[01:06] UNE respun finished, new candidate posted [01:06] s/respun/respin/ [01:07] others to follow ASAP [01:30] KNR also posted [01:44] Ubuntu desktop is up [01:56] slangasek: iso image? [01:56] cr3: yes [01:56] slangasek: have there been a few respins today? I noticed that my activity queue for running jobs in certification is rather big today [01:59] battery is dying, back tomorrow [01:59] cr3: prior to now, the last respin run was last night [02:00] slangasek: thanks, I'll have a closer look at my queue then to make sure it doesn't start overloading [02:32] I noticed on the QA site it lists the mythbuntu images as rebuilding, but the current/ folder for the daily live disk has 2 images in it. Should I expect that these two images are bad and I need to wait for the rebuilt ones, or would these images be good to start mirroring? [02:32] I ask, because I thought in the past that if there was a rebuild that the current/ folder gets emptied [03:41] tgm4883: the current folder always has images in it, current doesn't mean candidate [03:41] tgm4883: I've just posted the new mythbuntu candidates [03:43] well - "always" has images in it; when it doesn't, it means the build failed and the scripts didn't notice [03:43] hello, just arrived home after a whole evening of work in the server room at the office. [03:44] I see that all DVDs are being rebuilt, any ETA ? [03:45] stgraber: ETA of 30min for edubuntu [03:46] ok, I'll see how awake I'm in 30min then. Worst case I'll e-mail highvoltage and hope he'll wake up earlier than me ;) [03:46] hmm - sorry, not 30min, 45min [03:48] slangasek, thanks for the info [04:41] stgraber: edubuntu up [06:21] good morning all [07:27] hey ara. [07:27] hey sbeattie :) [07:28] are you still in london? [07:28] sbeattie, no, I arrived to Malaga yesterday afternoon [07:28] Ah, cool, just in time to burn out iso testing. :-) [07:29] ara: have you seen https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Plymouth ? [07:29] sbeattie, I've seen some updates as i am subscribed to /Testing/* [07:30] what is all about? [07:31] keybuk, slangasek, and possibly others spent today trying to fix plymouth issues and slangasek wanted to try to cover testing all the possible boot situations for plymouth. [07:32] since it's going on to the beta1 isos at the last minute [07:42] sbeattie, ok [07:42] hrm, is the kubuntu bottom panel supposed to visible in the livecd environment? [07:42] meaning, while installing? [07:43] no, just in the "try kubuntu before installing" environment. [07:44] sbeattie, then, you're supposed to have a full environment, aren't you? [07:44] sbeattie, can you imagebin? [07:46] ara: will do, one sec [07:50] ara: http://imagebin.org/89349 [07:52] sbeattie, indeed, that's a bug [07:53] sbeattie, well, did you choose "try kubuntu" or you just let it timeout? [07:53] try kubuntu [07:54] sbeattie, then it is a bug in casper, I guess. Can you reproduce? [07:58] sorry, I had to kill xchat, sbeattie, I was asking if it is reproducible [07:58] ara, yep, reproducible in vbox/amd64, seeing if it i386 reproduces. [07:58] err, it reproduces on i386/vbox. [07:58] sbeattie, :( [07:59] * sbeattie wonders if the small screen size is causing the panel not to display. [08:00] I'll try on live hardware in a bit. [08:01] sbeattie, ok, thanks, I will try in KVM [08:03] yeah, reproduces in i386/vbox. [08:18] sbeattie, I cannot reproduce in KVM [08:18] hunh [08:18] ara: what resolution is your kvm environment? [08:20] sbeattie, not sure, but higher than vbox's 800x600 [08:20] sbeattie, so it might be the resolution [08:21] yeah, I don't reproduce it on live hardware w/1440x960 [08:21] so I don't think it's casper, but whatever the kde panel is. [08:39] sbeattie, do you get graphical splash in vbox? [08:40] ara: no, I get a text based splash. [08:41] hrm, reconsidering how I answered the matrix [08:41] sbeattie, me too, but, do you get sometimes fsck messages without having set the details mode [08:41] no, but I get other messages on the screen (broken pipe, ureadahead) [08:42] sbeattie, ok, I get those too [08:42] sbeattie, and I guess these are not supposed to be visible, are they? [08:42] no, they're not. [08:43] sbeattie, is there a bug I can subscribe