[04:22] <zeroseven0183> Hi! What do I need to do when the bug reporter replies he is not sure if the bug was fixed or not (after a long time)?
[04:23] <micahg> zeroseven0183: someone needs to test
[04:24] <micahg> preferably the reported
[04:24] <micahg> *reporter
[04:25] <Damascene> hello I haven't get any respond from translators
[04:26] <Damascene> I've a screen shot but I forget what are the package the freeserif comes from
[04:26] <Damascene> I mean I'm ready to report a bug
[04:27] <micahg> Damascene: nothing all day?
[04:27] <micahg> weird
[04:27] <Damascene> I didn't stay there the whole day for sure
[04:27] <zeroseven0183> Thanks micahg. I think I will have to try my best to reproduce it since the reporter has no longer access to the plugin he was trying to report.
[04:28] <micahg> Damascene: well, the font is in the ttf-freefont package
[04:28] <micahg> zeroseven0183: bug #?
[04:28] <Damascene> any way the man that the related bug is assigned to was there but didn't respond.
[04:28] <zeroseven0183> micahg: The bug# is 292659
[04:29] <micahg> bug 292659
[04:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 292659 in pidgin (Ubuntu) "pidgin wont use plugins in /.purple/plugins (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/292659
[04:35] <micahg> zeroseven0183: close invalid due to unable to reproduce by reporter and successful test byt triager
[04:35] <micahg> *by
[04:35] <zeroseven0183> Alright. Thank you
[04:36] <persia> Just be careful with the comment, indicating that we appreciate the input, but couldn't replicate, and the reporter can't replicate, so we have no choice but "Invalid".
[04:36] <zeroseven0183> Yup
[04:38] <Damascene> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ttf-freefont/+bug/540042
[04:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 540042 in ttf-freefont (Ubuntu) "Freserif Arabic version is broken (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New]
[04:38] <Damascene> is there any thing else I can do?
[04:38] <Damascene> ops title
[04:39] <Damascene> bug #540042
[04:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 540042 in ttf-freefont (Ubuntu) "Freeserif Arabic version is broken (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540042
[11:42] <hernejj> vish: Hi Vish :) Are you around? I would like to talk about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-panel/+bug/540006
[11:42] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 540006 in gnome-panel (Ubuntu) "bottom panel appears to have double column (dup-of: 532309)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[11:42] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 532309 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "Light-themes: panel-background isn't scaling (affects: 12) (dups: 2)" [Undecided,Fix committed]
[11:53] <persia> hernejj: Apparently not.  Could perhaps someone else help?
[11:54]  * persia strongly believes this to be a feature, as it's been available since before Ubuntu existed
[11:54] <hernejj> persia: Sure :) I do not believe that 540006 is a duplicate of 532309.
[11:55] <hernejj> persia: Mainly because of the fact that 540006 points out that the panel actually uses two rows for displaying applications when at size 41 or greater.  Please see the screen shot I uploaded for details.
[11:55] <persia> hernejj: Ah.  I thought that the original reporter of 540006 was complaining about the double line from the background image, not the application selector.
[11:55] <persia> You think that's the cause of the 540006 report?
[11:56] <persia> Because 532309 can display similar issues with the apparent double-line due to background scaling failure.
[11:57] <persia> see http://ubuntu-pics.de/bild/45297/bildschirmfoto_YlXF4q.jpg as an example
[11:57] <hernejj> persia: Ok. I misunderstood what I was looking at in the OP's screen shot then.
[11:58] <hernejj> persia: Would a separate bug be appropriate for the 2-rows of applications issue?
[11:58] <persia> That doesn't need a bug.  It's an intentional feature.
[12:00] <hernejj> persia: Do you feel that some users might like an option to disable it?
[12:00] <persia> hernejj: To put it another way, in your screenshot, the double-line of applications is a feature.  The continued horizontal line to the right is the bug.
[12:01]  * vish o/
[12:02] <persia> hernejj: I've just tested it, and yes, such an option may be interesting.
[12:02] <persia> Just be sure to phrase your bug as an enhancement request, and detail how the option should be presented for an e.g. 48px panel.
[12:03] <persia> Be warned that the enhancement request will likely go upstream, and may take a very long time to be considered.
[12:04] <hernejj> persia: Will do. I'll take care of the upstream report as well. Maybe I'll even write the code... Might be a good bug for me to start learning gnome-panel. :)
[12:04] <persia> hernejj: Heh.  Good luck with that.
[12:08] <vish> hernejj: you would have better luck filing a wishlist in gnome-shell than in gnome-panel
[12:09] <hernejj> vish: gnome-shell? What is that?
