'll only be in vm for now although if I get some breathing space after I'll have a go on hw
[12:00] <ara> davmor2, thanks!
[12:02] <davmor2> the slideshow bug was one I pointed ev at but didn't have time to do anything about
[12:02] <mvo> ara: thanks, let me check
[12:51] <ara> mvo, might be
[12:51] <ara> mvo, I have only tried i386
[12:56] <mvo> ara: if you can reproduce it, can you either attach sources.list or add a "print channel" to /usr/share/software-center/softwarecenter/view/viewswitcher.p (before line 172) and give me the output?
[12:57] <ara> mvo, I don't have that kvm image anymore, but I'll try to reproduce in a new one
[12:57] <mvo> ara: no worries, its not urgent
[12:58] <mvo> ara: I will also ask garry if he can reproduce it
[12:58] <ara> mvo, ok
[13:12] <davmor2> ara: any reason there are so few install options in 64bit?
[13:12] <ara> davmor2, what do you mean?
[13:13] <davmor2> http://pairwise.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/3722 so's only auto resize-freesoftware
[13:15] <ara> davmor2, because it is a pairwise approach
[13:15] <ara> davmor2, we generate teh minimum set of combinations
[13:15] <ara> davmor2, we cannot cover all the possibilities in every ubiquity upload
[15:38] <fader_> Has anyone installed and subsequently booted from today's desktop image?
[16:00] <mdeslaur> cr3: didn't like my joke? :)
[16:00] <cr3> mdeslaur: I'm looking forward to the tar and feathers at the next uds :)
[16:00] <davmor2> fader_: I have in vm
[16:00] <fader_> davmor2: Was it daily-live or an alternate?
[16:01] <davmor2> live
[16:01] <mdeslaur> cr3: ah! that explains it :)
[16:01] <fader_> davmor2: alexmoldovan says that the alternates don't manage to install X
[16:01] <davmor2> testing ubiquity on 64bit for ara
[16:01] <fader_> Which seems like a Bad Thing
[16:01] <fader_> :)
[16:01] <cr3> mdeslaur: I'm missing one more review and then I'll submit to mathiaz for inclusion in lucid along with a ffe, which I hope will be accepted
[16:02] <davmor2> http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/daily/current/report.html
[16:02] <mdeslaur> cr3: once you fill out the ffe, let me know and I'll comment in it
[16:02] <cr3> fader_: who needs X anyways
[16:02] <fader_> cr3: You know ratpoison still depends on X, right? :)
[16:02] <mdeslaur> cr3: is the dbus-root code in lucid right now? or is it the same checkbox as karmic?
[16:02] <cr3> mdeslaur: thanks for the offer, much appreciated. I have to admit I'm a bit stressed about it :/
[16:03] <cr3> mdeslaur: I believe karmic has dbus-root code too
[16:03] <cr3> mdeslaur: but karmic has no third party tests which limits damage quite considerably
[16:03] <mdeslaur> cr3: ok
[16:03] <cr3> "third party" as in tests branched from the outside into /tmp
[16:03] <mdeslaur> cr3: does lucid have the third party tests?
[16:05] <davmor2> alexmoldovan: fancy breaking daily, what did you do that for?
[16:05] <cr3> mdeslaur: nope
[16:05] <mdeslaur> cr3: hmm
[16:06] <cr3> mdeslaur: but lucid has a very old checkbox compared to what I'm trying to propose
[16:06] <mdeslaur> ok, we'll see
[16:06] <fader_> alexmoldovan: Don't let him push you around; I've got your back dude :)
[16:06] <davmor2> alexmoldovan: was this on 32 or 64bit?
[16:07] <alexmoldovan> davmor2, let me see
[16:07] <alexmoldovan> davmor2: let me see
[16:11] <alexmoldovan> davmor2: it's Xubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha i386 (20100305)
[16:11] <davmor2> meh
[16:13] <davmor2> hang on then
[16:32] <fader_> Everybody blame alexmoldovan when things break :D
[16:33] <fader_> davmor2, alexmoldovan: I'll try installing xubuntu alt i386 in a vm and see if I get the same X breakage
[16:33] <fader_> I know alexmoldovan is busy right now working on bugs and davmor2 is probably too lazy
[16:33] <fader_> :P
[16:34] <davmor2> it's already running :P
[16:34] <cr3> fader_: so alex has become the new davmor2?
[16:34] <cr3> maybe he should change his nick to davmor3
[16:34] <fader_> cr3: Nah, alexmoldovan is actually doing things ;)
[16:35] <davmor2> fader_: I might have to get to uds just so I can slap you around a bit :D
[16:35] <fader_> davmor2: Nah, you even blow off UDS... I'm not worried.
[16:36] <davmor2> fader_: it's only a long drive away I might just turn up slap you and drive home again ;)
[16:37] <sbeattie> ara: will the next ubiquity upload test have the same set of pairs, or will we generate a new set of random pairs the next go-around?
[16:37] <alexmoldovan> funny :)
[16:40] <davmor2> sbeattie: no ara!
[16:41] <sbeattie> davmor2: oh, bah!
[16:41] <davmor2> sbeattie: might just take a while to answer you ;)
[16:42] <sbeattie> that's what I get for not reading scrollback all the way forward.
