[00:47] <Ahmuck> got a problem.
[00:47] <Ahmuck> my clients start, present a login screen, user name & password, and then dump me back to the login screen
[00:47] <Ahmuck> could it be the syslog server?
[00:47] <Ahmuck> or something else
[00:47] <Ahmuck> er, sorry, ltsp
=== jussi01 is now known as o1
=== o1 is now known as jussi01
[12:03] <CTek> Hi guys, can someone help me with som information regarding LTSP. Thank you
[12:04] <alkisg> CTek: what exactly?
[12:04] <alkisg> Is it not in the docs?
[12:16] <CTek> yes it is i did make it  with a test enviroments on 2 laptops, 1 server second test client but here is my problem:
[12:17] <CTek> I have a eBox server in my organisation, It is based on Ubuntu, it can have boot biles sent via dhcp. and with LDAP integration this will be the perfct setup
[12:18] <CTek> so i want to make the eBox server also a LTSP server
[12:19] <CTek> It is possible to export the client image that i make to the ebox ? and work ? :)
[12:29] <alkisg> Why not just install ltsp-server in the ebox server?
[12:29] <CTek> this is what i want to do although the ebox server is a little complicated
[12:30] <CTek> it has a config system that is managed via web and any modification made by hand (touching files directly) could be overwrittne
[12:30] <CTek> so i have to do as little modifications to the structure as possible
[12:30] <alkisg> If you install ltsp-server (not standalone) it doesn't include a dhcp server
[12:30] <alkisg> So you can use the ebox dhcp server...
[12:31] <CTek> yes
[12:31] <CTek> i can specify to send a boot file
[12:31]  * alkisg doesn't get what the actual question is.
[12:31] <CTek> the question(s):
[12:32] <CTek> 1 can i put a boot file made from another LTS server into a different bootp server and work ?
[12:32] <alkisg> Sure
[12:33] <CTek> 2 what are the special requirements to make on the server to make it work (instal LTSP server etc.
[12:33] <alkisg> The boot file is served with tftp
[12:33] <CTek> i mean can it serve the file with out the LTSP server ?? and the client will load the img ok ?
[12:33] <CTek> yes
[12:33] <alkisg> The "virtual disk" with nbd
[12:34] <alkisg> Do you want the first, the second, or both of them in the ebox server?
[12:34] <CTek> can you please explain a little more (like for a noob )
[12:35] <CTek> i have parsed all the documentation but this porting thing is not "common knoledge" :)
[12:35] <alkisg> How ltsp works? Do read the docs, it explains the architecture quite qell
[12:35] <alkisg> *well
[12:35] <alkisg> https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ltsp/index.php?title=Ltsp_LtspDocumentationUpstream
[12:36] <alkisg> As far as I understand you, you don't need any porting at all
[12:36] <CTek> ?
[12:36] <alkisg> You just want to install ltsp-server in the ebox server...
[12:36] <CTek> yes, exactly
[12:36] <alkisg> That should be pretty straight forward...
[12:36] <CTek> another issue is that the ebox is a LDAP server aswell
[12:37] <CTek> ok here is a little short description of what i want to do:
[12:37] <CTek> 1 copy the boot file that i made to ebox bootp
[12:37] <alkisg> Replace that with "install ltsp-server and start from scratch" :)
[12:38] <alkisg> It'll be easier this way, you won't be mixed up :)
[12:38] <CTek> :))
[12:38] <CTek> actually installing ltsp from scratch is simple :)
[12:38] <alkisg> Right
[12:38] <CTek> and will work out of the box
[12:38] <alkisg> So forget all about copying, you don't need it
[12:38] <alkisg> You just need to configure the ebox dhcp server to send a boot filename
[12:39] <CTek> ok... and ... i end up using 2 servers instead of 1 ...
[12:39] <CTek> i for dhcp and serves a bootp file that points to the second (LTSP) server
[12:40] <CTek> and no LDAP integration
[12:40] <CTek> :(
[12:40] <CTek> sorry, i have to run now for some time
[12:40] <alkisg> Erm, what?
[12:40] <alkisg> I obviously didn't understand what you want to do
[12:40] <alkisg> Come back later... :)
[12:41] <CTek> ok, i'll be back in a short while i hope :)
[12:41] <CTek> some admin task to do , Thank you for assistance, I'll shury return
[12:42] <alkisg> If you want the ltsp server to be a different server than the ebox server, then you just need "next-server" in the ebox dhcp server.
[12:42] <alkisg> No copying at all...
[14:24] <Ahmuck> need a bot that does !ltsp and points to the docs
=== highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage
[17:50] <mgariepy> good afternoon everyone
[18:00] <Lns> hi mgariepy
[18:00] <Lns> meeting, right?
[18:04] <mgariepy> in an hour i thinks
[18:05] <mgariepy> think**
[18:06] <Lns> OH, stupid dst
[18:06] <Lns> heh
[18:06] <mgariepy> hehe
[18:57] <alkisg> Meeting in 3' ?
[18:59] <highvoltage> yep
[18:59] <mgariepy> Lns, now it's the right time i guess
[18:59] <highvoltage> I can't say that I'm ready for it
[19:14] <highvoltage> sbalneav: moo
[19:15] <highvoltage> sbalneav: we need another EC member for quorum
[20:28] <alkisg> highvoltage: "Bug that crashes X when enter is pressed is now resolved" ==> when?!!! with a 3-day-old ubuntu live cd I'm still getting it...
[20:35] <highvoltage> alkisg: it was fixed just a few hours ago
[20:35] <alkisg> wow, nice! At last! :)
[20:35] <highvoltage> alkisg: it will probably be in tomorrow's build
[20:36]  * alkisg wonders why he didn't get a launchpad notification from the bug report...
[20:37] <highvoltage> alkisg: maybe keybuk still needs to update it
[20:38] <alkisg> Ah, here's the correct one, I've been monitoring duplicates etc: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/532047
[20:38] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 532047 in plymouth "Plymouth text-mode splash causes X to crash on first run due to shared tty7" [High,Fix released]
[20:42] <alkisg> Nah, it appears that there are at least 3 different issues with the same symptoms: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/529230
[20:42] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 529230 in plymouth "X server crashes when enter key is pressed (dup-of: 532047)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[20:42] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 532047 in plymouth "Plymouth text-mode splash causes X to crash on first run due to shared tty7" [High,Fix released]
[20:42] <alkisg> That one isn't resolved yet...