[14:49] <Mark__T> I get an error building libindicator 0.3.6: http://pastebin.ca/1849251
[14:49] <Mark__T> what am I doing wrong?
[15:03] <kenvandine> humm
[15:03] <kenvandine> Mark__T, failed to generate indicator-object-enum-types.h.template
[15:03] <kenvandine> tedg, ^^
[15:04] <Mark__T> any idea why?
[15:04] <kenvandine> not me... 
[15:05] <tedg> Mark__T: Hmm, did it make a tmp-indicator-object-enum-types.h
[15:05] <Mark__T> yep
[15:06] <Mark__T> it's empty
[15:06] <tedg> Oh wait, it couldn't find the template.  Is there a template in the tarball?
[15:14] <kenvandine> oh duh.. EXTRA_DIST fail?
[15:16] <tedg> That's my guess.
[15:16] <tedg> We probably didn't notice building from bazaar.
[15:16] <tedg> I thought I'd distchecked it though :-/
[15:30] <qense> MacSlow: Did you have time to merge my $XDG_CACHE_HOME fix branch?
[15:31] <MacSlow> qense, yes
[15:31] <MacSlow> qense, check the changelog of notify-osd 0.9.27
[15:32] <MacSlow> qense, ehm... 0.9.26-0ubuntu1 actually
[15:33] <qense> MacSlow: but also in the trunk? I couldn't find the changes there.
[15:35] <MacSlow> qense, atm all dev is happening in the lucid branch... I'll move those changes over to trunk later
[15:35] <qense> MacSlow: ah, that explains
[15:35] <qense> ok! thank you
[15:36] <tedg> kenvandine: Hmm, passes distcheck
[15:37] <tedg> Mark__T: Hmm, it seems that we're dist'ing indicator-object-enum-types.h -- do you have that?  What's the timestamp on it?
[15:37] <tedg> I guess we should probably dist the template instead though.
[15:39] <kklimonda> tedg: can you take a look at bug 532858 when you have a moment?
[15:39] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 532858 in indicator-application (Ubuntu) "[Lucid] No icon for transmission in any icon theme except Humanity (affects: 3)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/532858
[15:41] <Mark__T> tedg: 18. Mar 16:46 indicator-object-enum-types.h
[15:42] <Mark__T> tedg: should I delete it and try again?
[15:44] <tedg> Mark__T: No, don't delete, try touch
[15:44] <Mark__T> ok
[15:45] <tedg> kklimonda: Looking
[15:46] <tedg> kklimonda: I'm going to propose for merging and comment there real, quick.  One minor issue.
[15:54] <Mark__T> tedg: touch doesn't help in any way
[15:54] <tedg> Mark__T: Touch harder!
[15:54] <tedg> ;)
[15:55] <Mark__T> :-P
[15:55] <tedg> Hmm, so can you copy the template from bazaar and see if that fixes it?  I'm curious why distcheck will pass, but I just want it to work now :)
[15:57] <Mark__T> what is s-enum-types-h
[15:57] <Mark__T> doesn't indicator-object-enum-types.h: s-enum-types-h
[15:57] <Mark__T>         @true
[15:57] <Mark__T> indicate that s-enum-types-s is always built?
[16:03] <tedg> Mark__T: Yeah, it's supposed to just be a timestamp
[16:10] <Mark__T> tedg: if I add *.[ch].template it passes that step, it fails with ndicator-object.c: In function 'indicator_object_new_from_file':
[16:10] <Mark__T> indicator-object.c:269: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
[16:10] <Mark__T> later though
[16:17] <Mark__T> tedg: if that doesn't hurt, I remove -Werror
[16:18] <tedg> Mark__T: Yeah, it shouldn't.... but I'm curious why you're getting it.
[16:19] <Mark__T> old libc
[16:19] <Mark__T> glibc 2.5 + gcc 4.1.2, maybe that's the problem
[16:20] <Mark__T> tedg: ^
[16:20] <tedg> Mark__T: Perhaps, just odd.  I'm not sure enough of the details on how gmodule works.
[16:22] <Mark__T> k
[17:11] <kklimonda> tedg: thanks for your comments - I've pushed branch with changes you have proposed.
[17:11] <kklimonda> updated the branch*
[17:12] <tedg> kklimonda: Cool, the diff is updating.
[17:14] <qense> tedg: Did you have time to take a look at my merge proposal for making AppInd menu items update as well when you change the toggle state of the actions of radio and checkbox items?
[17:15] <qense> bug #542221
[17:15] <tedg> qense: Yes, it looked okay to me, I forwarded it to bratsche to get his comments.  I think he's out to lunch right now though.
[17:15] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 542221 in indicator-application "The 'active' property of GtkToggleActions isn't updated (affects: 1)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/542221
[17:15] <qense> ok
[17:16] <qense> tedg: maybe someone should look if we should watch more gtkaction elements.
[17:17] <tedg> qense: That makes sense to me, but that's really not really I know anything about :-/
[17:17] <qense> I could take a look at it.
[17:17] <kklimonda> hmm.. when I use fallback and start playing the music in rhythmbox the stock icon is displayed and not the monochromatic one.. is this known or did I miss somrthing?
[17:18] <kklimonda> (it's with the lucid version of indicator-application so I didn't break anything with my patch ;) )
[19:54] <magcius> What does the DX team think of the latest gnome-shell developments?
[20:15] <kklimonda> latest?
[20:16] <kklimonda> do you have links to some good overwiew of the latest changes?
[20:32] <qense> kklimonda: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/log/ ? ;)
[20:33] <qense> kklimonda: GNOME Shell does have Twitter and Identi.ca accounts: http://identi.ca/gnomeshell
[20:33] <kklimonda> oh, great. thanks
[21:18] <vish> magcius: you could ask that on the ayatana mailing list..[DX is subscribed there and replies sometimes] you asked this a couple of weeks ago too.. i dont think you would get much response here 
[21:18] <magcius> vish: I didn't know there was a mailing list.
[21:18] <magcius> vish: I'd rather not subscribe though 
[21:24] <vish> magcius: not much chat goes on there recently ;)  
[21:58] <Mark__T> tedg ping
[22:17] <Nafai> jcastro: Hey, is there anything you suggest I do to help upstream along?  I haven't got feedback on any of the 3 patches I've passed upstream