[00:02] <cbrowne> I'm having immense trouble setting up my Ubuntu 9.10 server as a Wireless Access Point; I've followed the various howtos and even tried compiling 2.6.32-wl (the rt2x00 project's kernel), all to absolutely no avail; chipset (according to lspci): "03:0b.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2561/RT61 802.11g PCI"; lsmod confirms I have the rt61pci module installed.  Any help would be greatly appreciated (sorry for the uber long message)
[00:21] <cbrowne> ping...
[00:35] <Hypnoz> I had problems with wireless in 9.10, which worked perfectly in 9.04
[00:35] <Hypnoz> so i finally went back to 9.04
[00:35] <Hypnoz> you might consider trying your setup on a 9.04 install
[00:35] <Hypnoz> if you get desperate i guess
[01:18] <ruben23> hi are there ways to optimize ubuntu-server default..
[01:23] <qman__> ruben23, you're going to have to be more specific -- ubuntu server is optimized for typical situations out of the box
[01:30] <ruben23> qman__: what are ways i can enhance and optimize ubuntu-server. my application need extensive processing...
[01:44] <qman__> ruben23, ubuntu server has no superfluous or performance-hindering configurations by default
[01:44] <qman__> there are some things you may be able to remove, but they would also remove functionality
[01:44] <qman__> if a base ubuntu server install is not fast enough, you probably need faster hardware
[01:53] <ruben23> qman__:ill take that...i just heard from other modifying kernel stack to preven memory leak.it hink thats wrong.
[01:54] <qman__> a memory leak is a different problem
[01:54] <qman__> if your kernel is leaking memory, it needs to be fixed, probably by updating it
[01:55] <qman__> if your program is leaking, you need to complain to whoever wrote it
[02:00] <ruben23> qman__: thank you for clarity.
[02:07] <MTecknology> qman__: there's ways to speed it up...
[02:08] <MTecknology> I figure it's the perfect balance between instant usability, security, and speed
[02:08] <MTecknology> although I wouldn't mind sacraficing a little usability for the sake of more security
[02:09] <ruben23>  MTecknology:hows that..?
[02:09]  * genii sacrifices a goat to MTecknology's cause
[02:10] <MTecknology> giovani: :P
[02:10] <MTecknology> genii: *
[02:11] <MTecknology> ruben23: I tend to remove a lot of cruft from a basic server install, but overall it's not bad
[02:11] <MTecknology> I kinda wish we offered a hardened kernel
[02:11] <MTecknology> genii: you should see my kernel config :P
[02:14] <ruben23> MTecknology:you re compile the kernel.
[02:15] <MTecknology> ruben23: ya, for my own laptop (only system) - not the servers I run
[02:16] <ruben23> ow ok, im just worried on my ubuntu-server i ahd it keeps getting high loadavg- up 12.0:-(
[02:18] <MTecknology> you check top output?
[02:19] <ruben23> im using htop
[02:20] <Pici> ruben23: how many cpus?
[02:20] <MTecknology> I don't trust htop, never seems completely accurate
[02:21] <ruben23> i got dual core xeon-intel.
[02:21] <ruben23> 2.4Ghz
[02:21] <Pici> Check iotop then
[02:23] <ruben23> Pici: i think the application itself are putting the high load
[02:23] <bogeyd6> MTecknology, how is htop not accurate?
[02:24] <ruben23> whats the difference betwwen buffer memory to cached memory..
[02:24] <MTecknology> apache under any normal use seems to add a plenty high load
[02:24] <bogeyd6> buffer is in the processor
[02:25] <bogeyd6> MTecknology, im interested in the specifics of htop being inaccurate
[02:25] <ruben23> how about cached..?
