| asac__ | does our default theme really have this annoying firefox dropdown bug? | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| asac__ | e.g. blue url on dark background? | 00:03 |
| ddecator | want me to test it? | 00:04 |
| asac__ | are you running lucid? | 00:04 |
| ddecator | yes | 00:04 |
| asac__ | sure you are running the default theme? | 00:04 |
| chrisccoulson | asac__ - yes, it does | 00:04 |
| chrisccoulson | (i'm running the default theme here) | 00:04 |
| asac__ | chrisccoulson: noone complained? | 00:04 |
| ddecator | not right now, but i can switch to it. but looks like i don't need to =p | 00:04 |
| asac__ | chrisccoulson: thats ueberannoying | 00:04 |
| ddecator | theres a lot of reports on it | 00:04 |
| chrisccoulson | asac__ - there's a bug about it somewhere i think | 00:04 |
| asac__ | chrisccoulson: well. ken filed one etc. | 00:05 |
| asac__ | but where are the folks bitching us all the time ;) | 00:05 |
| chrisccoulson | that might be the one i saw | 00:05 |
| asac__ | i cant even read that at all | 00:05 |
| ddecator | asac__: i believe you were assigned to the bug | 00:05 |
| asac__ | i know there was one bug ;) | 00:05 |
| ddecator | there are a lot of dupes | 00:05 |
| asac__ | but i didnt know our default theme is affected | 00:05 |
| asac__ | ;) | 00:05 |
| asac__ | simply because i was using human all the time | 00:05 |
| chrisccoulson | assuming our default theme is "ambiance", then that's affected | 00:06 |
| asac__ | sigh ;) | 00:07 |
| chrisccoulson | it had never bothered me before though | 00:08 |
| chrisccoulson | i can still read it ok ;) | 00:08 |
| ddecator | from the screenshots i saw, it would be annoying though =p | 00:09 |
| chrisccoulson | i might set gnome-terminal to use the same colours.... ;) | 00:09 |
| ddecator | for a program to know what media is inserted in a cd drive, does it have to communicate with nautilus? | 00:10 |
| chrisccoulson | no | 00:12 |
| ddecator | alright. i was just copying a cd and i noticed that songbird didn't even notice anything in the drive | 00:13 |
| Mook_sb | songbird doesn't do cd rip on linux yet, fwiw. it'd need to hook up with various bits of stuff to learn to do that. | 00:14 |
| ddecator | huh, i thought it did before...maybe not, maybe i'm thinking of my windows days, haha | 00:15 |
| ddecator | Mook_sb: that's something i'd be interested in helping make a reality =) | 00:15 |
| Mook_sb | if you're interested in trying that out, it might be a good thing to do, yeah. | 00:16 |
| ddecator | first i have to get this ready for merging into the ppa, then try and figure out the bug i'm having, but that'd be a high priority imo | 00:17 |
| asac__ | micahg: was prism finished? | 00:22 |
| asac__ | think it was just the stnadard lines in control and verification missing | 00:22 |
| ddecator | i can't get this to create a build-area... | 00:35 |
| micahg | asac__: I forgot :( | 00:36 |
| micahg | asac__: yes, enhances looks sane, so does depends | 00:37 |
| asac | recommends is the one that hsould have the apps now | 00:37 |
| micahg | recommends is empty | 00:38 |
| micahg | Recommends: ${xpi:Recommends} ? | 00:38 |
| asac | what is in Depends? | 00:38 |
| asac | imo Recommends should have firefox etc. | 00:38 |
| asac | or xulrunner? | 00:39 |
| asac | hmm | 00:39 |
| asac | whats in install.rdf? | 00:39 |
| micahg | firefox or firefox's id | 00:42 |
| micahg | mroe specifically | 00:42 |
| micahg | only for target application | 00:42 |
| micahg | .substvars is correct | 00:43 |
| asac | hmm. not expanded | 00:44 |
| asac | ? | 00:44 |
| asac | check the real .deb | 00:44 |
| asac | what it has | 00:44 |
| micahg | asac: is there a command to do that or just install? | 00:44 |
| asac | micahg: dpkg -x DEB /path/where/to/extract | 00:46 |
| micahg | no recommends, just depends | 00:46 |
| micahg | there's a note in devscripts the xpi:Depends is deprecated | 00:46 |
| micahg | I'm checking what happens when I get rid of it | 00:47 |
| micahg | recommends shows up when I get rid of xpi:Depends | 00:49 |
