[04:26] <gnomefreak> anyone here?
[04:28] <micahg> gnomefreak: sure
[04:29] <gnomefreak> micahg: any chance you know a command to opena tab in gnome-terminal?
[04:33] <micahg> gnomefreak: thought it was CTRL + SHIFT + T
[04:33] <gnomefreak> micahg: yeah but i need a command :(
[04:34] <gnomefreak> terminals dont like a command using keys
[04:34] <micahg> gnomefreak: cli?
[04:34] <micahg> idk
[04:34] <gnomefreak> yes
[04:35]  * gnomefreak neither and ive been trying to find out since before jaunty
[04:40] <micahg> gnomefreak: did you try asking in -desktop?
[04:41] <gnomefreak> micahg: not recently but i asked during karmic and noone answered. I was just poping in there to see if anyone was talking but im guessing its too early/late
[04:41] <gnomefreak> i can ping chris monday or so
[04:42] <gnomefreak> i just dont want to try grabbing source and looking for it but since its 11:42pm its too late for me too think
[04:43] <gnomefreak> seems that --tab does
[04:43] <gnomefreak> --tab                           Open a new tab in the last-opened window with the default profile
[04:44] <gnomefreak> well --tab opens a new window
[04:45] <gnomefreak> oh well its been a few years a few days wont kill me
[04:46] <gnomefreak> i have a few scripts to work on so that one is not in a hurry
[04:50]  * gnomefreak heads for smoke but i just noticed that 3.7 hasnt had an update in a while ~20 days
[04:50] <micahg> gnomefreak: mozilla 550823
[04:51] <gnomefreak> micahg: thanks
[04:54] <micahg> gnomefreak: I guess I could add the patch locally till it's accepted upstream since it's not a release
[04:55] <gnomefreak> micahg: maybe wait to see what happens. no sense in adding it and in 2 days removing it
[05:01] <micahg> gnomefreak: yeah, that's what I figured
[05:07] <gnomefreak> that could be why the browser is still slow like it was beginning of the month
[05:08] <micahg> gnomefreak: yep, I think they fixed a lot of issues in the past 3 weeks
[05:11] <gnomefreak> micahg: there is no way to add hte patch and have bot remove it on its own right?
[05:12]  * gnomefreak not sure how the bot works other than grabbing latest changes and builds it
[05:13] <micahg> gnomefreak: no
[05:16] <gnomefreak> micahg: seems like a simple enough change but it seems he would rather it not be in the makefile but since he says that you know
[05:17] <micahg> gnomefreak: I made the change that upstream requested
[05:17] <micahg> waiting on approval
[05:17] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[05:31] <gnomefreak> 2 gwibber-service and 1 gwibber process everytime you open gwibber but closing it only closes the gwibber process not the -service
[05:31]  * gnomefreak will ping ken this week to find out why
[06:06] <gnomefreak> !info opera
[06:06] <micahg> gnomefreak: not in repo
[06:06] <micahg> gnomefreak: not open source
[06:07] <gnomefreak> micahg: i thought it was in canonical repo at one time
[06:07] <micahg> gnomefreak: they have a deb
[06:08] <gnomefreak> micahg: thanks,
[07:31] <gnomefreak> micahg: are you still here? If so what are the chances that bug 548577 is related to bug 191889
[07:34] <micahg> gnomefreak: possibly, but I'd ask teh user to update to latest firefox in jaunty first...currently 3.0.18
[07:34] <gnomefreak> ok
[07:35] <gnomefreak> micahg: he states he sees it in 3.5
[07:35] <gnomefreak> also
[07:35] <micahg> well, then 3.5.8
[07:36] <micahg> it seems like the user isn't using an updated jaunty system, so that's teh first step
[07:37] <gnomefreak> pl asled
[07:37] <gnomefreak> ok asked even
[07:39] <micahg> gnomefreak: I don't think bug 547143 is a dupe of the addon bug as it causes a system freeze
[07:39] <gnomefreak> looking
[07:40] <gnomefreak> ok i see there are 2 users on that bug sorry unmarking as dup
[07:45] <gnomefreak> micahg: ok updated
[07:50] <ddecator_> micahg: did you get my email?
