| === rmcbride__ is now known as rmcbride | ||
| === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening | ||
| lfaraone|really | Hm. I tried building http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/sushi-1002112221/sushi_1.1.1-0ubuntu1.dsc from source, but I get a bunch of errors related to waf unpacking itself and adding .pyc files. I assume I should remove these files in rules? | 01:13 |
|---|---|---|
| Linux000 | lfaraone|really: You are trying to build that package, right? | 01:16 |
| MTecknology | Is it possible to use a ppa on a debian system? | 02:12 |
| MTecknology | if you just add the apt line? | 02:12 |
| lfaraone|really | Linux000: yes. | 02:26 |
| lfaraone|really | MTecknology: yes. | 02:26 |
| MTecknology | lfaraone|really: thanks | 02:27 |
| ScottK | Doesn't necessarily mean you'll get packages that work. | 02:36 |
| ScottK | Binary compatibility between Ubuntu and Debian is not even a design goal for Ubuntu, let alone something one can rely on. | 02:36 |
| ScottK | Depending on what they package is, it may or may not work. | 02:37 |
| lfaraone|really | ScottK: but, it is however "possible" :) | 02:58 |
| ScottK | lfaraone|really: Certainly. | 02:58 |
| ScottK | Lots of things are possible that aren't a good idea. I wasn't meaning to disagree with you. | 03:00 |
| === MTecknology is now known as MTeck-ricer | ||
| MTeck-ricer | what do I need to be able to install grub on no-multilib?> | 06:32 |
| MTeck-ricer | oh.. grub-static | 06:35 |
| MTeck-ricer | wrong chan too... | 06:42 |
| pmcenery | Does anyone know at which point in the Debian package upload process a sync request can be submitted? I.e. after it has passed new? | 07:48 |
| duanedesign | working on a FFe, building the new upstream source I am getting two(2) warnings. http://paste.ubuntu.com/401850/ | 08:59 |
| ari-tczew | Permission denied (publickey). bzr: ERROR: Connection closed: Unexpected end of message. Please check connectivity and permissions, and report a bug if problems persist. | 10:49 |
| ari-tczew | how can I fix it? | 10:49 |
| geser | are you using the same SSH key as stored in your LP profile? | 10:50 |
| ari-tczew | how can check it? | 10:53 |
| geser | are you using an ssh-agent and does ssh-add -l list your key? | 10:57 |
| ari-tczew | I'm not using ssh-agent | 10:58 |
| ari-tczew | $ ssh-add -l Could not open a connection to your authentication agent. | 10:58 |
| geser | no problem | 10:59 |
| ari-tczew | geser: huh? | 10:59 |
| geser | then you probably have a file ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub (or similar) (it's some time since I used a real SSH-key) | 10:59 |
| ari-tczew | geser: in ~/.ssh exist only file known_hosts | 11:01 |
| geser | ok, do you have a SSH key? | 11:02 |
| geser | did you generate one with ssh-keygen in the past? | 11:03 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I have created key a long time ago and it exist in my LP page, but I created second key 10 minutes ago | 11:03 |
| ari-tczew | I'm confused about it all, I don't understand these procedures and make me crazy | 11:04 |
| geser | if you add this second SSH key to LP (as it's a different one), your bzr problem should go away | 11:05 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I found these 2 files .pub, do I need to move correct .pub file anywhere? | 11:07 |
| ari-tczew | can I use 1st key if I found .pub file? | 11:08 |
| geser | a SSH key is similar to a GPG key, it consists of a public part (those in the .pub file) and a private part (usually similar named but without .pub) | 11:08 |
| geser | if you put the contents of the .pub file into ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (or add it to your LP profile), you can use the private part of the key for authentication when access the other server | 11:10 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I have added key on LP | 11:11 |
| ari-tczew | problem is not fixed! | 11:12 |
| geser | :( | 11:12 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I think about clear all ssh keys from my system and try to create since zero | 11:13 |
| ari-tczew | and clear from LP | 11:13 |
