[00:03] <gnomefreak> yay found all the unsent emails :)
[00:03] <gnomefreak> sending them now
[00:04] <gnomefreak> now i hope he knows what that means
[00:07] <gnomefreak> bug 518422
[00:12]  * gnomefreak seeing alot of bugs that has a good chance of failing into that bug
[00:12] <micahg> gnomefreak: yes
[00:13] <gnomefreak> prism at least the ones ive seen have prism in extensions so ive been "remove/disable prism and try again, likely a dupe of bug #*
[00:14] <micahg> gnomefreak: nah, prism just happens to be a common symptom, not the problem
[00:15] <gnomefreak> micahg: disabling it fixes for alot of them (cant say all)
[00:15] <micahg> gnomefreak: yes, because it's probably the only symlinked extension
[00:15] <gnomefreak> prism hasnt been enabled herre since it didnt support the 3.6 version
[00:15] <gnomefreak> oh
[00:30] <gnomefreak> micahg: what are the chances that "global indexing" being disabled is causing mozilla554051?
[00:30] <gnomefreak> mozilla 554051?
[00:31] <micahg> gnomefreak: pretty low I would think
[00:32] <gnomefreak> yeah i thought so but cant remember if it started when i disabled it. still dont know what he is getting at
[00:42] <micahg> so, it's working?
[00:44] <asac> chrisccoulson: can you file a bug or so about the evolution warning? with a screenshot and explain why you see that?
[00:44] <asac> chrisccoulson: i think i want to run this through nss folks
[00:44] <asac> thanks. i will do that tomorrow, so we hopefully get an answer by tomorrow evening
[00:45] <chrisccoulson> asac, ok, i'll do that in a bit
[00:49] <gnomefreak> micahg: if you mean is mine working it sort of is. it should still give me an option to send when i go back online << very least.
[00:49] <gnomefreak>  oops
[01:24] <LLStarks> micahg, umd interferes with gnome-shell deps.
[01:25] <LLStarks> xulrunner versioning and crap.
[01:26] <LLStarks> umd's 1.9.1 is too new.
[01:26] <micahg> LLStarks: so, don't use UMD?
[01:27] <LLStarks> is this umd's fault or gnome-shell's packagers?
[01:27] <micahg> LLStarks: idk
[01:28] <LLStarks> has the 3.6.2 lp been merged yet?
[01:28] <micahg> LLStarks: i don't see a dep on xul
[01:28] <LLStarks> i'll double check
[01:34] <LLStarks> gnome-shell:
[01:34] <LLStarks>  Depends: libgjs0 but it is not going to be installed
[01:35] <LLStarks> libgjs0:
[01:35] <LLStarks>   Depends: xulrunner-1.9.1 (<=1.9.1.9~) but 1.9.1.10~hg20100324r26859+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 is to be installed
[01:36] <micahg> ugh,I better finish porting that to xul192...
[01:52] <LLStarks> you maintain libgjs?
[01:52] <micahg> LLStarks: no, I'm doing some of the porting to xul192 this cycle though
[01:52] <LLStarks> cool.
[03:46] <ddecator> what does "42: pushd: not found" mean?
[03:47] <ddecator> nvm, found it...
[06:04] <AnAnt> asac: Hello, I have a question about dh_xulrunner, I am building a package that links against libmozjs (the one that is shipped by xulrunner), so when I run dh_xulrunner, I don't get xulrunner in dependencies, why's that?
[06:04] <AnAnt> another thing, in order to get the software to operate, I added an rpath: -rpath=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2, is that alright ?
[06:34] <AnAnt> asac: ok, I checked the dh_xulrunner code, so it searches for certain strings that are not in programs that just used libmozjs
[06:46] <ddecator> woot! i guess there isn't a gtk bug, i got songbird to start =D
[08:50] <BUGabundo_remote> m0rning
[10:51] <[reed]> hmm
[10:51] <[reed]> I have to build a .deb from scratch
[11:03] <asac> [reed]: whatfor?
