mozmck | how does one compile the lucid git kernel? | 02:52 |
---|---|---|
mozmck | in the karmic tree I could do this: skipabi=true skipmodule=true fdr binary-generic | 02:52 |
mozmck | but that doesn't work on the lucid tree | 02:52 |
crimsun | mozmck: have you followed the wiki? | 03:28 |
crimsun | bah. | 03:51 |
crimsun | Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x1f, nsteps=0x1f, stepsize=0x05, mute=0 | 03:51 |
crimsun | Amp-In caps: ofs=0x0b, nsteps=0x1f, stepsize=0x05, mute=1 | 03:52 |
crimsun | that makes me a sad panda | 03:52 |
mozmck | crimsun: wiki where? I've looked at several places | 04:03 |
crimsun | wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/KernelMaintenance | 04:04 |
mozmck | I can't figure out how to compile one flavour. if I do debian/rules binary it looks like it will compile all flavours | 04:04 |
mozmck | here's what it says there "fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic" | 04:07 |
mozmck | that's what I'm doing and it says there's no rule for that target | 04:08 |
crimsun | I presume you've looked through debian.master/config/ ? | 04:09 |
mozmck | yes. I made a new flavour, but I've also tried just compiling the generic flavour with out changes | 04:10 |
mozmck | hmm, just tried again with binary-generic and it's working... | 04:12 |
mozmck | ok, I ran debian/scripts/misc/kernelconfig editconfig and didn't save any changes. then fdr clean and fdr binary-generic and it tells me "No rule to make target" | 04:15 |
mozmck | at the end of running kernelconfig it gave me 8 of these errors: | 04:16 |
mozmck | ./debian/scripts/misc/kernelconfig: line 150: /home/moses/Projects/kernel/ubuntu-lucid//scripts/misc/../config-check: No such file or directory | 04:16 |
mozmck | could that be the problem? | 04:16 |
crimsun | debian/scripts/config-check | 04:17 |
mozmck | it's there and executable | 04:18 |
mozmck | is it possible the kernelconfig script is broken? | 04:43 |
crimsun | possibly, but I'm not looking closely. Slew of bugs on my plate. | 04:44 |
mozmck | ok, thanks. | 04:46 |
=== MTecknology is now known as MTeck-ricer | ||
=== Guest23197 is now known as Hedgehog | ||
=== Hedgehog is now known as Guest30641 | ||
Sarvatt | cnd: the two lines removed by the DPMS load detect fix exist in the current ubuntu-lucid source | 18:37 |
Sarvatt | lines 3666 and 3775 in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 18:37 |
Sarvatt | which is why I said the patch mistakenly got dropped somewhere along the line, it is not upstream yet even in 2.6.34 | 18:40 |
Sarvatt | thats in reference to http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-lucid.git;a=commit;h=7b56712ff524ee55e38afaee3954d125f56a6070 | 18:41 |
jono | hey folks | 19:28 |
jono | is the linux-image-2.6.34-020634rc1-generic_2.6.34-020634rc1_i386.deb package known to boot? | 19:29 |
jono | I installed it to test if a a bug still exists and it would not boot | 19:29 |
mrec | hope that won't happen with the latest git build here | 19:31 |
jono | going to test againbrb | 19:32 |
mozmck | anyone know why running kernelconfig editconfig with the lucid git breaks my build? | 19:36 |
Sarvatt | the 2.6.34-rc1 mainline kernel doesn't boot here either | 19:41 |
* Sarvatt tries the latest daily, havent tried in a few weeks | 19:42 | |
jono | hey | 19:42 |
jono | just tried the .34 mainline and no luck | 19:43 |
mrec | mainline or git? | 19:44 |
johanbr | for that matter, why do the latest daily builds have a -karmic suffix? | 19:47 |
Sarvatt | the latest 2.6.34 mainline daily still fails to boot here, spits out a trace as soon as it starts and seems to be timer init related | 19:50 |
Sarvatt | i'm guessing the ones with -karmic are using the karmic config and the -lucid ones are using lucid's, and there hasnt been any lucid ones recently. they were all using karmic's config before | 19:51 |
Sarvatt | correction: there haven't been *any* lucid ones, the one there failed to build because it was trying to use apparmor | 19:53 |
jono | mrec, mainline | 20:35 |
jono | is there an actual PPA for the kernel? | 20:36 |
marga | I asked this yesterday, but got no-reply. I'm interested in a -generic-64bits kernel for the i386 arch (similar to -amd64 in the i386 arch in Debian). I've seen that there is a -server flavor, which is only 64bits, but it's supposed to be "server oriented". What does "server oriented" mean? | 20:39 |
mrec | my git kernel is still compiling.. | 20:41 |
Sarvatt | marga: ubuntu doesn't support a 64 bit kernel with 32 bit userspace at all as far as I know unlike debian, the server flavour doesn't exist for 32 bit and is just a transitional package to push people to one of the generic-pae kernels if they had it installed in 32 bit from an old release | 21:00 |
Sarvatt | i could be mistaken though | 21:00 |
mrec | you should be wrong | 21:01 |
mrec | skype works without any problem here | 21:01 |
mrec | and skype is 32bit | 21:01 |
mrec | file /usr/bin/skype | 21:01 |
mrec | /usr/bin/skype: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, stripped | 21:01 |
Sarvatt | i'm referring to using explicitly installing a 64 bit kernel in a 32 bit release | 21:05 |
mrec | ah | 21:06 |
mrec | well I tried using a 64bit kernel with 32bit environment it worked too | 21:06 |
mrec | (I upgraded my system from a 32bit ubuntu to a 64bit ubuntu that way with some fiddling around with chroot and moving the root files) | 21:06 |
mrec | didn't have usb nor cd for a 64bit install cd back then | 21:07 |
Sarvatt | yeah you can get it working somewhat but a lot of things will be broken like dkms and its not something thats supported. http://www.ubuntu.com/products/whatisubuntu/serveredition/features/kernel has some description of whats different in -server over -generic | 21:11 |
mozmck | anyone know why running kernelconfig editconfig makes it so running fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic (or any other flavour) says "No rule for target"? | 21:15 |
mozmck | on lucid git | 21:16 |
marga | Sarvatt: is there a rationale behind that? | 21:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!