[07:49] <DanaG> hmm, does "splash" without "quiet" do anything on arm?
[07:51] <DanaG> weird... reference u-boot doesn't have mpuspeed
[07:53] <persia> The use of "splash" and "quiet" shoudn't be arch-specific.
[08:00] <DanaG> interesting: with "quiet" boots in 19 seconds; without, boots in 30 or so.
[08:00] <DanaG> er, 16, not 19.
[08:01] <persia> Maybe slow console?
[08:01] <persia> maybe kernel compilation options?
[08:02] <DanaG> well, console speed is 115200; kernel is rcn-ee's kernel.
[08:02] <DanaG> I wonder if something similar is a factor on my "host" computer (with serial console).
[14:11] <asac> plars: the consistence CPU check .... wonder if that should sleep a bit after resume. I guess bunch of stuff gets triggered on resume, so things would be slowed down naturally. ideas?
[14:11] <asac> (suspend resume testing)
[14:11] <asac> or does the suspend test script already take care of that?
[14:12] <asac> plars: anyway. awesome job on getting this spec done ;)
[14:29] <asac> so i cant find any "armel" tagged mono bug ;)
[14:30] <asac> ah it was bug 530000 ...
[14:30] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 530000 in qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) "mono assembly installation under qemu-arm-static hangs (affects: 1)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/530000
[14:30] <asac> cool bug no. ;)
[16:13] <plars> asac: no, it doesn't do that currently, but I saw that test failed the last time I tried to run it, and I was thinking of doing just that... because there's a lot of stuff at resume time that could throw the timing off too far
[17:51] <rcn-ee> ogra, i started working on cherry picking patchs for the IGEPv2 (it's an omap3 based board made in spain), most of it's suppot is in 2.6.34-rc2, the biggest difference, its factory u-boot needs boot.ini vs boot.scr... the dss2 patch needs a little fixup, as it doesn't apply cleanly to 2.6.33..