| geser | if this doesn't help too, try getting help from #launchpad as I'm out of ideas | 11:14 |
| ari-tczew | what's the f_cking system this bzr! | 11:19 |
| pmcenery | superm1: just installed latest updates and still crashed. See bug #549459. | 11:21 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: list index out of range (https://launchpad.net/bugs/549459) | 11:21 |
| pmcenery | superm1: I initially tried without libdvdcss2 installed, and thought this may be the reason for the crash, so I have added it, but doesnt make any diff. | 11:23 |
| AnAnt | Hello, can someone review/sponsor http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8017 , it has been granted an FFe in LP #543679 | 11:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 543679 in ubuntu "Add a plymouth theme for sabily" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/543679 | 11:38 |
| === lfaraone|really is now known as lfaraone | ||
| ari-tczew | I have created branch on my LP page, I sent new revision, but bzr leave debian/patches/ directory, what happens? | 13:14 |
| geser | was debian/patches already in the branch or did you add it? | 13:22 |
| ari-tczew | geser: I did add directory /debian/patches and file.patch in /debian/patches | 13:27 |
| geser | did you also "bzr add debian/patches/file.patch"? because bzr only track those files it knows about to track | 13:28 |
| ari-tczew | geser: nope, I'll try do it | 13:29 |
| ari-tczew | why LP-Branches shows my ssh-key login instead my e-mail ? | 13:30 |
| ari-tczew | geser: please take a look @ https://code.launchpad.net/~ari-tczew/+junk/weechat | 13:32 |
| ari-tczew | e.g. your revision has been called to your LP account, but my revision doesn't call to my LP account | 13:33 |
| ari-tczew | ... | 13:51 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: ping | 14:04 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: pong | 14:05 |
| geser | ari-tczew: what does "bzr whoami" return for you? | 14:05 |
| ari-tczew | the same as LP-Branches | 14:06 |
| ari-tczew | how can I change whoami? | 14:06 |
| geser | with 'bzr whoami "Artur Rona <your@email>' (see bzr help whoami) | 14:09 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: ok, nevermind | 14:10 |
| ari-tczew | geser, thanks! | 14:10 |
| ari-tczew | if I want to give a patch to fix bug instead debdiff, is enough link to my branch? | 14:43 |
| nigelb | ari-tczew: is the package maintained in bzr? | 14:44 |
| ari-tczew | nigelb: maintained? | 14:44 |
| ari-tczew | package has got registered branch in ubuntu, if you mean about it | 14:45 |
| nigelb | ari-tczew: aha, then link to branch and request merge | 14:45 |
| ari-tczew | thanks | 14:46 |
| ari-tczew | which patchsystem require debian/patches/series file? | 14:52 |
| nigelb | quilt usually | 14:52 |
| ari-tczew | in debian/rules: include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk is enough? | 14:53 |
| nigelb | ouch, that doesn't look like quilt | 14:53 |
| nigelb | do a what-patch inside the source folder | 14:53 |
| nigelb | it should be cdbs | 14:53 |
| ari-tczew | yea, cdbs | 14:54 |
| ari-tczew | so if I'll got "quilt" by what-patch I need to create series file, right? | 14:54 |
| nigelb | check in control file if the source format is 3.0? | 14:55 |
| nigelb | if so, how cdbs and 3.0 works together is a mystery to me. maybe someone else can help | 14:55 |
| ari-tczew | this is not 3.0 source format | 14:56 |
| nigelb | in that case do you need a series file? | 14:56 |
| ari-tczew | I am only asking when do I need add series file... | 14:56 |
| ari-tczew | I got cdbs, so not | 14:56 |
| nigelb | ah, I think (someone correct me if I'm wrong) series is file is only when using quilt pactching system or source format 3.0 (quilt) | 14:57 |
| ari-tczew | thanks | 14:58 |
| ari-tczew | why I can not create branch like /package/karmic ? | 15:07 |
| ari-tczew | only /package-karmic | 15:07 |
| geser | ari-tczew: as you seem to try to gain experience with bzr and package branches, have you read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation? | 15:10 |
| geser | I found it quite useful when I experimented with package branches | 15:11 |