to? [08:53] ara: hrm, I can't find one, though I know keybuk knows about it. [08:55] best to file one, I guess. [09:24] the fsck messages are bug #535108 [09:24] Launchpad bug 535108 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "Hide console messages while Plymouth is running (affects: 10) (dups: 3)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/535108 [09:24] morning, folks [09:29] ara: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/3833/442, the test case instructions say I should see a pop-up about incomplete language support and I didn't [09:29] ara: is the testcase out of date, or is this a bug? [09:30] slangasek: hrm, these messages puke over the aubergine display, not before the splash shows up. [09:30] (which is what 535108 seems to be about, though it may just be different consequences of the same bug) [09:30] slangasek, it should pop up, it is a bug [09:31] sbeattie: same basic issue; the console is in text mode, so anything written to the console by another process gets shown [09:31] wasn't "The Aubergine Display" a Pournelle novel? [09:32] slangasek: okay. [09:32] ara: ok - what are the packages it's looking to be able to install? language-support-es? [09:32] slangasek, at least you're using the DVD [09:32] slangasek, are you using the DVD? [09:32] ara: no; Ubuntu desktop on USB [09:34] ara: can you have a quick look at bug 540776 and confirm it if you agree please, I figure this will be something that needs work pretty pronto if it is going to be fixed [09:34] Launchpad bug 540776 in gdm (Ubuntu) "Gdm theme makes it impossible to see accessibility option (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540776 [09:35] hey ara [09:35] hi everyone [09:35] dpm, slangasek is having an issue with no network installations [09:35] hi [09:35] hey slangasek [09:35] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/3833/442, the test case instructions say I should see a pop-up about incomplete language support and I didn't [09:35] ara: is the testcase out of date, or is this a bug? [09:35] hello dpm [09:35] after install in Spanish, I didn't get prompted about incomplete language support [09:35] hello slangasek wfm on this notebook just [09:35] what packages should be looking at to show (or not show) the pop up? [09:36] ara, it is a bug, we detected while testing the alpha-3. Let me find the bug no... [09:36] ara, I think it's between ubiquity and language-selector [09:36] slangasek: scrap that I did an english install sorry [09:37] launchpad bugs wishlist: in between packages bugs :D [09:37] :P [09:37] ara, slangasek, it's bug 527623 [09:37] Launchpad bug 527623 in language-selector (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 2 other projects) "Notification of missing language support not shown after installation (affects: 1)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/527623 [09:37] heya davmor2 [09:40] dpm: ah, already targeted and milestoned - thanks [09:42] slangasek, no worries. Thanks for testing languages, I didn't do a very good job at testing localized installations on this milestone :/ [09:42] hrm, is there a known bug for the kubuntu installer not finishing shutting down after installing? [09:44] sbeattie: there was one that was supposed to have been fixed [09:45] sbeattie: bug #526456 [09:45] Launchpad bug 526456 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "shutdown does not work (affects: 2)" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/526456 [09:45] slangasek: it didn't make it back to plymouth. [09:45] hey davmor2 :) - bug 540776 looks like it's probably a dupe of bug 532844 [09:45] Launchpad bug 540776 in gdm (Ubuntu) "Gdm theme makes it impossible to see accessibility option (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540776 [09:45] Launchpad bug 532844 in light-themes (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 3 other projects) "Lucid: White symbols on light panel and Ubuntu Logo are difficult to see (affects: 14) (dups: 4)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532844 [09:47] http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/3834/51 - could use some contact info for 'starslights', to find out what his framebuffer config is (and