| asac | micahg: yes, no xpi:Depends | 00:50 |
| asac | just what is on the wiki | 00:50 |
| micahg | asac: you told me depends too :P | 00:50 |
| asac | Depends: ${misc:Depends} | 00:50 |
| asac | Recommends: ${xpi:Recommends} | 00:50 |
| asac | Provides: ${xpi:Provides} | 00:50 |
| asac | Enhances: ${xpi:Enhances} | 00:50 |
| asac | didnt i paste that? | 00:50 |
| micahg | ah... | 00:50 |
| asac | maybe add ${shlibs:Depends} | 00:50 |
| asac | to Depends: | 00:50 |
| asac | but no xpi:Depends ;) | 00:50 |
| micahg | asac: apparently I can't read too well... | 00:52 |
| asac | heh | 00:52 |
| asac | well, i think i said it wrong initially | 00:53 |
| asac | but i hoped i pasted the full lines from above ;) | 00:53 |
| micahg | no, I checked the scrollback | 00:53 |
| ddecator | i feel like i must be making a stupid mistake...every time i try to make a build-area for the latest songbird release, it goes fine until it looks for the 1.4.0 source instead of 1.8.0... | 00:53 |
| micahg | I have a reading problem :) | 00:53 |
| asac | good to feel less guilty ;) | 00:53 |
| * micahg wonders how many times a release can be rereleased | 00:53 | |
| asac | ddecator: thats the version you have in changelog | 00:53 |
| asac | it looks for the version there | 00:54 |
| ddecator | asac: ah, that's easy enough to fix. thanks =) | 00:54 |
| asac | hehe | 00:54 |
| asac | np | 00:54 |
| micahg | asac: looks good now | 00:54 |
| micahg | well | 00:54 |
| micahg | except it says it provides xul-ext-prism | 00:55 |
| asac__ | thats ok | 00:55 |
| micahg | k | 00:55 |
| asac__ | actually wanted ;) | 00:55 |
| asac__ | so folks that want xul-ext-prism can install that still ;) | 00:55 |
| micahg | asac__: so, retag on top again? | 00:55 |
| asac__ | yes | 00:55 |
| asac__ | release and tag | 00:55 |
| micahg | asac__: ok, pushed | 00:58 |
| asac | micahg: you didnt update the tag | 00:59 |
| micahg | asac__: I did | 01:00 |
| micahg | I get a conflicting tag notice | 01:00 |
| asac | i didnt get an updated | 01:00 |
| asac | micahg: you need to --delete the tag fiurst | 01:00 |
| micahg | asac: I did | 01:00 |
| asac | its not here ;) | 01:00 |
| * micahg goes over to #bzr | 01:01 | |
| asac | let me try again | 01:01 |
| asac | i will just move it now | 01:01 |
| micahg | asac__: do I have to push overwrite? | 01:02 |
| asac | ok tagged | 01:02 |
| asac | no clue | 01:02 |
| asac | ;) | 01:02 |
| asac | most likely | 01:02 |
| asac | just pull now | 01:02 |
| micahg | well, I can | 01:02 |
| asac | you can? | 01:02 |
| asac | i retagged ;) ... so better leave it there | 01:02 |
| asac | maybe push has an --include-tags? | 01:02 |
| micahg | yeah, I see your tag | 01:03 |
| micahg | no option for that | 01:03 |
| asac | ok i sponsored | 01:05 |
| micahg | asac; thank you | 01:06 |
| micahg | asac: fennec too? | 01:06 |
| asac | no that one is left i think | 01:06 |
| micahg | k | 01:06 |
| * asac produces orig with the tag in changelog and 1.0 | 01:08 | |
| asac | pushed | 01:14 |
| micahg | asac: thakns | 01:14 |
| micahg | *thanks | 01:14 |
| ddecator | there we go, now i can get to work =) | 01:14 |
| asac | micahg: so saw that read said we get an early .2? | 01:14 |
| micahg | asac: ? | 01:14 |
| asac | micahg: 1.9.2.2 and 3.6.2 are released today ;) | 01:15 |
| asac | reawd scrollback | 01:15 |
| asac | 00:52 < [reed]> Firefox 3.6.2 shipping later this evening | 01:15 |
| asac | 00:52 < [reed]> (1.9.2.2) | 01:15 |
| asac | 00:52 < [reed]> pushed up 8 days | 01:15 |
| asac | 00:53 < [reed]> asac__ / micahg / fta: ^ | 01:15 |
| asac | 00:53 < [reed]> you should prepare for release ASAP | 01:15 |
| asac | 00:53 < [reed]> 3.5.x and 3.0.x still on track for the 30th | 01:15 |
| micahg | asac: fun...I'll prepare them now | 01:15 |
| asac | heh | 01:15 |
| asac | no need to hurry | 01:15 |
| asac | just FYI | 01:15 |
| asac | chris can also do that | 01:15 |
| asac | focus on porting ;) | 01:15 |
| asac | and only do this for recreation ;) | 01:16 |