| paissad | what do you usually use to make a patch ? .... quilt command or patch command ? | 15:24 |
| paissad | i have created 2 patches files & i put them in debian/patches/ | 15:25 |
| ari-tczew | paissad: do you have 2 patches or 2 patched files? | 15:25 |
| paissad | ari-tczew, i created to diff files & i put them in debian/patches | 15:26 |
| paissad | i did --> diff -u file.orig file > file.diff | 15:26 |
| paissad | i put file.diff into debian/patches | 15:26 |
| paissad | i did the same operation for the other file | 15:26 |
| nigelb | um, that wont work | 15:27 |
| nigelb | paissad, do you know what patch system is being used? | 15:27 |
| nigelb | (just type what-patch inside the source directory | 15:27 |
| paissad | nigelb, patch system ? ... don't know what you mean ... i want to modify 2 files from upstream source ... i thought that i just have to create a diff file & apply it during call from debian/rules | 15:28 |
| paissad | wrong ? | 15:28 |
| nigelb | you want to fix a bug right? | 15:29 |
| nigelb | and you've got the lucid source? | 15:29 |
| paissad | nigelb, it's no a bug ... actually upstream source developper put it's log file in /tmp ... but i modified the source so that the log file is saved in /var/log/$prog_name.log | 15:30 |
| nigelb | paissad, you're trying to fix that for lucid, i.e., get the changes into Ubuntu. am I right? | 15:31 |
| paissad | yes | 15:31 |
| nigelb | if you can follow the ubuntu/debian development process and generate a debdiff you can get into lucid easily | 15:32 |
| nigelb | so, first, what does the 2 patches do? | 15:32 |
| nigelb | since we're quite late into the lucid cycle depending on what it does you might need a feature free exception. If it fixes, a bug, not needed. | 15:33 |
| paissad | i think it's to complicated to create a debdiff ... & i think you misunderstand me ! | 15:33 |
| paissad | i have to apply the diff before running debuild | 15:33 |
| paissad | :) | 15:33 |
| nigelb | yes, I know | 15:33 |
| nigelb | but what I wanted to know was whether you wanted to generate a debdiff or just supply the patches so someone can do it for you | 15:34 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| jbicha | I'm trying to request a FFE/sync request for gramps, could someone guide me through what I need to do? bug 549045 | 16:22 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 549045 in gramps "Sync gramps 3.2.0-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/549045 | 16:22 |
| === korn_ is now known as c_korn | ||
| RainCT | hey jcastro :) | 16:23 |
| jcastro | howdy | 16:23 |
| nigelb | jbicha, provide and build log and install log too | 16:23 |
| iulian | jbicha: See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess. | 16:33 |
| psusi | blast.... gcc doesn't have itoa? what was the standard alternative to it? I can't seem to remember | 16:48 |
| superm1 | pmcenery, cool, well hopefully the apport retracer will be able to help us get to the bottom of it, thanks for filing the bug | 16:52 |
| === ember_ is now known as ember | ||
| jbicha | ok, I uploaded a build & install log, anything else I should do before subscribing ubuntu-release ? | 17:23 |
| ari-tczew | jbicha: test package | 17:25 |
| jbicha | ari-tczew: what do you mean? | 17:26 |
| ari-tczew | so you did install, then open a program and test all functions | 17:27 |
| ScottK | Or even some? | 17:29 |
| ejat | if we got make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1 .. where should we take a look ? | 17:39 |
| ari-tczew | patch is wrong | 17:39 |
| ejat | ari-tczew: yeah .. but how to trace .. | 17:39 |
| ejat | inside the patch file | 17:40 |
| ari-tczew | is there a .hunk file? | 17:40 |
| ejat | no | 17:40 |
| ari-tczew | did you patch manually or did you get patch from internet? | 17:40 |
| ejat | from the net | 17:41 |
| ari-tczew | so you should did patch (diff command) between 2 folders | 17:41 |
| ari-tczew | manually | 17:41 |
| ari-tczew | then you have full control on changes which will be in patch | 17:42 |
| ari-tczew | s/did/do a | 17:44 |
| jbicha | ari-tczew: I don't really use gramps so I don't know what to test, everything I've tested works, presumably upstream & Debian are testing also | 17:45 |
