| === jonathan_ is now known as jjesse | ||
| kermiac | vish: you around? bug 538742 appears to be a dupe of bug 532844. This seems to be your area of expertise, should I dupe 538742 & *possibly* add an ubuntu-mono task to 532844? | 01:36 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538742 in ubuntu-mono (Ubuntu) "[LoginIcons] White icons on light background makes them invisible (affects: 2)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538742 | 01:36 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 532844 in light-themes (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 3 other projects) "Lucid: White symbols on light panel and Ubuntu Logo are difficult to see (affects: 11) (dups: 2)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532844 | 01:36 |
| wolfger_ | Hello, channel. Would you say that Bug #538589 should be marked as "confirmed"? "Fix comitted"? Seems that this has been addressed upstream some time ago. | 01:44 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538589 in ezstream (Ubuntu) "ezstream man page in incomplete and incorrect. (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538589 | 01:44 |
| yofel | wolfger_: as long as it isn't fixed in ubuntu don't use fix committed/released (in general at least) | 01:47 |
| yofel | wolfger_: as I don't know the package good enough I would set it confirmed for now | 01:47 |
| yofel | ah wait | 01:48 |
| yofel | you reported it | 01:48 |
| * yofel tests in lucid | 01:49 | |
| nigelb | wolfger_: did you try man ezstream? | 01:50 |
| nigelb | there might be an upstream manpage with more details | 01:51 |
| wolfger_ | nigelb: "man ezstream" is near-useless in Karmic | 01:51 |
| wolfger_ | haven't gotten around to trying Lucid yet | 01:52 |
| yofel | yep, manpage is wrong in lucid | 01:52 |
| wolfger_ | thanks, yofel | 01:52 |
| yofel | this should be fixed in debian IMO | 01:52 |
| yofel | as we just sync the package | 01:52 |
| nigelb | wolfger_: open a debian bug, its easier that way :) | 01:52 |
| nigelb | yofel: oh no, you're too fast ;) | 01:53 |
| wolfger_ | LOL | 01:53 |
| * yofel looks if there's a debian bug | 01:53 | |
| yofel | nigelb: :P | 01:53 |
| yofel | nope, no bug | 01:54 |
| yofel | wolfger_: do you know how to file a bug on bugs.debian.org? | 01:55 |
| wolfger_ | yofel: I think I may have done it once, a year or so ago. Not intimately familiar with it, no. | 01:55 |
| wolfger_ | Would be nice if Launchpad had a "forward bug to Debian" button... :-) | 01:56 |
| yofel | wolfger_: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/Bugs | 01:56 |
| yofel | usually using reportbug is the easiest way | 01:56 |
| wolfger_ | Thanks. will do this when I get the chance. Night all. | 02:02 |
| yofel | wolfger_: then I'll do it now as I've got time now | 02:03 |
| hernejj | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/538853 Should be ready for Triage. Importance=Low would be my best guess on this one. | 03:59 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538853 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "panel transparency broken with light theme (affects: 2) (dups: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 03:59 |
| ddecator | micahg, if you get a sec, i'm trying to decide if bug 534606 should be linked to mozilla 171237 (closest i found) since they kind of want the same thing, but for different reasons | 04:14 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 534606 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Find positions match off-screen (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/534606 | 04:14 |
| ubot4 | Mozilla bug 171237 in Find In Page "Scroll view a few lines beyond occurrence of found search term with type ahead find to show more context instead of bottom of page" [Enhancement,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171237 | 04:14 |
| micahg | ddecator: sounds good, but I'm wondering if we already have a bug | 04:16 |
| micahg | ddecator: wait | 04:16 |
| micahg | ddecator: that bug is targetted at seamonkey | 04:17 |
| ddecator | micahg, didn't even notice that...i filtered for firefox only | 04:17 |
| micahg | ddecator: hold on let me check | 04:18 |
| ddecator | micahg, i just double checked and don't see anything on lp that matches it | 04:21 |
| micahg | ddecator: still working it out with the mozilla devs | 04:28 |
| ddecator | micahg, sure thing. thanks | 04:29 |
| micahg | ddecator: use mozilla 440198 | 04:39 |