| micahg | asac: at least they're not in stable releases yet :) | 01:16 |
| asac | yeah | 01:16 |
| micahg | asac: so we leave your mini patch in tehre for bug 518422 | 01:17 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 518422 in firefox "Firefox does not start with certain addons installed" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/518422 | 01:17 |
| asac | micahg: please leave ffox open | 01:18 |
| ddecator | and no build-tree...should there be? or is that a ground control thing? | 01:18 |
| asac | i will figure that tomorrow and do the release if not | 01:18 |
| asac | ddecator: ? | 01:19 |
| ddecator | asac: in the build-area, there is only a debian folder and a source.tar.bz2 file. with the last release there was a build-tree file that had all of the songbird files in it to look at and view | 01:20 |
| micahg | ddecator: it's created when you run debuild | 01:20 |
| asac | not sure why debian folder ends up for you there | 01:21 |
| asac | probably something messy ;) | 01:21 |
| asac | trash the build-area | 01:21 |
| asac | start over ;) | 01:21 |
| ddecator | micahg: ah, that's why. thanks, =) | 01:21 |
| ddecator | asac: before i used that copy of the debian folder to test new changes and patches for building | 01:21 |
| micahg | ddecator: the source is bz2 to save space/time uploading | 01:21 |
| ddecator | micahg: ? | 01:22 |
| micahg | ddecator: most times the source is only compressed once | 01:23 |
| micahg | we have a tarball in the tarball :) | 01:23 |
| ddecator | micahg: i just used the command you gave me before to make the build-area and this is what was made =p | 01:24 |
| micahg | asac: I'll try to run the test list you gave me on galeon later so we can get that out of the way | 01:24 |
| asac | cool | 01:24 |
| * micahg will have to check with gnomefreak tomorrow | 01:25 | |
| micahg | he said he tested firegpg, but I know it's broke | 01:25 |
| asac | heh | 01:25 |
| asac | dont wait for him | 01:25 |
| micahg | asac: I won't | 01:26 |
| ddecator | there, that's more familiar... | 01:26 |
| micahg | asac: 5 more + gears on the insecure list... | 01:26 |
| micahg | oops and conkeror | 01:27 |
| ddecator | micahg: should i update the changelog with each commit or just update the log at the end? | 01:36 |
| micahg | ddecator: with each commit | 01:38 |
| ddecator | micahg: thanks =) | 01:38 |
| ddecator | micahg: how should i describe that patch you had me add for the bash/dash issue? | 01:39 |
| micahg | take a look at the changelog for thunderbird or xulrunner | 01:40 |
| ddecator | fair enough... | 01:40 |
| ddecator | micahg: and one more question. am i supposed to use "dch -i" for each change to the changelog (which would make it -0ubuntu6 or something after all the changes), or just use gedit and add them all under -0ubuntu1? | 01:42 |
| micahg | ddecator: dch for the first one, dch -e for the rest | 01:43 |
| ddecator | micahg: alright, thanks | 01:43 |
| ddecator | is all of the "-updated debian/rules" style things added manually? | 01:45 |
| ddecator | s/is/are | 01:45 |
| micahg | ddecator: no | 01:45 |
| ddecator | good deal | 01:45 |
| chrisccoulson | well, i think i've done enough work for the evening now | 01:49 |
| ddecator | i have a feeling that during the commit i'm supposed to list those changes under the found changelog entry... | 01:50 |
| micahg | ddecator: ? | 01:51 |
| ddecator | micahg: with each commit, the change i made shows up under "unkown" and is ignored. am i supposed to add them to the commit for each change? | 01:52 |
| micahg | ddecator: yes | 01:52 |
| ddecator | micahg: dang... | 01:52 |
| micahg | ddecator: nice feature of bzr is uncommit | 01:52 |
| ddecator | micahg: glad i caught that fairly early on =p | 01:53 |
| ddecator | alright, getting there. applied all of the changes, just need to re-pull the source with sqlite, then try to build it | 02:31 |
| ddecator | there we go, now it's building | 02:52 |
| ddecator | micahg: songbird built and installed, but i get the following error when i try to start it: (songbird-bin:2899): Gdk-WARNING **: gdk_window_set_icon_list: icons too large | 03:45 |