| ari-tczew | jbicha: heh, so go ahead and subscribe ubuntu-release maybe you will got ACK | 17:46 |
| jbicha | thanks | 17:46 |
| ari-tczew | jbicha: you should add information about new features, because this is a new upstream release | 17:49 |
| ejat | ari-tczew: how to create .dpatch ? | 18:14 |
| ari-tczew | create a normal .patch then convert do dpatch | 18:15 |
| sistpoty | or use dpatch-edit-patch <nameofpatch>, that will get you a shell where you can modify what you like. The result will end up in <nameofpatch> | 18:17 |
| ejat | sistpoty: http://paste.ubuntu.com/402518/ | 18:21 |
| ejat | but no shell | 18:21 |
| ejat | ari-tczew: using dpatch patch-template to convert ? | 18:23 |
| ari-tczew | I'm using an author's script based on this: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/index.php?view=use_dpatch look @ field "2. Convert a patch" | 18:26 |
| * ejat opening .. | 18:27 | |
| ejat | diff -u source-tree-original/the-file source-tree-new/the-file ? | 18:29 |
| sistpoty | ejat: you don't get a shell with that? (using dpatch-edit-patch in the top source directory)? | 18:30 |
| ejat | yeah .. | 18:30 |
| ejat | just end like that | 18:30 |
| sistpoty | ejat: haven't stumbled on this yet, sorry | 18:30 |
| ejat | im using terminator .. is a issue? | 18:30 |
| ejat | it will switch to new shell or what ? | 18:31 |
| sistpoty | ejat: shouldn't be an issue | 18:31 |
| sistpoty | ejat: yes, it will just start a new shell session in the new directory | 18:31 |
| sistpoty | ejat: don't confuse shell session with shell window though | 18:31 |
| ejat | sistpoty: owh ok .. got it .. | 18:33 |
| ejat | what should i edit in the new shell ? | 18:35 |
| sistpoty | ejat: whatever file you want to modify... the result lands in the patch | 18:35 |
| sistpoty | ejat: for example you could patch -p0 < somepatch, or use $SENSIBLE_EDITOR somefile and do changes | 18:35 |
| ejat | ari-tczew: thanks .. its work | 18:44 |
| ari-tczew | np | 18:44 |
| === hannesw__ is now known as hannesw | ||
| * sistpoty tries to remind slangasek as soft as possible about delegates for ubuntu-release | 19:15 | |
| ari-tczew | can someone check whether I did correct link to my bazaar branch with patch? bug 342790 | 19:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 342790 in weechat "DoS crash when receiving a certain color code" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/342790 | 19:45 |
| geser | looks good, it's listed at "Related branches" in that bug | 19:48 |
| ari-tczew | geser: is my branch correct patched and ready to upload? | 19:53 |
| geser | ari-tczew: looks good, but I don't how strict the template for security changelog entries is to follow (your changelog entry misses a description how the bug got fixed) | 20:01 |
| geser | see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update%20the%20packaging for the template and some examples | 20:01 |
| geser | btw: that page mentions to update the Maintainer for >= feisty | 20:02 |
| ari-tczew | geser: right! this is an answer for my question! I need to reupload a branch | 20:03 |
| geser | everything else looks ok (but my last security update is long time ago) | 20:03 |
| ari-tczew | in response to changelog: I never add in changelog how bug has been fixed | 20:04 |
| geser | for normal uploads me neither, but security uploads might be special (I just looked at the wiki page) | 20:06 |
| geser | as said I don't know how strictly the security template is to follow | 20:06 |
| ari-tczew | security sponsors never poked me about it | 20:06 |
| jdstrand | ari-tczew: I ack'd your patch-- my comment was for future securit updates. you don't need to do anything else this time around (I've already uploaded it to the security queue) | 20:07 |
| ari-tczew | jdstrand: ah OK, what about debian/changelog - is it correct? | 20:08 |
| jdstrand | ari-tczew: it was ok, but we like more info usually. | 20:08 |
| ari-tczew | ok | 20:08 |
| thedeeno | Hey everyone, can someone clue me in on how to request a package be updated? guake is at v0.4.1 but I'm only seeing 0.4.0 in apt. Debian repo's are at 0.4.1 | 20:09 |
