[01:31] Could someone mark bug #543851 as wishlist, please? [01:31] Launchpad bug 543851 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-173 (Ubuntu) "New upstream 173.14.25 available (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543851 [02:28] micahg: got any new mails on bug squad ML? [02:28] nigelb: yours [02:29] micahg: phew :) I didnt get the confirmation mail. got worried it got lost === anzenketh_ is now known as anzenketh [05:45] apologies if this is not the place to ask this [05:45] but this bug https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/377598 is still affecting me in lucid [05:45] Launchpad bug 377598 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[i945gm] Video corruption when disabling internal monitor (affects: 5)" [High,Confirmed] [05:46] even though it's fix released for xf86-video-intel [05:46] hello, I wonder why mozilla-plugins-gnash isn't a dependences of gnash? [05:46] Damascene: because gnash can be used as a standalone application afair [05:48] so someone thinks that people installing gnash may not use it with firefox?!! [05:48] is there a bug about that or I might file one? [05:51] Damascene: people who want to use it with firefox should install firefox plugin [05:52] what if some one doens't think so? might he file a bug? [05:53] Damascene: and what is your reasoning? [05:54] mwhudson: There's two tasks in that bug: looks like the kernel portion isn't resolved yet. Are you sure you're still seeing issues in the X driver? [05:54] persia: i'm running a kernel newer than that linked in the freedesktop.org bug report [05:54] i thnk [05:54] I think 99% of people download flash player is for web [05:55] hm, maybe not [05:55] mwhudson: Ah, you reopened it (I've just gotten through the log). [05:56] i don't think i touched the status did i? [05:57] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/377598/+activity claims you did (about 6 weeks ago) or else I'm confused. [05:57] Launchpad bug 377598 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[i945gm] Video corruption when disabling internal monitor (affects: 5)" [High,Confirmed] [05:58] persia: oh yeah, so i did [05:58] i'm not sure i meant to though... [05:59] kklimonda, ? [06:00] mwhudson: I think the change was correct. Try catching someone in #ubuntu-kernel (early in your morning Tues-Sat is likely best), and see what information you can provide to help them investigate further. [06:00] persia: ok [06:00] persia: thanks [06:00] Damascene: you may fill the bug but I don't think it's something that should be fixed - there are two plugins and gnash is the name of the standalone application [06:01] * persia would support wontfixing that : the firefox plugins *should* be installed separately. [06:01] I believe there's even a helper tool installed by default that tries to install packaged plugins by preference (although this may be buggy) [06:02] if we install adobe flash player doesn't it comes with a plugin in firefox or people are using it for other perpse [06:02] *purpose [06:03] I think then we should file a bug against adobe flash player installing a plug in firefox by default. right? [06:03] I think that Adobe sticks everything in one package (standalone and plugin). I don't happen to think this is best practice. As the Adobe packages aren't controlled by us, we can't fix that bug. [06:03] Damascene: We can't : there's no bug tracker for the Adobe packages, but I agree it would be nice to do so. [06:06] if some one reported that to Adobe. they well think he is mad without doubt [06:09] Why? [06:09] Adobe certainly endorses the use of flash in contexts other than browsers. [06:10] do you know any one who do so? me. no [06:11] Actually, I do. [06:12] Lots of folks use flash for demos of various sorts. [06:12] I even use flash as the default interface for my smallest handheld. [06:12] but not the majority for sure [06:13] But is that because of this bug, or is this bug not important because of that? [06:16] why we don't file it against gnash and ask them to include it in their package as adobe do? [06:17] persia, it's a bug for me [06:17] I believe gnash has the correct behaviour and adobe doesn't. [06:17] I believe filing a bug against gnash would be precisely the wrong thing to do. [06:18] I heard "it's ubuntu's choice to package them separately" [06:20] you might install vlc without needing to use it with firefox but not a flash player for most user. any way I've had enough of that. maybe I'll file a bug or I might not. I'll think about it later [06:21] Damascene: but as there are valid use cases for having a standalone flash player and not plugin you would have to rename gnash -> gnash-player and mozilla-plugin-gnash -> gnash. and then what about konqueror plugin? [06:21] Damascene: I don't see any supporting evidence of that being an Ubuntu-specific choice. The lack of recommends or depends matches Debian. [06:24] maybe this attitude against gnash because it has many weaknesses and it is not used by many people. I agree on that [06:26] right, we believe that it's unsuitable for users and are making it hard to install both gnash and swfdec on purpose. That's why we use alternatives system so people can have all 3 plugins installed at the same time.. oh, wait.. [06:27] good you mentioned swfdec. I've installed the "swfdec-mozilla" but