/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/03/12/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

Milos_SDHi00:06
Milos_SDWhy is there no Firefox 3.7 updates for 64bit for a few days? :) There is a little bug rendering one web site that I visit a lot...00:07
micahgchrisccoulson: still around?00:31
ccheneyasac: getting close to done (i think) i found more classes i had to override due to struct changes though :-\00:53
ccheneyasac: if i add items to a struct at the end is it safe to put that into the regular glib? or should i override the class?01:47
ccheney_GIconIface has two new functions in its struct but are at the end of it01:47
* ccheney adds it temporarily to work around and fix the other items01:50
BUGabundo_remotemorning08:53
fta2asac, bug 53761710:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 537617 in chromium-browser "[FFe] chromium-codecs-ffmpeg for lucid" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53761710:21
chrisccoulsonbdrung - did you test xiphos before uploading?11:55
chrisccoulsonit doesn't work with xulrunner 1.9.2 ;)11:55
asacchrisccoulson: so :)11:56
asacdid micah talk to you about tbird 2.0.0.24 security update?11:56
bdrungchrisccoulson: i did only a compile test11:57
chrisccoulsonasac - he mentioned it briefly, but i'm not sure of the exact specifics11:57
asacchrisccoulson: if not ... that needs to be done today11:57
asac;)11:57
asacstaged in the security ppa11:57
asacso on monday/tuesday we can release11:57
asacone second11:57
chrisccoulsonbdrung - there's a change in behaviour in xulrunner 1.9.2 which breaks xiphos and causes it to spawn lots of nautilus windows11:57
asaclp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird.karmic11:58
asaclp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird.jaunty11:58
chrisccoulsoni'm just about to upload a temporary change to make sure it doesnt load the 1.9.2 GRE if it's installed, as the current version stops working even if 1.9.2 is on the system11:58
asaclp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird.intrepid11:58
asaclp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird.hardy11:58
asaccheckout the previous changelogs and how that was committed11:58
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, i'll grab those branches11:58
asacright. lets go through one branch together when done. have to do some pre-lunch stuff (bb in 15)11:59
bdrungchrisccoulson: spawn nautilus windows? what does xiphos has to do with nautilus?11:59
asacheh11:59
asac;)11:59
chrisccoulsonbdrung - give me one second and i will explain what is happening12:00
chrisccoulsoni just need to open up all the source files again12:00
chrisccoulsonbdrung -  xiphos has a handler for open_uri events from the GtkMozEmbed instance. when it calls gtk_moz_embed_open_stream in order to load the HTML content, this triggers a open_uri signal with the URI set to the base_uri passed to gtk_moz_embed_open_stream (which happens to be set to file:///). The handler in xiphos handles this in the expected way, and ends up opening the file browser12:04
chrisccoulsonthis behaviour is different in xulrunner 1.9.2. in the previous version, calling gtk_moz_embed_open_stream did not trigger the open_uri signal12:04
chrisccoulsoni'm not sure if the new behaviour is intended or not, but it completely breaks xiphos12:04
bdrungchrisccoulson: can you open a bug report for that?12:05
chrisccoulsonyes, i will do12:05
chrisccoulsonin the meantime, i'm going to upload a xiphos change to make sure it uses the 1.9.1 GRE if 1.9.2 is on the system12:05
chrisccoulsonas a temporary fix to make it usable again12:05
asacchrisccoulson: so tbird 2 is kinda old ... its basically the only branch where we start with upstream tarballs (or ... can start with upstream tarballs)12:24
asacthe current candidate build is: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/2.0.0.24-candidates/build1/12:24
asacso thats 2.0.0.24+build1+nobinonly12:24
asacversion wise12:24
asaccheckout the branches ... e.g. what they committed/documented12:24
asac16:08 < jdstrand> asac: 910-112:25
asacthats the USN we use for this release12:25
asacthere is a rule to make a nobinonly proper tarball out of upstream tarballs in debian/rules12:25
chrisccoulsoncool, that's ok then :)12:25
asacin case  you dont see the upstream source, its: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/2.0.0.24-candidates/build1/thunderbird-2.0.0.24-source.tar.bz212:26
chrisccoulsoni'm just downloading that12:27
chrisccoulsonright, so i've got the tarball now12:31
