[02:17] <NCommander> eggonlea: ping
[03:27] <NCommander> GrueMaster: when was the last time we got a successful dove image build?
[03:28] <DanaG> hmm, I wonder... can ARM boot from usb-cd? =P
[03:30] <GrueMaster> NCommander: According to the logs, there was 20100330.1, but I'm not seeing that in cdimage (unless it was copied as 20100330).
[03:31] <crimsun> GrueMaster: would you attach straces for the pa/dove bug, too?
[03:31] <GrueMaster> And it may have been a manual build.  It looks like there is a lot of flux from the gtk library builds.
[03:32] <eggonlea> NCommander: ack
[03:32] <GrueMaster> crimsun: If you are referring to the permissions issue, it is also on babbage.
[03:32] <NCommander> eggonlea: good morning
[03:32] <eggonlea> DanaG: usb-cd? do you mean u-disk image or usb-cdrom?
[03:33] <GrueMaster> except it has a problem with samples at 48000 instead of 44100.
[03:34] <DanaG> I mean real USB CD drive.... or a U3 drive emulating one.  =P
[03:34] <DanaG> You can replace the U3 thingy with an Ubuntu ISO.
[03:34] <GrueMaster> at any rate, I'm busy fixing dinner and need to get back to the kitchen.
[03:35] <DanaG> and I need to boot Ubuntu and work on some programming stuff.
[04:28] <DanaG> rcn-ee: are there headers for your kernels?  I want to build the OMAP SDK stuff, but I need headers.
[04:33] <DanaG> Fatal error in dependency resolver.  You can continue searching, but some solutions might be impossible to generate.
[04:33] <DanaG> In solution <binutils:=2.20.1-3ubuntu1>;[binutils 2.20.1-3ubuntu2 -> {}];-90:  Unexpectedly non-broken dependency binutils 2.20.1-3ubuntu2 -> {}!                           (binutils 2.20.1-3ubuntu2 is not installed)
[04:35] <DanaG> * binutils depends on binutils (>= 2.20.1-4) [UNAVAILABLE]
[05:13] <crimsun> known issue
[05:15] <DanaG> cool.
[05:34] <DanaG> argh, stupid omap / sgx SDK.
[05:35] <DanaG> Makes tons of assumptions... assumes you'll be using THEIR kernel, and tries to "make clean" on the install destination... when it doesn't exist yet!
[05:35] <DanaG> And that build_sgx_modules.sh silently quits.
[06:17] <DanaG>  /build/buildd/linux-ti-omap-2.6.33/drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
[06:33] <DanaG> weird... it's giving "no such device" for ALL g_* drivers.
[06:41] <DanaG> weird... the ubuntu kernel won't see the CD drive part of the u3 drive.
[06:42] <DanaG> Interesting... the ubuntu kernel DOES suspend successfully.
[06:44] <DanaG> now... how do I wake it?
[06:44] <DanaG> WOL doesn't work, and neither does the USER button.
[06:46] <DanaG> beagle-ext4: clean, 67413/122640 files, 319977/483958 blocks (check deferred; on battery)
[06:46] <DanaG> interesting... it thinks its on battery?
[06:53] <DanaG> great, so it suspends.  now I can't wake it up.
[09:21] <hrw> morning
[13:37] <ndechesne1> amitk: i am not able to cross compile ubuntu-luci/ti-omap using CS arm-none-linux-gnueabi. well, kernel builds fine, but modules don't. i am using the config in the debian.ti-omap/config folder
[13:38] <amitk> ndechesne1: what is your commandline to compile?
[13:38] <ndechesne1> make modules
[13:39] <ndechesne1> amitk: i have these failures: __aeabi_uldivmod undefined
[13:40] <hrw> '__aeabi_uldivmod undefined' is very common
[13:41] <amitk> ndechesne1: the in-kernel build system and the ubuntu kernel build system (for .deb packages) don't like each other.
[13:41] <amitk> so assuming you are only looking for zImage and modules, here are the steps to follow
[13:44] <amitk> cd <linux>; mkdir ../build; cp debian.ti-omap/config/config.common.ubuntu ../build/.config; ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux- make -j2 O=`pwd`/../build
[13:44] <amitk> ndechesne1: ^^
[13:44] <hrw> ndechesne1: look at http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/tree/recipes/linux/linux-nokia800-2.6.21-osso71/1300-fix-gcc-4.3-false-modulo-optimization.patch.patch as example
[13:44] <amitk> ndechesne1: change your CROSS_COMPILE argument as required
[13:45] <ndechesne1> amitk: thx, let me try this
[14:05] <lool> ndechesne1: Right, you want ARCH= and CROSS_COMPILE= on pretty much all make calls, even for make silentoldconfig or this kind of calls
[14:06] <ndechesne1> lool: this, I know. I am guessing that I am using an older version of CS gcc. I am using 2009q3.
