[00:05] <TheMuso> ScottL: unknown ship, I don't know what that means.
[01:48] <ScottL> sorry TheMuso, apparently I just assumed you knew everything ;)
[01:49] <TheMuso> ScottL: heh I am glad I don't. :p
[02:00] <TheMuso> ScottL: Interesting re jackd not shutting down. Were you using it with any particular application that may have also been running like pulse?
[02:14] <ScottL> TheMuso, i don't know, to be honest.  i've been jumping around between partitions (rebuilding lv2rack/zynjacku for karmic) and I don't really remember
[02:14] <ScottL> i didn't even realized that it had happened until the next time I logging into my lucid-test install and apport told me
[02:14] <TheMuso> heh ok.
[02:15] <ScottL> i wasn't sure if I should really file the bug or not
[02:24] <ScottL> themuso, the last time I was using jackd was probably almost a week ago, but i've done other things since (like the plymouth theme) that didn't involve jackd, so I don't really know
[02:24] <TheMuso> ScottL: ah ok.
[07:57]  * abogani waves
[07:57] <abogani> I would want let you notice that linux-realtime (available in my PPA) fix three bugs if linux-rt (at the moment at least but I suspect that the number of fixed bugs will increased).
[07:57] <abogani> s/if/of
[08:24] <astraljava> abogani: That's great! How does the bug marking process work these days, do you have to get someone from the bugcontrol team to mark the bugs as fixed, or can you do it by yourself?
[08:25]  * astraljava is a little out of the ubuntu processes these days... :)
[08:27] <abogani> astraljava: I can do it by myself (because I'm a member of bugcontrol Team) but I'll don't it because fix packages are present into my PPA and not in Ubuntu archive.
[08:27] <abogani> I'm not sure how proceed...
[08:30] <abogani> s/present/available through
[08:43] <astraljava> abogani: Ahhh, that's right, of course. I suspect you have to go through REVU? Or are these just update packages, in which case someone from the ubuntu-sponsors uploads them?
[08:48] <abogani> astraljava: In almost three years on one REVU have uploaded my updates.
[08:48] <abogani> It is the reason of linux-realtime....
[08:52] <astraljava> abogani: Yeah it can be tough, but the last time I looked, that was the process. It might have changed since then, though. Are there any other MOTUs/sponsors here, except TheMuso? What has been the process for getting Ubuntu Studio packages into the repos during the last two years?
[08:53] <abogani> astraljava: Luke and Hemmet upload almost all Studio packages.
[08:54] <astraljava> abogani: Okay, but what about kernel packages, do they need blessings from the kernel team?
[08:55] <abogani> astraljava: No since Intrepid linux-rt is a universe package so it is under MOTU capella
[08:57] <astraljava> abogani: Then I assume following the normal routine here should do it. Ask persia or TheMuso to do it, bribe them if you need to. :D
[20:21] <fritzm_> hi all
[20:24] <scott-work> hello fritzm_ 
[20:25] <fritzm_> I downloaded the daily build of 03/17 and installed it - that's what I'm using at the moment.
[20:26] <fritzm_> One thing I noticed was that when I put an audio CD in, nothing happened. 
[20:26] <fritzm_> When I clicked on the CD in Nautilus, it gave me a message that sound-juicer was not found.
[20:26] <scott-work> You can open Audacious from the Audo&Video menu and play the cd
[20:27] <fritzm_> That's what I did; I was just wondering why it was looking for sound-juicer if it isn't part of the default install.
[20:27] <scott-work> can you file a bug then please about Nautilus trying to use sound-juicer?  be sure to include which option you tried to use while in nautilus
[20:28] <scott-work> if you haven't filed a bug report before, this is a good place to start:   https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs
[20:28] <fritzm_> OK; I was wondering against what package I list the bug ?
[20:28] <fritzm_> Nautilus ?
[20:30] <scott-work> I would file it against Ubuntu Studio.  I say this because I think this might be a MIME-type set within Ubuntu Studio, but...
[20:31] <scott-work> you might check to see if there are other bugs already listed for Nautilus that have the same problem, then it would be a Nautilus problem probably
[20:38] <fritzm_> OK I'm checking; 
[20:38] <scott-work> great :)
[20:45] <fritzm_> Nope, nothing anywhere in bugzilla about "cd", "audio cd", or "play cd" if I limit the search to Lucid, Lucid beta or Lucid updates
[20:46] <fritzm_> Looks like it might be Ubuntu Studio then - is sound-juicer a part of the default install in the standard Ubuntu? 
[20:48] <scott-work> no I believe it is not
[20:49] <scott-work> oh, sorry, in Ubuntu you said, yes I believe it is for Ubuntu, but not for Ubuntu Studio
[20:50] <fritzm_> So presumably if I'd installed Ubuntu and then added the Studio package, I wouldn't have run into the problem.
[20:52] <scott-work> that sound logical
[20:53] <scott-work> but sound-juicer can be added extremely quickly by typing 'sudo apt-get install sound-juicer' in a terminal (and whithout the little quote thingies)
[20:54] <scott-work> if you are using Ubuntu Studio and you really, really want sound-juicer (not that this excuses the original problem of it trying to fit sound-juicer)
[20:55] <fritzm_> No, I didn't want sound-juicer, I wanted to play the CD and expected some player to automatically start when I put the CD in, or at least when I clicked on the CD in Nautilus.
[20:59] <fritzm_> I see that the ubuntustudio-default-settings has autoplay_cda false, so I suppose that means it wouldn't play the CD automatically.
[20:59] <scott-work> yes, that is true and I believe there has been some discussion about it at some time
[21:04] <fritzm_>  I'm happy with it that way; so it's just the issue of what Nautilus does with it. 
[21:06] <fritzm_> I'm not seeing anything to do with mime types in ubuntustudio-default-settings, and I don't see any other studio packages that look like the deal with mime type settings, so should I file the bug against ubuntustudio-meta ?
[21:11] <scott-work> hmmm, I don't really know to be honest
[21:12] <scott-work> but you can either use Ubuntu Studio (as a distribution) or ubuntustudio-meta (as a package) and either will get the dev's attention via email, if it turns out it is not the correct one to report against, it will be changed
[21:19] <fritzm_> OK, I'll note the exact details and post a bug in the morning; late here now - heading for bed.
[21:30] <scott-work> doh, he left before I could thank him for taking the time and making the effort to help :(