[02:58] #ubuntu-offtopic (UTC) 02:53:56 [~Emzzzz] http://imggmi.info/DSC-1268362047.jpg/ do my tits look big? [02:58] Just fyi ⢁) [04:46] In #kubuntu-devel, vorian said: ubottu: !lucid is Lucid lynx is the codename for Ubuntu 10.04, due April 29th, 2010 - Lucid is NOT released and is NOT stable - Discussion and support only in #ubuntu+1 - Development Schedule https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidReleaseSchedule [04:48] ^ that request is just an addition of the schedule [04:52] !lucid [04:52] Lucid lynx is the codename for Ubuntu 10.04, due April 29th, 2010 - Lucid is NOT released and is NOT stable - Discussion and support only in #ubuntu+1 - Development Schedule: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidReleaseSchedule [04:52] I just changed it [04:53] FINE, BE THAT WAY [04:53] :) I think having a link to the schedule makes sense [04:53] I agree. [04:55] * SportChick bops tonyyarusso over the head [04:56] yay, thanks [04:57] * vorian waves at SportChick [04:57] * SportChick tackles vorian [05:02] heya [06:22] good morning mYute. How can we help you today? [07:22] I think he's just demonstrated that he needs to help himself. [07:23] (where 'just' is an hour ago) [07:24] hrm, yeah, looks that way... [07:38] good morning [07:42] In #ubuntu-offtopic, AtomicSpark said: !test is tested [08:06] ahhh spam time [08:29] Tynice called the ops in #ubuntu () [08:30] I /msg'ed him [08:37] that's the same serial troll spammer of quite some time, doing the same thing in several other channels [08:41] oh... sounds fun [14:05] !it [14:05] Vai su #ubuntu-it se vuoi parlare in italiano, in questo canale usiamo solo l'inglese. Grazie! (per entrare, scrivi « /join #ubuntu-it » senza virgolette) === Pici` is now known as Pici [15:23] nj]]] [15:23] ops [15:25] ikonia called the ops in #ubuntu-ops. [15:25] I'm not that silly [17:06] I've never seen that bot before ? [17:06] ahh log [17:06] that's better [17:32] acicula called the ops in #ubuntu (BOOOO) [17:36] * genii feeds mneptok cookies [17:46] * mneptok munches contentedly === mnepton is now known as mneptok [18:17] erUSUL called the ops in #ubuntu (cami) [18:27] I sometimes wonder if "usuario" is spanish for something like "user" [18:27] it is. [18:28] Its like people coming into the channel with the nick 'ubuntu' [18:28] Pici: I suspected something like that but wasn't sure, thanks :) [20:26] theadmin called the ops in #ubuntu (someone tell elena70 to stop this) [20:29] what was the factoid that tells you can search the bot in query? [20:29] !msgthebot [20:29] Please investigate with me only with "/msg ubottu Bot" or in #ubuntu-bots. Search for factoids with "/msg ubottu !search factoid". [20:29] cheers. a bit hard to remember though... :) [20:30] yeah, that "i want to tell someone to msg the bot, what is the non-intuitive command" question comes up a lot [20:30] !botabuse is easier :) [20:30] In #ubuntu-ops, topyli said: !botabuse is easier :) [20:30] ok, so now i know how to not escape ubottu commands [20:31] !botabue [20:31] fail [20:31] s* [20:31] iirc it's the same [20:31] yup [23:27] linuxguy2009 seems to be spreading FUD [23:27] the attitude is my issue with him [23:28] kinky koala sux! [23:30] who wants to take on changing the topic in +1 to add something about the window control changes. I have no easy short way of saying it [23:31] gnomefreak, what's the hard long way? [23:31] brb smoke and think [23:31] somone had a factoid iirc (or a suggestion) [23:31] knome: short not so nice == move it someone else [23:31] long == this is intendened at this time and is not yet set in stone but please use stable if you cant hanele change [23:32] I would reserve topic entries in +1 for critical things [23:32] uh, i can handle change. but i don;t want my buttons moved. [23:33] thought gconf-editor could switch them [23:33] people that don;t want window controls moved != people that cannot deal with change [23:33] see i feel this is as it is likely to drown support questions [23:33] gconftool-2 --set "/apps/metacity/general/button_layout" --type string "menu:minimize,maximize,close" << will move them [23:34] * gnomefreak brb [23:41] ok maybe factoid is better just need to find a place to post it all on one page. i dont think its enough to warrent a wiki though [23:41] something like !buttons ? [23:42] yeah [23:42] to reset your buttons blah blah blah [23:42] there is a command for moving it right and left and also in gconf [23:43] oh, have to do it in lucid channel iirc [23:43] bazhang: cant you use !bleh #ubuntu+1 or something like that [23:44] i dont recall the way its done [23:44] gnomefreak, thought it took hold in the channel it was created; ie if done here was universal , in -ot only there, and so on [23:44] bazhang: oh iu thought it was general in any channel unless told [23:44] s/iu/i [23:44] the factoid master pici would know for certain [23:46] * gnomefreak had a long enough discussion about the buttons and the g-t profiles to last a life time :) [23:48] Pici: any ideas on the bot/factiod questions above? [23:48] the window controls move is a stupid idea, full stop. there's no benefit, so there's no reason to change. changes either result in benefit to the user, or they are not made. [23:48] [23:51] mneptok: im suprised its not on the national news [23:53] gnomefreak: it will be once Obama links it to healthcare [23:54] :) [23:58] i don't mind where the buttons are, i can easily find them. although i can't figure out why it was changed [23:58] a bigger problem for me is that the gtk themes are so bright i can't see buttons or text entry boxes [23:58] and flat [23:59] or sorry, i can definitely see the buttons. just not the in the menu bar [23:59] tool bar. i'll shut up now