[11:04] <asac> you want to handcraft just a .deb or a sourcetree that builds a deb?
[11:04] <[reed]> apache module for work
[11:05] <[reed]> what's the difference between the two options?
[14:37] <micahg> _Tsk_: around?
[14:38] <_Tsk_> yes ;-)
[14:38] <micahg> _Tsk_: mozilla 532601
[14:38] <micahg> is seems that it's a problem with the upstream build isn't it?
[14:39] <_Tsk_> Might be , my comment might have been made in a hurry
[14:40] <micahg> _Tsk_: ok, so, it looks like a patch was made, but not applied because it was buggy or something per the other bug, should I mark it as a dupe then and comment that it appears to be needed per the newer bug
[14:40] <_Tsk_> yes
[14:40] <micahg> although weirdly enough, people say it worked in TB2, but the patch was never applied
[14:42] <micahg> _Tsk_: oh wait, the issue here seems to not be LDAP, but the NFS mounted home
[15:02] <micahg> asac: do you remember a bug similar to bug 535465
[15:02] <asac> micahg: yes, i think we had a patch for that in xul 1.9.1
[15:03] <asac> maybe it got lost
[15:03] <micahg> asac: ok, I'll look, thanks
[15:06] <micahg> asac: any luck with NSS/NSPR?
[15:07] <asac> micahg: oh sorry. i ment to CC you. i sent out a request to NSS folks to check the patch
[15:07] <asac> i cant really add it without their blessing and cant upload if evolution is
[15:07] <asac> broken
[15:08] <asac> so either they say: yes ... or they hopefully tell us how to fix evolution
[15:08] <asac> and other apps
[15:08] <asac> minus setting an env
[15:08] <micahg> asac: well, latest is NSS 3.12.6, but it's not released
[15:08] <micahg> but it's in Firefox
[15:09] <asac> chrisccoulson: how are the symptoms in evolution exactly with a broken nss?
[15:09] <asac> micahg: its tagged
[15:09] <asac> thats released
[15:09] <micahg> asac: BTW, should I link the upstream bug for the pref reset to LP
[15:09] <micahg> asac: ah, ok
[15:09] <asac> they just are forgetting to put tarballs out simetimes
[15:09] <asac> micahg: if there is a bug and and upstream bug. sure
[15:09] <micahg> asac: ok, I didn't know if we generate from tag like FF/TB
[15:10] <asac> i also sent out request to mozilla for three issues: 1. patch for cairo (lcd) ... 2. patch for "not starting because of symlinked components" and 3. font color of awesome dropdown urls in default theme
[15:13] <chrisccoulson> asac - hmmm, i've not seen the invalid certificate warning yet today since i removed the patch from nss again :-/
[15:14] <micahg> asac: so are we trying for NSS 3.12.6 or 3.12.5?  I saw a merge for 3.12.5?
[15:18] <micahg> asac: I also seem to be having trouble with LD_LIBRARY_PATH for edbrowse
[15:19] <chrisccoulson> asac - ok, i got it again (i just had to remove my camel-cert.db after removing the nss patch)
[15:20] <chrisccoulson> asac - http://people.canonical.com/~chrisccoulson/Screenshot-Evolution%20Warning-1.png
[15:31] <chrisccoulson> asac - ok, it seems that my issue is not related to that debian bug, and the patch doesn't help
[15:32] <chrisccoulson> it only appeared to work because i need to delete camel-cert.db from my evolution profile to trigger it
[15:32] <chrisccoulson> so, i have another issue then :-/
[15:33] <chrisccoulson> asac - debian bug 563253
[15:39] <chrisccoulson> sure enough, when i run the latest version of nss, the list of CA's in evolution is virtually empty
[15:42] <micahg> asac or chrisccoulson do you know of an app that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH properly so I can use it as an example for getting a mozjs app to work?