confirm he's using the right image...) [09:59] ara, davmor2: are you able to estimate how long it will take to test all the images? [10:00] * ara checks the current state [10:02] slangasek, I guess that, if no major bugs are found, by 18UTC everything should be covered, except for things that normally people test on the other side of the ocean [10:02] bladernr__: you marked bug #532047 as affecting beta alternate, which we know is not the case; can I get some more information from you about hardware config? (a fresh bug filed with 'ubuntu-bug plymouth' from the affected machine is simplest) [10:02] ara: ok, thanks [10:02] Launchpad bug 532047 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Plymouth text-mode splash causes X to crash on first run due to shared tty7 (affects: 160) (dups: 35)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532047 [10:17] kermiac: Yay I hate launchpad search it sucks [10:17] davmor2: I totally agree [10:18] I've been using google to search LP for dupes lately. I was given this by another triager - "site:bugs.launchpad.net " [10:18] seems to work a lot better [10:54] morning all [10:54] again === kermiac is now known as kermiac_ [12:04] davmor2: can you do the LTSP tests ? if you do, I'll start downloading Edubuntu [12:05] I can but not right now [12:46] cr3, ara, fader_, davmor2, marjo, everyone else: Bonjour! [12:47] moustafa: mornnig dude [12:47] hey moustafa, morning [12:47] morning cr3, fader_ you slacker wake up [12:47] moustafa: baguette! [12:47] cr3: hon! hon! [12:48] davmor2: Allons-y! Allonso! [12:54] Wow...I wonder if anybody tried to install Ubuntu on one of these: http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/zpc-gx31.cfm [12:55] moustafa: you need to stop watching doctor who ;) [12:56] davmor2: Which iteration? Also *sonic screwdriver* [12:57] stgraber: right going for a 64bit ltsp [12:58] davmor2: great, thanks [12:58] I'm doing edubuntu amd64 and highvoltage is doing 32bit [12:58] stgraber: after lunch I'll try and fit in 32bit too [13:00] moustafa: That thing brings back unpleasant memories of the TRS-80. [13:02] fader_: care to elaborate? [13:02] slangasek: bug 540897 opened per your request [13:02] fader_: I had memories of the C-64 [13:02] Launchpad bug 540897 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "X/GDM crashes on first login attempt (sounds a LOT like the plymouth bug) (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540897 [13:02] moustafa: http://www.digibarn.com/collections/systems/trs80-colorcomputer/index.html [13:03] fader_: did you actually have a trs-80? [13:03] cr3: Oh yeah... my early computing experiences were divided between typing on a VT-220 hooked up to a Xenix mainframe and the Trash-80. === zul_ is now known as zul [13:05] fader_: are you serious? the trs-80 is from the early 80s, either you're older than you look or you started freaking early [13:05] * cr3 was barely potty trained in the early 80s [13:06] * sbeattie shakes his head at you kids. [13:06] then again, who's to say I didn't get potty trained in my 20s [13:06] cr3: I could type before I could write with a pen/pencil. [13:06] Not *well* mind you, but still. :) [13:06] * davmor2 had a zx81 as his first computer [13:07] davmor2: Nice! I've never actually played with one of those. [13:07] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX81 [13:07] davmor2: sinclairs were much more popular in the uk, right? [13:07] cr3: they were the only things around for a long while [13:07] sbeattie: you're so old, you get up at 6 in the morning :) [13:08] cr3: no, I'm about to call it end of wednesday. [13:08] * davmor2 wonders if me or sbeattie is older :) [13:09] davmor2: I'm just slightly older than kwwii, if that helps you figure it out. [13:09] goes of to the directory to find out :) [13:11] davmor2: http://www2.b3ta.com/heyhey16k/ [13:13] kicks directory for not displaying year [13:21] this moment of old ggeksers remember the 80's was brought you by the number Pi and the croissant [13:21] ggeksers should be geeksers [13:21] And I can attest that cr3 has yet to be fully potty trained [13:22] never has my parenting experience be put to the test in a professional environment as my time at Canonical [13:26] moustafa: that's why parenting was part of the job requirements [13:27] cr3: That's what you said each time, even though I had not seen any written statement about it [13:28] "change me, it's in your job description"? === bladernr__ is now known as bladernr_ [13:30] slangasek: I was looking for the instinctive reflex of a parent to go into changing mode when there is a smell, so I wouldn't even need to ask... because that would be inappropriate :) [13:32] slangasek: Yeah, I'd be reading some code, then raise my head like an ostrich and look at cr3 while saying in a teasing voice: "Did you poop again?" and his little chuckle would say it all [13:43] Edubuntu amd64 worked fine ! [13:45] huzzah [13:48] * highvoltage will start edubuntu i386 tests in about 2 minutes [13:48] slangasek: me is just firing up thin client for ltsp 64bit [13:49] bladernr_: followed up to the bug, please upgrade plymouth and re-test [13:49] slangasek: you want I should update plymouth only, or try the latest ISOs instead? [13:50] bladernr_: please also update http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/3812/22 to point at your new bug instead of 532047 [13:50] bladernr_: there's no newer ISO of alternate [13:50] gotcha... [13:50] this is actually the issue that we respun the desktop CDs for; didn't respin alternate because it only impacts the first login post-install [13:51] (whereas for the desktop installer, a crashed X server could botch the whole process) [13:52] stgraber: meh forgot to look, I'm assuming you still need to change the /etc/lstp/dhcp.conf from i386 to amd64 on 64bit. I did it automatically [13:53] davmor2: yes, you still need to do that on amd64 [13:53] phew [13:53] davmor2: especially as Edubuntu will be shipping a pre-generated i386 chroot on the amd64 dvd, it'll actually start to make sense ;) [13:55] slangasek: -17 got it. upgraded and no more X crash on my Alternate install [13:55] bladernr_: great, thanks [13:56] stgraber: I just got the plymouth's dot cycling here on my client [14:00] davmor2: what's the hardware in your client ? [14:01] stgraber: http://www.davmor2.co.uk/pc-specs/hplappy.html [14:02] ok, nvidia based then. I didn't have the chance to test that much these days [14:02] do you happen to have an intel based computer around ? [14:02] a netbook being the ideal ;) [14:03] davmor2: how many display outputs do you have connected? [14:05] slangasek: one notebook I'm just grabbing my netbook [14:14] stgraber: that would work but atom processor's aren't 64bit D'oh [14:15] davmor2: well some are but netbooks usually aren't indeed ... [14:25] the only other intel box I got is an i686 [14:25] :( [14:32] hmm, "Running dpkg" took quite some time [14:32] is that normal? [14:36] Edubuntu i386 is fine [14:59] slangasek: okay I've chrooted into the ltsp image I've updated plymouth and am rebuilding the image I'm gonna see if that fixes it if it does I'll write a bug with the step in [15:00] davmor2: how did you get an ltsp image with an outdated plymouth? [15:00] slangasek: it was on the cd [15:00] which CD? [15:00] alternate [15:00] ubuntu [15:00] ok [15:31] * davmor2 kicks box, then hops around the floor fsckin' sandles for slippers [15:31] slangasek: this isn't doing anything ;( [15:32] davmor2: you mean upgrading plymouth didn't change the behavior? [15:33] slangasek: that is correct [15:33] davmor2: what happens if you hit Alt+SysRq+K? [15:34] slangasek: the dots stop cycling [15:34] and nothing else? [15:34] doesn't seem to be [15:34] hmm [15:35] special [15:35] did you say this was nvidia? [15:35] yeap http://www.davmor2.co.uk/pc-specs/hplappy.html [15:36] slangasek: this also works fine as an installed system [16:12] hggdh, ttx is complaining a bit about your last minute testcases at #ubuntu-release ;-) [16:15] ara, yes... such is life, I guess [16:19] plars: hi, please see my followup to bug #540477 [16:19] Launchpad bug 540477 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "X restarted, but no .crash file (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540477 [16:20] slangasek: hmm, no I didn't. will take a look [16:21] slangasek: I'll have to reinstall, I've had to blow away that system since this test to make use of the