[00:50]  * ccheney takes a break, currently down to only 11 symbols to copy over, and whatever huge mess they drag with them
[00:50] <ccheney> this patch is going to end up huge :-\
[02:49] <Drakeson> with lucid on amd64, xul-ext-greasemonkey and many other addons break firefox.
[02:49] <Drakeson>  (it starts the first time after installation, copies the new addon in ~/.mozilla/firefox/blah/extension, runs with the new addon in a usable state, and then when I restart firefox, firefox does not even launch).
[02:50] <Drakeson> is there anyone who experiences otherwise on lucid + amd64?
[02:51] <micahg> Drakeson: this is known
[02:52] <micahg> Drakeson: the workaround is  to delete the compatability.ini file in the profile dir
[02:52] <Drakeson> thanks
[02:52] <micahg> Drakeson: there are 2 bugs if you'd like to subscribe
[02:53] <Drakeson> one is mine :p
[02:53] <micahg> k
[02:53] <Drakeson> I apport-collected, and you didn't respond or merge it with the other one :p
[02:53] <micahg> after beta 1 I'll try to get it sorted out if 3.6.2 didn't fix it
[02:54] <micahg> s/didn't/doesn't
[02:54] <Drakeson> thanks, I was just desparate to get a fix
[02:55] <micahg> Drakeson: which bug is yours?
[02:55] <Drakeson> 528498
[02:56] <micahg> bug 528498
[02:56] <Drakeson> so, what should I do to the compatibility file?
[02:57] <Drakeson> delete it everytime? ln -s it to /dev/null ? just delete some of the fields in there?
[02:58] <micahg> Drakeson: rm seems to work
[02:58] <Drakeson> every time I install a new plugin or just once?
[02:58] <micahg> Drakeson: just before you start firefox
[02:59] <Drakeson> aaah, I see
[02:59] <Drakeson> thanks
[03:32] <micahg> asac: still up?
[03:36] <micahg> [reed]: should configure fail with the wrong nss version?
[06:16] <[reed]> micahg: it should ...
[06:16] <micahg> [reed]: k, I'll file a bug against the landing bug for NSS in the morning
[07:33] <fta2> jdstrand, any idea if debian will have the recent apache2 security fixes?
[09:06] <BUGabundo_remote> buns di@s
[10:18] <asac> chrisccoulson: xulrunner is not fully promoted to main
[10:18] <asac>  Filename: pool/universe/x/xulrunner-1.9.2/xulrunner-1.9.2-dev_1.9.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_armel.deb
[10:18] <asac> maybe check with pitti ;)
[10:19] <chrisccoulson> asac - is that why stuff keeps failing on armel?
[10:19] <asac> openjdk fails to ubuild etc.
[10:19] <asac> yes
[10:19] <chrisccoulson> ah
[10:19] <asac> at leaste http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40773332/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-armel.openjdk-6_6b18~pre2-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[10:19] <asac> fails because of that
[10:19] <chrisccoulson> i have to confess, i haven't checked all the armel build failures yet
[10:20] <asac> yeah. lets get it promoted and retry
[10:20] <asac> asap
[10:43] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, xiphos behaves really weird with the new xulrunner
[10:43] <chrisccoulson> it does nothing except for spawn lots of nautilus windows :-/
[10:51] <asac> attached a patch for bug 518422
[10:51] <asac> bdrung confirmed it ... maybe add it to our packages
[10:51] <asac> so we can get verification on dailies
[10:52] <asac> chrisccoulson: what is xiphos doing?
[10:52] <chrisccoulson> asac - the main window opens, and then it floods my desktop with new nautilus windows
[10:52] <chrisccoulson> and it doesn't do anything else
[10:52] <chrisccoulson> it doesn't show any of the content that it is meant to show
[10:54] <asac> chrisccoulson: right what i wondered is what is xiphos about at all ;)
[10:54]  * asac checks apt
[10:54] <chrisccoulson> oh, its meant to show religious texts i think
[10:54] <asac> bible studying tool ;)
[10:56] <asac> chrisccoulson: is it in the archive already?
[10:56] <chrisccoulson> asac - no, i've not uploaded it yet
[10:58] <asac> ok
[11:09] <chrisccoulson> asac - xulrunner-1.9.1 is off the CD now
[11:16] <asac> yay!!