[15:46] <chrisccoulson> micahg - /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/run-mozilla.sh sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't it?
[15:46] <chrisccoulson> basically, it should be a colon separated list of paths
[15:47] <micahg> chrisccoulson: is that the only way to do it, in a wrapper script?
[15:48] <chrisccoulson> thats the usual place to do it
[15:48]  * micahg can't figure out why the linker can't find mozjs
[15:49] <micahg> chrisccoulson: if that's the only way, I'll add a wrapper script to edbrowse...
[15:49] <chrisccoulson> micahg - the linker can't find libmozjs because it's not in /usr/lib
[15:51] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ah, I guess this is normal...ok, wrapper script it is
[16:06] <asac> chrisccoulson: cairo patch was bad?
[16:10] <fta> all, please test chromium from the beta ppa, i need to upload it to lucid
[16:10] <chrisccoulson> asac - yeah, i applied the patch and the fonts are worse than ever now
[16:10] <chrisccoulson> so i'm just investigating that
[16:11] <chrisccoulson> the fonts don't change at all when i adjust my font preferences, so i'm not sure if that points you towards anything....
[16:11] <chrisccoulson> even the DPI settings have no effect
[16:27] <asac> chrisccoulson: well thats a different ubg ;)
[16:27] <asac> chrisccoulson: we have two font bugs
[16:27] <asac> one about preferences not honoured
[16:27] <chrisccoulson> asac - oh, you're aware of this already
[16:27] <chrisccoulson> ?
[16:27] <asac> the other about lcd stuff
[16:27] <asac> chrisccoulson: i considered that bug more critical even
[16:27] <asac> but seems community wants lcd
[16:28] <asac> chrisccoulson: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox
[16:28] <asac> the 2nd and 3rd bug on that list
[16:28] <asac> MASTER - FF 3.5 font hinting does not honour gnome-settings -> thats what you refer to
[16:28] <asac>   fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo -> thats the lcd patch
[16:28] <chrisccoulson> asac - so, we'd need need to fix both bugs then
[16:28] <chrisccoulson> the fonts with the lcd patch are significantly worse than without :-/
[16:29] <asac> chrisccoulson: well. in theory yes. but in practice we can only fix the lcd one
[16:29] <asac> we can escalate the other too
[16:29] <asac> but that wont get a fix because thats due to gtk loading system cairo to parse settings
[16:29] <asac> adn then firefox loads own cairo
[16:29] <asac> and the settings get wiped by that
[16:29] <asac> (e.g. a static struct)
[16:29] <asac> thats my eval
[16:29] <asac> anyway... release team eeting now ;)
[16:29] <asac> ttyl
[16:29] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[16:36] <fta> asac, ^^
[16:38] <asac> fta: ?
[17:09] <fta> asac, /wrt "all, please test chromium from the beta ppa, i need to upload it to lucid"
[17:10] <fta> i also need to have a look at our bugs, see if there's something ubuntu specific
[17:28] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: I'll spam it
[17:31] <BUGabundo_remote> done
[17:49] <BUGabundo_remote>  7221      0      0      39565K   1.3G 628.8M     0K     0K   8% chromium-brows
[17:49] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: ^^^^^
[17:53] <fta> doh!
[17:53] <fta> doing what?
[17:53] <fta> how many tabs?
[17:59] <asac> fta: in the beta ppa?
