=== jonathan_ is now known as jjesse
kermiacvish: you around? bug 538742 appears to be a dupe of bug 532844. This seems to be your area of expertise, should I dupe 538742 & *possibly* add an ubuntu-mono task to 532844?01:36
ubot4Launchpad bug 538742 in ubuntu-mono (Ubuntu) "[LoginIcons] White icons on light background makes them invisible (affects: 2)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53874201:36
ubot4Launchpad bug 532844 in light-themes (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 3 other projects) "Lucid: White symbols on light panel and Ubuntu Logo are difficult to see (affects: 11) (dups: 2)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53284401:36
wolfger_Hello, channel. Would you say that Bug #538589 should be marked as "confirmed"? "Fix comitted"? Seems that this has been addressed upstream some time ago.01:44
ubot4Launchpad bug 538589 in ezstream (Ubuntu) "ezstream man page in incomplete and incorrect. (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53858901:44
yofelwolfger_: as long as it isn't fixed in ubuntu don't use fix committed/released (in general at least)01:47
yofelwolfger_: as I don't know the package good enough I would set it confirmed for now01:47
yofelah wait01:48
yofelyou reported it01:48
* yofel tests in lucid01:49
nigelbwolfger_: did you try man ezstream?01:50
nigelbthere might be an upstream manpage with more details01:51
wolfger_nigelb: "man ezstream" is near-useless in Karmic01:51
wolfger_haven't gotten around to trying Lucid yet01:52
yofelyep, manpage is wrong in lucid01:52
wolfger_thanks, yofel01:52
yofelthis should be  fixed in debian IMO01:52
yofelas we just sync the package01:52
nigelbwolfger_: open a debian bug, its easier that way :)01:52
nigelbyofel: oh no, you're too fast ;)01:53
* yofel looks if there's a debian bug01:53
yofelnigelb: :P01:53
yofelnope, no bug01:54
yofelwolfger_: do you know how to file a bug on bugs.debian.org?01:55
wolfger_yofel: I think I may have done it once, a year or so ago. Not intimately familiar with it, no.01:55
wolfger_Would be nice if Launchpad had a "forward bug to Debian" button... :-)01:56
yofelwolfger_: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/Bugs01:56
yofelusually using reportbug is the easiest way01:56
wolfger_Thanks. will do this when I get the chance. Night all.02:02
yofelwolfger_: then I'll do it now as I've got time now02:03
hernejjhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/538853  Should be ready for Triage. Importance=Low would be my best guess on this one.03:59
ubot4Launchpad bug 538853 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "panel transparency broken with light theme (affects: 2) (dups: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed]03:59
ddecatormicahg, if you get a sec, i'm trying to decide if bug 534606 should be linked to mozilla 171237 (closest i found) since they kind of want the same thing, but for different reasons04:14
ubot4Launchpad bug 534606 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Find positions match off-screen (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53460604:14
ubot4Mozilla bug 171237 in Find In Page "Scroll view a few lines beyond occurrence of found search term with type ahead find to show more context instead of bottom of page" [Enhancement,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17123704:14
micahgddecator: sounds good, but I'm wondering if we already have a bug04:16
micahgddecator: wait04:16
micahgddecator: that bug is targetted at seamonkey04:17
ddecatormicahg, didn't even notice that...i filtered for firefox only04:17
micahgddecator: hold on let me check04:18
ddecatormicahg, i just double checked and don't see anything on lp that matches it04:21
micahgddecator: still working it out with the mozilla devs04:28
ddecatormicahg, sure thing. thanks04:29
micahgddecator: use mozilla 44019804:39
ubot4Mozilla bug 440198 in Find Toolbar "If Firefox must scroll the page to display a search result, centre them vertically to the page" [Enhancement,Reopened] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44019804:39
ddecatormicahg: sure thing. thanks04:40
micahgddecator: and I already linked the LP bug upstream04:40
ddecatormicahg: perfect, thanks =)04:40
ddecatormicahg: just one quick question. since it's "enhancement" upstream, should it be "wishlist" downstream?04:41
micahgddecator: well, technically, it's the fault of that banner that actually makes it "off-screen", but I'd mark it Low04:42
ddecatormicahg: alright, fair enough04:42
micahgddecator: Importance is relative to the project04:42
micahgddecator: are you setting the importance on the bug?04:48
ddecatormicahg: yup, just cleaned the description first04:48
micahgddecator: k04:48
=== kermiac is now known as kermiac_
