=== jonathan_ is now known as jjesse
[01:35] <Linux000> Is there a way to link 2 Bugs, i.e. If fixing one bug fixes the other?
[01:42] <Linux000> Is there a way to link 2 Bugs, i.e. If fixing one bug fixes the other?
[01:45] <greg-g> Linux000: please only ask your question once. And the answer to your question is "it depends, but probably not how you would like." You can mark one bug as a duplicate of another bug when that bug is the same bug. But if fixing one also fixes the other but they are separate issues, then keep them as separate bugs and just close them when the issue is fixed.
[01:45] <greg-g> Linux000: thanks for helping!
[01:47] <Linux000> Also, would a UI (request?) like bug 53768 be considered a bug? It seems more like personal preference.
[01:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 53768 in clustalw (Ubuntu) "[Sync Request] clustalw 1.83-1.1" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53768
[01:47] <Linux000> sorry, bug 537768
[01:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 537768 in indicator-sound (Ubuntu) "Slider is too short (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/537768
[02:51] <crimsun> Linux000: sure, that _could_ be a bug
[02:51] <crimsun> Linux000: I'd be inclined to mark it wishlist after retitling it
[02:53] <Linux000> crimsun: thanks
[03:03] <Linux000> Could someone set the Importance of bugs 537783, 537773, and 537768 to wishlist?
[03:03] <ubot4> Linux000: Bug 537783 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/537783 is private
[03:04] <Linux000> Sorry, typo bugs 537782, 537772, and 537768
[03:04] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 537782 in software-center (Ubuntu) ""Ubuntu" in "Ubuntu Software Center" is not necessary (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/537782
[03:04] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 537772 in bzr-git "AssertionError: recreated git commit had different sha1 (affects: 1)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/537772
[03:04] <Linux000> I can't type today, not 537772, 537773
[03:06] <crimsun> done.
[03:07] <Linux000> Thanks
[03:07] <crimsun> yw
[04:03] <EzraR> can someone take a look at this and tell me if these errors are normal or if i should be running memtest
[04:03] <EzraR> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40848926/valgrind.log
=== kermiac is now known as kermiac_
[07:11] <m0ar> My X-session randomly restarts after being logged on a frw minutes. It's NOT the bug when it restarts when you press a certain key, so I have no idea. Usually happens when the system if fully loaded, I've started up some shit and starts a chet with someone. Screen gets black and I return to the logon screen. Is this known?
[07:11] <m0ar> I'm running lucid, fully updated system.
[07:14] <m0ar> I'll have to leave for work, but a query form anyone who knows someything would be appreciated!
=== kermiac_ is now known as kermiac
[07:35] <thekorn> good morning
[07:38] <kermiac> hi thekorn :)
[07:38] <thekorn> hey kermiac :)
=== kermiac is now known as kermiac_
[08:53] <BUGabundo_remote> morning
[09:04] <andol> BUGabundo_remote: The underscore in your nickname really confused me for a while there. Was trying rather hard to figure out what a "remote morning" might be :-)
[09:08] <BUGabundo_remote> ahaha
=== almighurt is now known as migerh
[10:50] <m0ar> andol: SSH from work :)
[11:26] <andol> m0ar: ?
[14:17] <ikt> something wrong with the servers?
[14:18] <yofel> ikt: which servers?
[14:19] <ikt> 'crash database'
[14:20] <ikt> went to submit a bug and apport said 'could not connect to crash database'
[14:20] <ikt> or something similar
[14:20] <ikt> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8955101
[14:20] <ikt> someone else got it
[14:22] <yofel> someone just filed bug 538097 about that
[14:22] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) "Apport cannot connect to crash database (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538097
[14:22] <yofel> and I got that in a VM too today
[14:23] <yofel> ikt: ^
[14:26] <ikt> +1
[14:40] <Mishtal> Hey folks, I'm trying to file a bug against network-manager, but ubuntu-bug is telling me "Cannot connect to crash database, please check your Internet connection." Anyone have any advice?
[14:41] <yofel> Mishtal: known, please tell bug 538097 that it affects you
[14:41] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) "Apport cannot connect to crash database (affects: 5)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538097
[14:41] <persia> Mishtal: You might want to follow bug #538097 until there is a solution
[14:41] <Mishtal> Alright. Thanks everyone. Is there a workaround to create a new bug until then?
[14:42] <ikt> neg
[14:43] <Mishtal> Ah. ok. Well, I'll just leave a note to myself then
[14:43] <Pici> I just mentioned it in #launchpad, since its cross-platform it may not actually be an apport bug.
[14:47] <yofel> good idea, I doubt that apport is broken too
=== jonathan__ is now known as jjesse
=== Pici` is now known as Pici
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== radoe_ is now known as radoe
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
[17:35] <EzraR> is bugcontrol the only people that can mark a bug triaged?
[17:35] <yofel> EzraR: yes
[17:36] <yofel> EzraR: if you want to have bug marked as triaged tell us the bug number and we'll take care of it
[17:36] <EzraR> yofel: i am the bug reporter, seems odd marking it confirmed
[17:36] <EzraR> yofel: Bug #537412
[17:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 537412 in groundcontrol "Causes Nautilus Segfault if NetworkManager is not installed (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/537412
[17:37] <nigelb> EzraR: when you report a bug, please don't confirm it
[17:37] <EzraR> nigelb: heh, well i wasnt going to confirm it because i saw it
[17:38] <nigelb> EzraR: ah, thats not an ubuntu bug though
[17:39] <nigelb> its a ground control bug
[17:40] <EzraR> nigelb: ahh
[17:41] <EzraR> nigelb: do you think i should add ubuntu as also affected?