there was no change in firefox. is it a bug? [06:27] no idea [06:28] well, it's probably a bug if it doesn't work [06:28] thanks for letting me have this nice conversation [06:30] we are serving the community. trying to find what is the best. and I agree gnash doesn't look like a flash player for web browser right now [06:30] On the other hand, gnash is *way better* as an integrated component. Adobe doesn't expose their libraries well without special licensing. === nixternal_ is now known as Guest87737 [08:32] morning [09:17] hi everyone [09:19] is there a channel for ubuntu-server specific bugs, or this is the right place for it? [09:22] Akos: Well, there is the channel #ubuntu-server, even if it's not really specific to handling bugs. I guess this channel is a good general choice no matter, but with #ubuntu-server as a second choice in case the bugs involves som rather techinal server issues. kind of. [09:24] i dropped this question beacause i'd triage some bugs, just so i know where to bring the discussion (: [09:25] Akos: Well, feel free to begin here then :) [09:26] andol: thank you (: [09:31] Akos: Just to add another opinion: this is the correct channel for triaging bugs: #ubuntu-server for coordinating development and support. [09:32] okay, this makes more sence then. I shall stick around here. Too many channels confuse me (parting from #ubuntu-server ) === radoe_ is now known as radoe [11:00] does anyone speak czech here? === ogra_ is now known as ogra [12:17] can anyone reproduce the infinite loop in bug 540579? [12:35] hmm.. my computer has a light that comes on when my computer sees it's plugged in.. yet right now ubuntu shows my battery is discharging....?? [12:36] computer = laptop [13:26] pedro_: hi.. got a min? could you have a look at Bug #527569 ? I have evolution frozen atm , i'v tried to attach and got a backtrace [13:26] Launchpad bug 527569 in evolution (Ubuntu) "Evolution freezes often [evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in __kernel_vsyscall() ] (affects: 2)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/527569 [13:27] vish, yup, let me have a look , one sec [13:27] it already has a backtrace the first one i started evolution /in/ gdb === jonathan_ is now known as jjesse [13:29] the second one i used (gdb) attach , but when i tried the Ctrl+c it doesnt seem to work if the program was already running , so i just skipped the option and retrieved the bt [13:30] wasnt sure if that was the right way [to skip continue], hence checking :) [13:33] ugh [13:35] vish, could you get another one? the first one seems better but is missing a few symbols [13:35] again [13:36] vish, install the dbg packages for the libraries which are having a ?? as a symbol like: [13:36] ?? () from /usr/lib/evolution-data-server-1.2/camel-providers/libcamelpop3.so [13:36] hey pedro_ ! how are you ? [13:36] pedro_: evolution is frozen now , so i can use the attach , but would an install now help? [13:37] vish, nope, you need to run the program again if you installed the dbg packages after the execution of that program [13:37] pedro_: ok , will do that.. thanks [13:38] vish, you're welcome, just ping me if you need help with the backtrace [13:39] pedro_: the only problem is , if i try to do a (gdb) continue and then try Ctrl+c for an already frozen program , it doesnt end the program , is skipping the continue ok [if the program is already frozen]? [13:42] vish, if the process is hanged and you attach gdb to it, it should (the vast majority of the programs) show you the backtrace and there's no need to use continue/ctr+c method [13:43] vish, but since you can reproduce it easily, run it under gdb and wait for the issue to appear then attach that log [13:43] ok. neat , thanks.. [13:44] vish, also , are you getting any evolution-data-server crash/hang ? [13:44] vish, could you check using the same method and attach that output to the report as well? [13:45] pedro_: havent noticed the evo-data-sever causing problems , only the evolution is frozen [14:16] chrisccoulson: I had pinged you about 2 bugs last night, did you see them? [14:17] nigelb - yes, thanks [14:17] chrisccoulson: gpm upstream comments were a bit harsh :( [14:18] nigelb - yeah, they were fair though [14:18] chrisccoulson: ubuntu had agreed to use their convention, but we have deviated this time though [14:18] we have a habit of making changes like this without discussing them with anyone, and GNOME has been string-frozen for ages too [14:19] chrisccoulson: we'll be undoing? [14:19] i understand why hughsie is a bit annoyed with us [14:19] i think one of the changes was already undone [14:19] oh, great :) [14:19] i think people proposing these changes at a distro-level often don't appreciate the effort involved [14:20] especially at this stage of the cycle. every time we change a string, it has to be translated again in every language [14:20] I know, I was surprised that the change got uploaded (urm, you did I think) [14:23] any one using vlc on lucid? http://www.khayma.com/tajweed/taha/lameyatebnalqayem.mp3 causing white noise [14:30] chrisccoulson: I've been banging that drum at the installer level for years [14:30] so now I'm just really hard-arsed [14:31] cjwatson - yeah, it wouldn't have been so bad if the people proposing the changes did so a little bit