drive elsewhere [16:21] slangasek: unfortunately this looks like it may be one of those "hard to reproduce" sort of bugs [16:22] plars: booting the installer and running cat /proc/fb should be sufficient [16:22] slangasek: will do === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:52] ara, davmor2: how do things look? [17:53] slangasek: sorry I've been off working [17:53] slangasek, I am trying to finish some i386 tests [17:53] stgraber, can you help with the edubuntu upgrades? [17:59] slangasek: just finished kubuntu DVD i386 and reported dup bug [18:00] marjo_: which bug? [18:00] 538213 [18:00] slangasek: #538213 [18:01] marjo_: that bug should not be present on the kubuntu DVD... [18:01] slangasek: uh oh, when i read the bug description, matched my symptoms [18:02] slangasek: worth redoing & reporting new bug? [18:02] marjo: yes, please report a new bug so we have it in your own words (and hopefully with apport data to go with it) [18:02] slangasek: ok, will do [18:13] so looking at what's left on the board, I think we need to make the call to push the release back to tomorrow morning UTC [18:14] I'll draft a mail to ubuntu-devel-announce to let people know, and as a CFT [18:15] everyone testing, please continue helping us get there... but don't kill yourselves trying to hit a Thursday deadline :) [18:22] btw, who's on Wubi duty this time around? [18:22] davmor2: is that all you? [18:29] slangasek: Yeah I can hit the wubis and m-a's I'm just installing alt 32 bit ltsp to see if it is a 64bit issue [19:18] stgraber: did you take edubuntu upgrades? I'm about to start in them... [19:21] sbeattie: please go for them; it won't hurt do double up [19:26] stgraber: can you have a look at ltsp on ubuntu dude. On my netbook on i386 I get a kernel panic which I'm now wondering if it is the same issue on 64bit [19:26] slangasek: ^ [19:30] sbeattie: I'd need to install edubuntu in a new VM first. So if you have something easily upgradable around, please feel free to do it. [19:30] davmor2: Is that an Asus eeepc ? [19:30] stgraber: compaq mini 110 [19:30] stgraber: no, I have to do installs from scratch, sadly. [19:31] davmor2: hmm, ok. Mine at home also kernel panic but similar hardware here at the office doesn't. [19:31] davmor2: feel free to open a bug and attach the detailed hardware (lspci will do). I'll have a look at it. [19:31] davmor2: I suspect we're missing a NIC driver or something since the last kernel. [19:31] davmor2: Is that an Atlansic ethernet card by any chance ? (atl1e driver) [19:32] stgraber: I'm getting the same thing on my laptop but it is syncing some stuff and it has an ip address [19:32] marjo_: no bug report yet for your X crash on enter? [19:33] ah, ok. I'll get an ubuntu alternate i386 here and run it on our libvirt cluster at revolution linux. I don't think it's related to LTSP itself but it might be some upstart/mountall/plymouth related issue (just guessing here ;)). [19:34] slangasek: it's a dup = 540856 [19:34] sbeattie pointed it out to me [19:35] i've modified my report in iso tracker [19:35] marked it as serious [19:35] marjo_: ah, so not a plymouth bug, how refreshing :) [19:35] slangasek: no [19:35] stgraber: yeah both boxes get an ip address and both sync some stuff and then seem to stop, but the netbook hadn't started plymouth so I could see what was going on :) [19:36] marjo_: although, you filed that against the "debian-installer" test case, which is the alternate installer - I guess that's not what you were actually testing? [19:41] stgraber: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltsp/+bug/541452 [19:41] Launchpad bug 541452 in ltsp (Ubuntu) "ltsp on ubuntu is crashing with a sync issue stopping the kernel from booting (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] [19:42] test case=kubuntu DVD i386/install (debian-installer)/Debian-Installer Whole Drive [19:42] slangasek: ^^^ [19:43] marjo_: yes; you could not have possibly run into bug #540856 with the alternate installer, the alternate installer doesn't use ubiquity [19:43] slangasek: Bug 540856 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/540856 is private [19:43] ubot4: liar [19:43] Factoid 'liar' not found [19:44] marjo_: so perhaps