ftadebian 43984316:27
ubottuDebian bug 439843 in libxml2 "libxml2: Version 2.6.30.dfsg-1 breaks Azureus and evolution (until now)" [Critical,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/43984316:27
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
micahgmorning, did I miss everyone?16:50
chrisccoulsonhey micahg16:58
micahghi chrisccoulson17:09
micahghi asac, any chance to get TB and xul192-ubuntu2 uploaded?17:35
asacarchive is frozen ;)17:36
asaci will do it eventually17:36
micahgugh...well, both are required for beta I would say...TB is a security update17:37
micahgasac: your compatability fix works beautifully :)17:38
micahgI spoke too soon17:38
micahgprogram only starts once after the patch17:39
asachmm17:39
asacbdrung confirmed it17:39
micahgoh wait, I don't know if it built yet17:39
asacyou mean the greasemonkey?17:39
asacheh17:39
micahgoh, the whole thing FTBFSd :(17:40
asacgood that i havent pushed ;)17:40
asacor patch changed on head?17:40
micahgasac: no, and we're not uploading FF36 until monday I thought17:41
micahgmissing install files17:41
micahgsorry, was looking at the wrong build ;)17:43
micahgit built fine17:43
micahgthe patch for bug 518422 didn't work17:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 518422 in firefox "Firefox does not start with certain addons installed" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51842217:44
micahgat least not for the apps I have, let me try the greasemonkey by itself17:44
micahgasac: so greasemonkey is fixed, but not some other addons17:47
chrisccoulsonasac - the thunderbird update only builds on karmic ;)17:56
asacmicahg: which addons are those?18:35
asacare those addons with .xpt?18:35
* micahg checks18:35
asacchrisccoulson: interesting. how does it fail?18:35
chrisccoulsonasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/394181/18:36
chrisccoulsoni'm just about to look at it properly18:37
micahgasac: yes18:37
asacchrisccoulson: seems they need a new nss or something hmm.18:38
asaccheck what they have included in-source18:38
asacor its just a bug and our compiler makes it an error18:38
chrisccoulsonwill do, thanks18:39
asacchrisccoulson: thats mozilla 1.8 branch, so: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla1.8/18:41
chrisccoulsonthanks18:41
chrisccoulsonasac - how do you normally test each of these security updates?18:41
chrisccoulsondo you test them on every release?18:41
asacchrisccoulson: to branch is named: MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH for http://bonsai.mozilla.org18:41
asacso you can look what commits happened18:42
asacjust tune that field (dont push on seamonkey etc.)18:42
asacand change the dates at the bottom so you can see what got comitted18:42
asacchrisccoulson: yes, testing them on every release is essential18:42
asacabout the how ... thats complicated18:43
asacnothing automated18:43
asacsetup various account types18:43
asacthen smoke test the UI18:43
asacmaybe we can work on a test plan for tbird too in the future18:43
asacin any case: what is important is to get more and more users on the security ppa18:44
asacso you see them complainig if suddfenly their email broke etc.18:44
asacunfortunately we dont know how many are using that ppa18:44
asacfor firefox its quite a few18:44
asacbut we loose some every release because update-manager disables the lines18:44
asacso we should regularly blog about that18:44
asace.g. when we stage a new securitr update is a good time18:45
micahgasac: chrisccoulson: last nss update on that branch was to 3.12.3.1 last year18:46
asacwhen last year?18:46
asacwe havent seen a release from 1.8 branch this year18:46
micahgchrisccoulson: are you testing with -updates/security?18:46
micahgasac: August18:46
asachmm. was there a tbird after that?18:47
micahgasac: no18:47
asacso yeah18:47
asacprobably is that18:47
asacso yeah18:48
asacwe have that in -security18:48
asacchrisccoulson: add -security to your pbu9ilder;)18:48
chrisccoulsonheh18:48
chrisccoulsoni'll try that in a second18:48
chrisccoulsonthanks ;)18:48
* asac happy to not require to roll a full new nss because of tbird 2 :)18:49
micahgasac: no, but for FF3, and FF35 :)18:49
micahgoops18:49
micahgnot FF318:49
asacwell. thats at least because we update something more or less newish ;)18:49
asacfeels a bit better .. though clearly is bad too18:50
asacunless there was a sec issue now ifxed18:50
micahgasac: well, we'll be pushing FF36, so that should feel better :)18:50
asacwhich i havent checked ;)18:50
asacyes thats going to be a bloody event :-P18:50