[07:50] <micahg> ddecator_: yes
[07:51] <ddecator_> i guess the trouble i'm having is gstreamer related, so idk if there are actually any problems with songbird
[08:12] <gnomefreak> its prompting me to send unsent ones again now
[08:12] <gnomefreak> damn i wish it would make up its damn mind
[08:18]  * gnomefreak goes for smoke maybe than i can start thinking again
[09:19] <AnAnt> Hello, are the packages in ubuntu-mozilla-daily going to enter lucid ?
[09:19] <AnAnt> I mean the firefox/xulrunner version in ubuntu-mozilla-daily
[09:20] <micahg> AnAnt: which version?
[09:20] <AnAnt> 3.6.3...
[09:20] <micahg> 3.6.3 won't be in until after release most likely
[09:20] <micahg> 3.6.2 will be in sometime this week
[09:21] <AnAnt> I had a problem in firefox, and I was advised to try the version in ubuntu-mozilla-daily, and that fixed it indeed
[09:21] <micahg> AnAnt: ok, good, is there a bug report?
[09:21] <AnAnt> no, I didn't file one
[09:22] <micahg> AnAnt: ok...so, yeah, 3.6.2 in this week, 3.6.3 after release unless they release it before final freeze
[09:22] <micahg> *they == mozilla
[09:23] <AnAnt> I see
[10:19] <gnomefreak> ok that is 3 times in a row it worked now i am confused as to what caused it
[12:12] <BUGabundo> m0rning
[12:28] <fta> asac, https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=chromium
[12:28] <fta> BUGabundo_AFK, lo
[14:19] <BUGabundo> hello fta
[16:40] <_Tsk_> micahg:  what's your bugmail ?
[16:40] <micahg> _Tsk_: ?
[16:40] <_Tsk_> email you use in bugzilla
[16:40] <micahg> _Tsk_: mozilla-bugs at micahscomputing dot com
[16:40] <_Tsk_> thanks
[16:45] <fta> micahg, about 3.7, why don't you take the patch in the branch instead of waiting for upstream forever?
[16:45] <fta> (hi, btw) :)
[16:45] <micahg> fta: I was asking gnomefreak about that last night...I geuss I could
[16:46] <fta> please, do it
[16:46] <micahg> fta: ok
[17:02] <micahg> bdrung: I wanted to say if you write a library for the units policy, I volunteer to help with the PHP version of it
[17:03] <bdrung> micahg: great
[17:03] <micahg> bdrung: I think we should try to get a library for each langague
[17:03] <bdrung> micahg: but i am still at the point discussing it with the glib devs
[17:04] <bdrung> micahg: yes - but one interface (same names for functions, etc)
[17:04] <micahg> bdrung: yes
[17:15] <bdrung> micahg: do you have a good name for this lib?
[17:19] <fta> gunit (or gun it)
[17:21] <micahg> bdrung: libunits?
[17:23] <bdrung> micahg: sounds good - and google found nothing conflicting by name
[17:25] <bdrung> micahg: ups, found this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libunits/
[17:26] <micahg> bdrung: does it do what we need?
[17:26] <bdrung> http://www.ohloh.net/p/libunits
[17:27] <bdrung> micahg: i cannot find any line of code (no tarball, no svn repo)
[17:35] <micahg> bdrung: oh well
[17:35] <bdrung> micahg: we can ignore that project
[17:41] <micahg> bdrung: maybe we should call is displayunits
[17:41] <bdrung> micahg: that's more clear, but longer
[17:41] <micahg> bdrung: does longer matter?
[17:42] <micahg> bdrung: also keep in mind, if we're doing per language libraries, we should try to get this in PEAR and CPAN as well
[17:42] <bdrung> sometimes - you know that devs are lazy ;)
[17:43] <micahg> bdrung: I'd help with that
[17:43] <bdrung> micahg: can you write perl?
[17:43] <micahg> bdrung: I used to be able to :)
[17:44] <bdrung> micahg: i need help writing a small script in perl (porting from python). can you help there?
[17:45] <micahg> bdrung: probably, depends how urgent
[17:45] <micahg> I'm a little swamped ATM
[17:45] <bdrung> micahg: i want to get it into lucid
[17:45] <bdrung> micahg: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566578
[17:46] <micahg> bdrung: I don't think I'll have time this cycle
[20:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: can you help me with my wrapper script for edbrowse?