vishkermiac_: it could either be dealt with in the theme or in the icons , you can dup them and add botht the tasks04:53
=== mr_steve_ is now known as mr_steve
=== kermiac_ is now known as kermiac
kermiacthanks vish :)06:22
^arky^apport giving me this check your network problems ?09:03
kermiac^arky^: known issue - bug 53809709:49
ubot4Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Apport cannot connect to crash database (affects: 84) (dups: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53809709:49
kermiacand maybe bug 53894409:49
ubot4Launchpad bug 538944 in apport (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "apport-collect -p does not work any more (affects: 1)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53894409:49
peciskHi people, I have question specific about reporting about Launchpads - do I also have to use ubuntu-bug, if I report bug I have collected info from other machine? It feels for me that it could be misleading for Ubuntu devs.09:54
duanedesignif the package says Fix  Released for a package but one build (i386) failed - should I file a  new bug report or reply to existing one?10:49
persiaduanedesign: Neither.  Build failures are tracked in a separate automated system.11:18
persiaThe uploader has already been notified, as well.11:18
ryepersia, thanks (that was me who asked duanedesign about the build failures :) )11:20
persiarye: Glad I could help.11:21
BUGabundo_remoteyofel: around ?11:50
yofelBUGabundo_remote: yes11:50
BUGabundo_remoteseems we have new _kids_ in +111:51
Damasceneis there any known bug about empathy not connecting when started in Lucid?11:52
Damascenehello first11:52
BUGabundo_remotehow long will he last ehe11:52
ryeDamascene, but it working when you connect manually?12:01
Damasceneneeds restarting many times12:02
=== BUGabundo_remote is now known as BUGabundo_lunch
arandNew (3.1.4-dfsg-2ubuntu1 (well, old relatively speaking but...)) version of virtualbox-ose in Lucid... Anyone care to confirm/defirm if Bug #510571 is fixed with this version?12:07
ubot4Launchpad bug 510571 in virtualbox-ose (Ubuntu) (and 3 other projects) "Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox (affects: 31) (dups: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51057112:07
DamasceneI want to report a bug that if empathy crashes or something wrong happened the bug tool says it can't connect to crash database12:15
yofelDamascene: known bug 53809712:16
ubot4Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Apport cannot connect to crash database (affects: 88) (dups: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53809712:16
Damasceneis that because "Chat app, and Telepathy user interface does not use Launchpad for bug tracking."12:16
=== kermiac is now known as kermiac_
Damascenebug 53809712:23
ubot4Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "+storeblob fails with "500 Internal server error" on production (works on edge) (affects: 88) (dups: 6)" [High,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53809712:23
DamasceneI wonder who came up with this complected title? I think if some one searched for "Apport cannot connect to crash database" wouldn't be easy to get to write crash report12:24
PiciIt was, but then it got duped to the LP bug with that title.12:25
DamasceneI think titles are made to suit the developer more than the testers12:25
Damasceneany one using the mainline kernel?12:28
hernejjI believe https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/538853 to be ready for Triage.13:02
ubot4Launchpad bug 538853 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "panel transparency broken with light theme (affects: 2) (dups: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed]13:02
=== BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_remote
vishhernejj: importance?13:17
=== jonathan_ is now known as jjesse
hernejjvish: Low I think.13:27
vishhernejj: actually it is a wishlist , since the panel was designed to use a background image13:28
hernejjvish: Ok, sounds good to me :)13:29
hernejjvish: Isn't it easy enough to modify Gtk code (or panel code?) to only apply the BG image if the user's Papel properties settings are not set to use transparency?13:31
vishhernejj: That would again be a wishlist in gnome-panel.. but worth a shot ;)  the above bug would probably end up being a "wont fix" in the theme :)13:32
hernejjvish: Makes perfect sense.  Thanks for taking the time to explain. I'll try to remember to open this for the panel later. I'm off to work. ttyl.13:34
Damasceneif some font's doesn't look probably. what should I do?13:35
hggdhDamascene: you mean what to do with fonts that don't look *good*?13:36
hggdhopen a bug on them: ubuntu-bug <font package name>13:37
hggdhextra points for chasing it upstream and reporting there also13:37
Damasceneevery font has package name?13:37