asacanyway, end of week for me18:52
asactalk to you later ;)18:52
sebnerasac: one of the best jokes you made lately ;P18:52
micahgasac: I'll try to have FF ready Monday so we can get on teh CDs18:54
micahgasac: 3.12.5 has security issues, so I figure 3.12.6 will have some as well18:55
alphaaquillaehello world, im running under ubuntu kramic koala, i've just downloaded thunderbird 3.0.3, i know it needs no installation, but how to run it?19:13
skierpageHeya, any plans for a thunderbird-3.1 beta1 in the PPA?19:48
micahgskierpage: yes, the build is currently broken, I'll try to get to it at some point19:53
micahgskierpage: I'm going to try to make a thunderbird-stable PPA soon thought19:53
skierpagemicahg, thanks!  You also probably know thunderbird-3.0 hasn't rebuilt since 3.03pre Feb 17 but Mozilla released 3.0.3 final March 1.19:56
micahgskierpage: it was changed to thunderbird in the PPA19:57
skierpagemicahg, ah I see!  Should I remove thunderbird-3.0 and add thunderbird in KPackageKit ?20:00
micahgskierpage: yes20:00
skierpageHmm, "Dependency resolution failed. Remove the package evolution-documentation-en before [rest cut off]".  Odd, I didn't know I had it.20:08
gnomefreakany chance nothing is broke in daily PPA?20:14
micahggnomefreak: there are a few things broke, why?20:14
gnomefreakmicahg: i want to back up before updating to broken apps20:15
gnomefreakmainly concerrned about tb320:15
micahgI'm actually using TB3 from PPA right now, seems fine, just the .desktop name is wrong20:16
gnomefreakmicahg: ok cool. thanks :) now i just need to find out how to make my theme right-handed20:17
micahggnomefreak: there was a dent about it20:17
gnomefreakmicahg: about tb3?20:17
micahggnomefreak: no, theme right handed20:18
micahgI'm asuuming about max/min/close20:18
gnomefreakmicahg: ah thanks ill see if i have it20:18
gnomefreakmicahg: `yep that one20:18
skierpageLooks like language-support-translations-en depends on evolution-document-en, and vice-versa! Aghh20:18
micahgskierpage: which release are you running20:19
gnomefreakevolution == broken as normal (doesnt work like tb)20:19
micahggnomefreak: nah, this is another bug20:19
micahggnomefreak: there was a language package deprecated in karmic and it should have been removed by update-manager20:19
gnomefreakoh yeah cant read dents :(20:20
skierpagemicahg, Kubuntu 9.04 amd64.  gnomefreak, some weirdness came up trying to remove thunderbird-3.0 and add the fine thunderbird.20:20
gnomefreakthunderbird-3.0 is no more20:20
micahgskierpage: yeah, so the thunderbird-locale-en-us package isn't compatible with TB320:20
micahggnomefreak: I know20:20
gnomefreakyeah i am reading20:21
* gnomefreak slow today20:21
micahgI didn't expect fta to do that switch, that's why it current says Shredder, but the .desktop says Mozilla Thunderbird still20:21
fta?20:22
skierpageIt's weird, I have thunderbird-locale-en-gb installed which is part of this ? unrelated dependency hell.20:22
micahgskierpage: yes, you can't have it with thunderbird version 3.020:23
skierpageOK, removing thunderbird-locale-en-gb warns it'll remove evolution-documentation-en and language-support-translations-en.  Do I care? ;-)20:24
micahgskierpage: not unless you're using evolution20:27
ccheneyasac: not sure what i am doing wrong, maybe i am blind: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/394229/20:28
ccheneyasac: its claiming undefined references to the _gtk_im_module bits but i have the include from gtk in the file and its in the hardy version already20:29
ccheneyasac: do those somehow get hidden even though their headers are installed, so other things can't link to them?20:29
ccheneyasac: that plus the two other symbols will have me finished (i think) though the two other symbols might pull in more junk20:30
gnomefreakmicahg: you didnt happen to find a dent on the gnome-terminal>file>open tab>*20:32
micahggnomefreak: no20:33
gnomefreakmicahg: thanks if i get time maybe ill trow it out there20:33
gnomefreaks/trow/throw20:33
ccheneyasac: fixed the g_signal_new_class_handler already so just down to that and the get_type20:34
* gnomefreak afk for a bit20:34
chrisccoulsonwhat's this about gnome-terminal?20:42
skierpagemicahg, that worked, I'm on thunderbird 3.0.4pre, thanks so much for all your help!20:43
micahgskierpage: np20:43
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: click on file and try to open a new tab it now has choices that make it a bit hardder to choose :)20:45