[16:55] <fader_> alexmoldovan, davmor2: xubuntu alt i386 gives me X in a VM
[16:55] <fader_> alexmoldovan: Were you seeing that behavior on *all* systems or only some of them?
[16:56] <alexmoldovan> fader_, davmor2 : on all
[16:56] <fader_> alexmoldovan: Weird.  I had thought maybe it was a specific graphics card issue or something
[16:57] <davmor2> I haz x too
[16:57] <fader_> davmor2: In a VM or on real hardware?
[16:57] <alexmoldovan> fader_: no, I tryed this even on a Toshiba with core i5 that has the graphics integrated in the CPU
[16:57] <davmor2> vm I can try on hw but not for a bit
[16:58] <fader_> alexmoldovan: Bizarre.  Since it seems to be happening in the lab but not anywhere else, I wonder if it's environmental
[16:58] <fader_> My vote would be that we wait and see if it happens on Monday's image as well before getting too excited
[16:58] <alexmoldovan> fader_, davmor2 : right now we have a xubuntu-desktop install going on, I'll see what happens
[16:58] <fader_> alexmoldovan: We have so many other bugs to file :D
[16:59] <alexmoldovan> fader_: I'll go in the lab to try out the solutions from ubuntugeek, then we could work on those bugs
[17:00] <fader_> alexmoldovan: Perfect... that's why you're a rockstar :D
[17:03] <alexmoldovan> fader_, davmor2 : xubuntu-DESKTOP booted correctly, but still no network applet
[17:04] <fader_> alexmoldovan: Yeah, sounds like bug 520589
[17:04] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 520589 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "Network manager icon does not appear in notification panel at startup (affects: 2)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/520589
[17:05] <davmor2> alexmoldovan: are you sure in vm I get to terminals
[17:05] <davmor2> they are admittedly black on dark so not great
[17:07] <davmor2> alexmoldovan: http://www.davmor2.co.uk/xub-desk.png
[17:07] <davmor2> next to the update icon
[17:51] <sbeattie> did anyone see garbled text like so on the first screen of the installer? http://www.nxnw.org/~steve/tmp/Screenshot-xubuntu-test-amd64-ubuiquity-text-oddity.png
[17:52] <davmor2> sbeattie: what happens if you up the resolution?
[17:54] <sbeattie> davmor2: that's as high as it goes in vbox without install the guest tools
[17:54] <sbeattie> if I resize the window the text doesn't correct itself
[17:55] <davmor2> I'd bug it then cause all the netbook are around the 600 high mark
[17:56] <davmor2> sbeattie: I don't see it on 1024x768 in kvm
[17:56]  * sbeattie is installing the guest tools now and will resize the guest.
[17:57] <sbeattie> davmor2: but yeah, I'll file a bug on it.
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[17:57] <davmor2> sbeattie: as I say it should display correctly at that res, because of netbooks if nothing else
[17:58] <fader_> sbeattie: Updating my image now, I'll see if I can reproduce it
[18:01] <fader_> sbeattie: Confirmed, the same thing happens in 'install xubuntu' mode (as opposed to 'try xubuntu' as your screenshot appears to be)
[18:38] <davmor2> fader_: can you have a look at bug 532836 and just let me know if it makes sense?
[18:38] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 532836 in gdm (Ubuntu) "If ambiance theme is used there should be a gdm theme to match (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532836
=== pedro__ is now known as pedro_
[19:20] <fader_> davmor2: I'll be honest, I'm not entirely clear on it
[19:20] <fader_> Are you wanting the gdm theme to be automatically changed when the gtk theme is?
[19:22] <davmor2> fader_: look at the gdm screen.  It's got the light grey of the radiance theme.  However the default theme seems to be the darker ambiance theme.  Wouldn't it look more polished if the gdm theme matched the actual theme?
[19:24] <fader_> davmor2: I'm going to have to google for those themes, as neither of them seems to be installed on my lucid machine by default
[19:24] <fader_> Ah
[19:24] <fader_> Heh
[19:24] <fader_> Okay, seems like those are the 'real' names for light and dark :)
[19:25] <davmor2> yes
[19:25] <davmor2> so radiance is light
[19:25] <davmor2> ambiance is dark
[19:26] <fader_> davmor2: I see what you mean now.  It's certainly worth hearing from the artsy types about it, but I don't know enough about design and color and whatnot to say
[20:09] <cr3> mdeslaur: if you have a moment, I would appreciate if you could have a look at my ffe detailed in bug #532882. if you notice anything missing from my ffe bug report, please let me know.
[20:09] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 532882 in checkbox (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Candidate revision checkbox_0.9 (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532882
[20:09] <cr3> it's been a while since I last submitted a ffe bug report
[21:03] <mdeslaur> cr3: done
[21:11] <cr3> mdeslaur: thanks for not mentionning anything about tar and feathers in your comment
[21:13] <mdeslaur> cr3: hehe
[23:01] <waltercool> Hey... i have a ehci_hcd bug!
[23:01] <waltercool> some tips for trace it?
[23:02] <waltercool> thats the bug: http://pastebin.com/JL2hRhdb