[11:16] <asac> though 1.9.2 is sitll on it
[11:16] <asac> but well it wasnt fixable anyway with couchdb
[11:50] <chrisccoulson> asac - yeah, and yelp too
[11:50] <chrisccoulson> i think those are the only 2 things pulling it on to the CD
[12:00] <asac> yelp was considered dead
[12:00] <asac> but we already discussed that ;)
[13:15] <fta2> kenvandine, yt?
[13:17] <fta2> kenvandine, any chance you can add my patch for gnome 585577 in evolution? each time someone touches the package, i have to re-add that patch in a ppa to be able to use evo at work
[13:26] <asac> asked seb to poke upstream
[14:10] <micahg> asac: ping
[14:26] <micahg> jcastro: PM?
[14:35] <jcastro> micahg: of course! for you, anything!
[14:57] <chrisccoulson> hey micahg, how are you today?
[15:00] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k
[15:00] <chrisccoulson> michag - i'm having issues with xiphos at the moment
[15:01] <chrisccoulson> it spawns lots of nautilus windows when it opens
[15:02] <micahg> chrisccoulson: let's push that on xnox as he said it would work :)
[15:03] <chrisccoulson> michag - it looks like a xulrunner bug
[15:03] <micahg> chrisccoulson: oh, then we should fix it :)
[15:03] <chrisccoulson> the GtkMozEmbed instance is creating a lot of open_uri events with file:/// as the URI
[15:03] <chrisccoulson> and it didn't do that before
[15:04] <chrisccoulson> and xiphos provides a signal handler for those, to handle the URI's (presumably for when someone clicks a link in the displayed content)
[15:04] <asac> jdstrand: we need USN for tbird 2.0.0.24
[15:08] <jdstrand> asac: 910-1
[15:08] <jdstrand> asac: when is it supposed to release?
[15:13] <chrisccoulson> asac - did you mean to assign bug 534760 back to yourself again, or was that an accident?
[15:15] <asac> chrisccoulson: no ;) ... wanted to assign it to you
[15:16] <chrisccoulson> ah, ok. i assigned it back now ;)
[15:16] <chrisccoulson> (to me)
[15:21] <asac> jdstrand: monday ... we want to stage tomorrow
[15:21] <jdstrand> asac: ok, I'll be on vacation, but mdeslaur or kees can handle it
[15:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: jcastro: I need to chat with both of you in about 2.5 hours :)
[15:28] <micahg> have to run now :)
[15:28] <chrisccoulson> no worries ;)
[16:21] <m0ar> I've got trouble installing filezilla
[16:21] <m0ar> Trying to install in lucid gives this error: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/188426/
[16:22] <m0ar> My original FZ-install mystically dissapeared, and now it isn't installable from the repos
[16:22] <BUGabundo_remote> scratch that
[16:22] <BUGabundo_remote> I asked m0ar to come here
[16:23] <BUGabundo_remote> cause I miss read "firefox" not filezilla :(
[16:23] <m0ar> Ah
[17:06] <asac> jdstrand: thanks. we have the USN; will find a peer to roll this. thanks! (maybe double check if the pocket copy is properly documented on wiki for mozilla ppa)
[17:07] <asac> enjoy your vacation
[17:14] <jdstrand> asac: it is documented, I already went over it with the security team
[17:14] <jdstrand> s/, I/and I/
[17:14] <jdstrand> asac: thanks!
 jdstrand, any idea if debian will have the recent apache2 security fixes?
[18:27] <jdstrand> fta: I'm told that debian unstable is already fixed
[18:27] <jdstrand> fta: 12:27 < mdeslaur> sid already has 2.2.15 which fixes the issues
[18:32] <asac> guess he caresa about stabel ;)
[18:35] <fta> yep, debian stable
[18:35] <fta> (at work)
[18:36] <fta> found nothing on the d security page this morning
[18:38] <asac> they usually send an email to securit-announce or something too
[18:38] <asac> webpage might be out of sync
[18:38] <asac> that ml should not lie
[18:53] <jdstrand> fta: I don't know the status of the apache update for debian stable. you could ask in #debian-security on oftc
[19:27] <micahg> chrisccoulson: can you work on the thunderbrid 2.0.0.24 release?
[19:29] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i can do. perhaps later though (i'm going to go for dinner shortly)
[19:29] <micahg> chrisccoulson: sure tomorrow is fine :)
[19:29] <micahg> chrisccoulson: just ping me later if you want to discuss details
[19:29] <chrisccoulson> cool, thanks!