skierpageI'd like to try thunderbird 3.1b1 but don't want to be too bleeding edge with my 1.1GB of email.  Can I install the thunderbird-3.1 package alongside thunderbird and switch back to 3.0.4 3.1 gives problems?20:45
chrisccoulsongnomefreak, yeah, that's the consequence of me adding a new profile ;)20:46
gnomefreak3.1 works?20:46
skierpagesorry "switch back to 3.0.4 if 3.1 gives problems?"20:46
gnomefreakskierpage: should have 2 dif dirs20:46
gnomefreaka ~/.thunderbird and a ~/.trhunderbird-3.120:46
gnomefreakor 3.0 and 3.120:47
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: well make it go away :)20:47
chrisccoulsongnomefreak, we wanted to ship a profile with colours to match the default theme ;)20:47
* gnomefreak doesnt want ambiance20:47
chrisccoulsoncan you not delete it?20:48
chrisccoulsonah20:48
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: havent found a way yet but not tried20:48
chrisccoulsoni bet it keeps coming back doesn;t it ;)20:48
chrisccoulsonso, you can probably blame me there ;)20:48
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: ok i can do that. any chance of this being changed?20:49
chrisccoulsongnomefreak - it might be if we can find a better way to implement the theme changes for the terminal20:50
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: no i cant find a way to remove it20:50
chrisccoulsonbut at the moment, there isn't one ;)20:50
chrisccoulsonso, ideas welcome20:50
skierpagegnomefreak, there is a thunderbird-3.1 package in the PPA, it's stalled at 3.1a1 for now but these fine folks are working on it.20:50
* ccheney doesn't think having ambiance as a theme choice for g-t is really a big deal switching the defaults on already installed systems was what annoyed me a little bit :)20:50
skierpagecheers y'all, kthxbye20:51
ccheneybut not nearly as much as the every upgrade revert button layout to left side issue :)20:51
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: skierpage its been at that version since dec 0920:51
gnomefreakoops20:51
chrisccoulsonccheney, that's also difficult to avoid. because we implemented it as a new profile and set the default profile to ambiance, that will apply to new installs and also to any existing users who haven't selected a new profile before20:51
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: i will think but im still +1 for leaving it alone since most people change it anyway. bug or blog on it IIRC20:52
ccheneychrisccoulson: yea20:52
skierpagegnomefreak, right micahg said just before you joined "skierpage: yes, the build is currently broken, I'll try to get to it at some point"20:52
skierpageand "I'm going to try to make a thunderbird-stable PPA soon thought"20:52
gnomefreakskierpage: yeah he hasnt had time to get to it as of last week20:52
chrisccoulsonccheney, i considered just modifying the default profile, but due to another issue in gnome-terminal it would mean that no upgraders would ever see the new colours20:53
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: ccheney new "default" profile should not override/change/add to already custom one20:53
gnomefreakusing the choices in the profile preff. dialog20:53
chrisccoulsongnomefreak, the issue is that most users haven't selected a new custom profile (they only make changes within the default). so, if we add a new profile and set that as the default one to be used, then existing users will be changed over too20:55
chrisccoulsonthats just the way gconf works20:55
chrisccoulsonbut we don't erase any settings - it's quite easy to go back to the old default20:55
chrisccoulson(which will still have the users customizations)20:55
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: ok but i dont see anything in profile prefs that gives me a choice to use x or y profile20:56
gnomefreakfound it i think20:57
gnomefreakalthough its not letting me delete ambiance20:57
ccheneyif i understand how this works its probably something to the effect that if you have the default one set even if it is modified it considers you to have never changed your profile so doesn't make note in gconf itself, then when the underlying system wide gconf default changes it automatically applies to your user20:57
ccheneychrisccoulson: is that roughly accurate?20:58
ccheneyer make note in the user's copy of gconf20:58
chrisccoulsonccheney, that's basically it, yes20:58
chrisccoulsonif you've never changed your default profile, then there will be no user-specific default profile key set20:58
chrisccoulsonso the system default will apply20:58
* ccheney wonders if that is the same reason he keeps losing his button layout20:58