| thedeeno | Unfortunately , i'm to nuby to figure out how to install this myself atm. (getting there :)) | 20:10 |
| Laney | there's nothing wrong with being more verbose in your changelogs :) | 20:14 |
| Laney | I absolutely encourage it | 20:15 |
| sistpoty | jdstrand: btw thanks for taking care of moin! :) | 20:17 |
| sistpoty | thedeeno: what is guake? a game? | 20:18 |
| sistpoty | ah, ok it isn't :( | 20:19 |
| thedeeno | sistpoty: haha, nope. It's a console wrapper. | 20:24 |
| thedeeno | hmm, so no thoughts on how to tell someone about this thing that needs updating? | 20:24 |
| sistpoty | thedeeno: just saw it, otherwise I'd have requested an ffe myself... !FFe | 20:25 |
| sistpoty | !FFe | 20:25 |
| ubottu | Feature Freeze Exception. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess for the freeze exception process. | 20:25 |
| sistpoty | ^ there you go | 20:25 |
| RoAkSoAx | sistpoty, bug #407722 is ready if you want to take a look at in again before I upload it. It builds in both pbuilder, ppa, and Im about to see if it installs and runs correctly | 20:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 407722 in lighttpd "[FFe] Please merge lighttpd 1.4.26-1 from Debian testing" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/407722 | 20:45 |
| RoAkSoAx | though 1.1 is from unstable rather than testing | 20:45 |
| sistpoty | RoAkSoAx: did you test the new version? | 20:53 |
| sistpoty | RoAkSoAx: -1 to -1.1 is fine for me, I've looked at that patch already | 20:54 |
| RoAkSoAx | sistpoty, yeah I just tested, builds, installs, runs | 20:57 |
| RoAkSoAx | installs the -dev files | 20:57 |
| sistpoty | RoAkSoAx: great, can you add that to the bug report please? I'm happy to give an ack then | 20:57 |
| RoAkSoAx | sistpoty, done, just updated the bug description | 21:00 |
| sistpoty | RoAkSoAx: thanks! | 21:00 |
| RoAkSoAx | :) | 21:01 |
| sistpoty | RoAkSoAx: feel free to upload | 21:02 |
| RoAkSoAx | sistpoty, thank you :) | 21:03 |
| sistpoty | RoAkSoAx: thank you for working on it in the first place :) | 21:03 |
| RoAkSoAx | sistpoty, i just love doing it :) | 21:04 |
| sistpoty | heh | 21:04 |
| RoAkSoAx | :) | 21:07 |
| * sistpoty goes to bed... gn8 everyone | 21:40 | |
| paissad | guys, i create a package_name.templates & package.config, po/POTFILES.in .... in the $package.template file, i have the Description field in 2 langage already (english & french )... what must i do to create the po/templates.pot | 21:43 |
| paissad | i did debconf-updatepo ..... but i got this | 21:43 |
| paissad | None of the files in POTFILES.in contain strings marked for translation. | 21:43 |
| paissad | here is the content of my POTFILES.in --> [type: gettext/rfc822deb] pms-linux.templates | 21:44 |
| === xhaker_ is now known as xhaker_globaljam | ||
| paissad | here is the content of pms-linux.templates --> http://pastebin.com/0xNDy7LK | 21:45 |
| thedeeno | hey guys I'm trying to figure out how to ask one of the package maintainers to update a package to a new version | 21:57 |
| thedeeno | but I'm kinda lost on how to do so. sistpoty showed be FFE but I think this is for an actual package maintainer | 21:58 |
| sebner | thedeeno: most packages in Ubuntu don't have a specific maintainer | 21:58 |
| thedeeno | ok, that makes sense. Well the package in question is guake. The karmic version is 0.4.0 - v0.4.1 fixes a transparency issue. | 21:59 |
| thedeeno | it's apart of the 'universe' repo | 22:00 |
| thedeeno | how do I get that repo updated? | 22:00 |
| thedeeno | debian has the package @ 0.4.1 - i'm pretty new (just recently switched from windows - *gasp*). So bear with me :) | 22:00 |
| sebner | thedeeno: urgh, updating a package in a stable release is not that eady | 22:01 |
| sebner | *easy | 22:01 |
| sebner | !SRU | thedeeno | 22:01 |
| ubottu | thedeeno: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 22:01 |
| thedeeno | sebner: I guess it makes sense that it's not that easy. Is there a Karmic 'testing' repo? | 22:24 |
| thedeeno | I expect that would be easy to change - if there is such a thing | 22:24 |
