[06:59] <AnAnt> Can someone review/sponsor http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8017 ? It has been granted an FFe in LP #543679 ?
[08:13] <\sh> moins
[08:14] <\sh> does anybody see gwibber-service crashings, too?
[08:28] <dholbach> good morning
[08:29] <ddecator_> dholbach: morning
[08:30] <dholbach> hi ddecator
[09:26] <micahg> thank you dholbach
[09:30] <dholbach> micahg: no worries
[11:18] <nigelb> does bug 314885 need a UIFe?
[13:03] <duanedesign> working on a new upstream source, i am getting a few Warnings when building it. http://paste.ubuntu.com/401850/
[13:59] <nigelb> some made a debdiff some time back and didn't subscribe sponsors(its in review queue now), now that package has made the debdiff stale.  Is it okay for me to make a new one and subscribe sponsors?
[14:28] <micahg> mr_pouit: I figured out gnome-chemistry-utils...if the build works, I'll propose a merge and comment in the master goffice bug
[14:47] <nhandler> nigelb: Maybe see if the person who made the original patch wants to update it. For new(er) contributors, it can be useful/helpful practice
[14:48] <nigelb> nhandler, canonical employee
[14:52] <micahg> nhandler: are you up for approving an FFe?
[14:52] <nhandler> Depends on what it is nigelb
[14:52] <nigelb> nhandler, lemme get bug number
[14:53] <nigelb> nhandler, 314885
[14:53] <nigelb> bug 314885
[14:54] <nhandler> nigelb: That is shipped by default. All screenshots that include pitivi would need to be updated
[14:54] <nigelb> um yeah
[14:55] <nigelb> I need a uife too
[14:58] <think> hi all
[14:58] <nigelb> nhandler, so close as wont fix for lucid?
[14:59] <nhandler> No need to close it as Won't Fix. It will get fixed in lucid+1
[15:03] <nigelb> so just milestone it for later?
[15:10] <nigelb> nhandler, ^
[15:15] <micahg> nhandler: are you up for approving an FFe?
[16:22] <james_w> mok0: bug 539134 doesn't seem to need anything from ubuntu-archive
[19:10] <ScottK> mok0: Let's not backport gunpg.  That seems more than a little scary to me.
[19:35] <C10uD> hello, i want to release a new version of an app that's in universe
[19:36] <C10uD> i know there's feature freeze, but is there something it can be done since it fixes some "critical" stuff?
[19:36] <C10uD> the app is emesene, so it's not critical.. but the version that ubuntu currently ships has some annoying bugs we fixed
[19:37] <ScottK> C10uD: You can ask for a freeze exception.
[19:38] <C10uD> ok then i'll ask my debian friend to make the package and upload to unstable and see what we can do with ubuntu
[19:38] <C10uD> thanks for the answer
[20:43] <nhandler> micahg: Bug number?
[20:48] <ronj> Hello. I was having a look on REVU at a package I'd like to see in Lucid (http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/autotrash), and it is currently in an error status because Lintian seems out of date. Will somebody update lintian so that packages having non-outofdate "Standards-Version" tags can pass successfully its checks?
[20:52] <micahg> nhandler: bug 541710, it's actually stefanlsd's but I have an interest in it
[20:53] <kamalm> ScottK: fwiw, gnupg 1.2.10 for Karmic is available in a PPA -- i have added a link to it in that gnupg backport bug.
[20:53] <ronj> OK I found an old bug where the same Lintian issue happened some months ago and I updated it. LP #490074, which was at the time handled by RainCT
[20:54] <ScottK> kamalm: gnupg affects far to much for an official backport, IMO.
[20:54] <kamalm> ScottK: got it
[20:55] <nhandler> micahg: Is it ready for review? It is still In Progress and assigned to stefanlsd
[20:56] <Elbrus> I created a debdiff for Winff to fix a bug (with confirmation of upstream) nearly a month ago in bug 521818. Is there any MOTU here that can apply the fix so that winff is usable in Lucid? Currently winff doesn't run as far as I can tell, although a rebuild *might* already fix that.
[20:56] <micahg> nhandler: yes, per comment 7, I think he forgot to reset the status
[21:16] <irvingpop> Hello MOTU team
[21:17] <irvingpop> I'm looking for sponsors for my two packages:  http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/flashcam   and http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/vloopback-dkms
[21:18] <irvingpop> They've been in queue since October, I'm wondering what I need to do next
[21:19] <geser> unfortunately REVU is very, very slow as not many MOTUs do reviews
[21:20] <irvingpop> That is understood.   I think my package could help a lot of people,  is it too late to see in Lucid?
[21:22] <geser> yes, and it's preferred if a packages comes through Debian as there is a higher chance that the package stays maintained after the initial upload (and it benefits both Ubuntu and Debian)
[21:23] <irvingpop> I got the impression that the Debian folks weren't too keen on my package, as it primarily benefits users of Adobe Flash  (end user types)
[21:27] <AnAnt> Hello, can someone review/sponsor http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8017 ? It has been granted an FFe in LP #543679
[23:02] <huats> I am looking for a simple package that is configured using CMake. Does anyone have an example ?
[23:33] <shakaran> Hi, I searching for a tutorial o something that explaing how to make a branch for each /debian for .debs on each distribution. I am a noob with bazaar