[19:30] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i found the issue with xiphos btw, but i'm not sure if the new xulrunner behaviour is correct or not
[19:30] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, you want to talk about it now or later?
[19:30] <chrisccoulson> later is fine
[19:31] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, I should be here for at least 2.5 hours
[19:34] <fta> asac, what kind of bug should i file for the chromium codecs?
[19:46] <fta> http://blog.chromium.org/2010/03/does-your-browser-behave.html
[19:47] <asac> fta: a [FFe] chromium-browser needs codecs packages to have oob video support
[19:47] <fta> asac, as title? do i need to add a tag?
[19:47] <asac> subscribe ubuntu-motu-release
[19:48] <asac> keep it in state New
[19:48] <asac> give some more verbose info in summary ... point them to packages, explain why we need a new copy etc.
[19:50] <micahg> asac: xul192 is tagged for ubuntu2 release
[19:50] <micahg> asac: I'm spiining TB303 now
[19:51] <fta> asac, there's already bug 513776, can i reuse it?
[19:53] <asac> fta: often having an individual bug as FFe helps. but in the end it doesnt matter ... just prepend [FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid - Was:...."
[20:09] <micahg> bdrung: xul-ext-notify doesn't work in firefox 3.6 for me, does it work for you?
[20:11] <bdrung> micahg: it works for me (up-to-date lucid)
[20:11] <micahg> bdrung: hmm, it doesn't work on karmic
[20:11] <micahg> I guess that's not a real problem as it's not packaged for karmic, but just wondering
[20:11] <bdrung> micahg: karmic's xul-ext-notify + FF 3.6?
[20:12] <micahg> bdrung: karmic doesn't have xul-ext-notify
[20:12] <bdrung> micahg: it's called firefox-notify in karmic
[20:14] <micahg> bdrung: it's says only for 3.5
[20:14] <bdrung> micahg: just edit the install.rdf file
[20:16]  * micahg has to rebuild...
[20:19] <fta> asac, bug 537617
[20:20] <fta> please read before i subscribe motu
[20:22] <micahg> fta: you'd actually subscribe ubuntu-release I think for the FFe
[20:22] <fta>  ubuntu-motu-release
[20:22] <micahg> fta: no, the release team merged I thought
[20:22] <sebner> fta: micahg : Yep, the merges, ubuntu-release is the way to go
[20:23] <sebner> *they merges
[20:23] <fta> ok
[20:23] <sebner> *merged
[20:23] <fta> i'm really diverging from all this :P
[20:23] <sebner> ;)
[20:23] <fta> drifting awat
[20:23] <fta> y
[20:24] <micahg> bdrung: no go, maybe I'll check when I upgrade to lucid next week, if it's good, maybe we can add a Suggests
[20:24] <fta> if you read the bug, is it clear enough?
[20:26] <micahg> asac: when you're done with fta's bug, TB3 is staged in my ppa: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+packages
[21:58] <rickspencer3> chrisccoulson, still around?
[21:58] <chrisccoulson> hey rickspencer3, i am
[21:58] <rickspencer3> chrisccoulson, have you seen this one:
[21:58] <rickspencer3> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/537298
[21:58] <chrisccoulson> didrocks mentioned that to me yesterday
[21:59] <rickspencer3> ok
[21:59] <rickspencer3> chrisccoulson, I am no expert here, but I am thinking this might be good to get into the mozilla bug tracker in case it is a true regressions n mozilla
[21:59] <rickspencer3> (and not a problem with the css or js in lp (which I suspect))
[21:59] <chrisccoulson> yeah, possibly. i wish i could recreate it here
[21:59] <rickspencer3> ^based on no good data btw, just a gut
[22:00] <micahg> chrisccoulson: rickspencer3: the user should try to reproduce in a clean profile first
[22:00] <micahg> nm
[22:00] <micahg> I see the user already did
[22:01] <rickspencer3> chrisccoulson, I leave it in your capable hands
[22:01] <chrisccoulson> rickspencer3, thanks :)
[22:01] <rickspencer3> don't worry, the only thing that can happen is you can piss off our most important upstream, and the launchpad team at the same time
[22:01] <rickspencer3> :)
[22:01] <rickspencer3> hi flacoste
[22:01] <rickspencer3> all, flacoste basically runs LP right now
[22:02] <rickspencer3> chrisccoulson, flacoste I need to run for some errands, I'll check back in an hour or so
[22:02] <flacoste> hi folks
[22:02] <flacoste> i'm trying this on windows right now
[22:02] <chrisccoulson> rickspencer3, no worries
[22:02] <chrisccoulson> hi flacoste
[22:02] <micahg> flacoste: can you verify with upstream firefox build in a clean profile as well?
