[00:16] yofel: thanks for correcting === jussi01 is now known as Guest4656 [01:04] oh, good, we're now logged :) [01:51] Yep. "Logs will start to show up not more than one hour after someone speaks in the channel": http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/03/25/%23ubuntu-reviews.html === Guest4656 is now known as jussi01 [08:19] good morning [08:19] hi dholbach [08:20] hi Akos [08:46] morning [08:47] dholbach: reading the wiki page nigelb was working on yesterday the only requirenment to join atm is being part of bug control? [08:47] yofel: persia can maybe answer that [08:48] ok, thx [08:49] I'm not any better qualified to answer than anyone else. I'd rather say that not being a member of bug control indicates one cannot join the team, but I don't know of positive requirements. [08:50] any team meeting planned yet to discuss this? [08:50] Ask nigelb or nhandler [08:50] or bdmurray [08:51] Yeah. [08:52] My personal sense is that the team is not that formal yet, so mostly anyone who wants to join can join, assuming that other folks think they have the qualifications. [08:52] Most of the new members I've seen have come because some member ha s asked an admin "Hey, can you add to the team?" [08:54] mind if I apply then? I'm interested. [08:56] I don't have any objections, but I'm not even a very active member of the team (I've maybe reviewed 30 patches in the past few weeks). === etali1 is now known as etali [11:55] I'm going through the process of creating a knowledge base for the reviewers team. let me know if there is something specific that needs to be there [12:11] nhandler: around to bounce some ideas off? [12:23] I fail at writing wikis [12:44] nigelb: Sort of (if it is really fast). If not, send me an email and I'll reply later today [12:45] nhandler: carry on then. I'll just keep writing and you can review later :) [12:45] :) [12:46] hey, I asked in the morning already? what are the requirenments to joing atm? anything else from the wiki page? I would be interested [12:46] s/already?/already/ [12:46] yofel: you can apply and ask d_holbach to approve [12:46] today's my typo day, meh... [12:56] * nhandler believes in the idea that joining the team on LP is more of a formality (in most cases) and that you should already "be" a member of the team through actions before joining [12:58] that's true too [12:59] anyway, should bug 546220 be synced from debian with an FFE, or should the lucid package be patched? [12:59] Malone bug 546220 in nginx "Include GeoIP support in nginx" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/546220 [13:00] not synced but merged [13:00] yofel, thanks for reminding me :) [13:01] * ibuclaw has his own report to request an FFE for [13:02] yofel: we have far too less devs here, ask in -motu? [13:05] will do [13:10] does lucid still allow login as root via gdm? [13:53] dholbach: ping [13:54] nigelb: pong [13:55] what would be the process for new member to join reviewers? [13:55] writing new wiki pages [14:00] dholbach: ^ (I've currently put as ping you here) [14:00] I have no idea [14:00] no n [14:00] maybe we should talk to bdmurray and other ubuntu qa people [14:00] ah [14:00] who have experience with the bug control thing [14:00] and judge membership [14:00] I dunno if we should make it open and free for all [14:01] requirements are currently members of bug control [14:01] but my question is, how should they apply and get accepted [14:01] pinging you would be fine? [14:02] no [14:02] they can just apply in LP [14:02] and any of the team admins can accept [14:02] aha, okay :) [14:02] I'm busy enough as it is right now and wouldn't want to be a blocker :) [14:03] hehe [14:21] dholbach: thoughts on having a "Patch Day" where we get all the reviewers together to work on bugs with patches attached? thinking of having something after lucid release when a large part of MOTU would be free for some time. [14:22] definitely [14:22] maybe part of Ubuntu Open Week [14:22] to have a session there to explain everything [14:22] and then do a patch day afterwards [14:22] +1 for that [14:23] I was thinking of doing a standalone session this week some time [14:23] s/week/month [14:41] sure [14:42] might be worth talking to http://launchpad.net/~packaging-training-coordinators [14:42] sure, I'll talk to nhandler :) [14:43] before that, are you okay with the workflow now? [14:46] I think we can improve it incrementally, my gut feeling is that we have too many tags [14:46] and that those tags don't equate to tasks that we can ask people to perform [14:46] got time? [14:46] no, unfortunately not [14:46] I can get you the use case for them [14:46] I think we can roll with it now [14:46] and revisit after lucid [14:46] we'll roll and improvise later? [14:47] that gives us some experience with how it works now [14:47] I'm getting this in shape now https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam [14:47] I'm sorry, but I'm maxed out right now [14:47] thanks a bunch for looking into this [14:47] I'll work on a class later this month and patch day after lucid release [14:47] no problem. Happy to help :) [14:47] awesome! [15:07] quick question, does lucid still allow login as root via gdm? [15:08] no clue. :( [15:08] I'm not near a machine atm [15:08] well... a lucid machine [15:08] nigelb, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/484317 [15:08] Malone bug 484317 in gdm "GDM allows root logins" [Medium,Triaged] [15:08] I'm still running karmic, so I can't test either [15:08] a bug I raised a while back w/ patch attached [15:09] hold on, lemme ask someone who might know [15:10] I've just updated the tags (some were irrelevant) === nigelb changed the topic of #ubuntu-reviews to: Topic for #ubuntu-reviews is: Welcome to the Ubuntu Reviews IRC Channel || https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam || Subscribed Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs || All Bugs: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.has_patch=on || 6697 down, 1812 to go [15:53] good news folks, the number of patches down has gone up from 6636 to 6697 :) === nigelb changed the topic of #ubuntu-reviews to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Reviews IRC Channel || https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam || Subscribed Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs || All Bugs: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.has_patch=on || 14321 down, 1812 to go [16:41] sorry, about the /topic spam, made a mistake earlier, corrected now :) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [18:28] * iulian suggests to /mode -t #ubuntu-reviews [18:28] So people who do not have access can still change the topic. [21:10] iulian: Any ubuntu member can change the topic: /msg chanserv help topic [23:50] iulian: all ubuntu members can change the topic :) [23:50] persia: byrce did some editing on the wiki to have https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/GettingInvolved [23:51] a bit of copy editing and now it looks pretty good :) [23:51] I saw that earlier. It's much nicer now. [23:51] Although the "repeat step 3" doesn't make sense anymore :) [23:52] ah, lemme see what it was supposed to do :) [23:56] so, everyone is +1 for a patch day (bryce and bdmurray), and we might actually have it :) [23:56] I need to work on finishing the wiki pages by then [23:56] anything more you'd like me to add? [23:57] persia: which is the page that gives information about making simple patches?