[14:01] <bac> hello
[14:01] <bac> the reviewers meeting has always been scheduled for 1500UTC...so that is in one hour.  US people who are here now you're early!
[14:02] <deryck> gah!
[14:02] <deryck> hello anyway bac :-)
[14:02] <bac> hi deryck!
[14:03]  * deryck really wants a show-relative-to-UTC option in Google calendar
[14:18] <salgado> bac, where's the agenda for today's meeting?
[14:18] <bac> salgado: regular place: https://dev.launchpad.net/ReviewerMeetingAgenda
[14:19] <salgado> oh, right, I was searching for reviewersmeeting
[14:19] <salgado> thanks bac
[14:19] <bac> np
[15:00] <bac> #startmeeting
[15:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 10:00. The chair is bac.
[15:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[15:00] <bac> hi and (finally) welcome to the AMEU reviewers meeting
[15:00] <bac> who is here today?
[15:01] <salgado> me!
[15:01] <bac> hi salgado
[15:01] <bac> anyone else around?
[15:02] <allenap> me
[15:03] <gary_poster> me
[15:03] <gary_poster> sending out call to foundations...
[15:03] <bac> sinzui, EdwinGrubbs, abentley, adeuring, BjornT, danilos, mars: ping
[15:03] <bac> thanks gary_poster
[15:03] <sinzui> me
[15:03] <danilos> me
[15:03] <danilos> :)
[15:03] <abentley> me
[15:03] <adeuring> me
[15:03] <EdwinGrubbs> me
[15:04] <leonardr> me
[15:04] <bac> gmb: ping
[15:04] <gmb> me
[15:04] <gmb> bac: Sorry, OTP...
[15:04] <bac> gmb: perhaps you can follow with one eye
[15:04] <gmb> bac: Am now NOTP, so it's okay :(
[15:05] <gmb> :)
[15:05] <mars> me!
[15:05]  * gmb is happy to be here, honest
[15:05] <bac> [topic] agenda
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  agenda
[15:05] <bac> * Roll call
[15:05] <bac>  * Agenda
[15:05] <bac>  * Outstanding actions
[15:05] <bac>  * New topics
[15:05] <bac>  * Peanut gallery
[15:05] <bac> [topic] outstanding actions
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  outstanding actions
[15:06] <bac> so let's see if we've made any progress
[15:06] <bac> [topic] salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[15:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[15:06] <salgado> I did it!
[15:06] <salgado> finally
[15:06] <bac> \o/
[15:06] <bac> [topic] leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree.  (revisit 17-Mar).
[15:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree.  (revisit 17-Mar).
[15:07] <leonardr> i'm about to start work on that
[15:07] <bac> leonardr you may not even know this was a topic we've been tracking.  gary_poster put you down for it
[15:07] <leonardr> yes, he and i have been talking about it
[15:07] <bac> leonardr: cool.  when do you think you might have something?
[15:07] <leonardr> bac: hopefully by the end of the week
[15:07] <leonardr> but it shouldn't take long in any event
[15:08] <bac> leonardr: great.  i'll leave it as an item for next week then
[15:08] <bac> [topic] bac to seek opinion of IS and Legal wrt community reviewers and committers. (done 5-Mar, no response from legal).
[15:08] <MootBot> New Topic:  bac to seek opinion of IS and Legal wrt community reviewers and committers. (done 5-Mar, no response from legal).
[15:08] <leonardr> ok
[15:08] <bac> as indicated i sent an email to our two legal folks and elmo a while back.
[15:09] <bac> i got a response from elmo but not the lawyers.  i'll talk to andrew on IRC and see when he will respond.
[15:09] <bac> at that point i'll share the input and we can revisit the topic from our perspective
[15:09] <bac> [topic] bac to update wiki re: interim status of community reviewers and committers
[15:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  bac to update wiki re: interim status of community reviewers and committers
[15:09]  * bac fail
[15:10] <bac> [topic] rockstar to update bugs to reflect new naming convention and will update the style guide
[15:10] <MootBot> New Topic:  rockstar to update bugs to reflect new naming convention and will update the style guide
[15:10] <bac> i don't think rockstar is here today
[15:11] <bac> did anyone see the bugs created?
[15:12] <bac> we'll carry it over until paul is here
[15:12] <bac> [topic] mars to discuss UI reviewers team on UI call
[15:12] <MootBot> New Topic:  mars to discuss UI reviewers team on UI call
[15:12] <abentley> bac, he usually attends the other meeting.
[15:12] <mars> bac, cone
[15:12] <mars> done
[15:12] <bac> mars: what was the outcome?
[15:12] <bac> abentley: yeah, but i invited him to this one today.  perhaps he didn't get my email in time.
[15:12] <mars> bac, rockstar is going to set up the UI reviewers team this week
[15:13] <bac> [action] rockstar to set up UI reviewers team in LP
[15:13] <MootBot> ACTION received:  rockstar to set up UI reviewers team in LP
[15:13] <bac> mars: thanks
[15:13] <mars> bac, no need for that, we already have an item in the UI call :)
[15:13] <mars> np
[15:13] <bac> [topic] peanut gallery
[15:13] <MootBot> New Topic:  peanut gallery
[15:14] <bac> any one have an unlisted topic for discussion?
[15:14] <gmb> Me.
[15:14] <bac> go graham
[15:14] <gmb> I'd like to rotate off on-call reviewing for a cycle, maybe two, and I'm wondering if we have a process for dealing with that. Should I just canvas for someone to take over my Tuesday EU slot?
[15:15] <bac> gmb:  we've had people do it in the past
[15:15] <bac> gmb: in fact, i think i originally proposed it but then never got around to taking a leave
[15:15] <gmb> Okay.
[15:15] <gmb> In that case, any volunteers for Tuesday EU ? :)
[15:16]  * bac looks for the schedule page on the wiki
[15:16] <bac> https://dev.launchpad.net/ReviewerSchedule
[15:16] <gmb> Aha.
[15:16] <bac> so we have double on M, W, and Th
[15:17]  * bac would (selfishly) really like to have someone in EU on Tuesday...
[15:17] <bac> gmb: why don't you look around for the rest of this cycle and see if you can bribe someone
[15:18] <bac> i have an item
[15:18] <gmb> bac: Okay; however I'm sprinting next week and unavailable the week after, so I'll try to sort something out sooner.
[15:18] <bac> gmb: ok
[15:19] <bac> this week the US moved to daylight savings time.  the UK does so in two weeks.  would we like to move the meeting back to 1400UTC?  would that be a hardship for anyone?  jtv says it is better for him.
[15:20] <bac> any one have an opinion or is 1500UTC good?
[15:22] <gmb> 1400UTC works, I think
[15:22] <gmb> No objections here.
[15:22] <bac> salgado: does it affect you badly?
[15:22] <salgado> nope
[15:23] <bac> ok, let's move it to 1400UTC starting next week.
[15:23] <bac> anything else?
[15:23] <bac> 3...
[15:24] <bac> 2...
[15:24] <bac> 1...
[15:24] <bac> have a great day.  thanks for coming.
[15:24] <bac> #endmeeting
[15:24] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 10:24.