[01:43] <kirkland> slangasek: around?  I need to get seabios and vgabios re-promoted to main
[01:43] <kirkland> slangasek: i did the MIRs earlier this cycle got them approved
[01:43] <kirkland> slangasek: but they fell out of main for a bit when qemu-kvm stopped depending on them
[01:44] <kirkland> slangasek: bug qemu-kvm now depends on them again...
[01:44] <kirkland> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vgabios/+bug/181876
[01:44] <kirkland> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seabios/+bug/508870
[03:16] <slangasek> kirkland: the packages still don't show up in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.txt - what version of qemu-kvm depends on them?
[03:17] <slangasek> (I'm not going to promote them until they have a revdep in main, that just runs the risk of another archive admin kicking them right back out again)
[03:47] <lamont> slangasek: livecd-rootfs_1.108 - how much documentation do you need for that - it's the upload to match the change that I made live to terranova earlier today...
[03:47] <lamont> (please to be blessing, once the source shows up - uploaded about 3 min ago)
[03:47] <lamont> or less
[03:48] <lamont> or do you want a bug filed for it for posterity?
[03:52] <lamont> anyway, bed for me.  I'll read scrollback in the morning
[05:31] <slangasek> lamont: er, you know we're not in archive freeze, right?  If you uploaded it, it goes straight in
[10:09] <slangasek> cjwatson, mvo: did you guys ever figure out a way to make libparted0/libparted1.8-12 happy?  (Still held back here for me)
[10:12] <mvo> slangasek: I did not inverstigate further, did I ask you for your /var/lib/dpkg/status file already?
[10:12] <mvo> slangasek: I will add a hint to u-m as a stop-gap, until a proper fix is there
[10:17] <slangasek> mvo: I wasn't the one reporting it originally, I think it was pitti
[10:17] <mvo> slangasek: ok, could you mail me the status file please? just so that I can easily reproduce it?
[10:19] <slangasek> mvo: sent
[10:19] <cjwatson> slangasek: I didn't - is there any way you can test adding libparted0 Conflicts:/Replaces: libparted1.8-12, libparted-2.1-0?
[10:19] <slangasek> can do that in the morning
[10:23] <mvo> thanks slangasek
[10:24] <slangasek> cjwatson: fwiw, my first instinct there would've been to name the package 'libparted0deb' :)
[10:26] <cjwatson> mm, I really hate that sort of thing though ...
[10:26] <cjwatson> (and it'll be hard to do that now, I've already started the 2.2 transition in unstable)
[10:26]  * slangasek nods
[10:30] <lamont> slangasek: oh. doh.
[15:00] <Riddell> BSD with advertising clause means multiverse?
[15:02] <Riddell> hmm, not in non-free in Debian
[15:02] <cjwatson> BSD with advertising clause is free, just GPL-incompatible
[15:04] <ScottK> and really annoying.
[15:14] <kirkland> slangasek: cjwatson got them for me