[02:25] <MTecknology> cached is held in memory but not being used, for being quickly recalled
[02:26] <bogeyd6> MTecknology, i ask because a) i assume you are not a troll b) i use htop and rely on it for my consulting
[02:26] <bogeyd6> cached is the ram
[02:26] <bogeyd6> Cache Memory can be accessed more quickly by the computer microprocessor than it can be accessed by regular RAM
[02:27] <bogeyd6> well cached is usually in the ram
[02:27] <MTecknology> bogeyd6: there are times where I see top and htop disagree
[02:28] <bogeyd6> run on the same box?
[02:29] <MTecknology> ya
[02:29] <MTecknology> same time
[02:29] <MTecknology> buffer = being moved around; used = ready for instant use; cached = ready to become ready for instant use; free means nothing there to be used
[02:29] <MTecknology> best as I know how to explain it very simply unless i'm wrong
[02:30] <bogeyd6> i know about the memory usage calculation
[02:30] <MTecknology> bogeyd6: I could be wrong and there could be bugs that were addressed in the time since I used it last - ~4yr
[02:30] <bogeyd6> but running htop and top at the same is very easy to see the disagreement and why
[02:31] <Pici> I've not had any issues running htop myself
[02:31] <bogeyd6> Pici, you did on the memory calculation and didnt know it
[02:32] <bogeyd6> Pici, fear not it was just the buffer usage
[02:33] <pmatulis> ruben23: you have a cpu load of 12.0 ?  for how long?
[02:34] <ruben23> pmatulis:actually i start at 0.89 then rising.then eventually ill get 12.0 when full usage then my apps crashed up. need to reboot again
[02:34] <ruben23> to correct.
[02:34] <bogeyd6> ruben23, which app?
[02:35] <pmatulis> ruben23: geez, change your h/w and/or your app
[02:35] <ruben23> bogeyd6: its a dialer system..for voice calling-asterisk, and he do recordings
[02:35] <bogeyd6> ruben23, i read your past convo and it seems no one told about the ubuntu linux rt kernel
 qman__: what are ways i can enhance and optimize ubuntu-server. my application need extensive processing...
[02:36] <ruben23> bogeyd6:  yes whats rt kernel.?
[02:36] <bogeyd6> real time processing
[02:36] <bogeyd6> linux has an inherent delay in processing
[02:36] <pmatulis> ruben23: even a consistent load of 2.0 is terrible
[02:36] <bogeyd6> !realtime
[02:36] <MTecknology> bogeyd6: so what happens with it? had to run
[02:36] <ruben23> pmatulis: yeah its true..worst is 12.0
[02:37] <bogeyd6> !rt | ruben23
[02:37] <bogeyd6> ruben23, https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
[02:38] <bogeyd6> ruben23, just to help even further Real-time applications have operational deadlines between some triggering event and the application's response to that event. To meet these operational deadlines, programmers use real-time operating systems (RTOS) on which the maximum response time can be calculated or measured reliably for the given application and environment.
[02:39] <ruben23> th recommend distro version for my apps is ubuntu-server 8.10 LTS
[02:39] <bogeyd6> 8.04 lts
[02:39] <ruben23> bogeyd6: this process is kernel recompile and patching it up..?
[02:39] <ruben23> sorry
[02:39] <MTecknology> !lts
[02:40] <bogeyd6> ruben23, as simple as apt-get install linux-rt
[02:40] <ruben23> bogeyd6:ow , wow this is a big help..
[02:40] <bogeyd6> reboot and try it
[02:40] <bogeyd6> if you dont like, remove it and reboot
[02:41] <MTecknology> I wonder how hard it is to write a useful OS from scratch...
[02:41] <bogeyd6> upgrading to karmic will be even more beneficial but who knows if your app is supported
[02:41] <MTecknology> gnu hasn't even been able to do it yet - obviously i couldn't, i'm just wondering what kind of work goes into it..
[02:42] <MTecknology> ruben23: what app?
[02:42] <bogeyd6> MTecknology, debian sarge had over 230 million lines of code
[02:42] <MTecknology> that's with the kernel and everything?
[02:42] <ruben23>  MTecknology: asterisk, with a couple of record apps, like sox and lame.