[20:40] <chrisccoulson> micahg, yeah, can do. which bit do you need help with?
[20:42] <micahg> chrisccoulson: here's the rules file: http://pastebin.com/9bmLtBHL and I get an error no target: debian/edbrowse.sh
[20:49] <micahg> chrisccoulson: did you work out the nss issues with asac?
[20:49] <micahg> asac: did you get USNs for the 3.0 and 3.5 updates yet?
[20:50] <chrisccoulson> the issue with debian/rules is that "pre-build: $(subst_files)" expands to "pre-build: debian/edbrowse.sh", so it looks also for the debian/edbrowse.sh target, which doesn't exist
[20:50] <chrisccoulson> if you drop the $(subst_files) there, it might work
[20:50] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I thought that %: was a universal target
[20:51] <chrisccoulson> ah, right. i missed that bit
[20:51] <chrisccoulson> one second, and i will have another think ;)
[20:53] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i can see what is going on with NSS now, but i'm still not sure whether we need to fix NSS or other applications that are using it
[20:53] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ok, because we really need to release 3.6.2 :)
[20:53] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i know ;)
[20:54] <chrisccoulson> we'll get it sorted tomorrow
[20:54] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, BTW, I'll be offline Tuesday and Wednesday
[20:54] <micahg> but I'd like to get in edbrowse and gnome-chem-utils today or tomorrow
[21:06] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I've got a weird issue with a changelog and non-ASCII characteras
[21:29] <micahg> chrisccoulson: still with me?
[21:39] <chrisccoulson> micahg - sort of ;)
[21:39] <chrisccoulson> i'll be back on here again in 20 minutes or so, just watching some tv first :)
[21:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, I have some chores to do, meet you back in 20
[21:41] <gnomefreak> status on nss/nspr? i was supposed to ask when i was here yesterday/early this morning
[21:42] <micahg> gnomefreak: should be worked out tomrorow
[21:42] <gnomefreak> micahg: thanks
[21:49] <gnomefreak> ok in therory this works great as for it working cant figure it out ;)
[22:05] <gnomefreak> ok so that gmail package works like it says to work.
[22:06] <gnomefreak> micahg: can you check perffered apps under mail reader adn see how many thunderbird is listed? i have thunderbird-3.1 thunderbird-3.0 thunderbird and thunderbird. Im thinking 3 of 1 is 2 too many
[22:07] <micahg> gnomefreak: I have 2, but I put thunderbird-3.0 there manually
[22:08] <gnomefreak> i may have done that but i wouldnt think i would add a thunderbird-3.0 and a thunderbird outside of the 1 that should be there
[22:08] <gnomefreak> but this is an old install so its possibile
[22:10] <micahg> chrisccoulson: are you familiar with gnome-chemistry-utils?
[22:10] <chrisccoulson> micahg - not really
[22:10] <micahg> chrisccoulson: it seems to want to check something from sourceforge in the latest build, but the same code is there in the previous version and it didn't do it before...
[22:11] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ok, any idea for my edbrowse puzzle?
[22:11] <chrisccoulson> just looking at that again now
[22:17] <gnomefreak> i couldnt find any info on that. like what it is but i will look at sourceforge.
[22:18] <gnomefreak> micahg: you patched XUL i see :)
[22:18] <micahg> gnomefreak: at fta's request
[22:18] <gnomefreak> micahg: ah makes sense
[23:23] <micahg> chrisccoulson: should we just continue this tomrorow?
[23:23] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, can do. i had a look at that problem and can't spot anything wrong yet
[23:24] <chrisccoulson> so i'm a bit confused now :-/
[23:24] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ok..I'll work on other stuff tonight then
[23:24] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[23:35] <gnomefreak> micahg: you busy? someone having a problem with tb3 that shouldnt happen with our build but stands by he is using it
[23:43] <gnomefreak> we need a way to change plymouth theme back to what it was before yesterday
[23:53] <micahg> gnomefreak: give me a little bit
[23:53] <gnomefreak> micahg: k
[23:59] <micahg> gnomefreak: so, what's the TB issue/