[07:58] good morning [07:59] how to give a rule in gtkrc for >Classpath: GtkWindow.GtkMenu : "menu_shadow" please to try if it's what i want to see? [08:39] kwwii: hi.. why dont the light themes set the gtk-button=16,16 .. [as was done for human] [08:41] zniavre: are you looking for > GtkMenuBar::shadow_type = GTK_SHADOW_NONE [08:41] or GTK_SHADOW_IN ? [08:41] vish, not really im trying to find why some separator are not ruled by gtkrc [08:42] ...test1 [08:42] ah.. [08:42] ooops sorry [08:43] zniavre: hmm , xchat seems to be using gdk? maybe [08:43] instead of gtk? [08:43] cimi add new option 'quite nice) for separator but it does not work every where [08:43] zniavre: which option? [08:43] smooth separator [08:44] zniavre: its not a murrine problem , i use industrial menu and xchat doesn follow the rest of the system [08:44] http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/301/capture2sc.png [08:44] ha ok [08:45] on the screenshot you can see desktop nautilus menu with white separator made by engine [08:46] hehe , i'v done the same[lighter seperators] thing with pixmaps :D [08:46] yes they are always same [08:47] so how to theme gdk apps? [08:49] zniavre: http://imagebin.ca/popup/ihn95SCo.html ;) [08:49] zniavre: you can try to use as gdk instead of gtk , might work , but i'm just guessing that xchat might be using gdk .. and i maybe easily wrong [08:54] zniavre: found it. [08:54] widget_class "**" style "menu_item" [08:55] zniavre: if i use that the pixmap is used^ [08:56] that's right [08:56] thnak you [08:56] thank* [08:56] np.. [09:00] grrrr it breaks my menuitem rules ... [09:00] zniavre: how to use the option ? smooth separator = TRUE or smooth separator = 1 gives error [09:00] you need updated GIt murrine [09:01] ah.. [09:01]

andrea.cimitan * r387560502b18 murrine/ (9 files in 3 dirs): New option: separatorstyle = 1 to draw smooth separators [09:01]

andrea.cimitan * r0b328037e8af murrine/ (NEWS schema/murrine.xml.in.in src/murrine_style.c): listviewstyle = 2 for a solid line [09:02] textestyle also fixed (but not tried yet) [09:03] yeah , even the button lighting seems fixed , we need to update to latest git [09:03] good morning guys n girls [09:11] vish, it works for separator but it breaks firefox/OOo/vlc etc... grrrrr [09:12] zniavre: hehe ;) [09:12] zniavre: probably we should switch to xchat-gnome :D [09:12] it looks less good i do not know why [09:33] so it's ok now but i loose the separator width and weight === andreasn_ is now known as andreasn === michaelforrest2 is now known as michaelforrest === kevin__ is now known as uvacav [15:42] anyone know if the rest of the purple icons are coming soon? [16:11] vish: Did you round the corners on that 48 pixel desktop icon? [16:12] troy_s: nope , "wasnt me" ;) [16:12] vish: Lol. [16:12] vish: It's got the earmarks of the Hobgoblin's consistency all over it. [16:13] troy_s: the only icon i edited for that was the desktop 128px , which had more rounding , and i had to edit it ;) [16:14] not saying that one is perfect though :p [16:14] uvacav: what purple icons? seems you have some inside info :) [16:16] vish: The rounding everywhere is nauseous. Classic all or nothing. Rather like looking at a human face with eyes all over it. [16:21] troy_s: i closed an old human bug you had commented on.. you've been doing the dance of the "target audience" for quite long ;p [16:21] human theme* [16:21] troy_s: current gnome 3 mockups have rounded corners (black to the outside) on the lower corners and at the top towards the panel [16:21] vish: LOL. Which one? [16:22] troy_s: Bug 19549 [16:22] thorwil: Yeah I know. And sixteen football fields of whitespace with no composition. [16:22] Launchpad bug 19549 in baltix "Usability : the default metacity theme must be accessible." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/19549 [16:22] vish: Oh god. [16:22] vish: a bunch of purple icons dropped in lucid alpha. http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/03/invasion-of-purple-icons.html [16:22] vish: Yeah ... we are pretty damn quick on the uptake eh? [16:23] uvacav: AFAIK , nothing more is turning purple.. [16:23] troy_s: what, the presence of whitespace as such is not composition? ;) [16:24] thorwil: I don't know what composition is or whitespace, but Houston - we have a problem. [16:24] omfgletssayrockandblingmore.com [16:24] Wholly crappers. [16:25] Ok... how about a move to avoid the word consistency and replace it with _continuation_? [16:25] There are way way way too many folks that use that fricking c word. Consistency is not dipping a Monet in a vat of purple paint. [16:26] Donkeyville. [16:26] c word is reserved for cunt, though. because you just can't write cunt [16:27] * troy_s *ugh*. [16:27] There were several lines there and you crossed them all. That's pretty unacceptable. [16:29] i forgive your begginess [16:30] thorwil: It isn't mine you need to concern yourself with. [16:32] thorwil: I'll suspect that's a translation issue. We shall blame ye German. [16:34] troy_s: not at all, there's a very direct equivalent of the term in german. but i really don't think anyone should get worked up about such words. [16:36] thorwil: We do. That's the point of language man! [16:37] thorwil: very honestly, that is a word you don't say in public [16:38] ok, so i should have stopped after "c word is reserved". [16:38] preferably, yes [16:39] and everyone would have known what i was referring to [16:40] but anyway, going to cook dinner now [16:40] kwwii: may the sauce be smooth and the salad crisp, as applicable [16:41] thorwil: I am indeed having salad ;-) [16:45] salad days === islington_ is now known as islington === thorwil_ is now known as thorwil