hggdhnot really, but generically, yes13:37
hggdhyou can search for the package a file belongs to by running 'dlocate <file>'13:38
Damascenewell the font is freeserif in openoffice and serif in firefox13:38
DamasceneI don't know what the package name13:38
DamasceneI guess it's fontconfig                               - generic font configuration library - support binar13:40
DamasceneI did dpkg -S serif13:40
Damascenesansserif no freeserif or serif13:41
hggdhDamascene: the problem here is that 'serif' and 'sansserif' are also designations for types of fonts13:42
hggdhserif means the font has the horizontal lines limiting hieght13:42
hggdhsansserif --- sans serif, without serif -- does not13:43
hggdhso it is difficult to know *which* serif-ed (or sans) font is in use when you say 'serif'13:43
Damascenehow to be sure?13:44
hggdhffox will use serif and sansserif fonts. Drill down, and find which are in use13:44
Damasceneit's serif13:45
hggdhok. then you must have an installed forn called serif13:46
hggdh(for me, I use on FFox Bistream Vera Serif)13:46
hggdhwhich is to say, the serif version of Bitsream Vera13:47
DamasceneI see. I installed dlocate. the same result from dpkg -S serif, there is only this too:13:48
Damascenefontconfig-config: /etc/fonts/conf.avail/49-sansserif.conf13:48
Damascenefontconfig-config: /etc/fonts/conf.d/49-sansserif.conf13:48
ubot4Launchpad bug 539103 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Default Arabic font in Firefox is ugly (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed]14:42
Damascenemay I ask some one to look in this14:42
scarhow can I debug xorg/xserver?15:09
scarit's not line one can run ubuntu-bug startx?15:09
greg-gubuntu-bug xorg will work, no?15:11
greg-gscar: ^15:11
scarthe thing is after gdm loads pc locks up, can't even ssh in15:12
scarI've looked at /var/log/Xorg.0.log15:12
nigelbif its lucid, it might be the plymouth bug15:13
scarkarmic and lucid both same problem15:13
scarI've made a forum post http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8969966 but I don't want to submit a bug before I've got more solid info15:14
scarI don't really know what to do next :-/15:16
scarI want to get amd64 8.04 to see if that could work15:19
nigelbscar: submit a bug against linux package describing the problem clearly and mention that its the same with karmic and lucid15:24
scarok I will do that now15:26
Damascenethere is a problem with lshw in lucid. the bug need someone with mainline kernel installed15:38
nigelbbdmurray: does the script for the reviewers team subscribe reviewers if the sponsors are subscribed?15:41
bdmurraynigelb: no it does not15:42
nigelbbdmurray: aha, that explains why some of my work was undone :)15:42
nigelbprobably something that could added some time :)15:43
bdmurraynigelb: why should both teams be subscribed?15:43
nigelbbdmurray: oh wait, it does not?15:44
nigelbokay, then there is some trouble.  I need to look again15:44
bdmurrayright it does not subscribe the reviewers team if a -sponsors team is already subscribed to the bug report15:44
nigelbis it possible to do it only once?15:45
nigelbi.e., if someone actually removes the patch tag for genuine reasons, not add the tag again15:45
bdmurraywhy would the patch tag be removed and not a different patch- tag be added or the attachment flag unset?15:46
nigelbI was guiding the patch towards sponsorship, so I removed the patch tag15:47
nigelbit was a debdiff ready for uploard15:47
bdmurraya debdiff is still a patch though - I think the tag should stay15:48
nigelbIn the use case that the debdiff works fine and can be sponsored, the patch tag should still stay?15:49
bdmurraynigelb: yes15:50
nigelbbdmurray: my issue with that process is that, once the sponsorship process is started, the patch does not need review, and only needs upload15:51
bdmurraynigelb: that's why the ubuntu-reviewers won't be subscribed to the bug report anymore15:51
nigelbbdmurray: ah, so ideally while reviewing we should be reviewing bugs which have reviewers subscribed?15:52
persiabdmurray: I think I like that model : rather than reviewing based on the patch tag, we review based on reviewers subscription.15:52
nigelb(I've been reviewing the ones with patch tag15:52
nigelbagain, the problem with that is not all patch reviewers have membership in ubuntu-reviewers15:53
bdmurrayyes I'd be looking at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs15:53
bdmurraynigelb: right let me check on that now15:53
vishbdmurray: Bug #531533 , has been committed upstream , the review team can be unsubscribed i guess :)15:55
ubot4Launchpad bug 531533 in tomboy (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Tomboy needs a monochrome Humanity Icon (affects: 6) (dups: 3)" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53153315:55