[02:43] <bogeyd6> MTecknology, the whole release
[02:43] <bogeyd6> ruben23, linux-rt is included in ubuntu studio because of the audio and video processing
[02:43] <MTecknology> bogeyd6: if you have 10 million devs that's ion 23 million lines each :P
[02:43] <bogeyd6> ruben23, asterisk is available on karmic
[02:43] <bogeyd6> MTecknology, http://www.dwheeler.com/sloc/
[02:44] <bogeyd6> !asterisk
[02:44] <bogeyd6> !voip | ruben23
[02:44] <ruben23> bogeyd6:  yes it the backend of my apps, using viciidal-created through perl script.
[02:45] <bogeyd6> i would try the linux-rt kernel which is made for sound processing and see how far tht gets you
[02:45] <ruben23> http://astguiclient.sourceforge.net/vicidial.html  <-------see ubuntu is recommended..best
[02:46] <MTecknology> bogeyd6: I have a hard time reading that article beyond the title, but it sounds interesting
[02:46]  * bogeyd6 feels dirty for helping a telemarketer
[02:46] <ruben23> bogeyd6:i will also try it to karmic- the goal is to lessen up loadavg generated..
[02:48] <bogeyd6> !ymmv | ruben23
[02:48] <ruben23> bogeyd6: this is a big help, thanks so much, il test it on production..
[02:48] <bogeyd6> :)
[02:49] <bogeyd6> we aim to please here at ubuntu
[02:49] <ruben23>  bogeyd6:does karmic already have the rt kernel..?
[02:50] <bogeyd6> ruben23, no it doesnt. you install and you "sudo apt-get install linux-rt" and reboot the server
[02:52] <ruben23>  bogeyd6: got one more clarification
[02:52] <bogeyd6> ruben23,  k
[02:53] <ruben23> i got this process on before installing my apps, where i can incorporate the rt kernel here on this part..? ---------> http://pastebin.com/H9MLXRKp  -----> do i need to omit process here..?
[02:53] <bogeyd6> hmm
[02:56] <ruben23> bogeyd6: what you think..?
[02:56] <bogeyd6> ruben23, http://pastebin.com/Lj2YrMh9
[02:57] <bogeyd6> im not sure about why you need the linux-source but it cant hurt
[02:57] <ruben23> ok i will omit linux source-im not needing it actually.
[02:58] <ruben23> ill replace linux source with rt linux install
[02:58] <bogeyd6> kk
[02:59] <ruben23> thanks
[03:06] <ruben23>  bogeyd6:if i install linux rt- do i need to install linux header again..? or no need
[03:07] <bogeyd6> not if you followed the order i did it in
[03:08] <MTecknology> ruben23: install kernel/header; reboot
[03:09] <MTecknology> !info harden
[03:09] <MTecknology> ruben23: you ever mess with that?
[03:09] <MTecknology> bogeyd6: *
[03:15] <ruben23> bogeyd6: how do i cehck if rt-kernel is installed propoerly
[03:16] <ruben23> i got this---> Linux vicidial 2.6.24-27-server #1 SMP Fri Mar 12 01:45:06 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
[03:16] <bogeyd6> cat /etc/lsb-release
[03:17] <bogeyd6> wait sorry im dumb
[03:19] <ruben23> ok
[05:01] <sekyourbox> I need help with wpa_supplicant. When i run the command its says the following drivers are installed: wext, nl80211, amtel, wired... I need to enable madwifi drivers, and i believe they are already installed by default on 910..Network says im using auth5. Any help please
[05:10] <twb> sekyourbox: that doesn't sound like a server issue.
[05:11] <sekyourbox> I need to do this for my server
[05:11] <sekyourbox> I cant set up a server with network manager
[05:20] <MTecknology> sekyourbox: hm?