| ubot4 | Mozilla bug 440198 in Find Toolbar "If Firefox must scroll the page to display a search result, centre them vertically to the page" [Enhancement,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440198 | 04:39 |
| ddecator | micahg: sure thing. thanks | 04:40 |
| micahg | ddecator: and I already linked the LP bug upstream | 04:40 |
| ddecator | micahg: perfect, thanks =) | 04:40 |
| ddecator | micahg: just one quick question. since it's "enhancement" upstream, should it be "wishlist" downstream? | 04:41 |
| micahg | ddecator: well, technically, it's the fault of that banner that actually makes it "off-screen", but I'd mark it Low | 04:42 |
| ddecator | micahg: alright, fair enough | 04:42 |
| micahg | ddecator: Importance is relative to the project | 04:42 |
| micahg | ddecator: are you setting the importance on the bug? | 04:48 |
| ddecator | micahg: yup, just cleaned the description first | 04:48 |
| micahg | ddecator: k | 04:48 |
| === kermiac is now known as kermiac_ | ||
| vish | kermiac_: it could either be dealt with in the theme or in the icons , you can dup them and add botht the tasks | 04:53 |
| === mr_steve_ is now known as mr_steve | ||
| === kermiac_ is now known as kermiac | ||
| kermiac | thanks vish :) | 06:22 |
| ^arky^ | hi | 09:02 |
| ^arky^ | apport giving me this check your network problems ? | 09:03 |
| kermiac | ^arky^: known issue - bug 538097 | 09:49 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Apport cannot connect to crash database (affects: 84) (dups: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538097 | 09:49 |
| kermiac | and maybe bug 538944 | 09:49 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538944 in apport (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "apport-collect -p does not work any more (affects: 1)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538944 | 09:49 |
| pecisk | Hi people, I have question specific about reporting about Launchpads - do I also have to use ubuntu-bug, if I report bug I have collected info from other machine? It feels for me that it could be misleading for Ubuntu devs. | 09:54 |
| duanedesign | if the package says Fix Released for a package but one build (i386) failed - should I file a new bug report or reply to existing one? | 10:49 |
| persia | duanedesign: Neither. Build failures are tracked in a separate automated system. | 11:18 |
| persia | The uploader has already been notified, as well. | 11:18 |
| rye | persia, thanks (that was me who asked duanedesign about the build failures :) ) | 11:20 |
| persia | rye: Glad I could help. | 11:21 |
| BUGabundo_remote | yofel: around ? | 11:50 |
| yofel | BUGabundo_remote: yes | 11:50 |
| BUGabundo_remote | seems we have new _kids_ in +1 | 11:51 |
| BUGabundo_remote | :p | 11:51 |
| Damascene | is there any known bug about empathy not connecting when started in Lucid? | 11:52 |
| Damascene | hello first | 11:52 |
| BUGabundo_remote | how long will he last ehe | 11:52 |
| yofel | heh | 11:54 |
| rye | Damascene, but it working when you connect manually? | 12:01 |
| Damascene | no | 12:02 |
| Damascene | needs restarting many times | 12:02 |
| === BUGabundo_remote is now known as BUGabundo_lunch | ||
| arand | New (3.1.4-dfsg-2ubuntu1 (well, old relatively speaking but...)) version of virtualbox-ose in Lucid... Anyone care to confirm/defirm if Bug #510571 is fixed with this version? | 12:07 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 510571 in virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) (and 3 other projects) "Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox (affects: 31) (dups: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/510571 | 12:07 |
| Damascene | I want to report a bug that if empathy crashes or something wrong happened the bug tool says it can't connect to crash database | 12:15 |
| yofel | Damascene: known bug 538097 | 12:16 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Apport cannot connect to crash database (affects: 88) (dups: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538097 | 12:16 |
| Damascene | is that because "Chat app, and Telepathy user interface does not use Launchpad for bug tracking." | 12:16 |
| === kermiac is now known as kermiac_ | ||
| Damascene | bug 538097 | 12:23 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "+storeblob fails with "500 Internal server error" on production (works on edge) (affects: 88) (dups: 6)" [High,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/538097 | 12:23 |