| micahg | that's a warning, not an error | 03:45 |
| micahg | we should see if one of the icons it's using is too big :) | 03:45 |
| ddecator | right, just no idea where to check that, haha. any ideas Mook ? | 03:46 |
| Mook | hehe. err, probably http://src.songbirdnest.com/source/xref/client/app/branding/songbird.xpm - which claims to be 512x512 in the header, if I understand it right | 03:48 |
| Mook | or maybe I'm on crack. in fact, probably. | 03:48 |
| ddecator | was that changed recently? the last build didn't have that problem | 03:48 |
| Mook | changed 06-Jan-2010, last version was 128x128. according to http://src.songbirdnest.com/source/history/client/app/branding/songbird.xpm anyway. | 03:50 |
| Mook | stevel: I blame you :D | 03:50 |
| ddecator | huh, but that would have been in the last build i used then... | 03:51 |
| ddecator | won't start in safe-mode either =\ | 03:52 |
| ddecator | and starting the profile manager segfaults -_- | 03:53 |
| Mook | what if you just rm'ed that file for now, to see if it does anything? | 03:54 |
| * Mook doesn't expect it to help, though | 03:54 | |
| ddecator | i'm not sure it would either. where can i see the upstream changelog? | 03:55 |
| micahg | ddecator: there was a GTK update today | 03:55 |
| Mook | ddecator: http://timeline.songbirdnest.com/client/ (or svn log, of course) | 03:56 |
| ddecator | Mook: thanks, i'll bookmark that | 03:57 |
| ddecator | micahg: you think that might be the cause? would that gtk issue cause it to not load at all? | 03:57 |
| Mook | bookmark the root; that has links to various useful things. | 03:57 |
| micahg | ddecator: no, not a big cahnge | 03:57 |
| ddecator | Mook: alright, thanks =) | 03:58 |
| micahg | ddecator: actually, yes, there we 2 updates | 03:58 |
| micahg | so it might have broke it | 03:58 |
| ddecator | micahg: alright, i'll take a look at that too | 03:58 |
| ddecator | wow, the devs have been busy... | 04:01 |
| Mook | yeah, it's our day job and all; sadly, that also means we don't always get to work on the things we want. (sometimes, though, that's also a good thing.) | 04:03 |
| ddecator | looks like most of it is getting everything ready for xulrunner 1.9.2 =) | 04:03 |
| ddecator | hm, i don't see anything in the upstream changelog that stands out | 04:15 |
| ddecator | micahg: which gtk package got updated twice? | 04:15 |
| micahg | ddecator: check bugs.gnome.org for the warning and see if anything comes up | 04:16 |
| micahg | ddecator: gtk itself | 04:16 |
| ddecator | i can't find the changelog for gtk...and the warning isn't on b.g.o or lp | 04:25 |
| ddecator | i'm stumped, i guess i'll see if any updates tomorrow fix it, otherwise i'll try the latest release | 04:30 |
| ddecator | micahg: i can still push it if you want to try it | 04:30 |
| micahg | ddecator: you should know that flash click bug by now :) | 05:09 |
| ddecator | micahg: haha, we get enough reports about it ;) | 05:09 |
| ddecator | aw, i was going to verify that he had flash installed from the repos first =( | 05:16 |
| micahg | ddecator: you can look at the plugin registry file | 05:18 |
| ddecator | oh... | 05:19 |
| ddecator | =) | 05:19 |
| micahg | ddecator: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41682957/profile_default_pluginreg.dat.txt | 05:19 |
| ddecator | and there it is... | 05:20 |
| micahg | ddecator: sorry, I actually added the comment before I noticed you commented | 05:37 |
| BUGabundo_remote | 0/ | 08:57 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac whats nm-applet Package? | 10:14 |
| BUGabundo_remote | I don't seem to have the applet when I have more then one session | 10:14 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/544926 | 10:20 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 544926 in network-manager-applet "An instance of nm-applet is already running. " [Undecided,New] | 10:20 |
| chrisccoulson | BUGabundo_remote, there's not really any need for a bug for that, that's a well known issue with how the user settings works | 10:28 |