gnomefreakok i set open using default but still cant delete ambiance but i am givent the choice20:59
* ccheney bets it is the same reason for button layout issue, heh20:59
chrisccoulsonccheney, button layout issue?20:59
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: right-hander vss left-handed20:59
gnomefreak:) all the buttons moved to top left of window21:00
chrisccoulsongnomefreak, you should be able to delete profiles, but i expect they will probably keep coming back21:00
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: it asked me if i wanted to i said yes/delete whatever it was and it never left21:00
ccheneychrisccoulson: with the button layout if i unset the value it goes to back to the right side but then something occassionally seems to set it back to the left21:00
gnomefreakso its likely to be coming right back21:00
chrisccoulsonthat's due to another change i made to ensure that new system profiles added to the system get merged in to the users list of available profiles21:01
chrisccoulsoni need to have a think about that one, but that's one i probably need to fix21:01
* gnomefreak is seeing a patteren here21:01
gnomefreakpattern even21:01
chrisccoulsonthe issue is if a user ever adds a new profile, then they will never ever see Ambiance available as an option after upgrading21:01
ccheneyprobably the main problem (if it is really one) is that gconf probably should make a local copy of values to the users gconf at first run21:01
chrisccoulsonso to fix that, we merge new system profiles in to the users list of available profiles21:02
ccheneybut seeing more profiles i personally don't consider a bug, switching to the new profile imho is21:02
chrisccoulsonccheney, it should be the opposite - it should never make a local copy unless a user changes it21:02
chrisccoulsonelse it becomes impossible to migrate defaults on upgrade21:02
chrisccoulsoneg, theme changes etc21:02
ccheneychrisccoulson: in that case though if the user likes the settings and then the settings change they are screwed21:03
gnomefreakim ok with these settings being set on clean install but it seems a bit invasive to be changed to already set up profiles21:03
ccheneychrisccoulson: there is no way for the user to say i like these default settings and never change them21:03
chrisccoulsonccheney, not with gconf. if a user sticks with defaults, they will get whatever new defaults we set on upgrade21:03
ccheneychrisccoulson: which is why i said "probably the main problem..."21:04
ccheneychrisccoulson: because if the user likes the current defaults, it doesn't mean they will like the new Ubuntu defaults21:04
chrisccoulsonthats true21:04
ccheneychrisccoulson: but with the way it currently works you either have to not use defaults at all, or take any changes Ubuntu ever pushes out21:04
chrisccoulsonbut on the flip side, a user might hate the old defaults, and prefer the new ones21:04
chrisccoulsonthe issue is that we'll never be able to please everybody when changing defaults on upgrade21:05
ccheneychrisccoulson: well at least in the g-t case it is relatively easy to switch the default profile21:05
chrisccoulsonccheney, yeah, that's partly why i added it as a separate profile21:05
ccheneyprobably in this case the default profile probably should not have existed, it should have been named something else :)21:06
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: right you cant please everyone however user settings should never be overwritten/changed/ect.. without premissions21:06
ccheneythen the user would either have 'white' theme or the ambiance theme set as default21:06
chrisccoulsonccheney, what profile names do you see btw?21:07
chrisccoulsongnomefreak, i haven't really over-written any settings. i changed the default to a new profile, which means users will be changed to it if they are still using the original default profile21:08
gnomefreakshould act simular to the firefox/yahoo changes. if custom set it will not change it but new install it will use yahoo21:08
chrisccoulsonit's just like changing a theme default - if a user keeps the default GTK / metacity theme, but changes the colours a bit in the appearance preferences, they will still be migrated to the new default on upgrade21:09
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: so the naming it something other than default should be enough?21:09
chrisccoulsongnomefreak, i changed the name to "Legacy"21:09
chrisccoulsonif it's still "Default", then that's probably a translation issue21:09
gnomefreaki never changed names of profile when i changed colors so its still "Default"21:10