earlier in the cycle [14:31] but they all landed on the day of UI freeze [14:31] freezes are like speed limits - they're a limit, not a target [14:32] and our UI freeze is already way past the GNOME string freeze [14:32] cjwatson: the gpm upstream pretty much blasted me :( [14:33] nigelb, don't take it personally [14:33] i think he's upset with us in general [14:33] chrisccoulson: I was in shock for like first few minutes ;) [14:33] then I realized, I represented Ubuntu there, so he's just taking it out at Ubuntu [14:46] pedro_: for > ?? () from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 which dbygsym should i install , i installed all these http://paste.ubuntu.com/399326/ , these were the ones i found having ?? in the last bt [14:47] btw , this is the bt now> http://paste.ubuntu.com/399325/ , it only has ?? for /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 [14:48] vish, you installed the -cli (C# binding) instead of the one for that symbol [14:48] vish: I think I figured out the solution to our troubles in the hook. Should get some time to fix those today :) [14:48] vish, the easier way to know which package to install is doing a : dpkg -S /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 [14:48] vish, then install the -dbgsym package for the package the command returns to you [14:48] pedro_: yeah , that[-cli] was the closest glib had , it didn have any other dbgsym [14:49] * vish looks again [14:49] rather is was -cil- [14:51] vish, if the -dbgsym is not available for you just install the -dbg one: libglib2.0-0-dbg [14:52] right , thanks [14:52] np [14:57] heh , evo is being quite the prankster :/ now that i have the -dbg installed it doesnt want to crash :s === aburch_ is now known as aburch [15:28] vish: got some time for testing ;) [15:30] vish: I think I have ironed out all the troubles. ping me if you got the time === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [15:47] nigelb: heading out now, will be back in a bit.. i'll ping you asap [15:47] vish: k === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [16:20] pedro_: how do we get the list of bugs for the hugday into the wiki? is there a tool? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:27] nigelb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/Organizing#Generate%20the%20bug%20list ? [16:27] yofel: thank you :) [17:01] bdmurray: is there a place I could see the source for the script that does the patch tagging and subscribing? [17:02] nigelb: No, not yet [17:03] bdmurray: seems to subscribe reviewers when release team is subscribed for FFE [17:03] nigelb: what's the exact team name? [17:04] bdmurray: ubuntu-release [17:04] nigelb: that's in there what is the bug number? [17:04] bug 221332 [17:04] nigelb: Bug 221332 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/221332 is private [17:04] * nigelb kicks ubot4` [17:07] nigelb: I'll have to do some digging to find out when ubuntu-release was subscribed vs when my script hit it. [17:07] bdmurray: ah. a small gap and the script hit it :) [17:08] nigelb: I'm not positive but if that is the case I think I'll increase the amount of time between script runs [17:08] since this has happened more than 1x [17:08] we've been fighting against an active script :) [17:09] never stays below 200 :D [17:12] hi! Just wondering if there's anything I can contribute to bug 543114 [17:12] Launchpad bug 543114 in gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) "gnome-screensaver-gl-helper crashed with SIGSEGV in _fini() (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543114 [17:13] or bug 94494 [17:13] Launchpad bug 94494 in debian (and 2 other projects) "[needs-packaging] Songbird (affects: 34) (dups: 3)" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/94494 [17:13] bdmurray: I need a merge of lp-gm-scripts some time this week to add a reviewers team icon, working on getting it done [17:14] nigelb: cool, that should be no problem [17:14] bdmurray: thank you :) [17:14] alex_mayorga: looking [17:15] nigelb: thanks! === celthunder is now known as Guest76549 [17:20] alex_mayorga: I made that bug private earlier, why did you make it public? [17:21] nigelb: why should it be private? [17:21] nigelb: out of ignorance I guess :( [17:21] alex_mayorga: it has a coredump.gz, which can contain confidential information [17:22] nigelb: oh! sorry then [17:22] alex_mayorga: apport retracer will remove it automatically and provide stack trace [17:22] and then make it public [17:22] nigelb: no, the retracer will not necessarily make it public [17:23] micahg: oh. Didn't know. [17:26] because the expanded backtrace *may* contain private data. A triager still has to go through it, and make the decision [17:27] ah. [17:29] what happens is the retracer does a 'bt full' -- the 'full' means dump variable contents [17:31] which might contain private information [17:38] skihero: Hey. Welcome to the bug coordination channel. [17:38] Lots of good links in the /topic here, and if you've any questions, just ask, and someone will likely be happy to answer. [17:38] persia`: thnx, really need to learn somethig [17:39] * bjwebb wonders if there is any more he can do about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xkeyboard-config/+bug/542237 [17:39] Launchpad bug 542237 in xkeyboard-config (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "UK Colemak Layout has bottom row offset (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] [17:40] so there's nothing else needed from this end on those? [17:42] alex_mayorga, those which? [17:42] ;-) [17:43] or, better stating, which 'those'? [17:43] bjwebb: Looks in a good state to me. Marking Triaged/Low [17:43] persia`: okay [17:43] persia`: i'd just really like to see it fixed in release, but i guess its unlikely [17:44] its annoying, it'll be a major pain for anyone that uses colemak in a uk, and it was literally patched in by someone who thought the right way was wrong :/ [17:45] bjwebb: Just needs a developer to push the change. [17:45] 543114 and 194494 [17:45] persia`: okay [17:45] bug 543114 [17:46] * hggdh kicks ubot4` [17:47] * BUGabundo_remote helps pushing it of the clif [17:47] alex_mayorga, for ug 543114 we need to wait for apport to do its magiv [17:47] magic [17:47] BUGabundo_remote: LOL [17:49] alex_mayorga, bug 194494 will start getting some attention now (pedro just set it assigned) [17:49] Launchpad bug 194494 in telepathy-butterfly (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 5 other projects) "telepathy-butterfly crashed with NotImplementedError in _on_error() (affects: 257) (dups: 32)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/194494 [17:49] BUGabundo_remote, thank you, it helped [17:49] thanks, just saw that on my mailbox [17:50] hggdh: it's a question of how hard you push them [17:51] BUGabundo_remote, I see. I need to get more, er, assertive ;-) [17:53] or violent [17:54] this bots only know one way [17:54] until someone passes laws forbiding it [17:54] enjoy kinking bots arse, instead humans === jonathan_ is now known as jjesse === radoe_ is now known as radoe === David-T_ is now known as David-T [21:09] Hey I have a question. So I've found duplicate bug reports. One has been recently filed by apport and has a status as "New", and the other was done by hand, but has already been triaged. Which one should I mark as the duplicate, since the former looks more complete, but apparently the latter was complete enough. [21:12] I'm talking about bug #345387 vs. #522102 [21:12] bug 345387 552102 [21:12] hggdh: Bug 345387 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/345387 is private [21:13] bug 522102 [21:13] Launchpad bug 522102 in compiz (Ubuntu) "Unable to set 4 horizontal desktops (affects: 2)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522102 [21:14] Not to mention the latter is in the wrong category. [21:14] cactaur, go ahead and set 522102 as a dup of 345287 [21:15] All right, thanks! [21:17] cactaur, and thank you for helping ;-) [21:24] Does anyone know how to downgrade a package in terminal? [21:28] who manage the package status page http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/qapkgstatus/ ? [21:28] Linux000, if you have the .deb, just sudo dpkg -i [21:29] hggdh: Thanks, I will try to find the deb's [21:29] jibel, what is the issue there? [21:30] (and, probably, #ubuntu-quality or #ubuntu-testing is a better place to ask) [21:31] It would be nice to add grub2 in lowlovel [21:31] jibel: ubuntu-qa-website [21:31] Linux000, also, with apt-get -- apt-get --reinstall install xpto =1.2.3.4-0ubuntu27 [21:31] micahg, thanks [21:31] jibel: project on LP :) [21:32] Yes, I'll file a bug, [21:32] of course, there is the micahg bot to answer ;-) [21:32] Hmm, will try that :) [21:32] * micahg goes hunting for factoids [21:32] Linux000, when in doubt... man apt-get ;-) [21:33] I tried, that couldn't find anything [21:34] Linux000, heh. In the SYNOPSIS... [21:34] Ahh [21:38] Linux000, no prob. This is an UNIX man page, after all, not expected to be easy to use ;-) [21:38] hmm , i'm having a weird problem ,the system slows down and everything is slow to react[random]. the mouse pointer has no lag though... earlier i used to SAK/logout of session and return to session and everything would be fine.. .. now , i seem to have a workaround of sorts.. when i switch to a guest session and return , everything is normal and works fine... anyone heard of such a bug? [21:39] no errors in logs or .xsession-errors either :s === yuriy_ is now known as yuriy [22:01] hello [22:01] can someone raise importance of bug 544434 (I guess uninstallable software is quite important) [22:01] Launchpad bug 544434 in ufraw (Ubuntu) "ufraw not installable due to dependency libexiv2-5 not installable (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/544434 === hggdh_ is now known as hggdh [22:38] I hope this channel is okay to ask my question: I don't know where to file a request for having a suitable theme in Chromium package by default [22:40] zerwas: I've filed one, it's not so simple [22:40] bug 543619 [22:40] Launchpad bug 543619 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Ship ambiance/radiance themes by default (affects: 2)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543619 [22:40] chromium doesn't have a system place to put themes [22:41] I see. That fact might make it quite difficult [23:06] * hggdh should know better than to try fglrx again :-( [23:08] hggdh: hey, wrote my next apport hook :) [23:10] nigelb, cool! There are now only about 9,637 packages to get a hook ;-) [23:10] (give or take a few thousands) [23:11] hggdh: one at a time [23:11] heh