[14:07] <amitk> ndechesne1: new is bad with CS toolchains IMHO
[14:07] <amitk> ndechesne1: I use 2008q3
[14:07] <ndechesne1> amitk: okay.... that is old ;-)
[14:08] <amitk> ndechesne1: I prefer 'mature' :)
[14:08] <hrw> one question then: which exactly toolchain Ubuntu Lucid uses on armel platform?
[14:08] <amitk> hrw: gcc
[14:08] <hrw> amitk: haha
[14:08] <ndechesne1> amitk: gcc 4.4, right?
[14:08] <hrw> amitk: gcc/binutils/glibc - which ver?
[14:09] <amitk> lool: is the rmadison accurate for armel too?
[14:09] <amitk> gcc | 4:4.4.3-1ubuntu1 |         lucid | amd64, i386
[14:10] <amitk> binutils | 2.20.1-3ubuntu3 |         lucid | source, amd64, i386
[14:10] <amitk> libc6 | 2.11.1-0ubuntu5 |         lucid | amd64, i386
[14:11] <hrw> thx
[14:16] <ndechesne1> amitk: it built with 2008q3. but that means that I am using gcc 4.3 to cross build.. which is not the official gcc version for 10.04...
[14:19] <amitk> ndechesne1: I've only been bitten with new CS toolchains. I've never had the 2008q3 toolchain fail to work for me with our archive compiled rootfs.
[14:19] <amitk> I only use it for local testing before an upload (for native compilation) though
[15:17] <rsalveti> morning
[15:17] <rsalveti> nosse1: any news today?
[15:18] <nosse1> morning. No, it's easter preparations today. My family is leaving for a holiday
[15:22] <rsalveti> oh, true :-)
[16:16] <lool> amitk: No
[16:16] <lool> amitk: ports are not listede in rmadison
[19:36] <orbarron> hey all: I am seeing this error when trying to do a apt-get update from within lucid --> http://pastebin.com/QKQVXGUU
[19:37]  * orbarron wondering if rootstock actually pulled down everything :-/
[19:42] <prpplague> orbarron: i assume you exported the proxy settings you need
[19:43] <orbarron> yes sir... first thing I did :D
[19:51] <orbarron> wget
[20:10] <orbarron> ahh... two solutions.. rootstock still needs proxy setting to be inserted or create a apt.conf and add proxy there
[21:12] <Guest63825> hi all
[21:13] <Guest63825> Anybody know, what's about ubuntu arm port to a different ARM architectures such as sharpdragon?
[21:18] <prpplague> Guest63825: are you asking what does it take to get ubuntu-arm up and running on a qualcomm snapdragon?
[21:20] <Guest63825> prpplague: yes
[21:21] <armin76> make :D
[21:21] <prpplague> Guest63825: the core portion of ubuntu-arm already supports cortex-a8 so there should be very little that needs to be done
[21:22] <prpplague> Guest63825: to main issues you are going to run into with the snapdragon are lack of documentation as qualcomm isn't very interested in making that info available to the average developer
[21:30] <Guest63825> prpplague: Thanks for your reply. I would like to buy arm netbook but is available only touch book manufactured by always innovation, which does not support native ubuntu installation, but I do not want netbook with limited functions like my communicator
[21:31] <DanaG> Guest63825: that thing is based on BeagleBoard; about the only thing I haven't been able to do on beagleboard is video acceleration.
[21:31] <prpplague> Guest63825: yea the touchbook is based on the omap3 series and supports ubuntu with no problems
[21:34] <Guest63825> I recently read a forum about the touch book, guys use qemu for emulate x86 architecture and run ubuntu from their firmware
[21:35] <Guest63825> i think it's not really powerfull solution for use sytem resourse
[21:37] <Guest63825> prpplague: maybe i wrong?
[21:37] <DanaG> Doesn't sound right to me.
[21:38] <DanaG> oh yeah, and keep an eye on "Lenovo Skylight" and on Marvell "Armada".
[21:38] <prpplague> Guest63825: uh that doesn't sounds right
[21:39] <prpplague> Guest63825: you can run native ubuntu on omap3 and therefor any of the boards like beagle and touchbook
[21:39] <armin76> prpplague: but sounds fun!
[21:39] <prpplague> armin76: indeed
[21:39] <prpplague> armin76: can't image why they were doing that
[21:39] <armin76> i'm pretty sure they were using windows and not ubuntu :)
[21:39] <prpplague> ahh
[21:41] <Guest63825> indeed it looks like I was cruelly mistaken