[14:19] <slangasek> davmor2: migration-assistant is higher priority (ubuntu amd64)
[14:20] <davmor2> slangasek: no probs I'll hit that after this xubunt 32bit wubi
[14:51] <slangasek> ev: the wubi 'stable' link points to r176, but davmor2 says he's been testing r174 - which am I meant to be publishing?
[14:51] <ev> 176 fixes the UNR is now UNE issue
[14:51] <ev> 174 fixes the crash
[14:52] <ev> I think we can get away with just 174 and telling UNE users to wait until beta 2
[14:52] <slangasek> davmor2: you've been testing 174?
[14:52] <davmor2> slangasek: yeap but I can run une and a couple of other on 176 if you want to release on that one instead?
[14:53] <slangasek> no, let's go with 174
[14:53] <cjwatson> err, is the release meeting in 7 minutes or 67 minutes?  this is Google Calendar Confusion Week
[14:53] <slangasek> 67 minutes
[14:53] <pitti> cjwatson: 67 usually
[14:53] <cjwatson> goodd
[14:54] <davmor2> slangasek: would you like me to test 176 for une to ensure that works?
[14:54] <slangasek> davmor2: it's not pertinent to beta1, though it should certainly be tested at some point
[14:55] <davmor2> slangasek: Well m-a on 64bit ubu is 50% installed now so I can do it after that
[14:56] <slangasek> GrueMaster: bug #541399> loaded from USB?  That seems to defeat the purpose of a netboot image
[14:57] <GrueMaster> slangasek: It's irrelevant how the kernel gets loaded by uboot.  The fact that the kernel wouldn't execute is the issue.
[14:57] <GrueMaster> I don't have a tftpboot server set up at the moment.
[14:58] <GrueMaster> But this is perfectly valid.  We have an img file for babbage that gets loaded from SD card for the same image.
[15:02] <slangasek> GrueMaster: ah, ok
[15:03] <slangasek> davmor2: how long do you expect the m-a test to take to finish?
[15:03] <davmor2> 95% now
[15:03] <davmor2> 98%
[15:03] <slangasek> cool
[15:03] <davmor2> restart
[15:07] <davmor2> slangasek: done
[15:08] <slangasek> sweet
[16:19] <slangasek> smoser: could you update the ec2 webpages, please?  (publicize-build running now)
[16:22] <smoser> slangasek, with --make-public ?
[16:22] <smoser> i will update ec2 pages now.
[16:22] <slangasek> smoser: isn't that implicit in the 'publicize' command?
[16:22] <slangasek> (I'm going by the wiki page...)
[16:23] <smoser> oh. shoot. no, you're right.
[16:23] <slangasek> ok, good :)
[16:23] <smoser> i was thinking you were running 'promote-daily'
[16:23] <smoser> thanks.
[16:30] <smoser> slangasek, pages updated.
[16:32] <slangasek> smoser: thanks!
[17:35] <cjwatson> slangasek: shall I kill queuebot?
[17:35] <slangasek> oh, probably :)
[17:35]  * ScottK imagines cjwatson with a large revolver.
[17:37] <cjwatson> I've got Control and C keys, if those are equivalent
[17:50] <cjwatson> nhandler: I've registered queuebot now
[17:54] <ScottK> slangasek: You may want to look at 538860 and decide if you want to retroactively approve it or get it reverted.
[17:57] <slangasek> ScottK: ah, actually I approved that one from the queue by hand after a review, I just didn't comment the bug :)
[17:58] <ScottK> slangasek: OK.  No problem then.
[18:01] <doko__> please promote python3-defaults and python3.1 (now needed by distribute as b-d). will have to seed python3-all-dbg
[18:24] <nigelb> if an apport hook is added, worth a beta freeze exception?
[18:24] <nigelb> or do I wait till lucid+1?
[18:26] <cjwatson> I don't think that needs a freeze exception
[18:26] <nigelb> ok, I'll get to work on it soon then :)
[18:35] <slangasek> doko__: is there an MIR for this?
[19:09] <doko> slangasek: hmm, no, in the past we never had MIR's for new versions. maybe we could have one for pybsddb3, but this is a new version of something we already have in the python2.6 package as well
[19:09] <doko> let me know what you prefer; I'll write it over the weekend. away now
[19:10] <slangasek> doko: well, python3 is a substantial enough change, and going in parallel, that I would be more comfortable having an MIR for it
[19:10] <doko> ok, will do over the weekend
[19:11] <slangasek> thanks
[19:16] <AnAnt> slangasek: Hello, regarding LP 402874, is there anything else needed other than than upgrade & install logs ?
[19:18] <cjwatson> pitti: I'd like to go ahead with the grub2 SRU in bug 477104; it's definitely the right fix for grub2 itself, even if there are some problems getting the update applied to wubildr
[19:19] <cjwatson> pitti: WDYT?  The latter might be covered by my lupin upload
[19:19] <cjwatson> I could upload that to -proposed if that would help
[19:22] <cjwatson> ... uploaded
[19:23] <cjwatson> pitti: see my most recent comment on the bug
[19:31] <slangasek> AnAnt: yes, the information described on the FreezeExceptionProcess page
[19:31] <slangasek> # A description of the proposed changes, with sufficient detail to estimate their potential impact on the distribution
[19:31] <slangasek> # A rationale for the exception, explaining the benefit of the change
[19:31] <slangasek> # Any additional information which would be helpful in considering the decision
[20:10] <asac> FYI, bug 542141
[20:58] <cjwatson> asac: does the default search change affect other Mozilla products, or just Firefox?
[21:00] <asac> cjwatson: just firefox
[21:01] <asac> cjwatson: mozilla prefers if we name it "Mozilla Firefox"
[21:01] <asac> rather than Firefox
[21:03] <asac> commented that on bug
[21:07] <cjwatson> asac: can we trade it for them not referring to "Ubuntu Linux" on mozilla.org? :-)
[21:14] <asac> haha
[21:14] <asac> where is that?
[21:15] <asac> or you want them to refer to Ubuntu rather than just "Linux"?
[21:25] <pitti> cjwatson: this bug keeps confusing me. A lot of people applied workarounds, but I didn't see any testing of the proposed package yet
[21:26] <pitti> hmm, unapproved queue still not flushed? any particular reason?
[21:42] <cjwatson> asac: google "Ubuntu Linux" site:mozilla.org - various wiki pages and such but some official things too
[21:43] <cjwatson> pitti: I think the lupin package I uploaded to karmic-proposed unapproved should help - it should fix upgrade to work the way it's meant to and rewrite wubildr automatically
[21:44] <cjwatson> the lack of that is probably why we haven't got real testing yet, but both parts are needed
[21:48] <asac> cjwatson: so they should just refer to "Ubuntu"?
[21:49] <asac> or what should i suggest?
[21:59] <cjwatson> I'll follow up
[21:59] <cjwatson> (to the bug)
[22:08] <asac> k
[22:08] <nhandler> cjwatson: Is there a draft of the next beta announcement? I want to s/FreeNode/freenode/g
[22:10] <slangasek> nhandler: feel free to copy https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/Beta1Announcement to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/Beta2Announcement and tweak
[22:10] <nhandler> slangasek: Will do