| ScottK | Proposed SRUs get uploaded to karmic-proposed for verification. | 22:33 |
| ari-tczew | I'm just waiting for my SRUs review... | 22:34 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, and how long does that take? | 22:37 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: It's in the StableReleaseUpdates wiki page | 22:37 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, so once the SRU has been acked, I need to add the tag: verification-needed and then just wait for the upload? | 22:40 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: No, the archive admin adds that tag when they accept the upload. Once you use the normal sponsorship process to get it uploaded. ubuntu-sru ack can come before or after, but the archive admins won't accept it until that happens. | 22:41 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: how long is waiting for SRU ACK? | 22:42 |
| ScottK | Depends on how busy they are. It varies. | 22:42 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, For example, I already have had the SRU acks like a month ago... after that, did I need to subscribe to archive-admins or wait for someone in the SRU team to upload it to proposed and then they will subscribe to archive admins? | 22:44 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: You needed to subscribe the sponsor team. | 22:48 |
| RoAkSoAx | i see :) that;s why i was wondering what was missing xD | 22:51 |
| RoAkSoAx | ScottK, so if packages are in universe, I can upload them directly once the sru has been acked? | 22:53 |
| ScottK | RoAkSoAx: Yes | 22:53 |
| ari-tczew | ScottK: IMO ~ubuntu-sru is very messed and unmaintained | 22:54 |
| ari-tczew | 497 bugs related! | 22:54 |
| ScottK | It seems to ebb and flow a bit. | 22:55 |
| ari-tczew | 'ebb' ? | 22:55 |
| jdong | why is the number of bugs a measure of the messyness of the team? | 22:55 |
| ari-tczew | because ubuntu-sru should has related to bugs which waiting for review, ACK etc | 22:56 |
| jdong | that's not the case. | 22:57 |
| jdong | a lot of the "related" bugs are ones that the SRU process has completed but baltix has a random task open or something. | 22:57 |
| ari-tczew | so sometimes someone from ubuntu-sru should clean up the list | 22:57 |
| jdong | well, I can either spend my free hour or two per week reviewing and ACKing as many SRU requests as I can from my bugmail directory, or do housekeeping on launchpad. which would you prefer? :) | 22:58 |
| ari-tczew | I want the SRU requests were dealt with quickly response like from ubuntu-universe-sponsors in development cycle | 23:01 |
| ari-tczew | "Ubuntu is a complete Linux-based operating system, freely available with both community and professional support." | 23:02 |
| ari-tczew | WANNA SEE "professional support" | 23:02 |
| RoAkSoAx | ari-tczew, I think you are confusing that sentence. Professional Support means "paid support" (those who buy support from Canonical) | 23:03 |
| jdong | most SRUs that I come across and ACK are no more than a week or two old. | 23:04 |
| jdong | the exception being the more complex SRU's or ones with not-so-great debdiffs attached | 23:04 |
| ari-tczew | RoAkSoAx: I'm contributing to Ubuntu, so this is my paid | 23:05 |
| azeem_ | my paid? | 23:05 |
| RoAkSoAx | ari-tczew, right, but what I'm trying to say is that "professional support" is referring to that Canonical provides paid support services for those who want to acquire them | 23:06 |
| ari-tczew | don't care about it | 23:06 |
| jdong | you were the one that brought it up in an incorrect context, and RoAkSoAx was correcting your misconception. | 23:07 |
| ari-tczew | jdong - you told week, max. 2, ok, I'm couting | 23:07 |
| jdong | ... ok, thanks for that helpful attitude | 23:07 |
| jdong | you know, that really makes me so much more excited about using my rare bits of free time to work on Ubuntu. | 23:07 |
| jdong | I better not eat dinner right now to empty my launchpad folder because you're counting. | 23:08 |
| ari-tczew | you can eat dinner, I don't prevent you :) | 23:09 |
| jdong | ari-tczew: but yes, if a SRU for you is taking too long in your opinion to get reviewed, feel free to ping me in here or directly email me about it. | 23:10 |
