[03:28] <wgrant> YesIamsureIwanttochangethebugstatus.
[03:29] <wgrant> Grrr.
[03:42] <wgrant> jtv: Morning. Are you going to have time to fix the /builders icon positioning in the next couple of days, or should I?
[03:42] <jtv> wgrant: wrapping up a sprint here...  I think I missed the boat on that one, sorry.
[03:42] <jtv> wgrant: did get an answer though on slave build cookies vs buildqueue ids.
[03:43] <wgrant> jtv: OK, I'll fix that up today.
[03:43] <wgrant> What was the answer?
[03:43] <jtv> Apparently there's talk of having slaves in the feature that may not even be in the buildfarm, in which case a cookie has real value (and what we have now has... less value I guess :)
[03:47] <wgrant> jtv: "not even be in the buildfarm"?
[03:47] <wgrant> You mean completely untrusted?
[03:47] <jtv> wgrant: hey, just telling you what I heard.  :)  Maybe it means upstream packages build their own packages or something.
[03:50] <wgrant> GAH
[03:50] <wgrant> YES I DO WANT TO SET THIS TO 'IN PROGRESS'
[03:50] <wgrant> Does Launchpad not want me to fix its bugs?
[03:55] <wgrant> (Bug #549323 )
[03:55] <mup> Bug #549323: Discourages bug fixes <Launchpad Bugs:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/549323>
[03:58]  * jtv swallows flippant speculation about how software feels about its bugs
[08:45]  * wgrant plays the "poke scripts semi-randomly and see if they make Rosetta do the right stuff" game.
[09:16]  * wgrant switches to the "oh wow, translation template builds and imports actually completely work now, with a few tweaks on top of trunk" dance.
[11:49] <wgrant> jtv: Are you actually present?