[17:59] <asac> fta: i see ftbfs on https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/beta
[18:00] <asac> top two most
[18:11] <fta> asac, yep, known, but lucid is fine. the 2 red are not really failures. but a kind of build-log post processing
[18:11] <asac> ah
[18:13] <jcastro> fta: btw if anyone has sad tab problems I found that that ambiance theme scrollbar extension is the problem
[18:14] <fta> jcastro, hm ok. there's also http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=38692
[18:15] <jcastro> ouch
[18:15] <fta> jcastro, ie, nvidia and fglrx using malloc corrupting tcmalloc stack
[18:26] <fta> jcastro, not sure if the bug i just linked is in the beta or just in trunk
[18:27] <ejat> !ping ccheney
[18:41] <fta> jcastro, do you have sad tabs with the beta alone? i mean, without the scrollbar extension
[18:43] <jcastro> no
[18:43] <jcastro> everything works for me after I removed the extension
[18:43] <jcastro> fta: It's only been an hour or two though, I'll keep an eye on it and report back
[18:44] <fta> ok, thanks
[18:44] <fta> i need to push the codecs too, long due :P
[18:44] <jcastro> heh
[18:45] <fta> asac, is s/nonfree/restricted/ ok?
[18:49] <asac> fta: i dont know. how are those codecs called in the ffmpeg package in archive?
[18:50] <asac> nonfree obviously is wrong
[18:50] <asac> restricted/ugly/bad ;)
[18:50] <asac> maybe
[18:50] <fta> i have no clue about what to do here
[18:51] <asac> fta: check with siretart
[18:51] <asac> he is the ffmpeg guy and give guidance
[18:51] <fta> he said upstream dislike nonfree
[18:51] <asac> if he says that he didnt do any special name, we can use -restricted
[18:51] <asac> fta: check with him about -restricted then. imo that better reflects the problem
[18:56] <fta> asac, iirc, he proposed -extra, sistpoty later said "the name of the binary packages are left to your discretion"
[19:29] <asac> fta: choose what you want. -nonfree is wrong, becuse the code itself is not really non-free afaik
[19:30] <fta> i initially meant it as nonpatentfree
[19:30] <asac> yes
[19:31] <fta> jcastro, do you still have chrome install? if so, could you please paste the desktop file?
[19:31] <fta> +ed
[19:32] <jcastro> fta: you mean official google chrome?
[19:33] <jcastro> http://pastebin.com/4BE1gQ50
[19:35] <fta> thanks
[19:36] <gnomefreak> no way to "shorten" it or each lang has to have its own line?
[19:41] <gnomefreak> are we able to use non-official icons for Firefox and still leave the firefox as the name?
[19:42] <micahg> gnomefreak: not AFAIK
[19:42] <gnomefreak> k
[19:42]  * gnomefreak playing with some of my FF and TB icons
[19:59] <gnomefreak> my wife came out to smoke with me. She is a very smart women but she said i want pizze but you have to order it and pick it up. she asked me what do i want on it. if im ordering it in 2 hours i have time to think about it
[20:01] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak - i uploaded gnome-terminal today without the extra profile ;)
[20:01] <chrisccoulson> you might have to delete the profile from your config after the upgrade though
[20:02] <chrisccoulson> and you can delete it now ;)
[20:02] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: thanks :) i just got good news about smart and now g-term im on a roll
[20:02] <chrisccoulson> lol
[20:02] <gnomefreak> what dir? there are a few gnome dirs
[20:03] <chrisccoulson> was that a question for me?
[20:03] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: yep
[20:04] <gnomefreak> there are 3 IIRC
[20:04] <chrisccoulson> once you've upgraded, you will be able to delete the old profile from your config just using the Profiles dialog in gnome-terminal
[20:04] <chrisccoulson> it will let you delete it after the upgrade
[20:04] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: ah ok thanks
[20:05] <chrisccoulson> there's not any sane way for me to clean that on upgrade really
[20:05] <chrisccoulson> so it has to be done manually
[20:05] <chrisccoulson> but there's a note in the changelog that explains that
[20:07] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: when you say old you mean both profiles? mine and ambience
[20:07] <chrisccoulson> ambiance
[20:07] <chrisccoulson> you don't want to delete the default profile (and i don't think it will let you anyway)
[20:08] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: ok thanks
[20:10] <gnomefreak> ok so smart bug has been open for ~2years so not holding my breath
[20:15] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: thanks it is normal now :)
[20:15] <chrisccoulson> excellent
[20:28] <fta> asac, help! http://paste.ubuntu.com/402015/ does it look good?