ccheneychrisccoulson: Ambiance and Default21:10
chrisccoulsonanyway, i have to disappear for a bit to get some food21:10
chrisccoulsonah21:10
gnomefreakthose are mine as well :)21:10
ccheneychrisccoulson: i haven't restarted g-t in a few days maybe that is why21:10
ccheneychrisccoulson: no just Ambiance and Default even on my other lucid system21:11
chrisccoulsoni bet gnome-terminal has written "Default" as a user key, even though you never changed it21:11
gnomefreaki started mine for the first time in ~1eek and this si the set up. doing updates atm21:11
chrisccoulsongnome-terminal seems to write some keys even without you changing them21:12
gnomefreak~1week21:12
chrisccoulsoni should look at fixing that21:12
ccheneychrisccoulson: ah probably so21:13
gnomefreakit seems that the palette has changed but not anything else when using ambiance21:13
chrisccoulsonanyway, i need to disappear for a bit21:14
gnomefreaki have green on black except it is using default palette settings as to my "linux console" setting21:14
gnomefreakchrisccoulson: have fun21:14
ccheneychrisccoulson: i see default at /apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default21:15
ccheneychrisccoulson: and i can't delete that one, i tried unsetting the other references to default but that didn't help21:15
ccheneychrisccoulson: ah unsetting the visible_name under that changed it to legacy21:15
chrisccoulsonccheney, ah, so that confirms what i thought then21:15
chrisccoulsongnome-terminal is writing the key without you changing it21:16
chrisccoulsongrrrr, stupid gnome-terminal21:16
gnomefreakccheney: did you change the key or did you just remove the value?21:18
gnomefreaksorry delete the key or edit it21:19
ccheneygnomefreak: i unset the key21:20
ccheneygnomefreak: there is an unset option21:20
gnomefreakccheney: ok looking21:20
gnomefreakah21:21
gnomefreakccheney: thanks21:21
ccheneynow just down to this stupid issue: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/394262/21:21
* ccheney wonders how to make the code see the definitions that are there already :-\21:21
* ccheney wonders if he needs to modify what it is trying to link to in glib21:22
* gnomefreak would be happy if grub would stop asking me anything than telling me everything i choose is a bad idea21:22
gnomefreakstupid shit like GRUB failed to install to the following devices:                          │  │                                                                           │  │ /dev/sda2 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb521:23
chrisccoulsonmciahg - i could thunderbird 2.0.0.24 built on jaunty now ;)21:24
chrisccoulsons/mciahg/micahg21:25
chrisccoulsonthanks for the tip, i probably should have spotted my error though ;)21:25
micahgchrisccoulson: tis ok, you know where the branches are so you can propose merges?21:25
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, i pulled from those branches i think21:26
micahgchrisccoulson: also, do you know what the style is for the changelog entries?21:26
chrisccoulsonthey're only changelog updates anyway ;)21:26
chrisccoulsoni just copied the style already used21:26
micahgchrisccoulson: and a release tag21:26
chrisccoulsonyeah, i'll sort that out later21:26
chrisccoulsoni probably should go and eat my dinner now :)21:26
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah, I'll be on for another hour or so and then back sat night and sunday if you have any Qs21:27
chrisccoulsoncool, thanks. i'll probably be around most of the weekend to test them ;)21:27
chrisccoulsonanyway, bbiab21:27
gnomefreakok now the background keeps changing damniot21:28
gnomefreakoh21:30
gnomefreakcosmos == slide show21:30
gnomefreakbrb. smoke than try to figure out how downloading works :(21:52
BUGabundobu noute21:56
ccheneyasac: i can't figure out how to make the epiphany link the lib/widgets library with the lib/ library23:27
ccheneyasac: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/394317/23:28
ccheneyasac: i also tried just using ../libephymisc.la instead of the top builddir thing and got the same error23:29
ccheneyasac: but effectively the same code apparently works for src/Makefile.am that is where i tried copying from23:29
ccheneyasac: resolved the issue was bad ordering of SUBDIRS23:53
ccheneyasac: i think i am almost done with first pass of epiphany then just have to clean all the patches up :)23:54
ccheneyasac: er and verify it actually runs23:54
asacright23:55
asac;)23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!