[07:02] <ara> morning!
[07:09] <grantbow> It's always morning somewhere!  Hi ara!
[07:10] <ara> hey grantbow, how are you doing?
[07:10] <ara> how was UGJ @ Berkley?
[07:10] <grantbow> Went very well, thanks!  Jono and pleia2 blogged about it.  I need to fire up my blog still.
[07:11] <grantbow> I'm getting ready for bed still as it's only just after 11 PM here, lol.
[07:11] <ara> grantbow, :)
[07:11] <ara> grantbow, are you coming to uds this time?
[07:11] <grantbow> not sure yet
[07:12] <grantbow> I can't drive and sponsor myself this time, lol.
[07:30] <grantbow> ara, how are things going for you?
[07:31] <grantbow> I already updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/LoCos for beta2
[07:31] <ara> grantbow, nice :)
[07:31] <ara> grantbow, have you applied for sponsorship?
[07:31] <grantbow> yes, I think choices will be announced this week.
[07:32] <ara> grantbow, I would love to see you there :) good luck :)
[07:33] <ara> grantbow, have you seen the projects (and blueprints) of the Italian loco team to be discussed at uds?
[07:33] <grantbow> not yet, thanks for the hint :-)
[07:35]  * grantbow looks
[07:35] <ara> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/qa-m-laptop-testing
[07:35] <ara> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/qa-m-loco-testing
[07:37] <grantbow> not listed on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-m yet - are those only for accepted ones or something?
[07:39] <grantbow> I see in my scollback the problems jcastro was having submitting test data - have you heard if that's been fixed yet?
[07:57] <ara> grantbow, I will accept them today
[07:57] <ara> grantbow, about the submitting issue, I don't know :(
=== MosquitoOo is now known as MaWaLe
[11:19] <davmor2> morning all
[11:39] <ara> morning davmor2
[12:51] <ara> mvo, one question, the pop up window that appears when you install a package and it requires running actions, is it part of update manager?
[12:51] <ara> the one that says "Run this action now"
[12:51] <mvo> ara: that is part of update-notifier, its a interactive upgrade hook
[12:52] <mvo> ara: why? is there something wrong with that?
[12:52] <ara> mvo, yes, I installed apt-file, and it says that you can create the cache now, when I click on "Run this action now" I get:
[12:53] <ara> There was an error creating the child process for this terminal
[12:53] <ara> :\
[12:53] <ara> nothing else
[12:53] <mvo> oh
[12:55] <mvo> ara: odd, I just tried that and it works, I will try in a clean VM next
[13:00] <ara> mvo, ok
[13:00]  * ara -> lunch
[14:05] <davmor2> morning fader_ cr3
[14:05] <cr3> davmor2: hey dude
[14:05] <fader_> davmor2: Howdy
[14:06] <cr3> fader_: do you happen to know what virtual box might do differently than kvm? I've noticed that stuff under /sys isn't quite the same
[14:06] <fader_> cr3: Is this in relation to the checkbox bug about vbox not providing all the info you need?
[14:07] <fader_> Unfortunately I don't know anything about vbox or kvm internals :/
[14:07] <cr3> fader_: well, that bug initiated the question about whether we should add vbox to the certification network in addition to the existing kvm instances
[14:09] <fader_> cr3: File a bug against virtualbox :)
[14:43] <jcastro> grantbow: someone is looking at fixing it
[16:21] <sbeattie> cr3: the the virtual hardware that they present to the guest is different.
[16:22] <sbeattie> cr3: but yes, I'd like to see us include virtualbox in the certification network rotation, as it's essentailly another (commonly used) hardware platform.
[16:23] <sbeattie> and we should do the same for kvm, if we don't already.
[16:25] <cr3> sbeattie: we do kvm already
[16:26] <cr3> sbeattie: but noted regarding virtualbox
[16:43] <ara> mvo, hey, can you have a quick look to bug 551782
[16:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 551782 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Not able to dist-upgrade, "calculating changes" can't solve dependencies and fail (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/551782
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== yofel is now known as yofel_
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[17:53] <plars> anyone running une on x86 that could confirm something for me?
[17:55] <davmor2> plars: what up dude?
[17:56] <plars> davmor2: hi
[17:56] <plars> davmor2: enabling accessibility, I can't login after
[17:57] <plars> davmor2: if it breaks you, I have an easy fix though
[17:57] <davmor2> hang on a second then
[17:57] <plars> davmor2: bug #551860
[17:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 551860 in metacity (Ubuntu) "Crash on login with accessibility enabled (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/551860
[18:01] <davmor2> plars: Yeap happens here to it just loops back around to login
[18:01] <plars> davmor2: ok, good, so not specific to my arch.  Thanks!
[18:03] <davmor2> added a note to the bug
[18:56] <elopio> hello there.
[18:59] <davmor2> elopio: hello
[19:06] <elopio> hello davmor2.
[19:06] <elopio> I'm executing laptop tests on ubuntu 10.04 beta 1
[19:06] <elopio> but where it says suspend in http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Plans/LaptopTesting
[19:06] <elopio> shouldn't it be sleep?
[19:08] <davmor2> elopio: yes probably these were written before the changes to that dialogue
[19:17] <elopio> ok. And do you know where is the option to install only free software?
[19:19] <davmor2> elopio: one sec I'll find out for you
[19:29] <elopio> thanks davmor2
[20:45] <elopio> I've just aptitude-upgraded my 10.04 and now the menu shows suspend instead of sleep.