[01:54] ardchoille called the ops in #ubuntu (root_my_box) [01:56] is #ubuntu-beginners exempt from the family friendly policy? [01:58] none of the #ubuntu-* channels are, really. Enforcing it though is dependant on the ops [01:58] of the said channel [01:59] It tends to be time-of-day dependent as well, depending on various ops local cultural interpretation. [01:59] hmm, ok. I guess either the ops there don't care, or they're not paying attention, but the offending party doesn't seem to be causing that much disruption [02:00] oh, I guess they do :P [02:04] FloodBot4 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [02:04] FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [02:04] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [02:04] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (exploit) [03:17] In ubottu, Semitones said: !checksum is md5sum [03:25] @login [03:25] The operation succeeded. [06:06] http://vasilisgreece.blogspot.com/ [06:06] http://vasilisgreece.blogspot.com/ [06:06] jo [07:22] good morning [07:34] In ubottu, ChanServ said: [#xubuntu] This channel is officially logged at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [07:48] ubottu seems to be dropping a lot [07:48] Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [07:50] Your very response demonstrates that sufficiently without the need for you to be explicit :) [07:54] elky: a lot of connections seem to be dropping a lot, its kinda curious. Im yet to work out what is causing it, but atm I blame the new ircd :D [08:09] hmm, why does ubottu catch the xubuntu chanserv message but not the others? [08:09] knome: no idea [08:09] ;) [08:09] you guys do weird things down there? [08:09] nope. [08:09] (really!) [08:09] it's the same kind of msg than from any other chan [08:11] oh, I know,... [08:11] pick me pick me!! [08:12] knome: think about the syntax for factoid adding... ;) [08:12] hmm !syntax? [08:12] ubottu: tell knome about yourself [08:12] knome, please see my private message [08:12] why? :P [08:13] knome: Doesn't need to be ! if you direct it at ubottu in some way [08:13] right. [08:13] factoi is blah ;) [08:13] i'm TOTALLY lost now. :) [08:13] so the "is" [08:13] makes it a factoid change request [08:13] rrright [08:14] ![#xubuntu] This channel [08:14] Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [08:14] doesn't exist yet, thankfully. [08:14] chanserv doesnt have rights :D [08:14] jussi01: I could just see copy/paste happening though. I know I've set all sorts of oddball things as factoids in the past. [08:15] Flannel: yeah, theres some crazy stuff, thats true [08:15] so if i say "botname, jussi is crazy", then "!jussi" -> "crazy" ? [08:16] ubottu: jussi is crazy [08:16] In #ubuntu-ops, persia said: ubottu: jussi is crazy [08:16] Seems to do. [08:16] well, it'd be !jussi "jussi is crazy" yes. [08:16] no [08:16] !jussi [08:16] * persia isn't trying to define a factoid, actually [08:17] why does the bot answer me in private? [08:17] knome: the response if that factoid went through would be: is crazy [08:17] (and hasn't even logged into the bot in > 2 years) [08:17] s/ "/ -> "/ [08:17] knome: minimises in channel traffic [08:17] jussi01: except it wouldn't, it'd be "jussi is crazy" because there's no [08:17] But the point is that the syntax checker catches it. [08:17] of course, this is above the scope of conversation :) [08:17] So: [08:18] ubottu: This channel is logged [08:18] In #ubuntu-ops, persia said: ubottu: This channel is logged [08:18] Whereas: [08:18] ubottu: Logs for this channel may be found at [08:18] Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [08:19] logged into the bot? should i be logged in to add factoids? :P [08:20] At one point. No idea if that is true for current code. [08:22] jussi01, ? [08:22] yes [08:22] @login [08:22] The operation succeeded. [08:22] can anybody login? [08:23] only if you have been given privelidges [08:23] have i? [08:23] no idea... [08:23] haha. :) [08:23] try it [08:23] :D [08:23] @login [08:23] Error: Your hostmask doesn't match or your password is wrong. [08:23] honestly I havent looked recently [08:23] knome: you dont. [08:24] okay. how can i? [08:24] @login [08:24] Error: Your hostmask doesn't match or your password is wrong. [08:24] Cool. My privleges have been dropped (which is fine, I don't need them anymore) [08:24] we are planning to fix it so core ops will have privelidges. [08:24] but core ops dont yet exist [08:24] so untill that happens, its a bit in limbo. [08:25] persia: I dont think you ever had them on this bot, no? [08:25] jussi01: I was able to log in to "ubottu" in 2007. I honestly haven't tried since. I have no idea if it's the same bot. Like I said, I don't need to log in. [08:26] lots of things have happened since then :D [08:26] Indeed :) [08:26] I do remember we dropped a big chunk when we re-did all the auth stuff [08:26] That's probably when I fell out. [08:26] and cripes, has she been around that long? [08:26] But since I stopped being active in #ubuntu back in Dapper or so, it really doesn't matter :) [08:31] Anyone know anything about "Dancing-Bot"? [08:31] no... [08:31] where? [08:31] #u [08:33] I PM'ed. [08:35] Theres three [08:35] er [08:36] Theres two *possible* hits in the BT (same ISP) [08:37] but nothing really bad happened in those either. [08:37] if it isnt making any trouble, lets leave it === jcarter is now known as highvoltage [13:06] fasta seems to be trolling [13:28] Did comcast just fail? [13:29] neat [13:29] one can only speculate at this point [13:30] And again. [13:55] In ubottu, Some_Person said: bing is /me sets mode +b $USER [14:53] marcus_: hi [14:53] hi [14:54] whazzup? [14:55] nothing special. just wondered if there is a special channel for ubuntu admin/server related tasks as the regular #ubuntu is quite crowded. [14:55] ah, that would be #ubuntu-server probably [14:56] although #ubuntu can answer your questions too [14:56] okay, thanks for the info [14:56] asked there. they pointed me here. [14:56] really? /me scrolls up [14:57] Oh, I think it was a misunderstanding. I think he tought you were looking for the people who admin the irc channels. [15:02] ah, okay. [15:02] np. heading over to -server [15:37] humdidumdidum [16:09] hm, are the webchat users just let in now without the proxy check? [16:11] my backlog doesn't have any exceptions set [16:12] ah, it uses invitations now [16:12] that's handy [17:28] Whoa. why didn't floodbots kick in? [17:29] they claimed they were in emergency mode /me looks [17:49] yes, I know and Im doing something about it. [17:51] In ubottu, NickServ said: This nickname is registered. Please choose a different nickname, or identify via /msg NickServ identify . [17:51] In ubottu, ChanServ said: [#xubuntu] This channel is officially logged at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [17:59] jussi01: If/when you have time, are there any reasons to permit two-word factoids? Both of these messages would go away if they were not permitted. [17:59] !es | persia [17:59] persia: En la mayoría de canales de Ubuntu se habla sólo en inglés. Si busca ayuda en español o charlar entra en el canal #ubuntu-es. Escribe "/join #ubuntu-es" (sin comillas) y dale a enter. [18:00] persia: Anyway, ubottu was getting triggered because the sentence had 'is' in it. "this channel" is "something" [18:00] ikonia, I'm sorry. I deserved to be kicked. [18:00] I know. [18:00] I know you did [18:00] that's why you where removed from the channel [18:00] !-ops | persia [18:00] persia: ops aliases: kops, op, calltheops, call the ops - added by Seveas on 2006-07-29 12:54:12 - last edited by jussi01 on 2010-03-13 10:03:11 [18:00] I'm not sure what you're playing at - but can you please control yourself in the #ubuntu channels [18:00] ikonia, but seriously. I screwed up twice there. It was worth being kicked. [18:01] jussi01: Ah, I see :( [18:01] SealedWithAKiss: please talk to staff in #freenode and stop discussing it in #ubuntu [18:02] ikonia, oh I'm back again. Okay then I'm done now. [18:02] SealedWithAKiss: once you have resolved you're password issues out and you're confident you can control your language, you're welcome to re-join #ubuntu [18:02] ikonia, okay then thanks. [18:03] SealedWithAKiss: ok, then if there is nothing else needed from the operator team, please leave this channel and rejoin #ubuntu when you are ready [18:06] Nice. [18:06] she is on her way back [18:08] In ubottu, ChanServ said: [#xubuntu] This channel is officially logged at http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [18:11] argh. Im real sorry, Ill probably have to restart the bot one more time. let me play a little and make sure its only one more time. [18:12] or maybe not. lets see. [18:12] So, I checked the factoids : http://paste.ubuntu.com/396290/ are my results. There are 8 items that have spaces that don't have nospace equivalents with the same spelling. None are unique factoids. [18:13] (and ありがとう is better transliterated as arigatou) [18:15] persia: please put all the info youve found into a bug. [18:15] jussi01: This is something worth fixing then? [18:16] persia: why not. I cant currently see any usecase for 2 word factoids. [18:16] That's what I was looking for :) Filing a bug. [18:16] it would also stop these people who talk to ubottu's conversations from coming here... [18:17] persia: I'm sorry, I misread your original question. I thought you said two *letter* factoids. [18:17] Pici: Ah. 