[02:52]  * stgraber looks at Edubuntu building and hopes that this time it'll work ;)
[03:03] <stgraber> seems like it worked !
[03:03]  * stgraber rsyncs
[03:16] <lamont> stgraber: woot!
[03:16] <lamont> Guess that means I should upload livecd-rootfs again
[03:16] <lamont> will do so in the morning
[03:19] <stgraber> yup, rsynced here, will start testing it but the logs were all looking good
[18:27] <lamont> slangasek: you gonna hurt me if I target bug 551069 at beta2?
[18:28] <slangasek> lamont: nope
[18:39] <pitti> slangasek: I have uploaded new tzdata packages for stables (again quite urgent, meh @ governments changing them at short notice); would you mind reviewing them?
[18:39] <pitti> slangasek: (dapper is still uploading, will be in the queue shortly)
[18:40] <slangasek> pitti: ok, grabbing
[18:43] <slangasek> ah yes, those ever-urgent Antarctic timezone changes :-)
[19:59] <cjwatson> god, I hate this lvm+encryption bug, it's totally intractable
[20:00] <cjwatson> I'm sure I'll figure it out at some point, but I've been prodding at it for hours and getting nowhere
[20:01] <cjwatson> all I've discovered so far is that parted_server seems to be writing out the swap header but by the time any other process sees it it's all-zeroes again
[20:22] <elmo> how do I (assuming I could, without my duck) tag a bug as 'not a regression, but damn, we should fix that before release'?
[20:24] <slangasek> if "without my duck" ~== "without upload rights", then by talking to the release team
[20:25] <slangasek> if you assume upload rights, then targeting to the release
[20:26] <elmo> duck == rubber duck == root in LP
[20:26] <slangasek> yeah, I know
[20:26] <slangasek> the question is how un-root you want to be for this :)
[20:26] <elmo> slangasek: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/546797
[20:27] <elmo> and i won't assume upload rights, I don't think I'm even an ubuntu member anymore ;-)
[20:27] <slangasek> eep
[20:28] <slangasek> yeah, targeting that to lucid; does that show up on upgrades from hardy, karmic, both?
[20:28] <elmo> slangasek: only tried karmic
[20:28] <elmo> don't tend to have OO.o on my hardy boxes
[20:29] <slangasek> maintainer script sez karmic-only
[20:29] <slangasek> and that this gets shown to *everyone* on karmic upgrade
[20:31] <slangasek> added in OOo 1:3.2.0~rc5-1
[21:03] <sbeattie> pitti: commented on bug 445852, let me know if there's more that you would like me to test.