[17:41] <nigelb> not really
[17:42] <nigelb> you can poke doctormo when you catch him
[17:43] <EzraR> true, my thinking is it might stop dupes
[17:43] <EzraR> actually nm, its not even in the repos
[17:44] <EzraR> im a bit out of it today
=== m0ar_ is now known as m0ar
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck
[19:02] <trijntje> Hi all, I have found a problem but I dont know what package it is:
[19:03] <micahg> trijntje: what's the problem
[19:03] <trijntje> When 'safely removing' media the icon on the desktop disappears, but then after a few seconds 'pending operations' get completed and only after that the device can safely be removed
[19:04]  * micahg doesn't
[19:04] <micahg>  know
[19:04] <trijntje> ok, no problem, but would you agree thats a problem?
[19:05] <micahg> no, not necessarily
[19:06] <trijntje> well, when the icon is gone i just pull the stick out, but that could lead to data loss, hence the problem
[19:07] <micahg> trijntje: yeah, you should wait for it to say you can safely remove
[19:08] <trijntje> I know that now, but I still think its not what people will expect
[19:08] <vish> micahg: but it wont say that always ;) only when there is pending read/write operations , which havent completed immediately it shows that
[19:08] <trijntje> but I suppose the package people can alway's say its not a problem, when I know the package
[19:08]  * vish finds bug
[19:11] <vish> trijntje: not the same bug , but insisting that the notification is shown always > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587340
[19:11] <ubot4> Gnome bug 587340 in fuse "Consistent Volume "Safe to remove" notifications" [Normal,Unconfirmed]
[19:12] <vish> trijntje: right now , the "safe to remove" is shown only when it takes longer than 0.5secs to remove  , which is a bad design IMO
[19:13] <trijntje> vish: yes, and since most users will unmount it using right click on the desktop icon that is where they will look to see if its safe to remove
[19:15] <vish> meh , few of us tried to reason with davidz but he has his own standards or rationale
[19:21] <trijntje> vish: so the advice is to give up?
[19:21] <vish> trijntje: well , you can comment on the bug ;)
[19:23] <vish> tremolux: 3-4 of us tried to reason out with him , but he kept saying this doesnt happen..
[19:23] <vish> oops trijntje ^
[19:28] <trijntje> vish: ok, ill see if he listens to me ;) Thanks for your time, at least I know the package now
[19:29] <vish> np..
=== Trijntje_ is now known as Trijntje
=== fabio__ is now known as fabio
=== kermiac_ is now known as kermiac
[20:06] <yofel> hm, if I run iotop in lucid it tells me: CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT not enabled in kernel, cannot determine SWAPIN and IO %
[20:06] <yofel> should I file a bug about iotop or the kernel?
[20:08] <yofel> ah, already filed
[20:21] <dpic> seb128: i hear you're the one to go to about codec detection issues?
[20:21] <seb128> dpic, not really, launchpad or upstream in bugzilla rather I would say
[20:21] <seb128> especially not on a friday evening
[20:21] <dpic> aha sorry =]
[20:21] <seb128> ie I'm not working right now
[20:22] <seb128> what is your issue?
[20:22] <dpic> on a new install of lucid, i try playing an mts file in totem and it asks for whatever gstreamer packages. I install them and it says they were installed but did not provide all the plugins that were requested
[20:25] <seb128> can you open a bug with an example?
[20:48] <hggdh> OK. How do I submit a branch of mine for merge on LP?
[20:50] <micahg> hggdh: click propose merge, and then search for the branch to merge into
[20:52] <hggdh> bllody thing does not show a 'propose merging' -- or I am looking at the wrong place
[20:52] <yofel> hggdh: hi, can you renew my bugsquad membership if you get the time? Got the mail from LP today
[20:54] <hggdh> yofel: will do
[20:54] <micahg> hggdh: where's your branch?
[20:55] <hggdh> micahg: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~hggdh2/+junk/testdrive
[20:55] <micahg> hggdh: I don't think you can merge from +junk as it's not really a branch
[20:56] <hggdh> ah
[20:56] <micahg> you should push under lp:~hggdh2/testdrive/whatever
[20:56] <hggdh> so I cannot create in junk... this might be it
[20:56] <hggdh> yofel: done
[20:56] <micahg> hggdh: junk is supposed to be a misc storage place
[20:59] <hggdh> micahg: yes, this is it, thank you
[20:59] <micahg> hggdh: np
[20:59]  * hggdh will have to start learning all of this ;-)
[21:00] <yofel> hggdh: thanks :)
[21:04] <yofel> argh, apport/LP being broken is annoying -.-
[21:04] <yofel> I'm piling up bug reports here ^^
[21:13] <kklimonda> what is the bug number of the recent dpkg performance regression related to the fsync() calls?
[21:17] <yofel> kklimonda: bug 537241
[21:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 537241 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "My computer updates are very slow since latest dpkg update (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/537241
[21:24] <nekohayo> hey folks, any plans to update the gnome-shell package et al. in lucid?
[21:55] <BUGabundo> bu noute
[21:57] <kermiac> morning BUGabundo :)