[05:21] <sekyourbox> MTecknology
[05:21] <MTecknology> sekyourbox: vim /etc/networking/interfaces
[05:22] <sekyourbox> I know how to set it up, i just need to know how to get wpa_supplicant to recognise the driver.
[05:22] <twb> sekyourbox: you generally want the generic wext driver these days.
[05:22] <MTecknology> you just need to have the driver loaded, the rest should be magic
[05:24] <sekyourbox> Wext isn't working for me
[05:24] <sekyourbox> it connects but wont grab a DHCP address
[05:24] <sekyourbox> I dont want to set up a static address
[05:24] <sekyourbox> AND i want to use madwifi
[05:25] <MTecknology> why don't yyou want a static ip for a server?
[05:26] <sekyourbox> because the wpa part of the setup has nothing to do with my server. I need to setup a PXE server for a seperate subnet in my lan
[05:27] <sekyourbox> so its actually a workstation/server
[05:27] <sekyourbox> I will also eventually be setting other things that need network manager to be disabled
[05:39] <sekyourbox> looks like I need to re-compile wpa_supplicant
[06:24] <Carbon_Monoxide> hi! i have an Ubuntu Server 9.04 with Error 16: Inconsistent filesystem structure during boot up
[06:25] <Carbon_Monoxide> I've used a LiveCD to fsck the ext2 /boot partition
[06:25] <Carbon_Monoxide> and it is marked as clean
[06:26] <Carbon_Monoxide> what else do i need to do?
[07:37] <sherr> Carbon_Monoxide: A google brings up some hits - looks like a serious issue and not solved by many ... filesystem issue/corruption
[07:37] <sherr> http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22Inconsistent+filesystem%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a
[07:38] <sherr> One person backed up the kernel and made a copy of it for boot :
[07:38] <sherr> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=72686
[07:38] <sherr> Maybe you will get lucky. Good luck.
[14:08] <ricdanger1> hi there
[14:08] <ricdanger1> I'm testing ubuntu 10.04 and find something really annoying
[14:08] <ricdanger1> no verbose output on boot
[14:08] <ricdanger1> is there a way to fix this?
[14:12] <twb> Remove "quiet" from the kernel boot parameters.
[14:12] <twb> Depending on what you mean by "verbose".
[14:13] <ricdanger1> nop
[14:13] <twb> I think there's further output if you add "debug" or someting.
[14:13] <ricdanger1> kernel messages show fine
[14:13] <twb> ricdanger1: did you install from the server CD?
[14:13] <ricdanger1> but everything from init-bottom is just black
[14:13] <ricdanger1> sure
[14:13] <ricdanger1> both minimal and regular
[14:13] <ricdanger1> btw, regular installs plymouth.
[14:13] <twb> Oh, it's THAT
[14:13] <twb> Hit Ctrl+Alt+F1
[14:13] <ricdanger1> so there is a splash, but still no boot messages
[14:14] <twb> There's a vt switching issue.
[14:14] <ricdanger1> Ctrl+Alt+F1 shows the caret scrolling vertically but not a single output from init scripts
[14:14] <ricdanger1> it's like the messages are being printed black in black
[14:14] <twb> OK, at this point I'm just going to say that I don't know.
[14:15] <ricdanger1> this is really annoying
[14:15] <twb> I can probably fix it from first principles, but I don't have hardware that can run plymouth to test a 10.04 image against.
[14:15] <ricdanger1> hope it gets fixed
[14:15] <ricdanger1> do you know where can I fill a bug for thgis?
[14:15] <ricdanger1> twbn: without plymouth (virtual or minimal install), you only get a black space without any output
[14:15] <twb> Dunno
[14:15] <ricdanger1> so, the problem is there
[14:16] <twb> The usual ubuntu bug reporting procedures should apply
[14:16] <ricdanger1> sure
[14:16] <twb> !malone
[14:16] <ricdanger1> but what package should this be related?