[12:09] <hernejj> Google shows me this: http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell
[12:10] <vish> hernejj: yeah , thats the one
[12:10] <hernejj> vish: Thanks! :) I'll consider that... and I'm excited to see what Shell is all about now!
[12:11] <persia> vish: Does gnome-shell even have that view?
[12:11] <vish> persia: nope ;)
[12:11] <persia> That's what I thought.
[12:11] <persia> This would need to be fixed in window-switcher-applet (I think), but that's just not something lots of folks are working on for the future.
[12:12] <vish> persia: but adding an extension for -shell is possibly more easier than convincing the -panel folks to accept hernejj's wishlist and probably not without him assuring them that he would maintain it ;)
[12:13] <persia> Well, yeah, but that decreases the chance of a new panel maintainer :)
[12:46] <nekohayo> hey there, is anyone looking into https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/473622 ?
[12:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 473622 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu) "presenter-console is displayed on same monitor as slideshow (affects: 5) (dups: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[12:46] <nekohayo> I kinda depend on that feature to be able to present at ubuntu global jam
[12:59] <nigelb> hggdh: I think you're an hour early for the meeting
[13:00] <nigelb> the whole DST has thrown google calender a bit off track
[13:00] <hggdh> dammit ;-)
[13:00] <nigelb> hggdh: I'm not sure either, there was some confusion yday
[13:01] <hggdh> no, it seems we are on track, at least two others popped in
[13:01] <nigelb> hggdh: noticed :)
[13:02] <nigelb> @now
[13:04] <vish> nigelb: this is not #u-classroom ;)
[13:04] <nigelb> vish: the bot should respond
[13:05] <nigelb> vish: anyway I queried it
[13:05] <vish> nigelb: oh that works for all bots.. hmm , i thought it was a -classromm feature..
[13:06] <hggdh> nigelb: indeed one hour too early :-(
[13:07] <nigelb> hggdh: hehe :)
[15:09] <jeanfi> Hello, with 10.04 the 2 indicator-applets are failing at startup, apport popup but complaining that 'assertion failure' cannot be reported. Except the crash file what can I put in the bug report? Do you how I can retrieve the famous 'assertion failure'? It does not seem to appear in the crash file :(
[16:10] <bdmurray> jibel: do you know if bug 515596 might be fixed?
[16:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 515596 in nvidia-common (Ubuntu) "package linux-headers-2.6.32-12-generic 2.6.32-12.16 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515596
[16:35] <jibel> bdmurray, i don't know.
[16:35] <jibel> I've seen it recently in karmic and lucid.
[16:36] <bdmurray> jibel: yeah, I found some more likely duplicates
[16:36] <jibel> The cause of the failure could be the debconf template "nvidia-common/obsolete" missing during the upgrade.
[16:37] <jibel> But I'm unable to reproduce it.
[16:37] <jibel> Maybe tseliot would know.
[16:38] <jibel> bdmurray, there are lot of similar like bug 303795
[16:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 303795 in nvidia-common (Ubuntu) "/etc/kernel/postinst.d/nvidia-common fails when you try to install a new custom kernel package (affects: 3) (dups: 2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/303795
[16:51] <jibel> bdmurray, tseliot think it's fixed in lucid but recent reports show it is not.
[16:55] <charlie-tca__> hmm, I just upgraded a 64bit system with hardware nvidia drivers installed, and it shuts off the monitor about the time it hits gdm
[17:16] <seb128> bdmurray, hi
[17:17] <seb128> bdmurray, did you have time to look at the query we discussed about the other day?
[17:17] <bdmurray> seb128: yes I believe I e-mailed you about it
[17:18] <seb128> bdmurray, urg sorry, I'm having spam issues atm and I think I flushed some non spams while dealing with those
[17:18] <seb128> bdmurray, can you send it again if you still have the email?
[17:19] <bdmurray> seb128: done
[17:20] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks
[17:26] <seb128> bdmurray, trying to get bughugger to work again, it seems having issues talking to launchpad, I will let you know in a moment
[17:26] <seb128> bdmurray, btw, http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/team-assigned/canonical-desktop-team-assigned-bug-tasks.html
[17:26] <seb128> bdmurray, the release column what is it?
[17:26] <seb128> it's not bugs with ie a lucid task?