'es' makes lots more sense in that context. I wondered what you were demonstrating. [18:19] that should be the final one for today, my apologies for the spam. [18:24] ubottu: Tell everyone about bug #539757, and complain about your inadequacy. [18:24] Launchpad bug 539757 in ubuntu-bots "factoids should be limited to a single word" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539757 [18:24] Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [18:24] Hehe [18:25] CalmvsKhaos called the ops in #ubuntu (auxi reminded over and over about !ubuntu-es) [18:27] o/ [18:27] SO, theres a super shiny new feature on ubottu. [18:27] Please report bugs if something is borked or there is a regression. [18:28] (or you just dont like it) [18:28] it looks like this: [20:28:14] Please comment on the ban of *!*@85.23.70.129 in ##jussi01, use: @comment 24030 [18:28] Our lovely friend will now nag you for a comment after a ban or removal. [18:30] why #jussi01 and not this channel? [18:31] Now there is one thing we are still thinking about: currently it nags on removals and bans/quiets. We are thinking about removing the the nag for removals, thoughts on this are welcome. [18:31] mneptok: I think its "please comment on the ban of IP in #thechannel" [18:31] mneptok: that was a test example. [18:31] persia: is correct. [18:31] No one should ever really be banned from -ops I don't think, anyhow. Unless k-lined.... [18:31] Pici: evem [18:32] oh god I hate that feature already [18:33] so now the removal message won't suffice for a comment? [18:34] Myrtti: yes of course it will. if you use a removal message, then just dont answer the bot. Unless you want to add more info. [18:37] right. [18:37] Myrtti: I'd file a bug [18:40] Hiya Jordan_U [18:41] whats up? [18:41] jussi01: Hi, just noticing a lot of people coming into #ubuntu speaking spanish. [18:42] I wasn't going to say anything unless sanreikaj persisted also. [19:00] In ubottu, rye said: !updown is The service that provides access to the file downloads via the web interface [19:00] Um. What? [19:01] !info ifupdown [19:01] ifupdown (source: ifupdown): high level tools to configure network interfaces. In component main, is important. Version 0.6.8ubuntu21 (karmic), package size 57 kB, installed size 264 kB [19:02] I know what ifupdown is, but what does that have to do with file downloads on a web interface? [19:03] Pici: I didn't know about ifupdown, just checking !info on it, shoulda done it in pm with bot :) [19:03] Might be a u1 thing, based on the requestor. [19:03] Maybe ask in #ubuntu-one ? [20:40] FloodBot4 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (flood (16)) [20:47] In #ubuntu-offtopic, rww said: ubottu: virus =~ s#A/V#Antivirus# [20:58] peepers open please in #ubunu DeaemonFC is in [20:58] hopefully he'll get on just fine [23:03] so, um, pingfloyd discovered memoserv [23:04] He left me a memo instructing the #ubuntu entity to somehow copulate with itself. [23:11] elky: he's a charming fellow. [23:12] Hola. I'm probably missing something here, but how come webchat users can speak in #ubuntu if there's a banforward on their hostmask and the floodbots aren't setting exempts any more? Do banforwards not stop people from talking if they're in the channel? (iirc, bans do, right?) [23:13] (I would have asked in #freenode, but I figure #ubuntu is a complex setup so the people in charge of it would probably know better :) [23:15] I tested it earlier today and the floodbots invite the users in [23:16] I don't know if that answers your question properly [23:17] oh goodie, we're trialling a fix for the banlist leakage? [23:18] * elky goes to check the mailing list [23:18] Myrtti: I noticed that. I'm not seeing how the invite overrides the +b, though [23:18] presumably because I'm missing something. As far as I can tell, if you invite someone who's banned from a channel to that channel, they don't get in, and can't speak if they are in. [23:19] but in #ubuntu, that doesn't happen =/ [23:19] which is why I said I don't know if that answers your question :-/ [23:22] the /topic in #ubuntu-proxy-users is cut off, btw [23:50] alright, I have to go to work, so I'll /part to avoid idling. If anyone figures out the answer to my question, please feel free to PM me :)