| BUGabundo_remote | chrisccoulson: its news for me :\ | 10:28 |
| BUGabundo_remote | care to point me to where it is documented? | 10:28 |
| asac | network-manager-gnome | 10:29 |
| chrisccoulson | BUGabundo_remote, it's been like that pretty much forever. is this the first time you've used user switching? | 10:29 |
| chrisccoulson | see http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2010-March/msg00071.html for example | 10:29 |
| BUGabundo_remote | chrisccoulson: I send all my work day remotely connected | 10:35 |
| BUGabundo_remote | so, no, its not the 1st time | 10:35 |
| asac | BUGabundo_remote: use system connections if you do user switching | 10:35 |
| asac | e.g. "available to all users" | 10:35 |
| chrisccoulson | BUGabundo_remote, then you must have noticed this before. it's almost always been the case that only a single user can run nm-applet at any one time | 10:35 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac I'm not having any prob with the connection, since its already up since I ever left home. | 10:40 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac chrisccoulson its just that having the applet missing (and yes, I only notice now, and I would bet it was there last week) doesn't allow me to mess around network | 10:40 |
| BUGabundo_remote | not that it would be a good idea to do, if I'm remotelly connected :D | 10:40 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - AFAIK there is not any way around that currently, other than killing the existing nm-applet and starting a new one in your new session | 10:42 |
| chrisccoulson | but...... | 10:42 |
| chrisccoulson | if you're using a user connection rather than a system one, you will lose the connection after killing the first nm-applet | 10:43 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - sorry, that was meant to be directed at BUGabundo_remote ;) | 10:43 |
| asac | ah ok | 10:43 |
| BUGabundo_remote | :) | 10:44 |
| chrisccoulson | heh, i should read what i write before hitting enter ;) | 10:44 |
| BUGabundo_remote | chrisccoulson: you can do that? please teach me how | 10:46 |
| chrisccoulson | BUGabundo_remote, which bit? | 10:47 |
| BUGabundo_remote | (2010-03-23 10:44:14) chrisccoulson: heh, i should read what i write before hitting enter ;) | 10:52 |
| asac | !info swt-gtk | 12:45 |
| ubottu | Package swt-gtk does not exist in karmic | 12:45 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - shouldn't libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.5-jni have a binary depends on xulrunner? | 13:22 |
| asac | probably | 13:22 |
| asac | if it uses the glue to start it up, then yes. | 13:22 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - it seems to | 13:23 |
| chrisccoulson | so, i will add a binary depend then | 13:23 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - swt-gtk is ready (bug 545099) | 13:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 545099 in swt-gtk "Rebuild against xulrunner 1.9.2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/545099 | 13:54 |
| chrisccoulson | i tried uploading it, but i'm not privileged enough ;) | 13:54 |
| asac | ok let me look | 14:10 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks | 14:10 |
| asac | uploaded | 14:12 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - thanks :) | 14:13 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - mozvoikko is done also: bug 545152 | 15:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 545152 in mozvoikko "Port to xulrunner 1.9.2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/545152 | 15:04 |
| chrisccoulson | i can't upload that either ;) | 15:04 |
| asac | yeah checking | 15:08 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: libxul-unstable is dead? | 15:08 |
| asac | maybe we should add a compatibliity .pc ... to ease porting | 15:08 |
| asac | would think more than one is using that | 15:09 |