[17:27] <bdmurray> it should be if the bug has a release task
[17:27] <bdmurray> or is targetted to the release
[17:27] <seb128> seems buggy
[17:27] <seb128> like there is no lucid task
[17:28] <bdmurray> yes I see that
[17:28] <bdmurray> I'll fix it
[17:29] <seb128> thanks
[17:30] <seb128> bdmurray, the json you made for me looks fine but I'm not sure about the "all ubuntu bugs tagged indicator-application" now looking at the list ;-)
[17:30] <seb128> bdmurray, I will check with dxbarth if that should rather be "lucid tasks tagged" or if we want to drop those
[17:31] <seb128> bdmurray, but thank you for setting that up, I've the list in bughugger now, it will be useful ;-)
[17:31] <bdmurray> seb128: okay, great I'll set it up to run regularly then
[17:31] <seb128> thanks
[17:31] <seb128> just wait maybe that I sort what we want to do with the tagged bugs
[18:04] <tramos> any known bug in empathy that alters the input while adding contacts to a msn account ?
[18:04] <seb128> bdmurray, can you please drop the tagged bugs from the query for now? sorry about the trouble but they clutter the list over what I though
[18:04] <seb128> bdmurray, otherwise it seems good to be run with other reports if you can do that, thanks!
[18:04] <bdmurray> seb128: sure, that's actually easier ;-)
[20:09] <vish> kamusin: Bug #532822 , is not a bug in the theme , gcc maybe
[20:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 532822 in light-themes (Ubuntu) "background icons not displayed correctly (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532822
[20:10] <kamusin> vish, let me see
[20:10] <vish> kamusin: hmm , i thought you filed the bug :)
[20:10] <kamusin> hehe vish , I had a terrible memory :)
[20:10] <kamusin> had/have
[20:16] <kamusin> vish, actually I had same question.. but if you sure please that is under gcc .. I can change it
[20:18] <vish> kamusin: well it is for sure not a theme bug , the theme has no control there , it affects all themes, the button order is always fixed in the gcc min,max,close , it does not look at the button order
[20:19] <kamusin> hehe right.. changed :)
[20:19] <vish> kamusin: ty
[20:19] <kamusin> np
[20:42] <cjohnston> Does anyone sort LP bug mail in thunderbird? How do you do it?
[20:42] <micahg> cjohnston: sure
[20:42] <micahg> various headers
[20:42] <cjohnston> I must be doing it wrong cause I can't get headers to work..
[20:42] <cjohnston> Keeps complaining about invalid characters
[20:45] <cjohnston> micahg: did you create custom filters?
[20:45] <micahg> cjohnston: yes, I use the custom LP headers
[20:46] <cjohnston> hmm
[20:47] <micahg> cjohnston: are you using TB3 or TB2?
[20:47] <cjohnston> 3
[20:48] <Linux000> When running debuild -S on the source to pychess, i get the error,  fakeroot debian/rules clean
[20:48] <Linux000> debian/rules:6: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk: No such file or directory
[20:48] <Linux000> make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk'.  Stop.
[20:48] <Linux000> dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2
[20:48] <Linux000> debuild: fatal error at line 1340:
[20:48] <Linux000> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -S failed
[20:48] <Linux000> , any ideas?
[20:49] <micahg> Linux000: #ubuntu-packaging would be a better place to ask and please use pastebin next time
[20:50] <Linux000> thanks
[20:55] <cjohnston> micahg: http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/520/screenshot1dy.png
[21:02] <micahg> cjohnston: try something more simple :)
[21:02] <micahg> the header is the first part before the colon
[21:02] <micahg> cjohnston: then you match against what you want or don't want in the header
[21:03] <cjohnston> ic
[21:06] <cjohnston> well.. i dont get errors now..
[21:08] <cjohnston> but it isnt filtering either
[21:09] <cjohnston> hey.. it finally did it
[21:09] <cjohnston> yippie
[22:40] <cjohnston> micahg: how do you reply to someone using your @ubuntu.c in TB?
[22:40] <micahg> cjohnston: set an identity on your account in TB
[22:41] <cjohnston> sweet
[22:41] <cjohnston> ty again
[22:45] <cjohnston> is there a way to set the @u.c one as default?
[22:46] <nigelb> yup
[22:46] <cjohnston> hey nigelb
[22:46] <nigelb> cjohnston: set email address as @u.c and gmail in identity
[22:48] <cjohnston> sweet
[22:48] <cjohnston> hmm
[22:48] <cjohnston> what else can I bug you about nigelb
[22:49] <nigelb> cjohnston: /me is getting a debian package ready and seems like it does't want to be fixed arrrg!
[22:49] <cjohnston> :-(
[22:49] <cjohnston> gwibber?
[22:50] <nigelb> yeah
[23:40] <bcurtiswx>  anyone know if having xorg-driver-fglrx (karmic) and xserver-xorg-video-ati (karmic) both installed would cause unnecessary CPU temps?