[14:16] <ricdanger1> I filled on upstart
[14:16] <twb> ricdanger1: best guess, and they'll reassign it if you're wrong
[14:16] <twb> upstart or plymouth are reasonable guesses IMO
[14:18] <ricdanger1> btw
[14:18] <ricdanger1> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41417613/LucidBoot.png
[14:18] <ricdanger1> here is the boot result
[14:19] <ricdanger1> the more services I add, the more scrolled down the prompt is
[14:19] <twb> Hmm, what provides the LSB script library
[14:19] <twb> ricdanger1: do you have lsb-base installed?  Check its bug list.
[14:20] <ricdanger1> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/upstart/0.6.5-5
[14:20] <ricdanger1> they have here something about foreground color
[14:20] <ricdanger1> fixed on 0.6.5-5 (the one I'm running)
[14:20] <ricdanger1> maybe this is why the text is black now
[16:34] <jmazaredo> can you forward 192.168.0.15:80 to 192.168.0.16:80?
[16:34] <jmazaredo> so that if 192.168.0.17 request webpage on 192.168.0.15 will go to 192.168.0.16
[17:37] <RoyK^> jmazaredo: there are several ways to do that :)
[17:39] <jmazaredo> i need!\
[17:39] <RoyK^> how?
[17:39] <RoyK^> proxying?
[17:40] <RoyK^> iptables can help you, but a simple redirect is easier
[17:40] <jmazaredo> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1434586
[17:40] <jmazaredo> thats my problem
[17:40] <RoyK^> <?php header("Location: http://newbox"); ?>
[17:40] <jmazaredo> posted in the thread
[17:40] <jmazaredo> iptables perhaps
[17:41] <jmazaredo> iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i wlan0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.155:80
[17:41] <jmazaredo> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 80 -i wlan0 -j ACCEPT
[17:41] <jmazaredo> the problem is the other box is in virtualbox
[17:41] <RoyK^> why would that be a problem?
[17:42] <RoyK^> if using NAT in vbox, you'll need their own port forward
[17:42] <jmazaredo> the adapter is bridged
[17:42] <jmazaredo> so they are on same network
[17:45] <RoyK^> sorry. fell out
[17:46] <jmazaredo> :)
[17:47] <jmazaredo> in the internet i only see forwarding external to internal
[17:47] <RoyK^> there isn't really a big difference
[17:47] <RoyK^> just two sides
[17:48] <jmazaredo> so this command what will this do? iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i wlan0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.155:80
[17:48] <jmazaredo> all request from that pc will go to 192.168.0.155:80?
[17:49] <RoyK^> yes
[17:49] <jmazaredo> iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 80 -i wlan0 -j ACCEPT
[17:49] <RoyK^> that is, it'll forward the request
[17:49] <jmazaredo> that one?
[17:50] <RoyK^> that one will accept routing in the FORWARD chain if that is already blocked by policy
[17:50] <RoyK^> if the policy is ACCEPT, it won't do much
[17:50] <jmazaredo> ok will try to sabotage my pc now :)
[17:50] <jmazaredo> i will run the command
[17:50] <RoyK^> you'll have to make sure ip forwarding is enabled in the kernel, though
[17:50] <RoyK^> well, no, I don't think you will need that
[17:51] <jmazaredo> think all kernels can forward
[17:51] <RoyK^> they _can_
[17:51] <jmazaredo> using 8.04 desktop
[17:51] <RoyK^> I can jump out of the window, but that doesn't make it likely for me to want to
[17:51] <jmazaredo> 0_0
[17:52] <RoyK^> see sysctl -a | grep forward
[17:52] <RoyK^> there's a setting in kernel wheather or not to do ip forwarding
[17:53] <jmazaredo> its all = 0?
[17:53] <RoyK^> then kernel won't forward packages
[17:53] <jmazaredo> why is that
[17:53] <RoyK^> well, just set it to 1
[17:54] <RoyK^> /etc/sysctl.conf
[17:54] <RoyK^> you don't necessarily want your box to work as a router
[17:55] <jmazaredo> firestarter makes your box like a router right?