| micahg | asac: yep, a lot of it is stripping libxul-unstable and libxul-embedding-unstable | 15:09 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - yeah, i think a lot of that work has been done already though | 15:09 |
| micahg | asac: that's the easy part :) | 15:10 |
| asac | micahg: we should add that to xulrunner-dev | 15:10 |
| asac | e.g. just links from libxul.pc to libxul-unstable.pc and libxul-embedding to libxul-embedding-unstable | 15:10 |
| asac | but well. not sure how many are left now | 15:11 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: i think mozvoikko should be moved to mozilla-devscripts evnetually | 15:11 |
| asac_ | chrisccoulson: the depends is wrong still | 15:12 |
| asac_ | its firefox-3.6 | 15:12 |
| asac_ | should be firefox | 15:12 |
| asac_ | and firefox-3.5 dropped | 15:12 |
| asac_ | probably firefox (>= 3.0) | 15:12 |
| chrisccoulson | oh, i'll fix that then | 15:12 |
| asac_ | i can add that. please remember to move that to mozilla-devscript next cycle | 15:12 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, no problem | 15:12 |
| micahg | asac: mozvoikko actually has a maintainer in debian | 15:12 |
| chrisccoulson | brb, need to reboot | 15:13 |
| micahg | asac: BTW, I"m test building xul192.2 now | 15:13 |
| micahg | asac: you want the .pc links? | 15:13 |
| asac | micahg: for the upload today? yeah, if that doesnt take much time add it | 15:14 |
| micahg | I was going to say I don't think it's a good idea, but until debian gets to xul192 it'll decrease our diffs | 15:15 |
| asac | micahg: i think its a good idea. upstream should have kept it and depreacated | 15:15 |
| asac | rather than dropping | 15:15 |
| asac | upstreams often want to build for 3.5 and 3.6 etc. | 15:15 |
| * micahg wonders if it was deprecated in 3.5... | 15:15 | |
| asac | without that link its painful | 15:15 |
| asac | if it was, then its ok for them to drop | 15:16 |
| micahg | the problem is a lot of upstreams are still using the 1.8 API | 15:16 |
| asac | yeah | 15:16 |
| asac | that reminds me that i whould send stuff to enigmail | 15:16 |
| asac | my patch moving it to frozen api | 15:16 |
| micahg | asac: BTW...had some success and some failure with galeon | 15:17 |
| micahg | asac: it was still using xul191 somehow | 15:17 |
| asac | what succeeded? were the failures regressions over 192 | 15:17 |
| asac | hmm | 15:17 |
| asac | micahg: thats the glue code you have to change | 15:17 |
| asac | minVerseion 1.9 | 15:18 |
| asac | err | 15:18 |
| asac | 1.9.2 | 15:18 |
| micahg | after I purged that from my system, it worked great | 15:18 |
| asac | micahg: yeah. thats the minversion in the glue code | 15:18 |
| asac | it picks up whatever it finds first in /etc/gre.de | 15:18 |
| asac | if its within the min/max version bounds specified in the GREVersionRange thing | 15:18 |
| micahg | ah, ok, seems I forgot a patch then...I think I found it | 15:18 |
| asac | grep for that string if you dont know how to find that | 15:18 |
| asac | yep | 15:18 |
| asac | nice | 15:18 |
| micahg | also was testing tuxguitar last night and noticed it was also looking for xul191, the fix ready for that though | 15:20 |
| micahg | asac: should I bother renaming xul191 patches to xul192? | 15:20 |
| micahg | asac: also, if flash doesn't look as sharp, do I need to worry? | 15:24 |
| asac | micahg: renaming? | 15:24 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: whats your ubuntu address? | 15:25 |
| micahg | asac: yes, a lot of the patches are named xul191 patch, I've been renaming, but I want to know if I should bother | 15:25 |
| asac | micahg: well. rename them to 19x ;) | 15:25 |
| asac | so we dont do that next time again ;) | 15:25 |
| asac | but i wouldnt really bother | 15:25 |
| micahg | asac: ok, I'll just modify then | 15:25 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - chrisccoulson@ubuntu.com | 15:26 |
| asac_ | thx | 15:27 |
| asac_ | sent | 15:27 |
| micahg | the good news with galeon is that flash seems to work fine, I was able to watch videos with it on multiple sites, just the quality seemed a little lower than firefox | 15:32 |
