=== doctormo__ is now known as doctormo === jamalta-afk is now known as jamalta === yofel_ is now known as yofel [02:02] hi. is there a help contact? [02:03] spiderbatdad: just go ahead and ask [02:04] mwhudson/thumper: can you upgrade a vcs-imports branch for me? or tell me how to? [02:04] poolie: no [02:04] poolie: needs a losa [02:04] ok thanks, that'll do as "how" [02:04] poolie: and we are a little losa shy right now [02:04] spm, halp? [02:04] oh [02:04] bleh. I can't login to LP...not recognizing my email. So I need an admin [02:05] spm still has a sore jaw [02:05] spiderbatdad: are you sure it's the right email? [02:05] poolie: ask a question on launchpad-code i guess [02:05] poolie, thought it was till it failed umpteen times [02:06] maybe we should just upgrade all the import branches again though [02:06] or maybe we should only do that on the new machine when that comes online [02:06] mwhudson: thanks, i will [02:06] that would be good [02:08] spiderbatdad: i assume you're https://edge.launchpad.net/~spiderbatdad [02:08] whose email is said to be spiderbatco@gmail.com [02:08] so try to log in with that, or send a password reset [02:08] poolie: ty verymuch. [02:15] mwhudson: thanks https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+question/103941 filed [02:16] poolie: deleting and recreating is always an option i guess [03:59] Hi, I just noticed, that there are gthumb bugs in launchpad, nobody seems to care about, I cant find these bugs in gnomes bugzilla, is there a standard way to import bugs from launchpad to bugzilla? [04:06] Nobody knows about that? [04:08] hunt: there's a bug for that I think [04:12] micahg: so I have to do it by hand? [04:12] hunt: at the moment [04:12] micahg: isnt that a thing that has to be done really often [04:12] then you can link it back to LP [04:14] micahg: so I'm gonna do that [04:15] hunt: k === jamalta is now known as jamalta-afk [05:40] Ooh, comments from previous merge proposals now show up in the resubmission. Thanks! === jtv is now known as jtv-otp === noodles785 is now known as noodles775 === jtv-otp is now known as jtv [09:46] <_Andrew> Are the build servers ok? My amd64 package has been waiting almost 5 hours to build? [09:46] <_Andrew> https://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+build/1556028 [09:48] _Andrew: see https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/ for the current workload === yofel_ is now known as yofel === gmb changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Recent problems browsing branches should be fixed. | Help contact: gmb | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [11:39] hi all, anyone know why LP would prevent me from creating a project by saying that the URL is already used by another project, but I see no project at that URL?? [11:42] anyone here is from Launchpad ? [11:45] odony: that would happen if launchpad previously hosted a project with that name which was deactivated === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha === henninge_ is now known as henninge === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === salgado is now known as salgado-afk === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === jamalta-afk is now known as jamalta === Chex_ is now known as Chex [14:24] mrevell, hi, I just tried to work out what the current method of reporting spam is, starting from , and I couldn't find it [14:24] (I guess that it's still asking "questions" on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad) [14:24] mpt, It is. Thanks for the pointer, I'll update the help site. [14:27] thanks === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] === gmb changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Recent problems browsing branches should be fixed. | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [16:41] After you've activated your PPA, it can take a couple of hours for Launchpad to generate your key. -- hmm where can i check if my PPA is already activated, and where is the key? === yofel_ is now known as yfoel === yfoel is now known as yofel [16:47] getxsick: A user's PPA's are displayed on their profile page, go to https://launchpad.net/people/+me [16:47] The key id and fingerprint will be displayed in the "Technical details about this PPA" foldout section of the PPA's page, once it has one [16:49] maxb: i don't see "Technical details about this PPA" on PPA's page [16:51] Oh. Maybe the entire section only appears once the PPA has packages [16:52] maxb: so how can i upload package without signing it by the generated key? [16:53] You do not sign packages with the generated key. You sign packages with *your* key. Launchpad signs the archive indexes with the generated key. [16:53] (and it's important that they are different, because the user can't access the LP secret, and LP can't access the user secret) [16:54] ah, so i have to use my key which i used to signing Ubntu Code of Conduct? ok [17:06] Why are some of the "official distribution builders" noted as "building private source"? Wouldn't that not qualify as official distribution work? :) [17:07] how about this? http://paste.pocoo.org/show/188454/ i haven't got any email, also packages haven't appeared since i uploaded them ~20 hours