| Damascene | I wonder who came up with this complected title? I think if some one searched for "Apport cannot connect to crash database" wouldn't be easy to get to write crash report | 12:24 |
| Damascene | *right | 12:25 |
| Pici | It was, but then it got duped to the LP bug with that title. | 12:25 |
| Damascene | I think titles are made to suit the developer more than the testers | 12:25 |
| Damascene | any one using the mainline kernel? | 12:28 |
| hernejj | I believe https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/538853 to be ready for Triage. | 13:02 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538853 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "panel transparency broken with light theme (affects: 2) (dups: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 13:02 |
| === BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_remote | ||
| vish | hernejj: importance? | 13:17 |
| === jonathan_ is now known as jjesse | ||
| hernejj | vish: Low I think. | 13:27 |
| vish | hernejj: actually it is a wishlist , since the panel was designed to use a background image | 13:28 |
| hernejj | vish: Ok, sounds good to me :) | 13:29 |
| hernejj | vish: Isn't it easy enough to modify Gtk code (or panel code?) to only apply the BG image if the user's Papel properties settings are not set to use transparency? | 13:31 |
| vish | hernejj: That would again be a wishlist in gnome-panel.. but worth a shot ;) the above bug would probably end up being a "wont fix" in the theme :) | 13:32 |
| hernejj | vish: Makes perfect sense. Thanks for taking the time to explain. I'll try to remember to open this for the panel later. I'm off to work. ttyl. | 13:34 |
| Damascene | if some font's doesn't look probably. what should I do? | 13:35 |
| Damascene | *fonts | 13:35 |
| hggdh | Damascene: you mean what to do with fonts that don't look *good*? | 13:36 |
| Damascene | yes | 13:36 |
| hggdh | open a bug on them: ubuntu-bug <font package name> | 13:37 |
| hggdh | extra points for chasing it upstream and reporting there also | 13:37 |
| Damascene | every font has package name? | 13:37 |
| hggdh | not really, but generically, yes | 13:37 |
| hggdh | you can search for the package a file belongs to by running 'dlocate <file>' | 13:38 |
| Damascene | well the font is freeserif in openoffice and serif in firefox | 13:38 |
| Damascene | I don't know what the package name | 13:38 |
| Damascene | ok | 13:38 |
| Damascene | I guess it's fontconfig - generic font configuration library - support binar | 13:40 |
| Damascene | I did dpkg -S serif | 13:40 |
| Damascene | sansserif no freeserif or serif | 13:41 |
| hggdh | Damascene: the problem here is that 'serif' and 'sansserif' are also designations for types of fonts | 13:42 |
| hggdh | serif means the font has the horizontal lines limiting hieght | 13:42 |
| hggdh | sansserif --- sans serif, without serif -- does not | 13:43 |
| hggdh | so it is difficult to know *which* serif-ed (or sans) font is in use when you say 'serif' | 13:43 |
| Damascene | how to be sure? | 13:44 |
| hggdh | ffox will use serif and sansserif fonts. Drill down, and find which are in use | 13:44 |
| Damascene | it's serif | 13:45 |
| hggdh | ok. then you must have an installed forn called serif | 13:46 |
| hggdh | (for me, I use on FFox Bistream Vera Serif) | 13:46 |
| hggdh | which is to say, the serif version of Bitsream Vera | 13:47 |
| Damascene | I see. I installed dlocate. the same result from dpkg -S serif, there is only this too: | 13:48 |
| Damascene | *two | 13:48 |
| Damascene | fontconfig-config: /etc/fonts/conf.avail/49-sansserif.conf | 13:48 |
| Damascene | fontconfig-config: /etc/fonts/conf.d/49-sansserif.conf | 13:48 |
| Damascene | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/539103 | 14:42 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 539103 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Default Arabic font in Firefox is ugly (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 14:42 |
| Damascene | may I ask some one to look in this | 14:42 |
| scar | how can I debug xorg/xserver? | 15:09 |
| scar | it's not line one can run ubuntu-bug startx? | 15:09 |
| greg-g | ubuntu-bug xorg will work, no? | 15:11 |
| greg-g | scar: ^ | 15:11 |
| scar | the thing is after gdm loads pc locks up, can't even ssh in | 15:12 |
| scar | I've looked at /var/log/Xorg.0.log | 15:12 |
