=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|errand === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic === MacSlow|errand is now known as MacSlow [15:42] good afternoon! [17:04] Who hear is in charge of notify-osd? [17:04] here [17:05] hey Nafai [17:05] Nafai, MacSlow [17:05] why? [17:05] ok [17:05] I think I've run out of trails to go down to figure out why the wrong album cover is being shown [17:06] And I've found a couple other bugs that might be related and wondering if he bug is in notify-osd itself [17:06] right [17:06] (bugs on launchpad, that is) [17:06] what I was thinking too when we discussed the empathy one yesterday [17:06] can you make notify-osd write extra infos in its logs? [17:06] Nafai: I get the feeling that you're going to end up fixing lots of things in notify-osd. :D [17:06] that would be a good start [17:07] like flags received [17:07] seb128: Sure, that does sound like a good start [17:07] and images [17:07] jcastro: Yeah, sounds like it :) [17:07] it does write to .cache/notify-osd.log [17:07] btw, I see you tumbled my blog entry [17:07] but that has only the text right now [17:07] Nafai: yeah that was actually an accident, but it's a good article anyway, heh [17:08] Nafai: check this out: https://edge.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+patches [17:08] Is this a pending patches view? [17:08] yeah [17:08] so those are bugs with patches attached [17:08] it would probably be a good idea to go through those at some point [17:08] ok [17:08] but less priority than what seb has assigned you [17:09] I found https://bugs.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+bug/525546 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/notify-osd/+bug/518021 that both sound related [17:09] Launchpad bug 525546 in notify-osd "Unable to update notification if content doesn't differ much (affects: 1)" [Medium,Fix committed] [17:09] btw, gdb question [17:09] is there a way without having a breakpoint that I can have it spit out the value of a variable at a point? [17:09] I don't want to have to keep hitting continue, but I'd like to monitor it [17:10] (been a while since I've used gdb for much more than getting back traces) [17:17] Nafai, that one should be fixed in lucid [17:17] ok [17:17] Nafai, rebuild with a printf where you want? [17:18] I could do that too :) [17:19] it's not like notify-osd was long to build [18:24] kenvandine, ping? [18:37] jono, pong [18:39] is there a gwibber hug day planned? [18:39] jono, not that i know of [18:39] there was one a few weeks back i think [18:39] but [18:39] we should have one soon [18:40] gwibber bug day is tomorrow [18:40] kenvandine: you had me schedule one remember? [18:40] oh yeah [18:40] cool! [18:40] * kenvandine had forgotten [18:40] lol [18:41] jcastro, I would like to talk about scheduling some more QA days [18:41] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Planning [18:41] Hey jono [18:42] jono: basically the workflow is "tell pedro and add it to the list" [18:42] kenvandine: the package has been adopted by 2 people too, so the bugs should get way less suckier [18:42] awesome [18:42] jcastro, ok, I just think we can do a better job of building buzz around it [18:42] does each event have targeted bug lists? [18:42] jcastro, after we talked about that i got spammed with bug mail [18:42] so thought it happened :) [18:43] kenvandine: no that was an opportunistic stab at my part. [18:43] jcastro, you rock! [18:44] jono: yes, one moment [18:44] jono: here's an example: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20100311 [18:44] jono: here's the last gwibber one: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20091105 [18:46] jcastro, awesome: so it sounds well organized, we just need to build some buzz [18:46] yeah, the word gets out in the existing QA channels [18:46] but not outside those usually tbh [18:55] jcastro, I got the code for gwibber, the setup is broken [18:55] just asking [18:55] what do you mean? [18:58] jcastro: Did you read the mail Jono CC'ed you? I was wondering what plans you had for bringing 'opportunities' under the attention of potential contributors. [19:00] qense: which one, the Wanted one? [19:00] jcastro: yes [19:00] the Wanted One [19:01] I need to think about it for a bit [19:01] that's fine [19:01] We're not in a hurry (yet.)