[20:34] <fta> asac, or http://paste.ubuntu.com/402017/
[20:36] <chrisccoulson> asac - did you see my comments earlier about nss?
[20:36] <chrisccoulson> after looking at the debian bug, it seems that evolution is doing the wrong thing
[20:40] <gnomefreak> thats why we use Thunderbird :)
[20:58] <fta> (i use evolution)
[21:20] <gnomefreak> i tried it a few times and i never got used to it
[21:27] <chrisccoulson> i use evolution too ;)
[21:53] <BUGabundo> evening
[21:54] <BUGabundo> fta: that was ONE single window (4 more running)
[21:54] <BUGabundo> if that was the one with more tabs (and I don't even have Flash on that machine) it had about 8 or 10 tabs open
[21:54] <BUGabundo> been running that session of Chromium for a few days now
[23:06] <chrisccoulson> asac - i dropped that extra patch from nss now, we don't need it
[23:29] <micahg> asac: still around?
[23:31] <BUGabundo> anyone reporting missed clicks on flash
[23:31] <BUGabundo> ?
[23:31] <micahg> BUGabundo: bug 410457
[23:31] <micahg> oops
[23:31] <micahg> bug 410407
[23:32] <BUGabundo> YES
[23:32] <BUGabundo> thannks
[23:32] <micahg> BUGabundo: np
[23:33] <BUGabundo> micahg: no longer idleing in +1»
[23:34] <micahg> BUGabundo: you?
[23:34] <BUGabundo> you
[23:34]  * micahg was in tehre?
[23:34] <BUGabundo> s/»/?/
[23:34] <BUGabundo> I saw you a very few/rare times
[23:34] <BUGabundo> this cycle
[23:34] <BUGabundo> for the 1st time
[23:34] <micahg> yes, I had a couple qeustions that no one had answers for
[23:35] <BUGabundo> with all your knowlage, we miss someone like you in there
[23:36] <AbortD> im having laggy video with flash in amd64 only some video is laggy like this i fixed it before but cant remember how i did it
[23:36] <micahg> AbortD: video driver?
[23:37] <AbortD> shouldnt be opengl works fine
[23:41] <asac> chrisccoulson: we dont need it?
[23:41] <micahg> BUGabundo: time
[23:41] <chrisccoulson> asac - no, my issue is unrelated to it
[23:41] <BUGabundo> for?
[23:41] <micahg> asac: conkeror merge approved..I'm just updating for the upload that chriscoulson made for me
[23:41] <BUGabundo> I'm not a bot, you know
[23:42] <micahg> BUGabundo: I don't idle in +1 due to a lack fo time
[23:42] <BUGabundo> ah
[23:43] <asac> micahg: merge. isnt it a sync now?
[23:43] <micahg> asac: no, I'm making one change to make xul192 the first of the depends
[23:43] <micahg> unless you think that should be dropped
[23:44] <micahg> asac: http://pastebin.com/depgfLc4
[23:48] <micahg> asac: I have to go soon
[23:49] <asac> micahg: we need to drop everything but 1.9.2 actually
[23:51] <micahg> asac: really?  ok...I'll make the change quick then
[23:51]  * micahg jsut uploaded new diffs, but will upload another set with that change
[23:51] <asac> if you link against glue of version X ... it will only work on >= X
[23:51] <micahg> asac: that's good to know, so why do they have xul1.9 in there?
[23:52] <asac> not sure ;)
[23:52] <asac> if conkeror has native components it cant use stuff from before
[23:53] <asac> e.g. is there an .so?
[23:53] <asac> i would think so
[23:58] <micahg> asac: done...bug 537900
[23:58] <micahg> asac: I have to go...if there's still a problem, please unsubscribe sponsors and send me an e-mail
[23:58] <micahg> ttyl