| nigelb | if its lucid, it might be the plymouth bug | 15:13 |
| scar | karmic and lucid both same problem | 15:13 |
| scar | I've made a forum post http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8969966 but I don't want to submit a bug before I've got more solid info | 15:14 |
| scar | I don't really know what to do next :-/ | 15:16 |
| scar | I want to get amd64 8.04 to see if that could work | 15:19 |
| nigelb | scar: submit a bug against linux package describing the problem clearly and mention that its the same with karmic and lucid | 15:24 |
| scar | ok I will do that now | 15:26 |
| Damascene | there is a problem with lshw in lucid. the bug need someone with mainline kernel installed | 15:38 |
| nigelb | bdmurray: does the script for the reviewers team subscribe reviewers if the sponsors are subscribed? | 15:41 |
| bdmurray | nigelb: no it does not | 15:42 |
| nigelb | bdmurray: aha, that explains why some of my work was undone :) | 15:42 |
| nigelb | probably something that could added some time :) | 15:43 |
| bdmurray | nigelb: why should both teams be subscribed? | 15:43 |
| nigelb | bdmurray: oh wait, it does not? | 15:44 |
| nigelb | okay, then there is some trouble. I need to look again | 15:44 |
| bdmurray | right it does not subscribe the reviewers team if a -sponsors team is already subscribed to the bug report | 15:44 |
| nigelb | is it possible to do it only once? | 15:45 |
| nigelb | i.e., if someone actually removes the patch tag for genuine reasons, not add the tag again | 15:45 |
| bdmurray | why would the patch tag be removed and not a different patch- tag be added or the attachment flag unset? | 15:46 |
| nigelb | I was guiding the patch towards sponsorship, so I removed the patch tag | 15:47 |
| nigelb | it was a debdiff ready for uploard | 15:47 |
| bdmurray | a debdiff is still a patch though - I think the tag should stay | 15:48 |
| nigelb | In the use case that the debdiff works fine and can be sponsored, the patch tag should still stay? | 15:49 |
| bdmurray | nigelb: yes | 15:50 |
| nigelb | bdmurray: my issue with that process is that, once the sponsorship process is started, the patch does not need review, and only needs upload | 15:51 |
| bdmurray | nigelb: that's why the ubuntu-reviewers won't be subscribed to the bug report anymore | 15:51 |
| nigelb | bdmurray: ah, so ideally while reviewing we should be reviewing bugs which have reviewers subscribed? | 15:52 |
| persia | bdmurray: I think I like that model : rather than reviewing based on the patch tag, we review based on reviewers subscription. | 15:52 |
| nigelb | (I've been reviewing the ones with patch tag | 15:52 |
| nigelb | again, the problem with that is not all patch reviewers have membership in ubuntu-reviewers | 15:53 |
| bdmurray | yes I'd be looking at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs | 15:53 |
| bdmurray | nigelb: right let me check on that now | 15:53 |
| vish | bdmurray: Bug #531533 , has been committed upstream , the review team can be unsubscribed i guess :) | 15:55 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 531533 in tomboy (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Tomboy needs a monochrome Humanity Icon (affects: 6) (dups: 3)" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/531533 | 15:55 |
| shrini | team: need help on 525308 | 15:57 |
| shrini | i just set the package | 15:57 |
| shrini | but the user needs more info | 15:57 |
| vish | bug #525308 | 15:57 |
| nigelb | bug 525308 | 15:57 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 525308 in libusb (Ubuntu) "Does not read a USB that was read yesterday. The USB is read by other computer. (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/525308 | 15:57 |
| shrini | wow. this is great. | 15:58 |
| shrini | I am very new to this channel and bugs | 15:58 |
| shrini | help me to response to the user | 15:59 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| vish | shrini: thanks for helping out with the bugs , i'm not sure where this problem is though , someone will read the above and respond soon ;) | 16:05 |
| * nigelb is not sure either | 16:05 | |
| vish | shrini: have a look at > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingRemovableDevices , https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures#Storage%20devices | 16:08 |
| nigelb | shrini: Please ask reporter to run 'ubuntu-bug' in terminal and select storage device option. | 16:08 |
