[07:58] <zniavre> good morning
[07:59] <zniavre> how to give a rule in gtkrc for >Classpath: GtkWindow.GtkMenu : "menu_shadow" please to try if it's what i want to see?
[08:39] <vish> kwwii: hi.. why dont the light themes set the gtk-button=16,16 .. [as was done for human]
[08:41] <vish> zniavre: are you looking for > GtkMenuBar::shadow_type = GTK_SHADOW_NONE
[08:41] <vish> or GTK_SHADOW_IN   ?
[08:41] <zniavre> vish,  not really im trying to find why some separator are not ruled by gtkrc
[08:42] <zniavre> ...test1
[08:42] <vish> ah..
[08:42] <zniavre> ooops sorry
[08:43] <vish> zniavre: hmm , xchat seems to be using gdk?  maybe
[08:43] <vish> instead of gtk?
[08:43] <zniavre> cimi add new option 'quite nice) for separator but it does not work every where
[08:43] <vish> zniavre: which option?
[08:43] <zniavre> smooth separator
[08:44] <vish> zniavre: its not a murrine problem , i use industrial menu and xchat doesn follow the rest of the system
[08:44] <zniavre> http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/301/capture2sc.png
[08:44] <zniavre> ha ok
[08:45] <zniavre> on the screenshot you can see desktop nautilus menu with white separator made by engine
[08:46] <vish> hehe , i'v done the same[lighter seperators] thing with pixmaps :D
[08:46] <zniavre> yes they are always same
[08:47] <zniavre> so how to theme gdk apps?
[08:49] <vish> zniavre: http://imagebin.ca/popup/ihn95SCo.html ;)
[08:49] <vish> zniavre: you can try to use as gdk instead of gtk   , might work , but i'm just guessing that xchat might be using gdk .. and i maybe easily wrong
[08:54] <vish> zniavre: found it.
[08:54] <vish> widget_class "*<GtkMenuItem>*"          style "menu_item"
[08:55] <vish> zniavre: if i use that the pixmap is used^
[08:56] <zniavre> that's right
[08:56] <zniavre> thnak you
[08:56] <zniavre> thank*
[08:56] <vish> np..
[09:00] <zniavre> grrrr it breaks my menuitem rules ...
[09:00] <vish> zniavre: how to use the option ? smooth separator = TRUE   or   smooth separator = 1  gives error
[09:00] <zniavre> you need updated GIt murrine
[09:01] <vish> ah..
 andrea.cimitan * r387560502b18 murrine/ (9 files in 3 dirs): New option: separatorstyle = 1 to draw smooth separators
 andrea.cimitan * r0b328037e8af murrine/ (NEWS schema/murrine.xml.in.in src/murrine_style.c): listviewstyle = 2 for a solid line
[09:02] <zniavre> textestyle also fixed (but not tried yet)
[09:03] <vish> yeah , even the button lighting seems fixed , we need to update to latest git
[09:03] <lassegul> good morning guys n girls
[09:11] <zniavre> vish, it works for separator but it breaks firefox/OOo/vlc etc...  grrrrr
[09:12] <vish> zniavre: hehe ;)
[09:12] <vish> zniavre: probably we should switch to xchat-gnome :D
[09:12] <zniavre> it looks less good i do not know why
[09:33] <zniavre> so it's ok now but i loose the separator width and weight
[15:42] <uvacav> anyone know if the rest of the purple icons are coming soon?
[16:11] <troy_s> vish: Did you round the corners on that 48 pixel desktop icon?
[16:12] <vish> troy_s: nope , "wasnt me"  ;)
[16:12] <troy_s> vish: Lol.
[16:12] <troy_s> vish: It's got the earmarks of the Hobgoblin's consistency all over it.
[16:13] <vish> troy_s: the only icon i edited for that was the desktop 128px , which had more rounding , and i had to edit it ;)
[16:14] <vish> not saying that one is perfect though  :p
[16:14] <vish> uvacav: what purple icons? seems you have some inside info :)
[16:16] <troy_s> vish: The rounding everywhere is nauseous. Classic all or nothing. Rather like looking at a human face with eyes all over it.
[16:21] <vish> troy_s: i closed an old human bug you had commented on..  you've been doing the dance of the "target audience" for quite long ;p
[16:21] <vish> human theme*
[16:21] <thorwil> troy_s: current gnome 3 mockups have rounded corners (black to the outside) on the lower corners and at the top towards the panel
[16:21] <troy_s> vish: LOL. Which one?
[16:22] <vish> troy_s: Bug 19549
[16:22] <troy_s> thorwil: Yeah I know. And sixteen football fields of whitespace with no composition.
[16:22] <troy_s> vish: Oh god.
[16:22] <uvacav> vish: a bunch of purple icons dropped in lucid alpha. http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/03/invasion-of-purple-icons.html
[16:22] <troy_s> vish: Yeah ... we are pretty damn quick on the uptake eh?
[16:23] <vish> uvacav: AFAIK , nothing more is turning purple..
[16:23] <thorwil> troy_s: what, the presence of whitespace as such is not composition? ;)
[16:24] <troy_s> thorwil: I don't know what composition is or whitespace, but Houston - we have a problem.
[16:24] <troy_s> omfgletssayrockandblingmore.com
[16:24] <troy_s> Wholly crappers.
[16:25] <troy_s> Ok... how about a move to avoid the word consistency and replace it with _continuation_?
[16:25] <troy_s> There are way way way too many folks that use that fricking c word. Consistency is not dipping a Monet in a vat of purple paint.
[16:26] <troy_s> Donkeyville.
[16:26] <thorwil> c word is reserved for cunt, though. because you just can't write cunt
[16:27]  * troy_s *ugh*.
[16:27] <troy_s> There were several lines there and you crossed them all. That's pretty unacceptable.
[16:29] <thorwil> i forgive your begginess
[16:30] <troy_s> thorwil: It isn't mine you need to concern yourself with.
[16:32] <troy_s> thorwil: I'll suspect that's a translation issue. We shall blame ye German.
[16:34] <thorwil> troy_s: not at all, there's a very direct equivalent of the term in german. but i really don't think anyone should get worked up about such words.
[16:36] <troy_s> thorwil: We do. That's the point of language man!
[16:37] <kwwii> thorwil: very honestly, that is a word you don't say in public
[16:38] <thorwil> ok, so i should have stopped after "c word is reserved".
[16:38] <kwwii> preferably, yes
[16:39] <thorwil> and everyone would have known what i was referring to
[16:40] <kwwii> but anyway, going to cook dinner now
[16:40] <thorwil> kwwii: may the sauce be smooth and the salad crisp, as applicable
[16:41] <kwwii> thorwil: I am indeed having salad ;-)
[16:45] <knome> salad days