[22:03] <flacoste> micahg: i'm not really set-up for that kind of tests
[22:03] <flacoste> on Ubuntu you mean?
[22:03] <flacoste> i'm still on Karmic
[22:03] <rickspencer3> flacoste, this might be a good time to get someone on our team set up with that capability
[22:03] <rickspencer3> it will be hard for you to drive this to completion if the devs can't good debugging info
[22:04] <micahg> flacoste: sorry, I thoguht it was your bug :)
[22:04] <flacoste> micahg: didier roche reported it, i just want to make sure that Launchpad doesn't become slow for all Lucid/firefox users :-)
[22:04]  * micahg goes to find didrocks
[22:05]  * sebner is of the opinion that LP was never that fast from the beginning :P
[22:05]  * sebner hides
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> micahg - didrocks has finished for the evening now
[22:05] <micahg> oh, just pinged him in devel
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> heh
[22:05]  * micahg can comment on teh bug
[22:05] <chrisccoulson> he left about 10 minutes ago i think
[22:06] <flacoste> fwiw, it's switches tab very fast on Windows in 3.6
[22:06] <micahg> wfm in ff36 on karmic
[22:06] <chrisccoulson> and it wfm in lucid ;)
[22:10]  * micahg saw jcastro's post on testdrive...seems interesting
[22:11] <flacoste> ok, it's probably something related to didrocks system environment (2d, 32 bits)
[22:11] <mars> flacoste, ok
[22:11] <flacoste> micahg, chrisccoulson: any of you have 3d enabled? or running on 32bits?
[22:11] <mars> flacoste, he said seb128 had the same issue
[22:12] <chrisccoulson> flacoste, 64bit here, with 3D
[22:12] <flacoste> same here
[22:12] <flacoste> although i'm not sure how that affects windows in virtualbox
[22:13] <mars> ah, someone tried 32bit without acceleration?
[22:13] <flacoste> i don't think so
[22:13] <micahg> flacoste: is this in virtualbox
[22:14] <flacoste> micahg: no, i tested FF36 on windows/virtualbox and didn't experience the issue
[22:14] <micahg> flacoste: w/or without guest additions?
[22:14] <flacoste> with
[22:16] <chrisccoulson> brb
[22:17] <micahg> mars: there are 144 CSS errors
[22:17] <mars> micahg, in which page version?  The /1/ page has almost every image path wrong :)
[22:18] <micahg> mars: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=0&uri=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.edge.launchpad.net%2Fubuntu%2F%2Bbug%2F113669  <-- the page didrocks was looking at
[22:18] <mars> micahg, which URL?
[22:18] <mars> looking
[22:18] <flacoste> seb128 reports that he doesn't experience the problem everytime
[22:18] <flacoste> he wonders if it's related to the number of tabs open
[22:19] <flacoste> seb128 has 32bit hw but 3d enabled
[22:20] <mars> micahg, it looks like a lot of the errors are browser-specific rules and hacks
[22:21] <micahg> mars: k, anyways, since not everyone is experiencing it, my guess is a graphics driver issue
[22:21] <mars> flacoste, is seb128 willing to shut off 3d to try a test? :)
[22:23] <mars> micahg, I guess that greatly lowers the possible exposure of this issue
[22:24] <mars> that, and the testing everyone has done just now
[22:25] <chrisccoulson> well, vesa doesn't work on my laptop
[22:28]  * micahg wonders if testdrive will work for older ISOs as well
[22:30] <micahg> mars: could also be a GTK bug...
[22:31] <mars> micahg, yeah, I was wondering about that.
[22:31] <micahg> bbiab
[22:32] <mars> I was wondering if someone had a massive Mozilla profiler superweapon they could point at the program to quickly narrow down the source of the CPU spike :)
[22:33] <mars> But we would have to reproduce it first :/
[22:35] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i would like to know what people use for profiling
[22:35] <chrisccoulson> i'm still on a big learning curve here
[22:35] <chrisccoulson> did didrocks say he was using the nv driver?
[22:36] <chrisccoulson> firefox has to do much more work when dragging a window over it if there is no compositing manager
[22:36] <chrisccoulson> because it will get floods of expose events