| nigelb | that should help collect proper information | 16:09 |
| === bac` is now known as bac | ||
| === scar_ is now known as tibbar | ||
| tibbar | ive tried everyone combination of kernal with nvidia driver, on 64bit ubuntu. From 9.04 - 10.4 X server crashes my system so the logs never saves. Also read about everyone solution online spent about 30hours straight | 16:26 |
| tibbar | still nothing, getting realllly desperate | 16:26 |
| tibbar | only thing ive figured out is "unable to load nvidia kernal" is a problem | 16:27 |
| tibbar | i have 8600, tried about every driver from 173-195. also got some logs | 16:28 |
| tibbar | how do i report the bug correctly really want my system to run in 10.4, the lts | 16:28 |
| rye | tibbar, hi | 16:31 |
| rye | tibbar, are you running with /usr partition separate from / ? | 16:31 |
| rye | tibbar, re: nvidia problem | 16:32 |
| shrini | vish: nigelb: thanks | 16:44 |
| shrini | update the bug | 16:44 |
| nigelb | welcome | 16:44 |
| shrini | wishes for your ubuntu membersips | 16:45 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === ikt_ is now known as ikt | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === radoe_ is now known as radoe | ||
| charlie-tca | bdmurray: I will test that screensaver bug again when I get a good lucid install this week | 19:17 |
| jjardon | Hello, Is the crash database down? | 19:25 |
| jjardon | I can't file a but with ubuntu-bug command | 19:25 |
| yofel | jjardon: known, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+bug/538097 | 19:28 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "+storeblob fails with "500 Internal server error" on production (works on edge) (affects: 95) (dups: 6)" [High,Invalid] | 19:28 |
| jjardon | yofel, thank you | 19:28 |
| cjohnston_ | Can someone look at Bug 535674 and tell me if they agree that it isnt a bug, just more crying and whining? | 20:04 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 535674 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "dust sand is one thousand times better than these new themes called Radiance - Ambiance (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/535674 | 20:04 |
| charlie-tca | Looks like an opinion. Belongs on a mailing list or in forums, maybe? | 20:05 |
| cjohnston_ | thanks charlie-tca.. im going to close and offer those suggestions. | 20:06 |
| charlie-tca | That works. There really is nothing in that to fix. | 20:06 |
| cjohnston_ | thanks charlie-tca | 20:07 |
| charlie-tca | You are welcome | 20:08 |
| bdmurray | thekorn: your merge proposal in bug 539211 has the wrong reviewer set | 20:09 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 539211 in update-manager (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "Lucid's update-manager does not show a warning when running on battery anymore (affects: 1)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539211 | 20:09 |
| thekorn | bdmurray, what is the correct one? | 20:10 |
| thekorn | bdmurray, I just took the pre-selected one | 20:10 |
| thekorn | bdmurray, mvo? | 20:11 |
| bdmurray | ubuntu-core-dev | 20:11 |
| bdmurray | or ubuntu-dev | 20:11 |
| bdmurray | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Branches | 20:11 |
| thekorn | bdmurray, great, thanks alot for the hint | 20:13 |
| bdmurray | thekorn: no problem | 20:13 |
| ddecator | micahg: are firefox crashes that failed retrace get treated differently from most crashes that fail retrace? i'm not sure what info the mozillateam needs in order to work on a crash | 21:17 |
| micahg | ddecator: usually | 21:17 |
| ddecator | micahg: so i'm looking at bug 521919, retrace failed, not much in the stacktrace (not sure if it's enough at least). in that case, do we remove the coredump and mark invalid? | 21:20 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 521919 in firefox (Ubuntu) "firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/521919 | 21:20 |
| micahg | ddecator: shouldn't be public with a coredump... | 21:20 |
| ddecator | micahg: the reporter changed it | 21:21 |
| ddecator | micahg: was going to mark private, but then i saw retrace failed | 21:21 |
| micahg | ddecator: remove the coredump and check for private info in the stacktraces...usually we mark invalid with a message, but this one has more info than njormal | 21:23 |
| ddecator | micahg: sure thing. thanks | 21:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!