| micahg | asac: edbrowse uses libcurl4-openssl-dev, but is ships a libcurl.pc file and dpkg-checkbuilddeps fails to find it, any ideas? | 15:45 |
| micahg | asac: is this note ok in the .links file: Only needed for transition from unstable API or until Debian migrates to xulrunner 1.9.2 | 15:49 |
| asac | micahg: how sure what you mean by libcurl | 15:50 |
| asac | for the .links its ok | 15:51 |
| asac | but dont mention debian | 15:51 |
| asac | we ship it until its old enough for upstreams to catch up | 15:51 |
| micahg | asac: k | 15:51 |
| micahg | asac: about libcurl, it fails to find it, but I have it installed with the proper version | 15:51 |
| micahg | oh, I see the problem :( | 15:51 |
| micahg | my fault | 15:51 |
| micahg | asac: wait, you said I shouldn't migrate packages to pkg-config, but rather just add the string from it? | 15:53 |
| asac | micahg: as you wish | 16:05 |
| micahg | asac: k | 16:05 |
| micahg | asac: is it add symlinks from or add symlinks to *-unstable? | 16:09 |
| * micahg needs more caffeine | 16:10 | |
| micahg | fta: sorry about the dailies will try to clean up a little tonight | 16:11 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| AnAnt | asac: Hello, I need to modify xulrunner-1.9.2 to provide libmozjs packages, would that be a complex thing to do ? | 18:20 |
| asac | thats a doomed way | 18:20 |
| asac | we wont do it for now | 18:20 |
| micahg | asac: anything else before I tag xul192.2? | 18:22 |
| AnAnt | asac: doomed way means ? | 18:22 |
| mahfouz | that you go to hell | 18:24 |
| AnAnt | asac: btw, I am not asking Ubuntu to do it, you told me before your concerns about xulrunner and its API/ABI issue | 18:25 |
| AnAnt | asac: I just ask how hard is it to modify xulrunner-1.9.2 package in order to provide it | 18:25 |
| asac | AnAnt: cant you work around with LD_LIBRARY_PATH etc.? | 18:27 |
| asac | otherwise its probably a diff to sonamify the libmozjs | 18:27 |
| AnAnt | asac: can you elaborate about that workaround please ? | 18:28 |
| asac | AnAnt: why do you need a libmozjs? | 18:47 |
| AnAnt | asac: a package is using it | 18:47 |
| fta | asac, micahg: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=36102 | 18:47 |
| AnAnt | asac: elinks has support for javascript, and that needs libmozjs. The current Debian/Ubuntu package doesn't enable it, but I want to enable it for myself | 18:48 |
| fta | asac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=31287 | 18:49 |
| AnAnt | brb | 18:50 |
| fta | micahg, why do you want to split prism? does the ext work without the core? | 18:51 |
| fta | jdstrand, type=1503 audit(1269334904.401:21): operation="open" pid=6159 parent=31639 profile="/usr/sbin/tcpdump" requested_mask="r::" denied_mask="r::" fsuid=0 ouid=0 name="/dev/bus/usb/" | 18:53 |
| jdstrand | I think there is a bug on that... | 18:53 |
| jdstrand | 523345 | 18:54 |
| jdstrand | fta: are you using usbmon? | 18:54 |
| jdstrand | fta: or even better, with what args did you start tcpdump? | 18:56 |
| fta | jdstrand, usbmon? no. tcpdump host foo.bar.baz | 18:56 |
| jdstrand | fta: ok, thanks | 18:57 |
| micahg | fta: no, just a separate package name for the extension so that it follows the extension naming convention | 19:03 |
| micahg | it would depends on prism | 19:03 |
| micahg | fta: I don't know if it's necessary | 19:03 |
| fta | i don't think it's useful, but it's your choice ;) | 19:04 |
| micahg | fta: I'll talk to bdrung about it to see if it's necessar | 19:04 |
| micahg | fta: about the TB bug, for some reason it seems that xdg-open was not the way they wanted to do things | 19:05 |
| micahg | fta: nm, that was xdg-email | 19:06 |
| micahg | asac: anything else before I tag xul192.2? | 19:29 |
| bdrung_ | micahg: i am here now | 20:11 |
| micahg | bdrung_: do we need to do bug 544645 | 20:20 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 544645 in prism "Split Prism Extension into its own package" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/544645 | 20:20 |