| ari-tczew | jdong: sure, 14 days... ;-) | 23:11 |
| paissad | is there a way to create a template for po/templates.pot ? | 23:13 |
| paissad | so that i use to begin the translation ... | 23:13 |
| ari-tczew | jdong: if ~500 bugs is not problem for you to review waiting SRU requests, how do you dig queue? | 23:13 |
| jdong | not sure I understand | 23:14 |
| jdong | btw, for your bug 421684, please add a SRU bug description | 23:14 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 421684 in obexd "bluetooth send malformed files " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/421684 | 23:14 |
| jdong | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure | 23:14 |
| ari-tczew | jdong: I'm very nuisance, right? | 23:20 |
| jdong | no, I didn't say that | 23:21 |
| ari-tczew | :) | 23:21 |
| jdong | rest assured that as one of the guys that spends time processing SRU's, I'm not 100% happy with my speed either | 23:21 |
| psusi | does patch ever explain WHY the damn hunk failed to apply? | 23:23 |
| azeem_ | not sure patch would know why | 23:24 |
| ari-tczew | propably changes were applied previously or you have not-refreshed patch | 23:25 |
| psusi | no, I mean WHY is it saying it failed? it looks like it should apply perfectly fine to me | 23:25 |
| psusi | context is right, I fixed the line number.... | 23:25 |
| psusi | not what the underlying cause is, why is patch pissed off | 23:26 |
| azeem_ | psusi: sorry, but I believe patch on this more than you | 23:26 |
| psusi | that's why I'm asking if there's a way to get it to explain itself | 23:26 |
| psusi | "hunk failed" is not a useful diagnostic | 23:26 |
| ari-tczew | I point on applied previously | 23:27 |
| azeem_ | maybe some spurious whitespace change | 23:27 |
| psusi | no, it has not been applied | 23:28 |
| psusi | the context looks like it matches, the lines it wants to remove are there... | 23:28 |
| ari-tczew | jdong: have you got a script which says what's the bugs are waiting for SRU review? like dholbach sponsoring | 23:29 |
| jdong | ari-tczew: no, I keep manual track of that through my inbox | 23:29 |
| ari-tczew | jdong: you give an ACK, so do I need to subscribe sponsors? | 23:37 |
| RoAkSoAx | persia, can I be readded to u-u-s please :)?? | 23:42 |
| RoAkSoAx | bdrung, could you please also unsubscribe keepalived from u-u-s?? thanks :) | 23:46 |
| bdrung | RoAkSoAx: i can't - i am only member of u-s now | 23:47 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: so what's news in your competition now? | 23:48 |
| RoAkSoAx | bdrung, oh ok.. np then :) | 23:49 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: rephrase your question please. | 23:49 |
| bdrung | RoAkSoAx: find a member of the dying u-u-s group! | 23:49 |
| RoAkSoAx | bdrung, yeah will do though but it is not such a big of a deal :) | 23:50 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: okay, another: what's the different between u-u-s and u-s? | 23:50 |
| bdrung | RoAkSoAx: bug dholbach | 23:50 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: u-u-s and u-m-s were merged into u-s. u-u-s and u-m-s are deprecated now | 23:51 |
| RoAkSoAx | ari-tczew, u-m-s and u-u-s are gonna die, and we'll keep a single sponsorship group u-s due to archives changes | 23:51 |
| bdrung | u-u-s and u-m-s are members of u-s. Therefore members of u-u-s and u-m-s can edit u-s subscriptions, but not the other way around | 23:52 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: so have you got access to upload for main now? | 23:52 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: yes ( http://overbenny.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/ubuntu-core-developer/ ), but that's independent of the u-s merge | 23:53 |
| ari-tczew | ouh, nice bdrung! | 23:55 |
| ari-tczew | I hope that merge 2 sponsors time will be good for clear bug-related list | 23:55 |
| paissad | is there a way to create a template for po/templates.pot ? | 23:56 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: it will be hard to get the u-s list clear | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!