the test case directions are out-of-date for lucid, and led you into testing something else [19:44] slangasek: i think you may be right [19:54] slangasek: I'm off shopping now but I'll hit what wubi and m-a I can when I get back [19:54] ok, cheers [19:57] slangasek: just so you know wubi is at least doing something now which is more than yesterday morning [19:57] slangasek: i'm redoing the test, just to make sure re test case instructions [19:59] marjo_: ok - when the first screen shows up with the Ubuntu logo and the "keyboard makes happy man" icon at the bottom, press a key to get to the boot menu first, then look for the "Install Kubuntu in text mode" option [20:00] Hi folks, I am trying the Lucid amd64 netboot test. I have downloaded the mini.iso but during the install I don't get the option to select a distro flavour to install, does anyone know where that option shows up? [20:00] marjo_: that's what should correspond to the test case; I imagine it will look very different from what you tested before [20:00] slangasek: ack [20:00] ameetp: right towards the end [20:00] after setting up user etc [20:01] ameetp: ^ [20:01] davmor2: hmm okay, let me try again. Thanks [20:02] slangasek: you're right [20:02] marjo_: ok, cool; so we should either tweak that test case so that it applies correctly to both DVD and alternate CDs, or else make a second test case for the DVD idiosyncracies [20:16] Hi there? [20:16] moonoi: Hello [20:17] davmor2: I finally saw it. Thanks! I got a little TAB key happy before ;) [20:17] can i be of any help? [20:18] moonoi: Sure! If you're interested in helping us test Beta 1, feel free to pop over to http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com, create an account, and grab an image that needs testing. [20:18] moonoi: welcome [20:19] moonoi: If you're interested in hanging around and helping test, there's plenty of info at http://qa.ubuntu.com as well [20:19] (And a mailing list, etc.) [20:19] to be more specific: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/untested [20:19] moonoi: Feel free to ask any questions you have here as well! [20:19] marjo_: Ah, thanks -- good point [20:19] ok taking a look now [20:20] moonoi: thx! [20:20] fader_: thanks [20:21] moonoi: No problem! Welcome and thanks for pitching in :D [20:24] would it be useful if i test in sun vbox? or you only interested in physical? [20:25] moonoi: VirtualBox is quite useful :) [20:26] ok starting now [20:26] :-) [20:26] * fader_ is running Mythbuntu tests in VirtualBox right now. [20:26] im on a mac [20:27] fader_: cool! [20:27] Daviey: Yeah, I <3 Mythbuntu :) I have to do my testing in virtualbox because if I screw up the installed system, I'd be in Big Trouble with, er, the end users in my house. [20:28] got the new i7 macbook pro ...:-) (jokin) hope it comes soon though [20:31] Oooooo.... I <3 the background and gdm screen for Studio... [20:33] moonoi: Regarding your upgrade... do you mean it is asking you to install edubuntu even though you have regular ubuntu installed already? [20:35] no sorry my mistake, on the link you originally gave me that mentioned edubuntu [20:35] now i have done the -d -c its doing the standard [20:35] moonoi: Okay, great :) [20:39] Ok... embarassingly stupid question, but how the heck do I do anything at all in KDE? All I seem to be able to do is zoom the desktop in and out, and open some tool menu that lets me add "widgets" and Doodads and thingamabobbers... [20:40] bladernr: click on the kde button bottom left hand corner [20:40] bladernr_: no bottom panel is bug 540810 [20:40] there you will see all the things you were looking for, i assume [20:41] Launchpad bug 540810 in kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "kde panel does not display on 800x600 display (affects: 2)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540810 [20:41] bladernr_: alt-f2 will bring up a search widget. [20:41] sbeattie: that is probably exactly why KDE is driving me insane :) [20:41] you can run programs from that. [20:41] cool... thanks... you to marjo_ [20:42] bladernr_: yes, I was quite confused for a bit about it, too. [21:04] I am right now downloading the Ubuntu DVD, and will go thru the d-i test. [21:04] the