[17:56] <RoyK^> just enable ipv4 routing
[17:56] <RoyK^> in sysctl.conf
[17:56] <jmazaredo> got it
[17:56] <RoyK^> it's the kernel doing the routing after all
[17:56] <RoyK^> not some fancy userspace software
[17:57] <jmazaredo> :)
[17:57] <jmazaredo> will restart the network dont jump on the window ok
[17:57] <RoyK^> hehe
[17:58] <RoyK^> jmazaredo: there's no need to restart anything to make those changes work
[17:58] <RoyK^> just sysctl -p
[18:01] <jmazaredo> still aint workin
[18:02] <jmazaredo> will try again
[18:02] <RoyK^> jmazaredo: there's no need to restart anything to make those changes work
[18:02] <RoyK^> just sysctl -p
[18:02] <RoyK^> telnet to ip:port to see what's happening
[18:05] <jmazaredo> nothing
[18:05] <jmazaredo> will try to flush
[18:05] <RoyK^> flush what?
[18:21] <jmazaredo> still not working
[18:21] <jmazaredo> 0_0
[18:35] <ChrisRut> so there is the 'time' command which will output the time taken to run a process (i.e. time ls), is there a command I can run that will tell me the cpu usage (min,max,average) during a process (for that given process) ?
[18:38] <ChrisRut> for benchmarkign
[18:38] <ChrisRut> *benchmarking
[18:59] <pwnguin> ChrisRut: not as easy as time, but bootchart can probably be hacked to do what you want
[19:00] <pwnguin> however, min, max and average by themselves are meaningless
[19:00] <pwnguin> the min will be 0 and max will be 100
[19:05] <pwnguin> average will just be user time / wall clock time
[19:05] <ChrisRut> right about min & max... but time's man says it can output cpu utilization(http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?time) using 'P' ?
[19:06] <pwnguin>   P      Percentage  of  the  CPU that this job got.  This is just
[19:06] <pwnguin>                      user + system times divided by the total running time. It
[19:06] <pwnguin>                      also prints a percentage sign.
[19:06] <pwnguin> all this really tells you is whether the bottleneck is CPU or not
[19:07] <ChrisRut> gotcha, Thanks pwnguin
[19:09] <pwnguin> i think the manpage for time and the binary don't match
[19:10] <pwnguin> yea,
[19:10] <pwnguin> Users of the bash shell need to use an explicit path in order to run the external time command and not the shell builtin variant.\
[19:17] <chocamo> I am installing server edition  10.04 beta and I can get a dhcp address during the install, but after installation and reboot I cannot get an IP on either my wired or by hooking up a wireless device
[19:37] <MTecknology> How can I reset all permissions on a home directory to their default settings?
[19:41] <sherr> MTecknology: if you know the perms you want, you can use find/exec/chmod to change all file (f) perms, and dir (d) perms etc.
[19:42] <MTecknology> sherr: what should I use for files/dirs with chmod?
[19:51] <sherr> Something like : find . -type f -exec chmod 755 {} \;
[19:51] <sherr> man find (and test/take care)
[19:52] <MTecknology> 755/744 sound good enough?
[19:52] <sherr> oops - that example if for "d"
[19:52] <sherr> f -> 644
[19:52] <sherr> d -> 755 (maybe)
[19:52] <MTecknology> ok, thanks
[19:52] <sherr> Don;t know defaults
[19:53] <MTecknology> i don't either, 755/644 sounds great
[19:53] <MTecknology> alrighty - time to get cleaned up
[19:55] <guntbert> MTecknology: if you don't want anybody your files you might want to use rather 750 or 640 ..
[19:57] <MTecknology> guntbert: sherr: thanks
[20:00] <guntbert> MTecknology: you're good if you figured out my sentence ... :-)
[20:17] <MTecknology> guntbert: made perfect sense
[20:30] <ruben23> hi how do i remove startscript of an application on my ubunt-server
[20:34] <mealstrom> man update-rc.d
[20:34] <mealstrom> there is a remove section
[21:39] <ruben23> hi guys modprobe load an application right..? how about to remove..?
