[01:43] slangasek: around? I need to get seabios and vgabios re-promoted to main [01:43] slangasek: i did the MIRs earlier this cycle got them approved [01:43] slangasek: but they fell out of main for a bit when qemu-kvm stopped depending on them [01:44] slangasek: bug qemu-kvm now depends on them again... [01:44] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vgabios/+bug/181876 [01:44] Ubuntu bug 181876 in vgabios "[MIR] vgabios" [High,Fix released] [01:44] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seabios/+bug/508870 [01:44] Ubuntu bug 508870 in seabios "[MIR] seabios" [High,Fix released] [03:16] kirkland: the packages still don't show up in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt - what version of qemu-kvm depends on them? [03:17] (I'm not going to promote them until they have a revdep in main, that just runs the risk of another archive admin kicking them right back out again) [03:47] slangasek: livecd-rootfs_1.108 - how much documentation do you need for that - it's the upload to match the change that I made live to terranova earlier today... [03:47] (please to be blessing, once the source shows up - uploaded about 3 min ago) [03:47] or less [03:48] or do you want a bug filed for it for posterity? [03:52] anyway, bed for me. I'll read scrollback in the morning [05:31] lamont: er, you know we're not in archive freeze, right? If you uploaded it, it goes straight in [10:09] cjwatson, mvo: did you guys ever figure out a way to make libparted0/libparted1.8-12 happy? (Still held back here for me) [10:12] slangasek: I did not inverstigate further, did I ask you for your /var/lib/dpkg/status file already? [10:12] slangasek: I will add a hint to u-m as a stop-gap, until a proper fix is there [10:17] mvo: I wasn't the one reporting it originally, I think it was pitti [10:17] slangasek: ok, could you mail me the status file please? just so that I can easily reproduce it? [10:19] mvo: sent [10:19] slangasek: I didn't - is there any way you can test adding libparted0 Conflicts:/Replaces: libparted1.8-12, libparted-2.1-0? [10:19] can do that in the morning [10:23] thanks slangasek [10:24] cjwatson: fwiw, my first instinct there would've been to name the package 'libparted0deb' :) [10:26] mm, I really hate that sort of thing though ... [10:26] (and it'll be hard to do that now, I've already started the 2.2 transition in unstable) [10:26] * slangasek nods [10:30] slangasek: oh. doh. [15:00] BSD with advertising clause means multiverse? [15:02] hmm, not in non-free in Debian [15:02] BSD with advertising clause is free, just GPL-incompatible [15:04] and really annoying. [15:14] slangasek: cjwatson got them for me === robbiew is now known as robbiew_