ago [17:15] lfaraone: private, as in security-embargoed [17:16] maxb: interesting, I see. [17:16] e.g. security updates for a vulnerability that has not been publicly disclosed [17:25] short question: i'm building package for a new release of packages which exist in hardy/intrepid/jaunty but not exist anymore, should i follow instructions for branw new package or alternative version? [17:27] Does the PPA +packages page autoupdate when a build completes? [17:27] yep [17:32] anyone? === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [17:38] getxsick: There's no good answer to that question, is the issue. [18:07] persia :-) === zekopeko_ is now known as zekopeko === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch === leonardr is now known as leonardr-lunch === salgado-afk is now known as salgado [19:00] does anyone know if it's possible to link PPA with a launchpad project somehow? [19:00] zyga: It'S not. [19:00] hmm, too bad :-( [19:01] zyga: The closest you can get is to have a team manage a project and own the PPA and reference the PPA from the project homepage. === leonardr-lunch is now known as leonardr [19:01] okay next question: how to generate proper signature for release tarball [19:01] I tried: gpg --sign|--clearsign file.tar.gz [19:01] I also tried --detachsign [19:02] but lanuchpad complained that I have a big file, the signature seemed to contain the tarball [19:02] this might be a gpg question but I cannot find anything in the manpage that would work [19:02] (this could be hinted on the launchpad milestone release page) [19:04] * persia thought it was -b but isn't sure how that differs from --detach-sign [19:04] -b and --detach-sign are the same [19:04] maybe I'm using it incorrectly [19:04] but I have a 33K tarball and get a 33K .asc file [19:05] That's not what you want. [19:06] yeah I think so [19:06] I know there are small .asc files that contain *just* the signature [19:06] but I'm clueless as to how to generate one [19:07] hi. does anyone know what's going on with launchpad's bgo bug watcher? [19:38] kwhy my launchbad account says at i dont use it anymore [19:38] my email is tommisaira@hotmail.com [19:38] but i can still login to a launchbad and contribute stuff [19:49] tommis: what is your lp id? [19:50] i dont know how do i find it out? [19:59] tommis: are you logged into LP now? [19:59] tommis: if you are, your username is on the top right [19:59] tommis: if you click on it, you go to your user page [20:00] thumper, it is Tommi Saira [20:00] tommis: the bit in the url after the ~ is your user id [20:00] tommis: why do you think that the launchpad account says you don't use it any more? [20:00] thumper, becose it says it [20:01] https://launchpad.net/~tommisaira [20:01] tommis: where does it say it? [20:01] hmm.. [20:01] interesting [20:02] theres no error or anything but it dosent so information about me [20:02] I'm asking an admin [20:02] when i try to chance my settings then it says at i dont us launchbad [20:03] tommis: when did you create your account? [20:03] yer ago [20:03] using it regularly [20:04] hmm.. [20:05] tommis: do you remember when this changed? [20:05] thumper, tommis, yes, this is a known problem; bug 525930 [20:05] Launchpad bug 525930 in canonical-identity-provider "Emails entered in SSO are not available in LP" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/525930 [20:05] salgado: thanks [20:05] :( [20:05] salgado, thx [20:06] salgado: when will the fix appear? [20:06] any information when it maybe fixd? [20:06] samefag xD [20:06] the code fix will go into login.u.c, but I don't know when it will be rolled out [20:07] we need to fix the accounts that got busted thanks to the bug in login.u.c [20:13] tommis, all fixed now. :) [20:13] except for the part that involves fixing login.u.c, which is outside my control [20:14] whell i see that the fix is committed but why it still dosent work? [20:14] hey it works now === fjlacoste is now known as flacoste [20:39] lo [20:39] is the AMD64 build farm stuck? [20:44] pmjdebruijn: hi [20:44] pmjdebruijn: it looks like just has a lot of jobs queued at the moment (https://edge.launchpad.net/builders) [20:45] The problem is that 2/3 of the builders are missing at the moment. I'm not sure why. [20:46] wgrant: maybe QA for beta 1? [20:46] micahg: Possibly, yeah. === blueyed_ is now known as blueyed [20:59] jelmer, wgrant ah [20:59] my builds aren't critical, it's just inconvenient :) === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [22:50] how long it usually takes to see uploaded packages on PPA ? === jamalta is now known as jamalta-afk [23:06] it's weird. yesterday i uploaded some packages (with successful dput update) and those packages have never showed up on PPA. ok, i figured out that they weren't signed. shouldn't dput error message? there is no way to find it out [23:25] getxsick: The problem is this: package upload is over anonymous ftp. the only way the system has to determine the uploader is the signature. with no signature, it doesn't know who to send the error message to. [23:28] maxb: 'allow_unsigned_uploads = 1' meh, thx! === verterok_ is now known as verterok [23:49] is it possible to upload only binaries packages on PPA? [23:50] getxsick: no