DVD tests are in need of help, BTW [21:04] there is nothing on that untested link you gave me now...? am i too late [21:04] moonoi: if you re willing, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/3842 [21:05] moonoi, you have to go to inprogress [21:05] moonoi, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/inprogress [21:05] ahh ok thanks :-) [21:05] before i had a link for the upgrade testing [21:05] now that seems to hav egone [21:07] hggdh: sadly, my wee little dsl line cannae take downloading the dvd images. [21:11] sbeattie: I am finding this myself... at .7MB/s, it will still take me about 90 minutes... [21:12] sbeattie: I noticed you had marked Kubuntu alternate 64 OEM as started... did you have problems at the end of oem-config? [21:13] bladernr_: um, refresh your browser? this last round of images I haven't touched oem-config. [21:14] I did have issues with it when I tried that test, but then the isos got respun and I've paged out the details of what went wrong. [21:15] mmmkay... [21:26] Anybody gotten a kubuntu OEM install working? I don't seem to have the 'prepare for shipping' icon [21:28] fader_: I believe that's bug 386099 [21:28] Launchpad bug 386099 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Karmic) (and 3 other projects) "Kubuntu Netbook OEM install does not create a 'prepare for shipping' icon (affects: 1)" [Medium,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386099 [21:28] fader_: oh, that appears to be netbook only. Hrm. [21:29] sbeattie: Yeah, and I don't seem to have 'oem-config-prepare' either... at least not in my path [21:30] Indeed; 'locate oem' doesn't turn it up either [21:30] fader_: oh! wait, let me check lastlog on #ubuntu-release, I recall a discussion about that. [21:30] sbeattie: Awesome, thanks! [21:30] bug 540895 [21:30] Launchpad bug 540895 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "Kubuntu OEM install does not install oem-config (affects: 1)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540895 [21:37] sbeattie: Thanks [21:40] fader_, sbeattie I just installed Kubuntu OEM from alternate [21:40] bladernr_: Were you able to do the oem config after install? [21:41] yep... the only issue I had was not getting KDM after doing the config. [21:41] I had to reboot the VM to login [21:42] bug 541546 [21:42] bladernr_: Error: Bug #541546 not found. [21:42] doh... [21:44] bladernr_: Hmm... did it create a desktop icon or did you run oem-config-prepare from the terminal? [21:45] I had the icon (was about the only thing I could do in KDE ;-) [21:46] Weird [21:46] even weirder... If filed a bug and it's not showing up in LP :( [21:46] Heheh [21:46] * fader_ wanders off to find some food. [21:46] I'll check back in a while [21:50] slangasek: that could be a problem on wubi I'm in the grub command line :( [21:54] fader_: bug 541539 [21:55] Launchpad bug 541539 in oem-config (Ubuntu) "[Lucid] after oem-config runs, X appears to hang, instead of restarting and launching KDM (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/541539 [21:55] * ara posts her last result for today and calls it a day [21:55] night everyone! [21:55] nn ara [21:57] ara: g'night! [22:08] oh, netboot install, you go so much faster when I preseed apt-cacher. [22:09] :) [22:09] cheat [22:29] hello, i need your help [22:30] yes, umberto? [22:31] i have an ibook g4, i am downloading ubuntu-9.10-desktop-powerpc.iso, how can i make install it on a usb? [22:32] ameetp: do you have netboot kubuntu amd64 going? [22:34] is there any way on iso.qa to show a report of all the test cases I have done? Or is that done by subscribing each time? [22:36] oh, hunh, no one's taken the kubuntu alt expert tests? [23:08] weird. The d-i test on the lucid-dvd-amd64 started OK, then suddenly threw me at the d-i menu (at the install base system piece) [23:16] this is getting even more confusing: the options to what to install shows options for an Ubuntu Server, not a desktop. I selected 'basic Ubuntu server', and installation proceeded [23:16] BUT it is installing X [23:17] hggdh: erk? [23:17] hggdh: I didn't see that when going through tasksel. [23:18] sbeattie: this is rather unexpected. I will wait for it to end, and will reinstall [23:18]