shriniteam: need help on 52530815:57
shrinii just set the package15:57
shrinibut the user needs more info15:57
vishbug #52530815:57
nigelbbug 52530815:57
ubot4Launchpad bug 525308 in libusb (Ubuntu) "Does not read a USB that was read yesterday. The USB is read by other computer. (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52530815:57
shriniwow. this is great.15:58
shriniI am very new to this channel and bugs15:58
shrinihelp me to response to the user15:59
=== deryck is now known as deryck[lunch]
vishshrini: thanks for helping out with the bugs , i'm not sure where this problem is though  , someone will read the above and respond soon ;)16:05
* nigelb is not sure either16:05
vishshrini: have a look at > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingRemovableDevices , https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures#Storage%20devices16:08
nigelbshrini: Please ask reporter to run 'ubuntu-bug' in terminal and select storage device option.16:08
nigelbthat should help collect proper information16:09
=== bac` is now known as bac
=== scar_ is now known as tibbar
tibbarive tried everyone combination of kernal with nvidia driver, on 64bit ubuntu. From 9.04 - 10.4 X server crashes my system so the logs never saves. Also read about everyone solution online spent about 30hours straight16:26
tibbarstill nothing, getting realllly desperate16:26
tibbaronly thing ive figured out is "unable to load nvidia kernal" is a problem16:27
tibbari have 8600, tried about every driver from 173-195. also got some logs16:28
tibbarhow do i report the bug correctly really want my system to run in 10.4, the lts16:28
ryetibbar, hi16:31
ryetibbar, are you running with /usr partition separate from / ?16:31
ryetibbar, re: nvidia problem16:32
shrinivish: nigelb: thanks16:44
shriniupdate the bug16:44
shriniwishes for your ubuntu membersips16:45
=== deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck
=== ikt_ is now known as ikt
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== radoe_ is now known as radoe
charlie-tcabdmurray: I will test that screensaver bug again when I get a good lucid install this week19:17
jjardonHello, Is the crash database down?19:25
jjardonI can't file a but with ubuntu-bug command19:25
yofeljjardon: known, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+bug/53809719:28
ubot4Launchpad bug 538097 in apport (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "+storeblob fails with "500 Internal server error" on production (works on edge) (affects: 95) (dups: 6)" [High,Invalid]19:28
jjardonyofel, thank you19:28
cjohnston_Can someone look at Bug 535674 and tell me if they agree that it isnt a bug, just more crying and whining?20:04
ubot4Launchpad bug 535674 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "dust sand is one thousand times better than these new themes called Radiance - Ambiance (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53567420:04
charlie-tcaLooks like an opinion. Belongs on a mailing list or in forums, maybe?20:05
cjohnston_thanks charlie-tca.. im going to close and offer those suggestions.20:06
charlie-tcaThat works. There really is nothing in that to fix.20:06
cjohnston_thanks charlie-tca20:07
charlie-tcaYou are welcome20:08
bdmurraythekorn: your merge proposal in bug 539211 has the wrong reviewer set20:09
ubot4Launchpad bug 539211 in update-manager (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "Lucid's update-manager does not show a warning when running on battery anymore (affects: 1)" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53921120:09
thekornbdmurray, what is the correct one?20:10
thekornbdmurray, I just took the pre-selected one20:10
thekornbdmurray, mvo?20:11
bdmurrayor ubuntu-dev20:11
thekornbdmurray, great, thanks alot for the hint20:13
bdmurraythekorn: no problem20:13
ddecatormicahg: are firefox crashes that failed retrace get treated differently from most crashes that fail retrace? i'm not sure what info the mozillateam needs in order to work on a crash21:17
micahgddecator: usually21:17
ddecatormicahg: so i'm looking at bug 521919, retrace failed, not much in the stacktrace (not sure if it's enough at least). in that case, do we remove the coredump and mark invalid?21:20
ubot4Launchpad bug 521919 in firefox (Ubuntu) "firefox-bin crashed with SIGSEGV (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52191921:20
micahgddecator: shouldn't be public with a coredump...21:20
ddecatormicahg: the reporter changed it21:21
ddecatormicahg: was going to mark private, but then i saw retrace failed21:21
micahgddecator: remove the coredump and check for private info in the stacktraces...usually we mark invalid with a message, but this one has more info than njormal21:23
ddecatormicahg: sure thing. thanks21:25

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!