| bdrung_ | micahg: can you classify prism as "extension"? | 20:22 |
| micahg | bdrung_: idk...it's the extension and the core prism...it provides xul-ext-prism right now | 20:22 |
| bdrung_ | micahg: can you use the core as stand alone? | 20:25 |
| micahg | bdrung_: idk, fta: do you need the prism extension to use the webapps provided as packages? | 20:26 |
| fta | micahg, not sure but at some point, it was necessary. try to drop it manually and see by yourself :) | 20:27 |
| bdrung_ | i wouldn't make sense to split a package into two package that must be installed both in all cases | 20:28 |
| micahg | fta: bdrung_: appears that it's not needed | 20:32 |
| bdrung_ | micahg: then i vote for an extra package | 20:32 |
| micahg | bdrung_: ok, then I'll leave the bug open for next cycle :) | 20:33 |
| bdrung_ | :) | 20:34 |
| micahg | asac: anything else before I tag xul192.2? | 21:24 |
| BUGabundo | bRoas | 22:17 |
| micahg | asac: anything else before I tag xul192.2? | 23:21 |
| asac | micahg: not sure | 23:21 |
| asac | micahg: fennec doesnt start anymore | 23:21 |
| asac | micahg: e.g. second run | 23:21 |
| asac | might be same extension issue as with firefox | 23:21 |
| asac | we should use that to try the patches | 23:21 |
| micahg | asacprobably | 23:22 |
| micahg | asac: wfm | 23:22 |
| asac | hmm. now it works again | 23:22 |
| asac | yeah | 23:22 |
| asac | odd | 23:22 |
| asac | probably forgot on which desktop it was ;) | 23:22 |
| micahg | asac: I didn't request blocking yet on teh upstream bug as your patch seems to work...wasn't sure what you wanted me to do | 23:23 |
| asac | micahg: i am confused. didnt you say it didnt help? | 23:23 |
| micahg | asac: on karmic, but on lucid it's fine | 23:24 |
| micahg | idk why | 23:24 |
| asac | interesting | 23:26 |
| asac | ok | 23:26 |
| asac | well. i dont see what else xul 1.9.2 needs for now. | 23:26 |
| micahg | asac: ok, should I tag then? | 23:28 |
| micahg | and then you can push? | 23:29 |
| micahg | builders are pretty empty | 23:30 |
| micahg | asac: tagged and pushed to bzr | 23:36 |
| asac | let me look | 23:38 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: hey ;) ... sorry to bother you with so many things. but we should try to get latest nss in ... not sure about nspr | 23:39 |
| asac | just saw that xulrunner would rever to in-source nss ... which would be a mess | 23:39 |
| micahg | asac: I warned you about that last night :) | 23:39 |
| asac | i know | 23:39 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - ok, i will make some time to look at that tomorrow | 23:39 |
| chrisccoulson | it's getting a bit late to start new tasks this evening ;) | 23:40 |
| micahg | asac: do you want me to untag before the 5 minutes expires? | 23:40 |
| asac | chrisccoulson:... its never too late :-P ... lol. no sure. tomorrow would be great. | 23:42 |
| micahg | asac: does that mean I should try to tag firefox tonight? | 23:42 |
| asac | micahg: untag? | 23:42 |
| micahg | asac: xul192? | 23:42 |
| asac | not sure | 23:43 |
| asac | if you think it helps go for it | 23:43 |
| asac | i have no strong opinion ;) | 23:43 |
| micahg | asac: on untagging? | 23:43 |
| asac | except that i pulled it already | 23:43 |
| micahg | or on tagging FF? | 23:43 |
| micahg | ah, well the only reason it would help is if I need to add something else before release | 23:43 |
| asac | both. i assume FF is also affected? | 23:43 |
| micahg | asac: yes | 23:43 |
| asac | micahg: go ahead and tag FF | 23:43 |
| asac | we will release it when nss is in | 23:44 |
| micahg | asac: with your patch, it'll close that bug in LP | 23:44 |
| asac | yeah do that | 23:44 |
| micahg | asac: k | 23:44 |
| micahg | asac: will do later tonight | 23:44 |
| asac | thanks | 23:44 |
| micahg | first, I'm going to try to fix a few dailies before the bot spins | 23:45 |
| micahg | asac: also what to do about firefox-stable...NSS won't be in the other releases | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!