[21:40] <PcCowboy2005> Hi
[21:42] <guntbert> ruben23: it loads a module, you can unload it with sudo modprobe -r <modulename>
[21:42] <ruben23> FATAL: Module dahdi is in use.
[21:42] <ruben23> guntbert: thats the message
[21:43] <PcCowboy2005> hello. can you answer a most likey stupid/easy question for me?
[21:43] <guntbert> ruben23: of course - a module that is currently used cannot be unloaded - try to see what it is with lsmod | grep dahdi
[21:43] <guntbert> PcCowboy2005: not if we don't hear it :-)
[21:44] <PcCowboy2005> how would you set up a subdomain? (eg. forum.mysite.me goes to root/forum)
[21:44] <guntbert> PcCowboy2005: here I have to pass ... sorry
[21:45] <ruben23>  guntbert: its empty
[21:46] <guntbert> ruben23: please !pastebin the output of lsmod
[21:46] <guntbert> !pastebin | ruben23
[21:46] <PcCowboy2005> oh...ok lol maybe not so easy.  i know on a normal web host i just make a pointer.  but i'm thinking for running my own server from home and was wondering how to do it.
[21:47] <ruben23> http://pastebin.com/uqzkgWS7
[21:49] <guntbert> ruben23: strange - and you are certain that the modules name is dahdi ?
[21:51] <rohanroy> Hey all, I've setup a VPN on a remote server using PPTP and CHAP Authentication on an Ubuntu 8.04 Server. Here in California, I can connect to my VPN on my mac, and Windows XP machines. I'm trying to setup a virtual machine on my home server running Ubuntu 9.10 via VirtualBox, VM is running: Ubuntu 8.04 JeOS. I would like this virtual machine to have a persistent connection to the PPTP VPN. I've managed to set it up so it successfully joi
[21:51] <rohanroy> VPN, I can ping and traceroute properly to the VPN server and other clients on the remote LAN. However, I would like to have it so that ALL TRAFFIC is routed through the VPN tunnel. I'm following the information here: http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/routing.phtml#automatic-setup However, I'm having difficulty getting it to work. Is there anyone here who can provide any help?
[21:53] <ruben23>  guntbert: thanks i thnk i have unloaded the dahdi startup script.
[21:53] <guntbert> ruben23: you're welcome :-)
[22:00] <rohanroy> Anyone know anything about routing all trafic through a VPN tunnell?
[22:00] <rohanroy> Everything I've found online describes how to do it with a gui, but I have no gui...
[22:05] <darkpixel> Anyone know what's up with nz.archive.ubuntu.com?  I'm getting 'no route to host' on about 5 boxes I manage, and timeouts on another 4.  They are spread out across multiple hosting providers and small business connections (Comcast, Qwest, Sprint/Embarq, etc...) around Washington and Oregon state.
[22:05] <darkpixel> (This has been going on all day)
[23:27] <RoAkSoAx> kirkland`, ping
[23:44] <rohanroy> Hey all, I've setup a VPN on a remote server using PPTP and CHAP Authentication on an Ubuntu 8.04 Server. Here in California, I can connect to my VPN on my mac, and Windows XP machines. I'm trying to setup a virtual machine on my home server running Ubuntu 9.10 via VirtualBox, VM is running: Ubuntu 8.04 JeOS. I would like this virtual machine to have a persistent connection to the PPTP VPN. I've managed to set it up so it successfully joi
[23:44] <rohanroy> VPN, I can ping and traceroute properly to the VPN server and other clients on the remote LAN. However, I would like to have it so that ALL TRAFFIC is routed through the VPN tunnel. I'm following the information here: http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/routing.phtml#automatic-setup However, I'm having difficulty getting it to work. Is there anyone here who can provide any help?